Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (25): 125-129.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0817
Special Issue: 生物技术; 植物保护; 烟草种植与生产
Previous Articles Next Articles
CAI Yongzhan1(), WANG Ruibao1, BAI Tao1, LIU Youcai1, HAN Xiaonv2, WANG Bin3(), HUA Xiaobing3, LI Cheng3, MAO Minglin3, ZI Wenlin3
Received:
2021-01-22
Revised:
2022-04-02
Online:
2022-09-05
Published:
2022-08-26
Contact:
WANG Bin
E-mail:caiyongzhan2010@163.com;921671573@qq.com
CLC Number:
CAI Yongzhan, WANG Ruibao, BAI Tao, LIU Youcai, HAN Xiaonv, WANG Bin, HUA Xiaobing, LI Cheng, MAO Minglin, ZI Wenlin. Control Effect of Three Bacillus subtilis Strains on Tobacco Powdery Mildew[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 125-129.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0817
处理 | 使用浓度 | 病情指数 | 防效/% |
---|---|---|---|
YWF-19-0068 | 1.0×108 CFU/mL | 11.56±1.31c | 70.49±1.25a |
YWF-19-0070 | 1.0×108 CFU/mL | 23.02±2.04b | 61.15±1.83bc |
YWF-19-0071 | 1.0×108 CFU/mL | 17.95±1.23b | 69.71±1.5ab |
25%嘧菌酯SC | 125 mg/L | 12.62±1.78c | 78.70±3.1a |
清水 | 59.26±1.52a |
处理 | 使用浓度 | 病情指数 | 防效/% |
---|---|---|---|
YWF-19-0068 | 1.0×108 CFU/mL | 11.56±1.31c | 70.49±1.25a |
YWF-19-0070 | 1.0×108 CFU/mL | 23.02±2.04b | 61.15±1.83bc |
YWF-19-0071 | 1.0×108 CFU/mL | 17.95±1.23b | 69.71±1.5ab |
25%嘧菌酯SC | 125 mg/L | 12.62±1.78c | 78.70±3.1a |
清水 | 59.26±1.52a |
菌株 | 稀释倍数 | 萌发孢子平均数/个 | 镜检孢子总数/个 | 萌发率/% | 抑制率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
YWF-19-0068 | 50倍 | 14.0 | 150 | 9.33 | 56.92 |
100倍 | 19.0 | 150 | 12.67 | 41.54 | |
150倍 | 22.5 | 150 | 15.00 | 30.77 | |
YWF-19-0070 | 50倍 | 14.0 | 150 | 9.33 | 56.92 |
100倍 | 21.0 | 150 | 14.00 | 35.38 | |
150倍 | 24.5 | 150 | 16.33 | 24.62 | |
YWF-19-0071 | 50倍 | 13.5 | 150 | 9.00 | 58.46 |
100倍 | 21.5 | 150 | 14.33 | 33.85 | |
150倍 | 25.0 | 150 | 16.67 | 23.08 | |
CK | 32.5 | 150 | 21.67 |
菌株 | 稀释倍数 | 萌发孢子平均数/个 | 镜检孢子总数/个 | 萌发率/% | 抑制率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
YWF-19-0068 | 50倍 | 14.0 | 150 | 9.33 | 56.92 |
100倍 | 19.0 | 150 | 12.67 | 41.54 | |
150倍 | 22.5 | 150 | 15.00 | 30.77 | |
YWF-19-0070 | 50倍 | 14.0 | 150 | 9.33 | 56.92 |
100倍 | 21.0 | 150 | 14.00 | 35.38 | |
150倍 | 24.5 | 150 | 16.33 | 24.62 | |
YWF-19-0071 | 50倍 | 13.5 | 150 | 9.00 | 58.46 |
100倍 | 21.5 | 150 | 14.33 | 33.85 | |
150倍 | 25.0 | 150 | 16.67 | 23.08 | |
CK | 32.5 | 150 | 21.67 |
菌株 | 稀释倍数 | 药前病情指数 | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
病情指数 | 防效/% | 病情指数 | 防效/% | 病情指数 | 防效/% | |||||
YWF-19-0068 | 50倍液 | 5.77±0.10e | 4.19±0.12g | 43.93±1.76a | 4.80±0.13f | 54.10±1.97d | 5.42±0.28de | 46.85±3.14cd | ||
