Genetic Analysis of Chlorophyll Content in the Flesh of Wax Gourd

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0061

Abstract

Abstract:

The paper aims to explore the genetic law of chlorophyll content in wax gourd flesh and lay a foundation for improving wax gourd breeding concerning flesh color regulating gene. Genetic groups P₁, P₂, F₁ and F₂ were obtained by using white flesh purified inbred line (LT-1) as P₁ and green flesh purified inbred line (LT-2) as P₂. Using the genetic analysis method of main gene plus polygene mixed model, the genetic law of chlorophyll content in wax gourd flesh was explored by analyzing the effects of main gene and polygene on chlorophyll content of wax gourd flesh. The results showed that the chlorophyll content in wax gourd flesh was regulated by two pairs of additive- dominant- epistatic major genes plus additive dominant polygenic genetic model. In F₂ population, the heritability of the main gene was 82.0696%. The additive effect d_a of the first pair of major genes was -1.477, and the dominant effect h_a was -1.465, and the dominance degree h_a/d_a was close to 1. The second additive effect on major genes d_b was -0.835 and the dominant effect h_b was -0.715, and the dominance degree h_a/d_a was close to 1. It showed that additive effect and dominant effect were equally important for genetic control of chlorophyll content in the same pair of main genes. The additive and dominant effects of the two pairs of major genes were negative, which played a reducing effect. Therefore, to increase chlorophyll content in F₂ generation, we should pay attention to the genetic effect of main genes, and use additive effect and dominant effect at the same time.

Key words: wax gourd, flesh chlorophyll, flesh color, major gene plus polygene, genetic analysis

CLC Number:

S642.3

GOU Jiquan, SU Liwen, CHENG Zhikui, HUANG Xiaochun, WU Wenting, LV Haixuan, LIU Zhengguo. Genetic Analysis of Chlorophyll Content in the Flesh of Wax Gourd[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 45-50.

