Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (13): 1-5.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb19020032
Special Issue: 水稻
Qiu Yao1,2,3, Liu Bei1,2,3, He Lin1,2,3, Yang Meiyu1,2,3, Tan Shiyong1,2,3
Received:
2019-02-21
Revised:
2019-05-31
Online:
2020-05-05
Published:
2020-04-16
CLC Number:
Qiu Yao, Liu Bei, He Lin, Yang Meiyu, Tan Shiyong. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Soil Fertility[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(13): 1-5.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb19020032
取样时间 | 处理 | 株高/cm | 叶宽/cm | 根长/cm | 生物量/(g/株) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地下部 | 地上部 | 总重 | ||||||||||||
分蘖期 | CK | 29.1 d | 0.8 c | 10.2 d | 0.18 d | 0.67 e | 0.85 e | |||||||
NPK | 56.8 bc | 1.1 b | 11.4 cd | 0.37 c | 1.21 d | 1.58 d | ||||||||
NPK+1500 kg | 54.3 c | 1.1 b | 10.9 d | 0.43 b | 1.87 b | 2.3 b | ||||||||
NPK+4500 kg | 58.5 bc | 1.1 b | 13.5 bc | 0.43 b | 1.98 ab | 2.41 ab | ||||||||
NPK+7500 kg | 67.4 a | 1.3 a | 16.4 a | 0.51 a | 2.13 a | 2.64 a | ||||||||
12000 kg | 55.4 c | 1.1 b | 17.5 a | 0.37 c | 1.55 c | 1.92 c | ||||||||
孕穗期 | CK | 63.3 d | 1.2 d | 11.6 d | 0.55 f | 4.1 d | 4.65 d | |||||||
NPK | 75.7 c | 1.9 c | 13 c | 0.73 e | 7.9 c | 8.63 c | ||||||||
NPK+1500 kg | 81.4 b | 1.8 b | 14.5 c | 1.32 c | 10.6 b | 11.92 b | ||||||||
NPK+4500 kg | 88.3 ab | 1.95 ab | 17 b | 2.16 b | 13.2 a | 15.36 a | ||||||||
NPK+7500 kg | 93.6 a | 2 a | 23.1 a | 2.91 a | 13.3 a | 16.21 a | ||||||||
12000 kg | 84.4 b | 1.75 b | 16.2 b | 1.09 d | 7.4 c | 8.49 c | ||||||||
抽穗期 | CK | 72.5 c | 1.4 b | — | — | — | — | |||||||
NPK | 88.3 b | 1.6 a | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
NPK+1500 kg | 86.6 b | 1.7 a | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
NPK+4500 kg | 91.2 ab | 1.8 a | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
NPK+7500 kg | 93.8 a | 1.8 a | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
12000 kg | 89.5 b | 1.8 a | — | — | — | — |
取样时间 | 处理 | 株高/cm | 叶宽/cm | 根长/cm | 生物量/(g/株) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地下部 | 地上部 | 总重 | ||||||||||||
分蘖期 | CK | 29.1 d | 0.8 c | 10.2 d | 0.18 d | 0.67 e | 0.85 e | |||||||
NPK | 56.8 bc | 1.1 b | 11.4 cd | 0.37 c | 1.21 d | 1.58 d | ||||||||
NPK+1500 kg | 54.3 c | 1.1 b | 10.9 d | 0.43 b | 1.87 b | 2.3 b | ||||||||
NPK+4500 kg | 58.5 bc | 1.1 b | 13.5 bc | 0.43 b | 1.98 ab | 2.41 ab | ||||||||
NPK+7500 kg | 67.4 a | 1.3 a | 16.4 a | 0.51 a | 2.13 a | 2.64 a | ||||||||
12000 kg | 55.4 c | 1.1 b | 17.5 a | 0.37 c | 1.55 c | 1.92 c | ||||||||
孕穗期 | CK | 63.3 d | 1.2 d | 11.6 d | 0.55 f | 4.1 d | 4.65 d | |||||||
NPK | 75.7 c | 1.9 c | 13 c | 0.73 e | 7.9 c | 8.63 c | ||||||||