100倍液 | 7.15±0.10c | 6.83±0.20c | 26.97±0.27d | 7.75±0.08c | 43.72±1.29f | 7.82±0.58c | 43.48±1.97de | |||
150倍液 | 8.73±0.06a | 8.26±0.16a | 26.20±1.11d | 8.90±0.46b | 40.13±0.89g | 8.72±0.50b | 38.02±1.60f | |||
YWF-19-0070 | 50倍液 | 6.38±0.20d | 5.04±0.14e | 39.05±2.12b | 3.94±0.29g | 65.98±1.06a | 3.89±0.25f | 65.50±2.37a | ||
100倍液 | 5.98±0.12e | 5.42±0.11d | 30.22±1.17c | 4.12±0.47g | 62.04±1.34b | 3.67±0.36f | 65.23±1.84a | |||
150倍液 | 7.33±0.19c | 6.63±0.19c | 30.08±0.95c | 5.80±0.26e | 56.34±1.55cd | 6.12±0.65d | 52.79±5.43b | |||
YWF-19-0071 | 50倍液 | 4.61±0.10h | 4.60±0.11f | 39.21±2.30b | 5.00±0.59f | 57.05±1.67c | 4.90±0.33e | 51.70±1.60b | ||
100倍液 | 4.86±0.09g | 5.31±0.13de | 23.02±3.28e | 5.12±0.16f | 41.88±2.06fg | 5.48±0.64de | 39.83±0.64ef | |||
150倍液 | 8.42±0.08b | 6.63±0.11c | 15.68±1.85g | 6.55±0.46d | 40.18±0.22g | 7.18±0.33c | 36.09±1.01f | |||
清水对照 | 5.54±0.13f | 7.18±0.09b | 10.05±0.43a | 9.79±0.52a | ||||||
甲基硫菌灵(全量) | 6.41±0.09d | 6.67±0.31c | 19.64±1.28f | 5.83±0.17e | 49.83±1.22e | 5.64±0.62de | 50.15±1.78bc |
菌株 | 稀释倍数 | 药前病情指数 | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
病情指数 | 防效/% | 病情指数 | 防效/% | 病情指数 | 防效/% | |||||
YWF-19-0068 | 50倍液 | 5.77±0.10e | 4.19±0.12g | 43.93±1.76a | 4.80±0.13f | 54.10±1.97d | 5.42±0.28de | 46.85±3.14cd | ||
100倍液 | 7.15±0.10c | 6.83±0.20c | 26.97±0.27d | 7.75±0.08c | 43.72±1.29f | 7.82±0.58c | 43.48±1.97de | |||
150倍液 | 8.73±0.06a | 8.26±0.16a | 26.20±1.11d | 8.90±0.46b | 40.13±0.89g | 8.72±0.50b | 38.02±1.60f | |||
YWF-19-0070 | 50倍液 | 6.38±0.20d | 5.04±0.14e | 39.05±2.12b | 3.94±0.29g | 65.98±1.06a | 3.89±0.25f | 65.50±2.37a | ||
100倍液 | 5.98±0.12e | 5.42±0.11d | 30.22±1.17c | 4.12±0.47g | 62.04±1.34b | 3.67±0.36f | 65.23±1.84a | |||
150倍液 | 7.33±0.19c | 6.63±0.19c | 30.08±0.95c | 5.80±0.26e | 56.34±1.55cd | 6.12±0.65d | 52.79±5.43b | |||
YWF-19-0071 | 50倍液 | 4.61±0.10h | 4.60±0.11f | 39.21±2.30b | 5.00±0.59f | 57.05±1.67c | 4.90±0.33e | 51.70±1.60b | ||
100倍液 | 4.86±0.09g | 5.31±0.13de | 23.02±3.28e | 5.12±0.16f | 41.88±2.06fg | 5.48±0.64de | 39.83±0.64ef | |||
150倍液 | 8.42±0.08b | 6.63±0.11c | 15.68±1.85g | 6.55±0.46d | 40.18±0.22g | 7.18±0.33c | 36.09±1.01f | |||
清水对照 | 5.54±0.13f | 7.18±0.09b | 10.05±0.43a | 9.79±0.52a | ||||||
甲基硫菌灵(全量) | 6.41±0.09d | 6.67±0.31c | 19.64±1.28f | 5.83±0.17e | 49.83±1.22e | 5.64±0.62de | 50.15±1.78bc |
处理 | 药前 病情指数 | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
病情指数 | 防效/% | 病情指数 | 防效/% | 病情指数 | 防效/% | ||||
甲基硫菌灵(全量) | 19.9±1.10b | 16.57±0.77a | 15.75±1.20i | 16.1±1.60a | 50.61±2.00f | 16.5±1.62b | 70.89±1.47e | ||
