Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 6-13.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190700418
Special Issue: 水稻
Previous Articles Next Articles
Huai Baodong1, Sui Wenzhi1(), Tian Yanhong1, Xu Fei1, Li Peiran1, Sui Xin1, Yan Fengchao1, Li Peishan2
Received:
2019-07-12
Revised:
2019-08-30
Online:
2020-01-05
Published:
2020-01-07
Contact:
Sui Wenzhi
E-mail:suiwz@sina.com
CLC Number:
Huai Baodong, Sui Wenzhi, Tian Yanhong, Xu Fei, Li Peiran, Sui Xin, Yan Fengchao, Li Peishan. Nanocarbon-based Fertilization Reduction Mode: The Effect on Rice Yield and Efficiency of Nitrogen Fertilizer in Cold Region[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(1): 6-13.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190700418
年份 | 处理 | 氮素积累吸收量 | 磷素积累吸收量 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
孕穗期 | 抽穗期 | 成熟期 | 孕穗期 | 抽穗期 | 成熟期 | |||
2015 | CK | 51.02±0.67b | 64.18±0.88b | 136.09±1.00b | 8.78±0.32b | 15.42±0.48b | 35.54±0.68b | |
SM-A | 57.8±0.58a | 70.38±0.67a | 140.62±0.92a | 10.03±0.29a | 17.54±0.52a | 37.26±0.74a | ||
SM-B | 56.22±0.59a | 70.42±0.75a | 142.81±0.87a | 9.63±0.35ab | 17.08±0.43a | 37.89±0.78a | ||
SM-C | 48.41±0.87c | 60.64±0.62c | 131.41±0.95c | 8.10±0.27c | 13.88±0.47c | 33.02±0.65c | ||
2016 | CK | 50.28±0.72b | 62.56±0.89b | 135.27±1.02b | 8.08±0.25b | 15.03±0.41b | 35.31±0.67b | |
SM-A | 55.64±0.83a | 69.23±0.81a | 140.25±0.98a | 9.26±0.29a | 17.26±0.50a | 37.55±0.71a | ||
SM-B | 56.37±0.69a | 69.81±0.78a | 141.27±0.88a | 9.37±0.34a | 17.58±0.46a | 38.01±0.65a | ||
SM-C | 47.01±0.76c | 59.35±0.83c | 132.09±0.95c | 7.15±0.30c | 14.05±0.47c | 32.82±0.73c |
年份 | 处理 | 氮素积累吸收量 | 磷素积累吸收量 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
孕穗期 | 抽穗期 | 成熟期 | 孕穗期 | 抽穗期 | 成熟期 | |||
2015 | CK | 51.02±0.67b | 64.18±0.88b | 136.09±1.00b | 8.78±0.32b | 15.42±0.48b | 35.54±0.68b | |
SM-A | 57.8±0.58a | 70.38±0.67a | 140.62±0.92a | 10.03±0.29a | 17.54±0.52a | 37.26±0.74a | ||
SM-B | 56.22±0.59a | 70.42±0.75a | 142.81±0.87a | 9.63±0.35ab | 17.08±0.43a | 37.89±0.78a | ||
SM-C | 48.41±0.87c | 60.64±0.62c | 131.41±0.95c | 8.10±0.27c | 13.88±0.47c | 33.02±0.65c | ||
2016 | CK | 50.28±0.72b | 62.56±0.89b | 135.27±1.02b | 8.08±0.25b | 15.03±0.41b | 35.31±0.67b | |
SM-A | 55.64±0.83a | 69.23±0.81a | 140.25±0.98a | 9.26±0.29a | 17.26±0.50a | 37.55±0.71a | ||
SM-B | 56.37±0.69a | 69.81±0.78a | 141.27±0.88a | 9.37±0.34a | 17.58±0.46a | 38.01±0.65a | ||
SM-C | 47.01±0.76c | 59.35±0.83c | 132.09±0.95c | 7.15±0.30c | 14.05±0.47c | 32.82±0.73c |
年份 | 处理 | 叶绿素含量/(mg/g) | 叶面积指数/(m2/hm2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
孕穗期 | 抽穗期 | 成熟期 | 孕穗期 | 抽穗期 | 成熟期 | |||
2015 | CK | 4.31±0.09b | 3.35±0.09b | 2.52±0.06b | 3.82±0.03a | 4.44±0.05c | 2.08±0.04b | |
SM-A | 4.53±0.07a | 3.54±0.11a | 2.63±0.08b | 3.88±0.04a | 4.57±0.06b | 2.15±0.03b | ||
SM-B | 4.61±0.07a | 3.66±0.10a | 2.82±0.06a | 3.86±0.03a | 4.77±0.04a | 2.64±0.04a | ||
