Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (14): 150-157.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0656
Special Issue: 植物保护
Previous Articles Next Articles
Li Jiajun1(), Tao Lihong1, Ye Min1(
), Wang Kaibo1,2(
), Wu Wenwei2, He Chengxing2, Fan Liming1, Su Fawu1
Received:
2020-11-16
Revised:
2021-01-11
Online:
2021-05-15
Published:
2021-05-19
Contact:
Ye Min,Wang Kaibo
E-mail:1347178595@qq.com;yeminpc@126.com;wangkaibo4015@163.com
CLC Number:
Li Jiajun, Tao Lihong, Ye Min, Wang Kaibo, Wu Wenwei, He Chengxing, Fan Liming, Su Fawu. Synergistic Antifungal Activity of Natural Phenolic Compounds and Two Chemical Fungicides[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(14): 150-157.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0656
混剂 | 实测混剂浓度/(mg/L) | 配比A:B | 混剂中组分理论抑菌率/% | 混剂理论抑菌率/% | 混剂实际抑菌率/% | 增效指数 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | A | B | |||||
百里香酚 | 百菌清 | 5.0 | 10:1 | 7.23 | 42.52 | 46.67 | 47.31 | 1.37 |
百里香酚 | 百菌清 | 3.0 | 5:1 | 1.85 | 44.50 | 45.52 | 56.53 | 24.18 |
百里香酚 | 百菌清 | 1.5 | 3:2 | 0.08 | 48.33 | 48.36 | 49.32 | 1.97 |
百里香酚 | 百菌清 | 1.0 | 2:3 | 0.00 | 48.33 | 48.32 | 53.21 | 10.10 |
百里香酚 | 百菌清 | 0.7 | 1:5 | 0.00 | 47.73 | 47.73 | 74.10 | 55.24 |
百里香酚 | 百菌清 | 0.7 | 1:10 | 0.00 | 49.57 | 49.56 | 61.50 | 24.09 |
百里香酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 8.0 | 10:1 | 16.71 | 49.24 | 57.72 | 53.05 | -8.09 |
百里香酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 5.0 | 5:1 | 6.06 | 50.06 | 53.09 | 53.62 | 1.004 |
百里香酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 3.0 | 3:2 | 0.76 | 52.25 | 52.61 | 51.05 | -2.98 |
百里香酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 2.0 | 2:3 | 0.05 | 52.25 | 52.28 | 46.89 | -10.30 |
百里香酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 1.5 | 1:5 | 0.00 | 52.50 | 52.50 | 53.30 | 1.52 |
百里香酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 1.3 | 1:10 | 0.00 | 52.16 | 52.16 | 45.13 | -13.48 |
混剂 | 实测混剂浓度/(mg/L) | 配比A:B | 混剂中组分理论抑菌率/% | 混剂理论抑菌率/% | 混剂实际抑菌率/% | 增效指数 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | A | B | |||||
百里香酚 | 百菌清 | 5.0 | 10:1 | 7.23 | 42.52 | 46.67 | 47.31 | 1.37 |
百里香酚 | 百菌清 | 3.0 | 5:1 | 1.85 | 44.50 | 45.52 | 56.53 | 24.18 |
百里香酚 | 百菌清 | 1.5 | 3:2 | 0.08 | 48.33 | 48.36 | 49.32 | 1.97 |
百里香酚 | 百菌清 | 1.0 | 2:3 | 0.00 | 48.33 | 48.32 | 53.21 | 10.10 |
百里香酚 | 百菌清 | 0.7 | 1:5 | 0.00 | 47.73 | 47.73 | 74.10 | 55.24 |
百里香酚 | 百菌清 | 0.7 | 1:10 | 0.00 | 49.57 | 49.56 | 61.50 | 24.09 |
百里香酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 8.0 | 10:1 | 16.71 | 49.24 | 57.72 | 53.05 | -8.09 |
百里香酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 5.0 | 5:1 | 6.06 | 50.06 | 53.09 | 53.62 | 1.004 |