甲基硫菌灵(50%) | 23.9±2.09a | 15.18±1.42b | 35.52±1.37h | 16.4±1.32a | 57.71±3.04e | 18.9±0.97a | 72.11±1.22de | ||
YWF-19-0070(50倍液) | 13.9±0.85d | 3.88±0.84e | 80.84±1.76a | 5.07±0.16d | 85.05±3.18a | 8.22±0.20de | 85.32±1.98a | ||
YWF-19-0070(100倍液) | 12.3±0.90d | 2.43±0.25fg | 71.74±1.84d | 3.02±0.28f | 77.75±1.73b | 5.16±0.30gh | 79.28±1.49b | ||
YWF-19-0070(150倍液) | 17.0±1.01c | 6.23±0.51d | 62.89±1.61f | 9.44±0.47b | 66.07±2.21d | 13.5±0.84c | 72.13±1.35de | ||
甲基硫菌灵(全量)+YWF-19-0070(50倍液) | 19.1±1.12b | 9.11±0.17c | 51.81±1.05g | 6.72±0.60c | 78.54±2.57b | 9.25±0.78d | 83.06±1.55a | ||
甲基硫菌灵(全量)+YWF-19-0070(100倍液) | 17.2±1.23c | 6.51±0.41d | 61.57±1.58f | 6.67±0.32c | 76.24±1.00b | 7.38±0.42ef | 84.91±1.05a | ||
甲基硫菌灵(全量)+YWF-19-0070(150倍液) | 9.79±0.78e | 3.27±0.34ef | 66.08±1.75e | 4.51±0.26d | 71.78±0.90c | 6.20±0.27fg | 77.73±0.39bc | ||
甲基硫菌灵(50%)+YWF-19-0070(50倍液) | 6.74±0.57f | 1.44±0.19gh | 78.35±1.61b | 3.12±0.21ef | 71.63±2.51c | 4.79±0.20hi | 75.01±3.59cd | ||
甲基硫菌灵(50%)+YWF-19-0070(100倍液) | 3.44±0.39gh | 0.62±0.08h | 81.69±1.26a | 2.63±0.24f | 53.02±3.10f | 3.89±0.30i | 60.23±1.67f | ||
甲基硫菌灵(50%)+YWF-19-0070(150倍液) | 4.76±0.33g | 1.15±0.18h | 75.52±0.35c | 3.06±0.09f | 60.59±1.95e | 3.77±0.31i | 72.13±3.65de | ||
清水对照 | 2.60±0.39g | 2.56±0.46f | 4.24±0.24de | 7.38±0.63ef |
处理 | 药前 病情指数 | 药后3 d | 药后7 d | 药后10 d | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
病情指数 | 防效/% | 病情指数 | 防效/% | 病情指数 | 防效/% | ||||
甲基硫菌灵(全量) | 19.9±1.10b | 16.57±0.77a | 15.75±1.20i | 16.1±1.60a | 50.61±2.00f | 16.5±1.62b | 70.89±1.47e | ||
甲基硫菌灵(50%) | 23.9±2.09a | 15.18±1.42b | 35.52±1.37h | 16.4±1.32a | 57.71±3.04e | 18.9±0.97a | 72.11±1.22de | ||
YWF-19-0070(50倍液) | 13.9±0.85d | 3.88±0.84e | 80.84±1.76a | 5.07±0.16d | 85.05±3.18a | 8.22±0.20de | 85.32±1.98a | ||
YWF-19-0070(100倍液) | 12.3±0.90d | 2.43±0.25fg | 71.74±1.84d | 3.02±0.28f | 77.75±1.73b | 5.16±0.30gh | 79.28±1.49b | ||
YWF-19-0070(150倍液) | 17.0±1.01c | 6.23±0.51d | 62.89±1.61f | 9.44±0.47b | 66.07±2.21d | 13.5±0.84c | 72.13±1.35de | ||
甲基硫菌灵(全量)+YWF-19-0070(50倍液) | 19.1±1.12b | 9.11±0.17c | 51.81±1.05g | 6.72±0.60c | 78.54±2.57b | 9.25±0.78d | 83.06±1.55a | ||
甲基硫菌灵(全量)+YWF-19-0070(100倍液) | 17.2±1.23c | 6.51±0.41d | 61.57±1.58f | 6.67±0.32c | 76.24±1.00b | 7.38±0.42ef | 84.91±1.05a | ||
甲基硫菌灵(全量)+YWF-19-0070(150倍液) | 9.79±0.78e | 3.27±0.34ef | 66.08±1.75e | 4.51±0.26d | 71.78±0.90c | 6.20±0.27fg | 77.73±0.39bc | ||
甲基硫菌灵(50%)+YWF-19-0070(50倍液) | 6.74±0.57f | 1.44±0.19gh | 78.35±1.61b | 3.12±0.21ef | 71.63±2.51c | 4.79±0.20hi | 75.01±3.59cd | ||
甲基硫菌灵(50%)+YWF-19-0070(100倍液) | 3.44±0.39gh | 0.62±0.08h | 81.69±1.26a | 2.63±0.24f | 53.02±3.10f | 3.89±0.30i | 60.23±1.67f | ||