NPK+1500 kg | 81.4 b | 1.8 b | 14.5 c | 1.32 c | 10.6 b | 11.92 b | ||||||||
NPK+4500 kg | 88.3 ab | 1.95 ab | 17 b | 2.16 b | 13.2 a | 15.36 a | ||||||||
NPK+7500 kg | 93.6 a | 2 a | 23.1 a | 2.91 a | 13.3 a | 16.21 a | ||||||||
12000 kg | 84.4 b | 1.75 b | 16.2 b | 1.09 d | 7.4 c | 8.49 c | ||||||||
抽穗期 | CK | 72.5 c | 1.4 b | — | — | — | — | |||||||
NPK | 88.3 b | 1.6 a | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
NPK+1500 kg | 86.6 b | 1.7 a | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
NPK+4500 kg | 91.2 ab | 1.8 a | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
NPK+7500 kg | 93.8 a | 1.8 a | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
12000 kg | 89.5 b | 1.8 a | — | — | — | — |
取样时间 | 处理 | SPAD | 硝酸还原酶/ [μg/(g·h)] | 根系活力/ [μg/(g·h)] |
---|---|---|---|---|
分蘖期 | CK | 27.6 d | 1.2 e | 28.9 c |
NPK | 33.4 c | 1.6 d | 35.4 b | |
NPK+1500 kg | 34.6 bc | 2 bc | 36.3 ab | |
NPK+4500 kg | 36.4 ab | 2.3 b | 37.6 ab | |
NPK+7500 kg | 37.9 a | 2.7 a | 38.9 ab | |
12000 kg | 34.1 bc | 1.9 c | 39.5 a | |
孕穗期 | CK | 25.3 c | 1.1 e | 30.5 d |
NPK | 36.2 b | 1.8 d | 37.7 c | |
NPK+1500 kg | 37.8 b | 2.1 c | 38.4 c | |
NPK+4500 kg | 39.6 a | 2.5 b | 40.5 bc | |
NPK+7500 kg | 41.7 a | 2.9 a | 42.9 ab | |
12000 kg | 37.3 b | 2.1 c | 43.1 a |
取样时间 | 处理 | SPAD | 硝酸还原酶/ [μg/(g·h)] | 根系活力/ [μg/(g·h)] |
---|---|---|---|---|
分蘖期 | CK | 27.6 d | 1.2 e | 28.9 c |
NPK | 33.4 c | 1.6 d | 35.4 b | |
NPK+1500 kg | 34.6 bc | 2 bc | 36.3 ab | |
NPK+4500 kg | 36.4 ab | 2.3 b | 37.6 ab | |
NPK+7500 kg | 37.9 a | 2.7 a | 38.9 ab | |
12000 kg | 34.1 bc | 1.9 c | 39.5 a | |
孕穗期 | CK | 25.3 c | 1.1 e | 30.5 d |
NPK | 36.2 b | 1.8 d | 37.7 c | |
NPK+1500 kg | 37.8 b | 2.1 c | 38.4 c | |
NPK+4500 kg | 39.6 a | 2.5 b | 40.5 bc | |
NPK+7500 kg | 41.7 a | 2.9 a | 42.9 ab | |
12000 kg | 37.3 b | 2.1 c | 43.1 a |
处理 | 容重/ (g/cm3) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 速效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 有机质/ (g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.20 a | 81.64 e | 16.34 c | 64.03 d | 1.99 d |
NPK | 1.21 a | 111.68 d | 19.75 b | 74.78 b | 2.24 c |
NPK+1500 kg | 1.18 ab | 118.89 b | 20.22 ab | 76.94 ab | 2.39 b |
NPK+4500 kg | 1.17 bc | 118.70 bc | 20.26 a | 78.35 a | 2.45 ab |
NPK+7500 kg | 1.15 c | 124.53 a | 20.99 a | 79.25 a | 2.46 ab |
12000 kg | 1.12d | 116.54 c | 19.88 b | 71.94 c | 2.55 a |
处理 | 容重/ (g/cm3) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 速效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 有机质/ (g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.20 a | 81.64 e | 16.34 c | 64.03 d | 1.99 d |
NPK | 1.21 a | 111.68 d | 19.75 b | 74.78 b | 2.24 c |
NPK+1500 kg | 1.18 ab | 118.89 b | 20.22 ab | 76.94 ab | 2.39 b |