百里香酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 3.0 | 3:2 | 0.76 | 52.25 | 52.61 | 51.05 | -2.98 |
百里香酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 2.0 | 2:3 | 0.05 | 52.25 | 52.28 | 46.89 | -10.30 |
百里香酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 1.5 | 1:5 | 0.00 | 52.50 | 52.50 | 53.30 | 1.52 |
百里香酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 1.3 | 1:10 | 0.00 | 52.16 | 52.16 | 45.13 | -13.48 |
混剂 | 实测混剂浓度/(mg/L) | 配比A:B | 混剂中组分理论抑菌率/% | 混剂理论抑菌率/% | 混剂实际抑菌率/% | 增效指数 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | A | B | |||||
和厚朴酚 | 百菌清 | 6.0 | 10:1 | 24.49 | 46.32 | 59.47 | 58.19 | 0.79 |
和厚朴酚 | 百菌清 | 3.0 | 5:1 | 15.28 | 44.50 | 52.98 | 60.83 | 14.83 |
和厚朴酚 | 百菌清 | 1.5 | 3:2 | 7.19 | 48.33 | 52.04 | 68.35 | 31.34 |
和厚朴酚 | 百菌清 | 1.0 | 2:3 | 3.52 | 48.33 | 50.14 | 77.78 | 55.12 |
和厚朴酚 | 百菌清 | 0.7 | 1:5 | 0.97 | 47.73 | 48.24 | 49.74 | 3.10 |
和厚朴酚 | 百菌清 | 0.7 | 1:10 | 0.47 | 49.57 | 49.80 | 57.95 | 16.36 |
和厚朴酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 10.0 | 10:1 | 31.85 | 48.27 | 64.75 | 61.48 | -5.05 |
和厚朴酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 6.0 | 5:1 | 23.34 | 48.84 | 60.78 | 58.18 | -4.29 |
和厚朴酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 3.0 | 3:2 | 12.19 | 49.94 | 56.04 | 47.99 | -14.38 |
和厚朴酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 2.0 | 2:3 | 6.52 | 49.94 | 53.20 | 49.57 | -6.83 |
和厚朴酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 1.4 | 1:5 | 2.07 | 49.77 | 50.81 | 46.54 | -8.41 |
和厚朴酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 1.3 | 1:10 | 0.99 | 49.85 | 50.34 | 44.07 | -12.45 |
混剂 | 实测混剂浓度/(mg/L) | 配比A:B | 混剂中组分理论抑菌率/% | 混剂理论抑菌率/% | 混剂实际抑菌率/% | 增效指数 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | A | B | |||||
和厚朴酚 | 百菌清 | 6.0 | 10:1 | 24.49 | 46.32 | 59.47 | 58.19 | 0.79 |
和厚朴酚 | 百菌清 | 3.0 | 5:1 | 15.28 | 44.50 | 52.98 | 60.83 | 14.83 |
和厚朴酚 | 百菌清 | 1.5 | 3:2 | 7.19 | 48.33 | 52.04 | 68.35 | 31.34 |
和厚朴酚 | 百菌清 | 1.0 | 2:3 | 3.52 | 48.33 | 50.14 | 77.78 | 55.12 |
和厚朴酚 | 百菌清 | 0.7 | 1:5 | 0.97 | 47.73 | 48.24 | 49.74 | 3.10 |
和厚朴酚 | 百菌清 | 0.7 | 1:10 | 0.47 | 49.57 | 49.80 | 57.95 | 16.36 |
和厚朴酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 10.0 | 10:1 | 31.85 | 48.27 | 64.75 | 61.48 | -5.05 |
和厚朴酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 6.0 | 5:1 | 23.34 | 48.84 | 60.78 | 58.18 | -4.29 |
和厚朴酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 3.0 | 3:2 | 12.19 | 49.94 | 56.04 | 47.99 | -14.38 |
和厚朴酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 2.0 | 2:3 | 6.52 | 49.94 | 53.20 | 49.57 | -6.83 |
和厚朴酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 1.4 | 1:5 | 2.07 | 49.77 | 50.81 | 46.54 | -8.41 |