甲基硫菌灵(50%)+YWF-19-0070(150倍液) | 4.76±0.33g | 1.15±0.18h | 75.52±0.35c | 3.06±0.09f | 60.59±1.95e | 3.77±0.31i | 72.13±3.65de | ||
清水对照 | 2.60±0.39g | 2.56±0.46f | 4.24±0.24de | 7.38±0.63ef |
[1] | 邢荷荷, 梁晨, 于静, 等. 青岛地区烟草白粉病病原[J]. 菌物学报, 2015, 34(1):159-163. |
[2] | 贾桥东, 张保全, 王卫民, 等. 烟草白粉病的研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(4):94-97. |
[3] | 朱贤朝, 王彦亭, 王智发. 中国烟草病害[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2002:75-80. |
[4] | 孟坤, 时焦. 烟草白粉病病原菌致病力分化与遗传多态性研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2014. |
[5] | 孟坤, 时焦, 孙丽萍, 等. 不同烟草品种对白粉病的抗性评价[J]. 烟草科技, 2013(12):78-81. |
[6] | 雒振宁, 时焦, 王聪, 等. 湖北晒晾烟地方种质对白粉病的抗性鉴定[J]. 烟草科技, 2015, 48(1):26-30. |
[7] | 汪汉成, 杨双剑, 许冬青, 等. 苯并噻二唑对漂浮育苗烟草白粉病的诱导抗性及其对烟苗安全性研究[J]. 植物保护, 2012, 38(6):123-126. |
[8] | 孙丽萍, 雒振宁, 孟坤. 5种杀菌剂对温室内烟草白粉病的防效调查[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2013, 33(9):64-66. |
[9] | 宋双, 张鑫, 罗晶, 等. 不同杀菌剂对烟草白粉病菌的室内毒力及田间防效[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 42(2):131-135. |
[10] | 蔡璘, 刘忠伟, 周为华, 等. 枯草芽孢杆菌对烟草白粉病抑制及控病效果研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(8):1795-1801. |
[11] | 杨兴, 秦铁伟, 杨峰刚, 等. 烟草白粉病的发生原因及防治技术研究[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2011, 57(4):27-29. |
[12] | 张涛, 雷帮星, 何劲, 等. 几种微生物菌剂对烟草白粉病的抑制效应[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2016, 44(9):60-62. |
[13] | 王静, 田华, 孔凡玉, 等. 短小芽孢杆菌AR03对烟草赤星病菌和白粉病菌的防治[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(10):3167-3173. |
[14] | MERCADO-FLORES Y, CRDENS-LVAREZ I O, ROJAS-OLVERA A V, et al. Application of Bacillus subtilis in the biological control of the photopathogenic fungus Sporisorium reilianum[J]. Biological control, 2014, 76(1):36-40. |
[15] | 焦蓉, 何鹏飞, 王戈, 等. 内生菌YN201728的定殖能力及其防治烟草白粉病的效果研究[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(4):721-728. |
[16] | DARVISHZADEH R, ALAVI R, SARRAFI A. Resistance to powdery mildew (Erysiphe cichoracearum DC) in oriental and semi-oriental tobacco germplasm under field conditions[J]. Journal of crop improvement, 2010, 24(2):122-130. |
[17] | DUNLAP C A, SCHISLER D A, PRICE N P, et al. Cyclic lipopeptide profile of three Bacillus subtilis strains; antagonists of Fusarium head blight[J]. The journal of microbiology, 2011, 49(4):603-609. |
[18] | 宋双. 陕西省烟草白粉病生理小种鉴定及其防治研究[D]. 杨陵: 西北农林科技大学, 2013. |
[19] | 卢志伟, 杨辉, 曾荣, 等. 烟叶烘烤过程中白粉病菌的侵染情况[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2015(2):14-17. |
[20] | 刘彩云, 王凤龙. 烟草叶表腺毛与烟草白粉病发生的关系[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(10):135-136. |