SM-C | 4.04±0.08c | 2.96±0.08c | 2.28±0.09c | 3.70±0.03b | 4.18±0.03d | 1.91±0.05c | ||
2016 | CK | 4.21±0.11b | 3.49±0.09b | 2.39±0.10b | 3.69±0.05a | 4.57±0.07b | 2.02±0.05b | |
SM-A | 4.66±0.13a | 3.76±0.12a | 2.69±0.07a | 3.74±0.04a | 4.63±0.06ab | 2.07±0.07b | ||
SM-B | 4.78±0.09a | 3.81±0.08a | 2.73±0.12a | 3.75±0.07a | 4.81±0.05a | 2.45±0.04a | ||
SM-C | 3.77±0.10c | 3.05±0.13c | 2.04±0.09c | 3.51±0.03b | 4.05±0.08c | 1.81±0.06c |
年份 | 处理 | 叶绿素含量/(mg/g) | 叶面积指数/(m2/hm2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
孕穗期 | 抽穗期 | 成熟期 | 孕穗期 | 抽穗期 | 成熟期 | |||
2015 | CK | 4.31±0.09b | 3.35±0.09b | 2.52±0.06b | 3.82±0.03a | 4.44±0.05c | 2.08±0.04b | |
SM-A | 4.53±0.07a | 3.54±0.11a | 2.63±0.08b | 3.88±0.04a | 4.57±0.06b | 2.15±0.03b | ||
SM-B | 4.61±0.07a | 3.66±0.10a | 2.82±0.06a | 3.86±0.03a | 4.77±0.04a | 2.64±0.04a | ||
SM-C | 4.04±0.08c | 2.96±0.08c | 2.28±0.09c | 3.70±0.03b | 4.18±0.03d | 1.91±0.05c | ||
2016 | CK | 4.21±0.11b | 3.49±0.09b | 2.39±0.10b | 3.69±0.05a | 4.57±0.07b | 2.02±0.05b | |
SM-A | 4.66±0.13a | 3.76±0.12a | 2.69±0.07a | 3.74±0.04a | 4.63±0.06ab | 2.07±0.07b | ||
SM-B | 4.78±0.09a | 3.81±0.08a | 2.73±0.12a | 3.75±0.07a | 4.81±0.05a | 2.45±0.04a | ||
SM-C | 3.77±0.10c | 3.05±0.13c | 2.04±0.09c | 3.51±0.03b | 4.05±0.08c | 1.81±0.06c |
年份 | 处理 | 净光合速率/[μmol/(m2·s)] | 气孔导度/[μmol/(m2·s)] | 胞间二氧化碳浓度/(μmol/mol) | 蒸腾速率/[μmol/(m2·s)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | CK | 13.84±0.76bc | 0.28±0.06b | 253.33±8.74b | 3.66±0.09ab |
SM-A | 15.33±0.62a | 0.37±0.04ab | 248.45±8.36b | 3.77±0.09ab | |
SM-B | 15.78±0.64a | 0.42±0.04a | 245.67±9.29b | 3.83±0.19a | |
SM-C | 12.97±0.51c | 0.21±0.03c | 257.78±6.51a | 3.53±0.17b | |
2016 | CK | 14.04±0.56b | 0.32±0.03b | 246.25±5.57b | 3.60±0.08b |
SM-A | 15.55±0.61a | 0.45±0.05a | 243.81±4.89b | 3.88±0.11a | |
SM-B | 15.80±0.72a | 0.48±0.04a | 239.16±7.21b | 3.95±0.14a | |
SM-C | 13.05±0.62c | 0.22±0.06c | 258.14±6.34a | 3.34±0.09c |
年份 | 处理 | 净光合速率/[μmol/(m2·s)] | 气孔导度/[μmol/(m2·s)] | 胞间二氧化碳浓度/(μmol/mol) | 蒸腾速率/[μmol/(m2·s)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | CK | 13.84±0.76bc | 0.28±0.06b | 253.33±8.74b | 3.66±0.09ab |
SM-A | 15.33±0.62a | 0.37±0.04ab | 248.45±8.36b | 3.77±0.09ab | |
SM-B | 15.78±0.64a | 0.42±0.04a | 245.67±9.29b | 3.83±0.19a | |
SM-C | 12.97±0.51c | 0.21±0.03c | 257.78±6.51a | 3.53±0.17b | |
2016 | CK | 14.04±0.56b | 0.32±0.03b | 246.25±5.57b | 3.60±0.08b |
SM-A | 15.55±0.61a | 0.45±0.05a | 243.81±4.89b | 3.88±0.11a | |
SM-B | 15.80±0.72a | 0.48±0.04a | 239.16±7.21b | 3.95±0.14a | |
SM-C | 13.05±0.62c | 0.22±0.06c | 258.14±6.34a | 3.34±0.09c |
年份 | 处理 | 每平方米穗数 | 穗粒数 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | CK | 548.6±8.3b | 117.4±4.3b | 82.0±0.5b | 26.5±0.5ab | 8511.3±87.0c |
SM-A | 566.4±10.4b | 120.2±3.8ab | 83.3±0.4ab | 26.6±0.3ab | 8789.7±49.7b | |
SM-B | 585.7±9.9a | 127.6±4.8a | 83.9±0.4a | 26.9±0.2a | 9116.0±83.1a | |