NPK+4500 kg | 1.17 bc | 118.70 bc | 20.26 a | 78.35 a | 2.45 ab |
NPK+7500 kg | 1.15 c | 124.53 a | 20.99 a | 79.25 a | 2.46 ab |
12000 kg | 1.12d | 116.54 c | 19.88 b | 71.94 c | 2.55 a |
处理 | 细菌/(×106个/g) | 真菌/(×104个/g) | 放线菌/(×105个/g) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.7 e | 0.7 e | 2.3 e |
NPK | 2.1 d | 1 d | 2.5 e |
NPK+1500 kg | 2.3 d | 1.1 cd | 3.1 d |
NPK+4500 kg | 3 c | 1.3 bc | 4.3 c |
NPK+7500 kg | 3.9 b | 1.5 b | 5.2 b |
12000 kg | 4.6 a | 1.9 a | 6 a |
处理 | 细菌/(×106个/g) | 真菌/(×104个/g) | 放线菌/(×105个/g) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.7 e | 0.7 e | 2.3 e |
NPK | 2.1 d | 1 d | 2.5 e |
NPK+1500 kg | 2.3 d | 1.1 cd | 3.1 d |
NPK+4500 kg | 3 c | 1.3 bc | 4.3 c |
NPK+7500 kg | 3.9 b | 1.5 b | 5.2 b |
12000 kg | 4.6 a | 1.9 a | 6 a |
处理 | 每穗实粒数/粒 | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 78.07 d | 25.18 c | 3034.5 d |
NPK | 89.52 c | 27.38 b | 4843.1 c |
NPK+1500 kg | 96.61 ab | 29.09 ab | 5287.5 b |
NPK+4500 kg | 97.43 a | 29.49 a | 6171 ab |
NPK+7500 kg | 101.29 a | 30.38 a | 6324 a |
12000 kg | 92.85 bc | 28.26 b | 5100.6 c |
处理 | 每穗实粒数/粒 | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 78.07 d | 25.18 c | 3034.5 d |
NPK | 89.52 c | 27.38 b | 4843.1 c |
NPK+1500 kg | 96.61 ab | 29.09 ab | 5287.5 b |
NPK+4500 kg | 97.43 a | 29.49 a | 6171 ab |
NPK+7500 kg | 101.29 a | 30.38 a | 6324 a |
12000 kg | 92.85 bc | 28.26 b | 5100.6 c |
容重 | 碱解氮 | 速效磷 | 速效钾 | 有机质 | 细菌 | 真菌 | 放线菌 | 每穗实粒数 | 千粒重 | 产量 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
容重 | 1 | -0.52 | -0.46 | -0.26 | -0.80 | -0.96** | -0.94** | -0.97** | -0.52 | -0.53 | -0.48 |
碱解氮 | 1 | 0.99** | 0.93** | 0.90* | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.96** | 0.94** | 0.94** | |
速效磷 | 1 | 0.95** | 0.87* | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.96** | 0.93** | 0.94** | ||
速效钾 | 1 | 0.73 | 0.36 | 0.427 | 0.39 | 0.95** | 0.94** | 0.95** | |||
有机质 | 1 | 0.83* | 0.90* | 0.85* | 0.87* | 0.85* | 0.85* | ||||
细菌 | 1 | 0.98** | 0.99** | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.58 | |||||
真菌 | 1 | 0.96** | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.61 | ||||||
放线菌 | 1 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.61 | |||||||
每穗实粒数 | 1 | 0.99** | 0.97** | ||||||||
千粒重 | 1 | 0.97** | |||||||||
产量 | 1 |
容重 | 碱解氮 | 速效磷 | 速效钾 | 有机质 | 细菌 | 真菌 | 放线菌 | 每穗实粒数 | 千粒重 | 产量 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
容重 | 1 | -0.52 | -0.46 | -0.26 | -0.80 | -0.96** | -0.94** | -0.97** | -0.52 | -0.53 | -0.48 |
碱解氮 | 1 | 0.99** | 0.93** | 0.90* | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.96** | 0.94** | 0.94** | |
速效磷 | 1 | 0.95** | 0.87* | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.96** | 0.93** | 0.94** | ||