[21] | 刘彩云, 王凤龙. 烟草叶表腺毛密度与白粉病发生关系初步研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2013, 42(4):95-98. |
[22] | 刘彩云, 许瑞瑞, 刘春香. 生防菌株LB-1对烟草白粉病的抑制效果及对病菌孢子萌发的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2019, 25(1):129-132. |
[23] | 孙一凡, 冯朝阳, 冯冰聪, 等. 2株优良芽孢杆菌的筛选鉴定及促生特性[J]. 西北农业学报, 2021, 30(2):132-142. |
[24] | 季倩茹, 陈静, 胡远亮, 等. 3种芽孢杆菌菌剂对黄瓜枯萎病的防效及其作用机制初探[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2020, 39(5):101-107. |
[25] | 吕萍. 兰花茎腐病预防性药效试验[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(3):487-488,497. |
[26] | 毛露甜, 刘洁琼, 林晓霖, 等. 一种防治马铃薯青枯病的生防菌剂及其制备方法[P]. 中国专利, CN202010522876.8,2020-10-13. |
[27] | 高洪波, 吴晓蕾, 吕桂云, 等. 番茄工厂化高效育苗及高质化绿色栽培关键技术创新与应用[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2020. |
[28] | 祁超, 寸海春, 何鹏飞, 等. 生防菌YN201490在黄瓜植株体内的定殖能力及防病机制的初步研究[J]. 云南大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 41(1):172-180. |
[29] | JIAO R, MUNIR S, HE P, et al. Biocontrol potential of the endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens YN201732 against tobacco powdery mildew and its growth promotion[J]. Biological control, 2019, 143:104160. |
[1] | SUN Bo, LIU Run, WANG Zhanbin, CHEN Huangxin, YAN Su. The Powdery Mildew on Polygonum persicaria L.: Microscopic Observation and Phylogenetic Relationship Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 130-136. |
[2] | HUANG Hao, XIE Jin, YUAN Wenbin, WANG Chuliang, CHEN Kunhua, ZENG Fandong, LIANG Zengfa, SU Zhao, WANG Wei. Effects of Different Organic Materials on Root Characteristics and Accumulation of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 51-57. |
[3] | PU Yongyu, BAO Lingfeng, HE Xiang, LIU Rui, ZHANG Qing, SHI Zhufeng, HE Yonghong, YANG Peiwen. Screening, Identification and Control Efficacy of Antagonistic Bacteria Against Ralstonia solanacearum and Phytophthora parasitica [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 116-123. |
[4] | LI Dongxue, WANG Yiliu, HUAN Weiwei, BU Lingduo, WANG Ruizhi, LIU Hao, LU Dianjun, WANG Huoyan, CHEN Xiaoqin. Nutrient Content of Tobacco Leaves and Root Zone Soil Affected by Citrate Soluble Potassium Fertilizer in Yuxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 67-73. |
[5] | GUAN Luohao, YANG Xin, LI Chao, ZHANG Yanling, ZHANG Guangfu, LI Yongliang, ZHOU Hanping, WANG Guangshan, ZHONG Shuai, DAI Huaxin. Influence of Remained Leaves on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Tengchong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 10-15. |
[6] | HUNAG Lei, LI Yimeng, ZHONG Shuai, JIN Baofeng, GAO Jinjun, WANG Xiaoyuan, GUAN Luohao, WANG Chuliang, HUANG Wanting, LI Min. Changes of Physical and Chemical Indexes of Tobacco Leaves Sealed with Hypoxia After Unsealing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 107-112. |