SM-C | 523.7±10.9c | 111.9±3.7c | 81.4±0.5c | 26.2±0.2b | 8090.3±65.7d | |
2016 | CK | 551.3±8.5b | 112.3±5.4b | 82.1±0.5b | 26.4±0.1ab | 8659.7±56.8b |
SM-A | 580.4±9.3ab | 124.5±6.7a | 82.6±0.4b | 26.7±0.3a | 9046.7±95.4a | |
SM-B | 592.7±8.9a | 126.9±4.5a | 83.8±0.6a | 26.8±0.2a | 9189.5±88.3a | |
SM-C | 526.3±10.4c | 105.3±5.9c | 81.1±0.4c | 26.4±0.2b | 8131.5±77.5c |
年份 | 处理 | 每平方米穗数 | 穗粒数 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | CK | 548.6±8.3b | 117.4±4.3b | 82.0±0.5b | 26.5±0.5ab | 8511.3±87.0c |
SM-A | 566.4±10.4b | 120.2±3.8ab | 83.3±0.4ab | 26.6±0.3ab | 8789.7±49.7b | |
SM-B | 585.7±9.9a | 127.6±4.8a | 83.9±0.4a | 26.9±0.2a | 9116.0±83.1a | |
SM-C | 523.7±10.9c | 111.9±3.7c | 81.4±0.5c | 26.2±0.2b | 8090.3±65.7d | |
2016 | CK | 551.3±8.5b | 112.3±5.4b | 82.1±0.5b | 26.4±0.1ab | 8659.7±56.8b |
SM-A | 580.4±9.3ab | 124.5±6.7a | 82.6±0.4b | 26.7±0.3a | 9046.7±95.4a | |
SM-B | 592.7±8.9a | 126.9±4.5a | 83.8±0.6a | 26.8±0.2a | 9189.5±88.3a | |
SM-C | 526.3±10.4c | 105.3±5.9c | 81.1±0.4c | 26.4±0.2b | 8131.5±77.5c |
年份 | 处理 | 氮肥农学利用效率(kg/kg) | 氮肥回收利用效率/% | 氮肥偏生产力(kg/kg) | 氮素收获指数/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | CK | 19.75±0.81b | 58.03±1.53b | 58.30±0.75b | 57.92±0.55a |
SM-A | 21.66±0.65b | 59.35±2.11b | 60.21±1.12ab | 58.01±0.69a | |
SM-B | 23.89±0.49a | 65.52±1.25a | 62.44±0.87a | 58.16±0.73a | |
SM-C | 16.87±0.57c | 50.21±1.76c | 55.41±0.95c | 57.85±0.49a | |
2016 | CK | 19.28±0.89b | 57.26±1.78b | 59.07±1.12b | 57.95±0.82a |
SM-A | 20.95±0.95b | 59.05±1.56b | 60.85±1.37b | 58.23±0.75a | |
SM-B | 23.67±0.78a | 66.31±2.03a | 63.24±0.05a | 58.42±0.89a | |
SM-C | 16.55±0.85c | 50.88±1.49c | 55.77±1.42c | 57.70±0.96a |
年份 | 处理 | 氮肥农学利用效率(kg/kg) | 氮肥回收利用效率/% | 氮肥偏生产力(kg/kg) | 氮素收获指数/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | CK | 19.75±0.81b | 58.03±1.53b | 58.30±0.75b | 57.92±0.55a |
SM-A | 21.66±0.65b | 59.35±2.11b | 60.21±1.12ab | 58.01±0.69a | |
SM-B | 23.89±0.49a | 65.52±1.25a | 62.44±0.87a | 58.16±0.73a | |
SM-C | 16.87±0.57c | 50.21±1.76c | 55.41±0.95c | 57.85±0.49a | |
2016 | CK | 19.28±0.89b | 57.26±1.78b | 59.07±1.12b | 57.95±0.82a |
SM-A | 20.95±0.95b | 59.05±1.56b | 60.85±1.37b | 58.23±0.75a | |
SM-B | 23.67±0.78a | 66.31±2.03a | 63.24±0.05a | 58.42±0.89a | |
SM-C | 16.55±0.85c | 50.88±1.49c | 55.77±1.42c | 57.70±0.96a |
氮肥农学利用效率 | 氮肥回收利用效率 | 氮肥偏生产力 | 氮素收获指数 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
每平方米穗数 | 0.945** | 0.841** | 0.873** | 0.807** |
穗粒数 | 0.946** | 0.855** | 0.921** | 0.896** |
结实率 | 0.743* | 0.843** | 0.831** | 0.805** |
千粒重 | 0.546 | 0.541 | 0.535 | 0.545 |
产量 | 0.919** | 0.891** | 0.904** | 0.917** |
氮肥农学利用效率 | 氮肥回收利用效率 | 氮肥偏生产力 | 氮素收获指数 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
每平方米穗数 | 0.945** | 0.841** | 0.873** | 0.807** |
穗粒数 | 0.946** | 0.855** | 0.921** | 0.896** |
结实率 | 0.743* | 0.843** | 0.831** | 0.805** |
千粒重 | 0.546 | 0.541 | 0.535 | 0.545 |
产量 | 0.919** | 0.891** | 0.904** | 0.917** |