Figures/Tables 7

References 39

[1]	MORTON J F. The wax gourd, a year-round Florida vegetable with unusual keeping quality[J]. Florida state horticultural society, 1971:104-109.
[2]	ADAMI M, FRANCESCHI P D, BRANDI F. Identifying a carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase (CCD4) gene controlling yellow/white fruit flesh color of “Piqiutao” (white fruit flesh) and its mutant (yellow fruit flesh)[J]. Plant molecular biology reporter, 2013, 31(5):1166-1175. doi: 10.1007/s11105-013-0628-6 URL
[3]	黄持都, 胡小松, 廖小军, 等. 叶绿素研究进展[J]. 中国食品添加剂, 2007(3):114-118.
[4]	BO K, WEI S, WANG W, et al. QTL mapping and genome-wide association study reveal two novel loci associated with green flesh color in cucumber[J]. BMC plant biology, 2019, 19(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1835-6 pmid: 31174472
[5]	BURGER Y, PARIS H S, COHEN R, et al. Genetic diversity of cucumis melo[J]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2010.
[6]	GALPAZ N, GONDA I, SHEMTOV D, et al. Deciphering genetic factors that determine melon fruit-quality traits using RNA-Seq-based high-resolution QTL and eQTL mapping[J]. Plant journal, 2018, 94(1):169-191. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13838 URL
[7]	BLANKE M M, LENZ F. Fruit photosynthesis[J]. Plant, cell and environment, 1989, 12:31-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1989.tb01914.x URL
[8]	HETHERINGTON S E, SMILLIE R M, DAVIES W J. Photosynthetic activities of vegetative and fruiting tissues of tomato[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 1998, 49:1173-1181. doi: 10.1093/jxb/49.324.1173 URL
[9]	DINAR M, STEVENS M A. The relationship between starch accumulation and soluble solids content of tomato fruits[J]. Journal American society for horticultural science,1981.
[10]	POWELL A L T, NGUYEN C V, HILL T, et al. Uniform ripening encodes a Golden 2-like transcription factor regulating tomato fruit chloroplast development[J]. Science, 2012, 336:1711-1715. doi: 10.1126/science.1222218 pmid: 22745430
[11]	SAGAR M, CHERVIN C, MILA I, et al. SlARF4, an auxin response factor involved in the control of sugar metabolism during tomato fruit development[J]. Plant physiology, 2013, 161(3):1362-1374. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.213843 pmid: 23341361
[12]	DAVIES J N, HOBSON G E, MCGLASSON W B. The constituents of tomato fruit- the influence of environment, nutrition, and genotype[J]. CRC critical reviews in food technology, 1981, 15(3):205-280.
[13]	KEPHART J C. Chlorophyll derivatives- Their chemistry? commercial preparation and uses[J]. Economic botany, 1955, 9(1):38. doi: 10.1007/BF02984957 URL
[14]	EDWARDS B J. Treatment of chronic leg ulcers with ointment containing soluble chlorophyll[J]. Physiotherapy, 1954, 40(6):177. pmid: 13177174
[15]	BOWERS W F. Chlorophyll in wound healing and suppurative disease[J]. American journal of surgery, 1947, 73(1):37-50. pmid: 20279378
[16]	LARATO D C, PFAU F R. Effects of a water-soluble chlorophyllin ointment on gingival inflammation[J]. The New York state dental journal, 1970, 36(5):291-293.
[17]	BALDER H F. Heme and chlorophyll intake and risk of colorectal cancer in the Netherlands cohort study[J]. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers and prevention: A publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2006, 15(4):717-725.
[18]	孙小镭, 王永强, 王冰, 等. 黄瓜嫩果果皮叶绿素含量的遗传[J]. 园艺学报, 2004, 31(3):327-331.
[19]	张兴伟, 王志德, 牟建民, 等. 烤烟叶绿素含量遗传分析[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2011, 17(3):48-52.
[20]	陈虹容, 商桑, 田丽波, 等. 苦瓜叶片叶绿素含量的遗传分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(6):1572-1578.
[21]	林婷婷, 王立, 张琳, 等. 不结球白菜叶绿素含量的主基因+多基因混合遗传分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2014, 37(5):34-40.
[22]	吴浪, 赵菁菁, 罗佳伟, 等. 番茄绿果与橙果间果实颜色及主要色素含量的遗传研究[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2017(3):29-37.
[23]	李洪涛, 许瀚元, 李景芳, 等. 玉米叶绿素含量基因效应分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2019(5):46-51.
[24]	唐亮, 徐正进. 水稻苗期干物重和叶绿素含量的遗传分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(6):1633-1635.
[25]	李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000:130-137.
[26]	章元明, 盖钧镒, 张孟臣. 利用P₁ F₁ P₂和F₂或F_2:3世代联合的数量性状分离分析[J]. 西南农业大学学报, 2000, 22(1):6-9.
[27]	曹锡文, 刘兵, 章元明. 植物数量性状分离分析Windows软件包SEA的研制[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2013, 36(6):1-6.
[28]	刘文睿, 江彪, 彭庆务, 等. 冬瓜种子千粒重主基因+多基因混合遗传分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2012, 33(6):993-996.
[29]	谢大森, 何晓明, 彭庆务, 等. 冬瓜枯萎病的抗性遗传规律[J]. 热带作物学报, 2009, 30(7):1005-1008.
[30]	程志魁, 刘政国, 陈婕英, 等. 冬瓜果实形状的主基因+多基因遗传分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 20(17).
[31]	吴兴富, 焦芳婵, 陈学军, 等. 烟草主要农艺性状的主基因+多基因遗传分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(19):6438-6447.
[32]	方敦煌, 焦芳婵, 卢灿华, 等. 烟草青枯病抗性的主基因+多基因混合遗传分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2023.
[33]	解松峰, 吉万全, 王长有, 等. 小麦穗部性状的主基因+多基因混合遗传模型分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(24):4437-4452.
[34]	丁盼盼. 辣椒果皮颜色的遗传分析及QTL定位[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2017.
[35]	李洪涛, 许瀚元, 李景芳, 等. 玉米叶绿素含量基因效应分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2019(5):46-51.
[36]	孙小镭, 王永强, 王冰, 等. 黄瓜嫩果果皮叶绿素含量的遗传[J]. 园艺学报, 2004(3):327-331.
[37]	唐亮, 徐正进. 水稻苗期干物重和叶绿素含量的遗传分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007(6):1633-1635.
[38]	翟英. 番茄果实色泽和色素含量的遗传特征[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(1):264-269.
[39]	李丹丹, 司龙亭, 李季, 等. 弱光下黄瓜幼苗叶片叶绿素含量的遗传分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2009, 24(1):133-137. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2009.01.030

群体	株数	平均值/(μg/g)	最低值/(μg/g)	最高值/(μg/g)	差值/(μg/g)	峰度	偏度
P₁	8	1.09±0.15	0.60	1.69	1.09	-0.67	0.48
P₂	7	6.78±0.32	5.77	7.65	1.88	-2.08	-0.06
F₁	12	2.13±0.35	1.06	3.30	2.24	-1.55	0.18
F₂	194	2.41±0.11	0.55	7.45	6.90	0.65	1.04