[7] | HAN Min, YANG Pengwu, HE Yuqin, HU Xueqiong, ZHU Yong. Prediction of the Disaster Risk of Overcast and Rainy Days on Flue-cured Tobacco Planting in Yunnan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 69-75. |
[8] | YAN Fangfang, KONG Chuixu, ZHANG Yingjie, MAO Min, JIAN Lianjun, WANG Rong. Biological Control of Tobacco Root-knot Nematode Disease by Penicillium purpurogenum K1 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 103-108. |
[9] | HOU Jianlin, LI Sijun, HE Mingyu, XIAO Hanqian, XIANG Tiejun, HUANG Jie, LI Wujin, XIAO Yansong, JIANG Zhimin, XU Junhua, DENG Xiaohua. Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on the Growth, Dry Matter Accumulation, Yield and Quality of Paddy-tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 39-43. |
[10] | ZHU Haixia, LI Xiang, WEI Youhai. 800 g/L Prosulfocarb EC: Annual Weeds’ Control Effect and Safety Analysis in Broad Bean Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 97-102. |
[11] | ZHANG Zhiling, LIN Haibin, WANG Xinwang, LIN Long, CHEN Xingfeng, GAO Weimin, LIN Zubin, CHEN Qingwen. The Correlation Between the Starch Content and the Appearance Quality and Sensory Quality of Fujian Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 136-141. |
[12] | WANG Yuemin, KE Yuqin, XIE Rongrong, LI Chunying, LI Wenqing. Effects of Spraying Microelement-fertilizer on Physiological Metabolism of Tobacco Plant at Mature Stage Under Localized Fertilization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 24-30. |
[13] | CHEN Jianfeng, ZHAO Wenjun, FU Libo, YIN Mei, WANG Zhiyuan, WANG Wei, WANG Yingxue, YANG Yanxian, CHEN Hua. Influence of Fertilization System of Nutrient Critical Value for Optimum Yield of Tobacco on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Yuxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 1-6. |
[14] | CUI Yanhua, ZHOU Tingting, SHEN Yuyang, CHEN Li, LIN Guocang, YANG Anpei, ZHANG Hang, LEI Junjie, LI Guangkuo, GAO Haifeng. Ultra-low Dose Spray of Small Plant Protection UAV: Control Effect on Wheat Powdery Mildew in Desert Oasis Wheat Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 147-150. |
[15] | WANG Zheng, LIU Jiuyu, KAN Hongwei, HUANG Shaoli, LI Zhi, DONG Shuchao, LIU Yangxu, LI Xiaoting, YANG Xiaobin, LI Xiancai. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Root Morphology and Leaf Quality of ‘Hongda’ Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 1-7. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||