年份 | 处理 | 单位产值 | 增加产值 | 纳米碳成本 | 肥料成本 | 人工成本 | 增加效益 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | CK | 23831.64 | 0 | 0.00 | 1495.00 | 0.00 | — |
SM-A | 24611.16 | 779.52 | -328.00 | 1495.00 | -40.00 | 411.52 | |
SM-B | 25524.80 | 1693.16 | -294.00 | 1375.10 | -40.00 | 1479.06 | |
SM-C | 22652.84 | -1178.8 | -262.00 | 1255.20 | -40.00 | -1241.00 | |
2016 | CK | 24247.16 | 0 | 0.00 | 1495.00 | 0.00 | — |
SM-A | 25330.76 | 1083.60 | -328.00 | 1495.00 | -40.00 | 715.60 | |
SM-B | 25730.60 | 1483.44 | -294.00 | 1375.10 | -40.00 | 1269.34 | |
SM-C | 22768.20 | -1478.96 | -262.00 | 1255.20 | -40.00 | -1541.16 |
年份 | 处理 | 单位产值 | 增加产值 | 纳米碳成本 | 肥料成本 | 人工成本 | 增加效益 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | CK | 23831.64 | 0 | 0.00 | 1495.00 | 0.00 | — |
SM-A | 24611.16 | 779.52 | -328.00 | 1495.00 | -40.00 | 411.52 | |
SM-B | 25524.80 | 1693.16 | -294.00 | 1375.10 | -40.00 | 1479.06 | |
SM-C | 22652.84 | -1178.8 | -262.00 | 1255.20 | -40.00 | -1241.00 | |
2016 | CK | 24247.16 | 0 | 0.00 | 1495.00 | 0.00 | — |
SM-A | 25330.76 | 1083.60 | -328.00 | 1495.00 | -40.00 | 715.60 | |
SM-B | 25730.60 | 1483.44 | -294.00 | 1375.10 | -40.00 | 1269.34 | |
SM-C | 22768.20 | -1478.96 | -262.00 | 1255.20 | -40.00 | -1541.16 |
[1] | 李俊峰, 杨建昌 . 水分与氮素及其互作对水稻产量和水肥利用效率的影响研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017,31(3):327-334. |
[2] | 刘兆辉, 薄录吉, 李彦 , 等. 氮肥减量施用技术及其对作物产量和生态环境的影响综述[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(4):1-8. |
[3] | Yang J, Gang L, Jing M , et al. Effects of urea and controlled release urea fertilizers on methane emission from paddy fields:Amultiyear field study[J]. Pedosphere, 2014,24(5):662-673. |
[4] |
Ji Y, Liu G, Ma J , et al. Effect of controlled release fertilizer on mitigation of N2O emission from paddy field in South China: a multi-year field observation[J]. Plant and Soil, 2013,371(1-2):473-486.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1700-6 URL |
[5] |
Grant C, Wu R, Selles F , et al. Crop yield and nitrogen concentration with controlled release urea and split applications of nitrogen as compared to non-coated urea applied at seeding[J]. Field Crops Research, 2012,127:170-180.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.002 URL |
[6] |
Lahiani M H, Chen J, Irin F , et al. Interaction of carbon nanohorns with plants:uptake and biological effects[J]. Carbon, 2015,81:607-619.
doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.09.095 URL |
[7] | 赵振杰, 梁太波, 陈千思 , 等. 碳纳米材料对植物生长发育的调节作用[J]. 作物杂志, 2017,2:7-13. |
[8] |
Khodakovskaya M, Dervishi E, Mahmood M , et al. Carbon nanotubes are able to penetrate plant seed coat and dramatically affect seed germination and plant growth[J]. ACS Nano, 2009,3(10):3221-3227.
doi: 10.1021/nn900887m URL |
[9] | Xie Y F, Yao X H . Effects of nano-meter TiO2 on germination and growth physiology of Pinus tabulaeformis[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali Occidentalia Sinica, 2009,29(10):2013-2018. |
