Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (34): 82-90.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1189
Previous Articles Next Articles
SHA Yuexia(), HUANG Zeyang, WEI Zhaoqing
Received:
2021-12-09
Revised:
2022-05-13
Online:
2022-12-05
Published:
2022-11-25
CLC Number:
SHA Yuexia, HUANG Zeyang, WEI Zhaoqing. Impact of Microbial Agent Broadcast Application on Microbial Community Structure of Saline-alkali Soil in Shizuishan of Ningxia[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 82-90.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1189
处理 | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 全磷/(g/kg) | 硝态氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JF | 8.00b | 19.40±0.34a | 326.00±0.19b | 0.79±0.01a | 1.06±0.02a | 3.97±0.49a | 111.00±9.64ab |
YF | 8.00b | 17.40±0.54b | 359.33±0.06a | 0.73±0.02b | 1.06±0.02a | 4.11±0.28a | 131.83±16.65a |
CK | 8.78±0.08a | 16.50±0.28b | 288.33±0.19c | 0.67±0.03c | 1.05±0.05a | 2.16±0.41b | 134.73±8.97a |
处理 | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 全磷/(g/kg) | 硝态氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JF | 8.00b | 19.40±0.34a | 326.00±0.19b | 0.79±0.01a | 1.06±0.02a | 3.97±0.49a | 111.00±9.64ab |
YF | 8.00b | 17.40±0.54b | 359.33±0.06a | 0.73±0.02b | 1.06±0.02a | 4.11±0.28a | 131.83±16.65a |
CK | 8.78±0.08a | 16.50±0.28b | 288.33±0.19c | 0.67±0.03c | 1.05±0.05a | 2.16±0.41b | 134.73±8.97a |
处理 | 丰富度Chao | 多样性Simpson | 覆盖度 | 均匀度Simpsoneven | 序列数量 | OTU数量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 161±2.25b | 0.08±0.02a | 1 | 0.08±0.01a | 69031±1878.61a | 497±9.54a |
YF | 164±3.02a | 0.04±0.31b | 1 | 0.05±0.02b | 57374±8036.22a | 541±74.41a |
JF | 171±3.37a | 0.05±0.26b | 1 | 0.06±0.02b | 70920±1244.29a | 456±17.13a |
处理 | 丰富度Chao | 多样性Simpson | 覆盖度 | 均匀度Simpsoneven | 序列数量 | OTU数量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 161±2.25b | 0.08±0.02a | 1 | 0.08±0.01a | 69031±1878.61a | 497±9.54a |
YF | 164±3.02a | 0.04±0.31b | 1 | 0.05±0.02b | 57374±8036.22a | 541±74.41a |
JF | 171±3.37a | 0.05±0.26b | 1 | 0.06±0.02b | 70920±1244.29a | 456±17.13a |
处理 | 丰富度Chao | 多样性Simpson | 覆盖度 | 均匀度Simpsoneven | 序列数量 | OTU数量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 796±16.91b | 0.02±0.03a | 1 | 0.11±0.01a | 57581±3755.83a | 3066±29.48a |
YF | 822±23.15a | 0.01±0.04b | 1 | 0.09±0.02b | 53018±3844.69a | 2694±37.56b |
JF | 810±7.36a | 0.01±0.02b | 1 | 0.09±0.02b | 47762±2258.17a | 2773±178.65ab |
处理 | 丰富度Chao | 多样性Simpson | 覆盖度 | 均匀度Simpsoneven | 序列数量 | OTU数量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 796±16.91b | 0.02±0.03a | 1 | 0.11±0.01a | 57581±3755.83a | 3066±29.48a |
YF | 822±23.15a | 0.01±0.04b | 1 | 0.09±0.02b | 53018±3844.69a | 2694±37.56b |
JF | 810±7.36a | 0.01±0.02b | 1 | 0.09±0.02b | 47762±2258.17a | 2773±178.65ab |
[1] | 王遵亲. 中国盐渍土[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1993. |
[2] | 边荣荣, 孙兆军, 李向辉, 等. 西北盐碱地改良利用技术研究现状及展望[J]. 宁夏工程技术, 2016, 15(4):404-408. |
[3] |
PANDA A K, DAS A B. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: A review[J]. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2005, 60(3):324-349.
pmid: 15590011 |
[4] | 韩亚琦, 唐宇丹, 张少英, 等. 盐胁迫抑制槲栎2变种光合作用的机理研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27(3):583-587. |
[5] | 宋日, 吴春胜, 牟金明, 等. 深松土对玉米根系生长发育的影响[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2000, 22(4):73-75,80. |
[6] | 李芙荣, 杨劲松, 吴亚坤, 等. 不同秸秆埋深对苏北滩涂盐渍土水盐动态变化的影响[J]. 土壤, 2013, 45(6):1101-1107. |
[7] | 秦都林, 王双磊, 刘艳慧, 等. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田对土壤理化性质及棉花产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(7):1030-1042. |
[8] | 王启龙, 卢楠, 魏样. 不同改良措施对定边盐碱地土壤理化性质、黑麦草生长及产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(11):282-286. |
[9] | 王景艳, 邓力群, 隆小华, 等. 滨海盐溃化土壤引种油葵的试验研究[J]. 土壤, 2008, 40(1):121-124. |
[10] |
MUNNS R, JAMES R A, XU B, et al. Wheat grain yield on saline soils is improved by an ancestral Na+transporter gene[J]. Nature biotechnology, 2012, 30:360-364.