速效钾 | 1 | 0.73 | 0.36 | 0.427 | 0.39 | 0.95** | 0.94** | 0.95** | |||
有机质 | 1 | 0.83* | 0.90* | 0.85* | 0.87* | 0.85* | 0.85* | ||||
细菌 | 1 | 0.98** | 0.99** | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.58 | |||||
真菌 | 1 | 0.96** | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.61 | ||||||
放线菌 | 1 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.61 | |||||||
每穗实粒数 | 1 | 0.99** | 0.97** | ||||||||
千粒重 | 1 | 0.97** | |||||||||
产量 | 1 |
[1] | 高菊生, 黄晶, 董春华 , 等. 长期有机无机肥配施对水稻产量及土壤有效养分影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2014(2):314-324. |
[2] | 刘增兵, 束爱萍, 刘光荣 , 等. 有机肥替代化肥对双季稻产量和土壤养分的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2018(11). |
[3] | 刘家龙, 李秀玲, 翁德强 , 等. 有机肥与化肥结合施用对水稻的增产作用[J]. 上海农业学报, 2009,25(2):115-118. |
[4] | 葛立立, 王康君, 范苗苗 , 等. 秸秆还田对土壤培肥与水稻产量和米质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012,28(12). |
[5] | 邢建国 . 水稻增施生物有机肥减施化肥试验初报[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2018(10). |
[6] | 邹原东, 范继红 . 有机肥施用对土壤肥力影响的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013,29(3):12-16. |
[7] | 高文胜 . 介绍几种新型生物有机肥[J]. 农业知识, 2014(31):32-33. |
[8] | 李小龙, 曾强, 汪莹 , 等. 防治烟草青枯病生物有机肥对土壤微生物菌群的影响及其抗病效果[J]. 广东农业科学, 2015,42(1):50-55. |
[9] | 刘迎春, 黄枭, 潘晓峰 , 等. 生物有机肥在水稻上的应用效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2014(24):32-32. |
[10] | 蔡红梅, 肖景华, 张启发 , 等. 抑制表达谷氨酰胺合成酶基因对水稻氮代谢和生长发育的影响[J]. 科学通报, 2010,55(10):875-886. |
[11] | 周利军, 叶会财, 李大明 , 等. 配施有机肥对潜育化水稻土的培肥效果[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(1):89-93. |
[12] | 孙旭, 刘臣炜, 张龙江 , 等. 农业废弃物制备生物有机肥及其在小白菜栽培上的应用[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2017,33(6). |
[13] | 郑存德, 张大庚, 徐龙超 , 等. 土壤容重对高产玉米根系生长的影响及调控研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2012,27(3):142-149. |
[14] | 周升明, 荣湘民, 刘强 , 等. 生物有机肥和化肥配合施用对水稻氮代谢关键酶活性的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2007(2):90-92. |
[15] | 张木, 唐拴虎, 黄旭 , 等. 一次性施肥对水稻产量及养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(3):1-7. |
[16] | 韩长泽, 刘云, 完颜华 , 等. 不同配比有机肥和改良剂对土壤理化性质及酶活性的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011,39(4):2161-2165. |
[17] | 罗霄, 李忠武, 叶芳毅 , 等. 基于PI指数模型的南方典型红壤丘陵区稻田土壤肥力评价[J]. 地理科学, 2011(4):495-500. |
[18] | 吴俊松, 许明敏, 王小华 , 等. 水稻秸秆集中沟埋还田对土壤有机质、酶活性及作物产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2015,46(1):203-209. |
[19] | 蒋婧, 宋明华 . 植物与土壤微生物在调控生态系统养分循环中的作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010,34(8):979-988. |
[20] | 荣勤雷, 梁国庆, 周卫 , 等. 不同有机肥对黄泥田土壤培肥效果及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20(5):1169-1178. |
[1] | WANG Fang, QIAO Shuai, YANG Songtao, SONG Wei, LIAO Anzhong, TAN Wenfang. Starch Type Sweet Potato Cultivar ‘Chuanshu231’: Breeding and Superior Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 16-21. |