[10] | 王飞, 刘彤彤, 郑成彧 , 等. 不同氮素水平下添加纳米碳增效剂对玉米氮肥利用率及产量影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(33):74-78. |
[11] | 李淑敏, 韩晓光, 张爱媛 . 不同尿素添加纳米碳增效剂对大豆干物质积累和产量的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2015,46(4):10-16. |
[12] |
梁太波, 尹启生, 张艳玲 , 等. 施用纳米碳对烤烟氮素吸收和利用的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(6):1429-1435.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201210231469 URL |
[13] | 徐明岗, 李冬初, 李菊梅 , 等. 化肥有机肥配施对水稻养分吸收和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008,41(10):3133-3139. |
[14] |
范立慧, 徐珊珊, 侯朋福 , 等. 不同地力下基蘖肥运筹比例对水稻产量及氮肥吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(10):1872-1884.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.10.004 URL |
[15] | 卞金龙, 蒋玉兰, 刘艳阳 , 等. 干湿交替灌溉对抗旱性不同水稻品种产量的影响及其生理原因分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017,31(4):379-390. |
[16] | 胡香玉, 郭九信, 田广丽 , 等. 不同供氮模式对水稻根系形态及生理特征的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017,31(1):72-80. |
[17] | 魏海燕, 李宏亮, 程金秋 , 等. 缓释肥类型与运筹对不同穗型水稻产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017,43(5):730-740. |
[18] | 王道中, 张成军, 郭熙盛 . 减量施肥对水稻生长及氮素利用率的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2012,43(1):161-165. |
[19] | 莫钊文, 李武, 段美洋 , 等. 减氮对华南早晚兼用型水稻产量、品质及氮吸收利用的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2014,42(9):83-89. |
[20] | 钱银飞, 邵彩虹, 邱才飞 , 等. 纳米碳肥料增效剂在晚稻上的应用效果初报[J]. 华北农学报, 2010,25(增刊):249-253. |
[21] |
王小燕, 马国辉, 狄浩 , 等. 纳米增效尿素对水稻产量及氮肥农学利用率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010,16(6):1479-1485.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2010.0625 URL |
[22] | 武美燕, 蒿若超, 田小海 , 等. 添加纳米碳缓释肥料对超级杂交稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2010,25(4):86-90. |
[23] |
Cong R H, Zhang Z, Lu J W , et al. Evaluation of nitrogen requirement and efficiency of rice in the region of Yangtze River Valley based on large-scale field experiments[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015,14(10):2090-2098.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60946-1 URL |
[24] |
张智, 李小坤, 丛日环 , 等. 稻田优化施肥效果与氮、磷环境效益评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(5):906-915.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.05.010 URL |
[25] | 王道中, 张成军, 郭熙盛 . 减量施肥对水稻生长及氮素利用率的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2012,43(1):161-165. |
[26] | 张运红, 杜君, 和爱玲 . 海藻酸钠寡糖对水稻生长发育、产量及镉吸收分布的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2017,29(6):1-6. |
[27] |
孙永健, 孙园园, 蒋明金 . 施肥水平对不同氮效率水稻氮素利用特征及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(24):4745-4756.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.24.007 URL |
[28] | 刘键, 马筠, 张志明 , 等. 肥料添加纳米碳在水稻上的施用效果[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2011,26(6):76-77. |
[1] | ZHANG Bo, SHI Feng, SONG Fuqiang. AMF Complex Fungicides: Effects on Photosynthesis and Growth of Rice in Cold Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 15-22. |