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2120 URL |
[11] | 鲁凯珩, 金杰人, 肖明. 微生物肥料在盐碱土壤中的应用展望[J]. 微生物学通报, 2019, 46(7):1695-1705. |
[12] | 沙月霞, 王晨曦, 邢敏, 等. 微生物菌剂拌土对玉米农田土壤细菌群落多样性的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(5):138-142,146. |
[13] |
LIA H S, LEI P, PANGA X, et al. Enhanced tolerance to salt stress in canola (Brassica napus L.) seedlings inoculated with the halotolerant Enterobacter cloacae HSNJ4[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2017, 119:26-34.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.05.033 URL |
[14] |
SARKAR A, GHOSH P K, PRAMANIK K, et al. A halotolerant Enterobacter sp. displaying ACC deaminase activity promotes rice seedling growth under salt stress[J]. Research in microbiology, 2018, 169:20-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2017.08.005 URL |
[15] | 沙月霞, 邢敏, 李明洋, 等. 微生物菌剂拌土对玉米茎基腐病的预防和促生效果[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(4):141-144. |
[16] | 余美, 芮孝芳. 宁夏盐碱地改良利用研究进展[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2006, 26(6):85-90. |
[17] | 吴晓卫, 付瑞敏, 郭彦钊, 等. 耐盐碱微生物复合菌剂的选育、复配及其对盐碱地的改良效果[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(6):346-349. |
[18] | 苟宇波. 宁夏盐碱地不同改良模式对土壤理化性质和植物功能性状的影响[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2017. |
[19] |
NADEEM S M, AHMAD M, ZAHIR Z A, et al. The role of mycorrhizae and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in improving crop productivity under stressful environments[J]. Biotechnology advance, 2014, 32:429-448.
doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.005 URL |
[20] | 侯景清, 王旭, 陈玉海, 等. 乳酸菌复合制剂对盐碱地改良及土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2019, 50(4):710-718. |
[21] |
范娜, 彭之东, 白文斌, 等. 微生物菌剂对土壤酶活性及高粱生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(2):185-192.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2019.0484 |
[22] | 林先贵, 胡君利. 土壤微生物多样性的科学内涵及其生态服务功能[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):892-900. |
[23] |
BAI R, WANG J T, DENG Y, et al. Microbial community and functional structure significantly varied among distinct types of paddy soils but responded differently along gradients of soil depth layers[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2017, 8:945.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00945 pmid: 28611747 |
[24] | 水燕, 徐增洪, 刘国锋. 不同土壤深度对宁夏石嘴山盐碱地细菌菌群多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(10):3597-3606. |
[25] | 代金霞, 田平雅, 张莹, 等. 银北盐渍化土壤中6 种耐盐植物根际细菌群落结构及其多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(8):2705-2714. |
[26] | 李明, 毕江涛, 王静. 宁夏不同地区盐碱化土壤细菌群落多样性分布特征及其影响因子[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(4):1316-1330. |
[27] | 沙月霞, 李明洋, 伍顺华, 等. 微生物菌剂拌土对盐碱地玉米茎基腐病的预防及促生效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(5):75-82. |
[28] | 高雪峰, 韩国栋, 张国刚. 短花针茅荒漠草原土壤微生物群落组成及结构[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(15):5129-5136. |
[29] | 张爱梅, 韩雪英, 王嘉, 等. 马衔山中国沙棘根瘤内共生细菌多样性研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(1):294-301. |
[30] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第三版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000:25-108. |
[31] |
ZHONG W, GU T, WANG W, et al. The effects of mineral fertilizer and organic manure on soil microbial community and diversity[J]. Plant and soil, 2010, 326:511-522.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-9988-y URL |
[32] |
WU Y P, LI Y P, ZHENG C Y, et al. Organic amendment application influence soil organism abundance in saline alkali soil[J]. European journal of soil biology, 2013, 54:32-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.10.006 URL |
[33] | 段雪娇. 微生物菌剂对水稻土土壤微生物数量及酶活性的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2015. |
[34] | 李凤霞, 王学琴, 郭永忠, 等. 宁夏不同类型盐渍化土壤微生物区系及多样性[J]. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(5):107-111. |
[35] |
YANG J, MA L A, JIANG H C, et al. Salinity shapes microbial diversity and community structure in surface sediments of the Qinghai- Tibet an Lakes[J]. Scientific reports, 2016, 6:25078.