和厚朴酚 | 啶酰菌胺 | 1.3 | 1:10 | 0.99 | 49.85 | 50.34 | 44.07 | -12.45 |
供试药剂 | 毒力回归方程 | EC50/(mg/L) | 置信区间/(mg/L) | ATI | TTI | CTC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
百里香酚(T) | y =2.414 x -3.046 | 18.28 | 12.80~28.34 | 3.56 | — | — |
百菌清(C) | y =1.217 x +0.228 | 0.65 | 0.35~1.09 | 100.00 | — | — |
T:C 10:1 | y =0.809 x -0.572 | 5.10 | 3.70~7.42 | 12.74 | 12.32 | 103.40 |
T:C 5:1 | y =1.416 x -0.512 | 2.30 | 1.81~2.83 | 28.25 | 19.63 | 143.91 |
T:C 3:2 | y =0.822 x -0.144 | 1.50 | 1.09~2.24 | 43.48 | 42.13 | 103.19 |
T:C 2:3 | y =0.749 x +0.203 | 0.53 | 0.29~1.20 | 121.50 | 61.42 | 197.80 |
T:C 1:5 | y =1.201 x +0.610 | 0.31 | 0.24~0.40 | 209.00 | 83.93 | 249.03 |
T:C 1:10 | y =1.712 x +0.894 | 0.30 | 0.00~1.75 | 216.67 | 91.23 | 237.49 |
供试药剂 | 毒力回归方程 | EC50/(mg/L) | 置信区间/(mg/L) | ATI | TTI | CTC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
百里香酚(T) | y =2.414 x -3.046 | 18.28 | 12.80~28.34 | 3.56 | — | — |
百菌清(C) | y =1.217 x +0.228 | 0.65 | 0.35~1.09 | 100.00 | — | — |
T:C 10:1 | y =0.809 x -0.572 | 5.10 | 3.70~7.42 | 12.74 | 12.32 | 103.40 |
T:C 5:1 | y =1.416 x -0.512 | 2.30 | 1.81~2.83 | 28.25 | 19.63 | 143.91 |
T:C 3:2 | y =0.822 x -0.144 | 1.50 | 1.09~2.24 | 43.48 | 42.13 | 103.19 |
T:C 2:3 | y =0.749 x +0.203 | 0.53 | 0.29~1.20 | 121.50 | 61.42 | 197.80 |
T:C 1:5 | y =1.201 x +0.610 | 0.31 | 0.24~0.40 | 209.00 | 83.93 | 249.03 |
T:C 1:10 | y =1.712 x +0.894 | 0.30 | 0.00~1.75 | 216.67 | 91.23 | 237.49 |
供试药剂 | 毒力回归方程 | EC50/(mg/L) | 置信区间/(mg/L) | ATI | TTI | CTC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
和厚朴酚(H) | y =0.986 x -1.417 | 27.38 | 15.05~67.57 | 1.76 | — | — |
百菌清(C) | y =1.217 x +0.228 | 0.65 | 0.35~1.09 | 100.00 | — | — |
H:C 10:1 | y =0.961 x -0.261 | 1.87 | 1.40~2.41 | 34.78 | 10.69 | 309.15 |
H:C 5:1 | y =0.946 x -0.159 | 1.47 | 0.61~3.74 | 44.10 | 18.13 | 236.51 |
H:C 3:2 | y =0.903 x +0.232 | 0.55 | 0.37~0.74 | 117.54 | 41.06 | 283.75 |
H:C 2:3 | y =2.601 x +0.723 | 0.53 | 0.46~0.61 | 123.34 | 60.70 | 202.36 |
H:C 1:5 | y =1.993 x +0.371 | 0.65 | 0.55~0.81 | 99.85 | 83.63 | 119.25 |
H:C 1:10 | y =1.693 x +0.914 | 0.29 | 0.20~0.36 | 224.91 | 91.07 | 246.82 |
供试药剂 | 毒力回归方程 | EC50/(mg/L) | 置信区间/(mg/L) | ATI | TTI | CTC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
和厚朴酚(H) | y =0.986 x -1.417 | 27.38 | 15.05~67.57 | 1.76 | — | — |
百菌清(C) | y =1.217 x +0.228 | 0.65 | 0.35~1.09 | 100.00 | — | — |
H:C 10:1 | y =0.961 x -0.261 | 1.87 | 1.40~2.41 | 34.78 | 10.69 | 309.15 |
H:C 5:1 | y =0.946 x -0.159 | 1.47 | 0.61~3.74 | 44.10 | 18.13 | 236.51 |
H:C 3:2 | y =0.903 x +0.232 | 0.55 | 0.37~0.74 | 117.54 | 41.06 | 283.75 |