群体	株数	平均值/(μg/g)	最低值/(μg/g)	最高值/(μg/g)	差值/(μg/g)	峰度	偏度
P₁	8	1.09±0.15	0.60	1.69	1.09	-0.67	0.48
P₂	7	6.78±0.32	5.77	7.65	1.88	-2.08	-0.06
F₁	12	2.13±0.35	1.06	3.30	2.24	-1.55	0.18
F₂	194	2.41±0.11	0.55	7.45	6.90	0.65	1.04

模型	MLV值	AIC	模型	MLV值	AIC
1MG-A	-388	785.7558	MX1-AD-ADI	-348	712.5784
1MG-AD	-361	733.4982	MX1-EAD-AD	-371	753.0085
1MG-EAD	-362	734.4564	MX1-NCD-AD	-351	713.2881
1MG-NCD	-399	807.5360	MX2-A-AD	-370	746.8378
2MG-A	-380	769.3349	MX2-AD-AD	-341	691.6910
2MG-AD	-341	696.0086	MX2-ADI-AD	-335	688.0900
2MG-ADI	-337	696.6345	MX2-ADI-ADI	-335	694.4754
2MG-CD	-344	697.5490	MX2-CD-AD	-366	738.7573
2MG-EA	-380	767.3349	MX2-EA-AD	-370	744.8320
2MG-EAD	-350	707.0548	MX2-EAD-AD	-344	692.5660
MX1-A-AD	-370	752.8922	PG-AD	-382	773.9715
MX1-AD-AD	-351	715.2881	PG-ADI	-366	743.4832

模型	MLV值	AIC	模型	MLV值	AIC
1MG-A	-388	785.7558	MX1-AD-ADI	-348	712.5784
1MG-AD	-361	733.4982	MX1-EAD-AD	-371	753.0085
1MG-EAD	-362	734.4564	MX1-NCD-AD	-351	713.2881
1MG-NCD	-399	807.5360	MX2-A-AD	-370	746.8378
2MG-A	-380	769.3349	MX2-AD-AD	-341	691.6910
2MG-AD	-341	696.0086	MX2-ADI-AD	-335	688.0900
2MG-ADI	-337	696.6345	MX2-ADI-ADI	-335	694.4754
2MG-CD	-344	697.5490	MX2-CD-AD	-366	738.7573
2MG-EA	-380	767.3349	MX2-EA-AD	-370	744.8320
2MG-EAD	-350	707.0548	MX2-EAD-AD	-344	692.5660
MX1-A-AD	-370	752.8922	PG-AD	-382	773.9715
MX1-AD-AD	-351	715.2881	PG-ADI	-366	743.4832

候选模型	世代	U₁²	P(U₁²)	U₂²	P(U₂²)	U₃²	P(U₃²)	nW²	P(nW²)	D_n	P(D_n)
MX2-AD-AD	P₁	1.3099	0.2524	0.6837	0.4083	1.2662	0.2605	0.2027	0.2644	0.3392	0.3206
	F₁	2.4466	0.1178	3.4344	0.0639	1.8358	0.1754	0.2539	0.1893	0.4047	0.2129
	P₂	0.7294	0.3931	1.3239	0.2499	1.6762	0.1954	0.1240	0.4848	0.3260	0.4502
	F₂	0.3514	0.5533	0.2044	0.6512	0.2379	0.6257	0.1308	0.4575	0.0609	0.4536
MX2-ADI-AD	P₁	0.0182	0.8927	0.0034	0.9532	0.5737	0.4488	0.0512	0.8691	0.2084	0.8660
	F₁	0.0184	0.8920	0.5661	0.4518	6.1699	0.0130^*	0.1375	0.4327	0.2811	0.6370
	P₂	0.0153	0.9017	0.5328	0.4654	5.9593	0.0146^*	0.1436	0.4117	0.2981	0.5632
	F₂	0.0460	0.8301	0.0311	0.8599	0.0156	0.9005	0.0479	0.8893	0.0396	0.9115
MX2-EAD-AD	P₁	1.3561	0.2442	0.6374	0.4247	1.7339	0.1879	0.2292	0.2214	0.3679	0.2343
	F₁	2.8491	0.0914	3.6451	0.0562	1.2090	0.2715	0.2799	0.1609	0.3942	0.2384
	P₂	0.8507	0.3563	1.2362	0.2662	0.7657	0.3815	0.1185	0.5080	0.3102	0.5124
	F₂	0.5132	0.4738	0.4926	0.4828	0.0011	0.9737	0.1540	0.3789	0.0550	0.5850