doi: 10.1038/srep25078 URL |
[36] | 柴晓彤, 顾金凤, 毛亮, 等. 微生物菌肥对盐渍化土壤中盐分离子及有机质含量的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2017(1):78-84. |
[37] |
ADEKUNLE V A J, DAFIEWHARE H B, AJIBODE O F. Microbia population and diversity as influenced by soil pH and organic matter in different forest ecosystems[J]. Pakistan journal of biological sciences, 2005, 8:1478-1484.
doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2005.1478.1484 URL |
[38] | 王晶晶, 樊伟, 崔珺, 等. 氮磷添加对亚热带常绿阔叶林土壤微生物群落特征的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(24):8361-8373. |
[39] |
MBARKI S, CERDÀ A, BRESTIC M, et al. Vineyard compost supplemented with Trichoderma harzianum T78 improve saline soil quality[J]. Land degradation & development, 2017, 28(3):1028-1037
doi: 10.1002/ldr.2554 URL |
[40] |
SANDHYA V, ALI S Z. The production of exopolysaccharide by Pseudomonas putida GAP-P45 under various abiotic stress conditions and its role in soil aggregation[J]. Microbiology, 2015, 84(4):512-519.
doi: 10.1134/S0026261715040153 URL |
[1] | WANG Lina, YANG Ying, Du Su. Effects of Biochar Application on Saline-alkali Soil: Research Status [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 81-87. |
[2] | HAN Xiaofang, TIAN Xiaoming, YANG Yongli, ZHANG Jingzhi, ZHANG Qing, ZHANG Kai, ZHANG Tao, JIA Lin. Two Soil Compound Amendments: Improvement and Fertility Effect on Coastal Saline Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 54-59. |
[3] | ZHOU Xianlin, QIN Qin, MENG Yongming, WANG Long, HU Chengcheng, ZHU Haiyong, LAI Bo. Effects of Different Amendments on Saline-alkali Soil Improvement and Cotton Growth in Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 91-96. |
[4] | LI Wei, XU Zhonghua, ZHENG Mingjie. Effects of Leaching and Organic Fertilizer on Improvement of Saline-Alkali Soil and Growth of Sapindus mukorossi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 32-37. |
[5] | DING Xueshuang, ZHU Hongqing, DING Yingfeng, YAO Qiaomin, ZHANG Qingqing, YAO Chunxin, ZHOU Xiaogang, YANG Jiazhen, DING Yumei, CHEN Jia. The Field Application Effect of a Compound Microbial Agent on Sweet and Crisp Pea [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 15-19. |
[6] | LUO You, XIAO Yang, ZHOU Tingyu, WANG Yue, XIE Chen, LI Dongying, CHEN Xueli. Resource Distribution, New Species and Isolation Methods of Actinobacteria in Saline-alkali Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 79-84. |
[7] | ZHU Shijun, WANG Lili, JIN Shuquan, ZHOU Jinbo, LU Xiaohong. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer and Microbial Agents on Soil Fertility and Growth and Quality of Strawberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 36-43. |
[8] | HAN Xiaoyun, HU Changlin, XU Ke, ZHENG Guihua, GUO Yuhao, SUN Qingshen. Construction of Corncob Degradation Compound Microbial Agent and Analysis of Its Degradation Effect [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(20): 20-28. |
[9] | Hu Juan, Zhou Daowei, Guan Shengchao, Zhang Dan. The Improvement and Utilization of Bare Saline-alkali Soil in the Songnen Plain by Sand-covering [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(9): 85-94. |
[10] | Guo Yanchun, Sun Xianmin, Zeng Lusheng, Li Xulin, Song Xiangyun, Liu Xinwei, Cui Dejie. Effects of Inhibitor NAM on Corn Yield and Agronomic Utilization Efficiency of Nitrogen Fertilizer in Saline-Alkali Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(5): 43-48. |
[11] | Sha Yuexia, Li Mingyang, Wu Shunhua, Zhang Ang. Microbial Agents Mixed with Saline-alkaline Soil: Effect of Prevention of Stem Basal Rot and Growth-promoting on Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(5): 75-82. |
[12] | SHI Jiaqi, SA Rula, LING Yu, SA Rulaqiqige, FAN Fu, ZHANG Xueting. Effects of Straw Addition in Saline-alkaline Soil on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth Characteristics of Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(36): 13-18. |
[13] | Xiao Hongyang, Li Mozhi, Lin Qimei, Li Erzhen, Li Guitong, Zhao Xiaorong. Effects of 8 Salt-tolerant Plants and Desulfurization Gypsum on the Water-stable Aggregates of Saline-alkali Soil in Hetao Irrigation District [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(34): 90-96. |
[14] | Yuan Chao, Shu Xuechun, Zhang Yingbo, Wang Kai, Xie Xiaoli, Xu Ziqi, Yuan Yuan. Antibacterial and Anti-anthracnose Activities of Endophytic Fungi Colonized in Blumea balsamifera (L.) DC. [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(23): 38-44. |
[15] | Lu Jiawei, Wang Mingze, Wang Qi, Wei Zongyou, Zhang Yanli, Wang Feng. Effects of Different Excipients and Microbial Agents on Aerobic Composting of Sheep Manure [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(15): 39-46. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||