[2] | Nie Liangpeng, Guo Liwei, Zheng Chunfeng, Lv Yuhu, Zhang Meng, Li Benyin, Pan Ziliang, Li Jie. Planting and Incorporation of Chinese Milk Vetch Coupled with Chemical Fertilizer Application: Effects on the Physical and Chemical Characters of Paddy Soil and Rice Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(27): 65-69. |
[3] | Ji Li, Shao Wenqi, Chen Fuping, Dong Qingjun, Zhang Ankang. Effects of Successive Years of Rice-duck Co-cultivation on Soil Properties, Rice Yield and Quality in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(13): 1-7. |
[4] | Wang Xiangling, Song Baiquan. Nitrogen Fertilizer Use Efficiency: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(5): 93-97. |
[5] | Zhao Liming, Gu Chunmei, Wang Shiqiang, Wang Liping, Wang He, Na Yongguang, Xie Baosheng. Planting Density Affects the Thermal Effect in Shallow Soil of Cold Region Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(3): 7-15. |
[6] | . Effects of Long-term Fertilization on Rice Yield and Basic Soil Productivity in Coastal Paddy [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(3): 1-5. |
[7] | . Sowing Date Affects Growth, Development, Yield and Quality of Rice in Cold Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(21): 1-6. |
[8] | 罗 璇,安 晨,路 璐,周贝贝,曹正锋,戴网成,沈晓昆,徐 琪,赵文明 and 陈国宏. Behavioral Differences of Duck Breeds in the Integrated Rice-duck Farming System and the Effects on Rice Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(15): 159-164. |
[9] | . Effect of Wheat Yield and Root Zone Soil Nutrients on Controlled-release Fertilizer’s Different Depth and Location Application [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(4): 9-15. |
[10] | 赵 营. Effect of Side Bar Application of Slow/controlled Release Fertilizers on Rice Yield and Agronomic Characters [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(6): 1-5. |
[11] | Sun Xing,Zhu Keya,Liu Qin,Cao Zhihong,Cai Xianjie,Cheng Sen,Zhang Weiefeng and Sun Ping. Effect of Silicon Fertilizer Application on Paddy Soil in Mountainous Areaof Southern Anhui Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(6): 6-10. |
[12] | . Nutrient Release Characteristics of Vinyl Chloride-vinyl Acetate Copolymers Coated Slow-release Nitrogen Fertilizer and Its Effect on Wheat-rice Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(33): 17-23. |
[13] | Xu Xuerong,Ma Gaiyan and Zhou Lei. Rice Yield Insurance Rates Estimating in Fujian Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(6): 21-25. |
[14] | Zhao Liming,Li Ming,Feng Naijie,Du Jidao and Zheng Dianfeng. Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Yield and Quality of Rice in the Cold Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(3): 43-48. |
[15] | . Effects of Biochar Fertilizer on Growth and Nitrogen Utilizing Rate of Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(5): 175-180. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||