H:C 2:3 | y =2.601 x +0.723 | 0.53 | 0.46~0.61 | 123.34 | 60.70 | 202.36 |
H:C 1:5 | y =1.993 x +0.371 | 0.65 | 0.55~0.81 | 99.85 | 83.63 | 119.25 |
H:C 1:10 | y =1.693 x +0.914 | 0.29 | 0.20~0.36 | 224.91 | 91.07 | 246.82 |
[1] | 赵红霞, 苟萍. 灰葡萄孢菌致病机理研究进展[J]. 生物技术, 2014,(1):100-103. |
[2] | 张艳杰, 沈凤英, 许换平, 等. 灰葡萄孢菌多样性研究进展[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2017,25(6):954-968. |
[3] | 纪军建, 张小风, 王文桥, 等. 番茄灰霉病防治研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012,28(31):109-113. |
[4] | 肖景惠, 逄飞, 倪瑞琪, 等. 植物灰葡萄孢菌生物防治与化学防治机理的研究进展[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2019(9):18-23. |
[5] | 熊晓妹(编译). 杀菌剂新品种——啶酰菌胺制剂的特性研究[J]. 农药研究与应用, 2006,10(4):21-23. |
[6] | 杨敬辉, 陈宏州, 吴琴燕, 等. 啶酰菌胺对草莓灰霉病菌的毒力测定及田间防效[J]. 江西农业学报, 2010,22(9):94-95,98. |
[7] | 魏继刚, 马峰, 侯伟. 50%啶酰菌胺水分散粒剂对番茄灰霉病的防治效果研究[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2014,60(5):37-39. |
[8] | 魏萍, 刘幸红, 万平平, 等. 5种杀菌剂对黄瓜灰霉病菌的室内毒力测定[J]. 山东农业科学, 2014,000(10):105-106. |
[9] | Fungicide Resistance Action Committee. List of Plant Pathogenic Organisms Resistant to Disease Control Agents[EB/OL]. http://www.frac.info/publications/downloads. |
[10] | 陈乐, 苗则彦, 孙柏欣, 等. 灰霉病菌抗药性研究进展[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2020,40(4):21-30. |
[11] | Aubee C L D. Environmental Fate and Ecological Risk Assessment for Boscalid New Uses on Alfalfa and Citrus (group10)[M]. U.S.: Environmental Protection Agency, 2010. |
[12] |
Yang Y, Qi S Z, Wang D H, et al. Toxic Effects of Thifluzamide on Zebrafish (Danio rerio)[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016,307:127-136.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.055 pmid: 26780700 |
[13] | 臧晓霞, 纪明山, 左平春, 等. 啶酰菌胺对斑马鱼胚胎及成鱼的毒性[J]. 农药, 2016,55(12):918-921. |
[14] | 林怡, 薛菊, 邓承军. 7种药剂对蓝莓灰霉病的田间药效试验[J]. 农药, 2019,58(5):385-387. |
[15] | Gwinn K D. Bioactive Natural Products in Plant Disease Control. In: Atta Ur R, editor, Studies in Natural Products Chemistry[M].Elsevier, 2018: 229-246. |
[16] | 王凯博, 吴文伟, 王群, 等. 单萜酚类化合物与苯醚甲环唑和噻呋酰胺混配对立枯丝核菌的抑菌活性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020,36(8):80-84. |
[17] |
Wang K B, Jiang S S, Pu T, et al. Antifungal Activity of Phenolic Monoterpenes and Structure-Related Compounds Against Plant Pathogenic Fungi[J]. Natural Product Research, 2018,33(10):1-8.
doi: 10.1080/14786419.2018.1437427 URL |
[18] | Bliss C I. The Toxicity of Poisons Applied Jointly1[J]. Annals of Applied Biology, 1939,26. |
[19] |
Mansour N A, Eldefrawi M E, Toppozada A, et al. Toxicological Studies on the Egyptian Cotton Leaf worm, Prodenia litura. VI. Potentiation and Antagonism of Organophosphorus and Carbamate Insecticides1[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1966,59(2):307-311.