[2] | DUAN Qingqing, HAN Meimei, TAN Yueqiang, ZHANG Zikun. Effects of Supplemental Light Quality and Duration on the Growth and Carbon Metabolism of Leaves of Greenhouse-grown Sweet Pepper [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 37-44. |
[3] | LU Qianqian, FENG Linjiao, WANG Shuang, GULIZHATI·Baoerhan , CHU Ren, ZHOU Long. Effects of Compound Saline-alkali Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Table Grapes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 62-70. |
[4] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[5] | CUI Yingying, ZHOU Bo, CHEN Yiyong, LIU Jiayu, LI Jianlong, TANG Hao, TANG Jinchi. Spatial-temporal Variation Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Fertility in Guangdong Major Tea Areas [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 85-95. |
[6] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[7] | Pema Rigzin, Dhonyo Dorji, Delek Kunkyi, Dekyi Yangzom, Yeshe Dorji, Penpa Tsring. Constructing the Monitoring Model of High Temperature Damage on Rice by Combining Data from Satellites and Ground Automatic Weather Stations [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 133-141. |
[8] | SUN Shuqing, DING Wei, SUN Rui, ZHANG Xicai, LAN Guoyu, CHEN Wei, YANG Chuan, WU Zhixiang. Soil Bacterial Community of Rubber Plantations of Different Ages of Stand: Composition and Diversity Study [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 93-100. |
[9] | LUO Xianfu, LIU Wenqiang, PAN Xiaowu, DONG Zheng, LIU Sanxiong, LIU Licheng, YANG Biaoren, SHENG Xinnian, LI Xiaoxiang. Mapping of Plant Height QTL Using NILs Derived from Residual Heterozygous Lines in Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 1-5. |
[10] | ZHANG Shuangyan, REN Hao, DING Wenqing, WU Yutao. Research Progress on Material Utilization of Agricultural Waste Rice Husk [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 101-108. |
[11] | HUANG Yu, CHEN Bin, XIAO Guanli. The Physiological Response of the Local Rice Variety of ‘Acuce’ of Hani Nationality in Yunnan Against the Feeding of Nilaparvata lugens Stål [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 123-129. |
[12] | SHI Yonghai, CAO Xiangde, XU Jiabo. Effect of COVID-19 Epidemic on Alosa sapidissima Production in China and the Countermeasures [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 151-156. |
[13] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. |
[14] | JI Kun, WANG Bin, ZHAO Bowen, XUE Hao, WU Jianmin, ZHU Xiaojian, WANG Yixin, ZHAO Haijun, HAN Zanping. Different Maize Germplasm Materials: Grey Correlation Analysis of Plant and Ear-kernel Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 27-32. |
[15] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||