doi: 10.1093/jee/59.2.307 URL |
[20] | Sun Y P, Johnson E R. Synergistic and Antagonistic Actions of Insecticide-Synergist Combinations and Their Mode of Action[J]. Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry, 1960,8(4):261-266. |
[21] | 赵建江, 陈治芳, 韩秀英, 等. 啶酰菌胺与唑胺菌酯混配对灰葡萄孢毒力的增效作用[J]. 农药学学报, 2015,17(4):417-424. |
[22] | 赵建江, 张小风, 马志强, 等. 啶酰菌胺与嘧菌酯混配对灰葡萄孢的增效作用:中国植物病理学会化学防治专业委员会第九届中国植物病害化学防治学术研讨会[C].郑州, 2014. |
[23] | 刘妤玲, 高亚楠, 冯岗. 吡唑醚菌酯和氟菌唑对番茄灰霉病菌室内联合毒力测定[J]. 热带农业科学, 2015(4):51-54. |
[24] | 欧晓明, 林雪梅, 盛书祥, 等. 评价杀虫剂混用联合作用的六种方法比较[J]. 农药科学与管理, 1997(1):20-23,29. |
[25] | 顾中言, 韩丽娟. 农药复配剂增效作用的定性定量分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 1990(3):31-34. |
[26] | 张志祥, 程东美, 胡珊, 等. 以共毒系数评价农药联合作用的不合理性[J]. 植物保护, 2008,34(1):34-36. |
[1] | JIANG Jia, CHEN Jinpeng, WEI Jiangqiao, GUO Xuhao, CHE Zhiping, TIAN Yue’e, CHEN Genqiang, LIU Shengming. Synergistic Effect of Fludioxonil and Tebuconazole Against Fusarium graminearum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 116-120. |
[2] | XIAO Ting, QIAN Rongming, ZHANG Furong, ZHOU Bin, WU Huiqiu, JI Sen, SONG Junxian, ZHUANG Yiqing, YANG Jinghui. Multidrug Resistance Detection of Strawberry Gray Mold Strains in Jiangsu Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(14): 110-117. |
[3] | Li Jianzhao, Gao Wanchao, Li Xian, Liu Pei, Jiang Bin, Tong Chunyi. Effects of Nano Selenium and Chitosan Compounds on Lettuce Planted in Cadmium-contaminated Soils [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(23): 113-117. |
[4] | Shen Yan, He Pengbo, He Pengfei, Wu Yixin, Kong Baohua, Li Xingyu, Shahzad Munir, He Yueqiu. Pathogen Identification and Biological Control of Gray Mold on Postharvest Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(13): 102-107. |
[5] | Wang Kaibo, Wu Wenwei, Wang Qun, Yin Mei, Zhang Xingfu, Yang Congdang, Fu Zhaocong, Li Qiongxian, Pu Jun, Huang Jimei, He Chengxing. Antifungal Activity Against Rhizoctonia solani: Mixtures of Phenolic Monoterpenes and Difenoconazole or Thifluzamide [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(8): 80-84. |
[6] | . Polyhexamethylene Biguanidine Hydrochloride and Epoxiconazole: Joint Toxicity Against Alternaria alternata f. sp. mali [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(2): 69-73. |
[7] |
Wu Zhonggao,Ni Hui,Yang Yuanfan and Wang Xing.
Inhibition Capability of Camellia Pollen Extract on |
[8] | Dou Junxia,Geng Zhongyi,Liu Cunhong and Li Yuanting. Determination of Combined Effect of Difenoconazole and Tebuconazole on Mixed Rice False Smut [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(4): 185-189. |
[9] | . Effects of Abamectin Mixed with 5 Bactericides against Tetranychus urticae Koch. [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(13): 276-280. |
[10] | . Research Advances of Aquatic Plants in Water Ecological Restoration [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(3): 413-416. |
[11] | . Studies on the synergistic effects of Myclobutanil and Thiophanate-methyl On Apple’s Alternaria mali, Physalospora piricola and Glomerella cingulata [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(18): 297-300. |
[12] | . Preliminary study on the Antifungal activity of thymol [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 25(21): 277-280. |
[13] | . Synergistic effect of chickpea protein hydrolysates (CPH) and other antioxidants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2008, 24(10): 57-60. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||