Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 77-84.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0085
Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Sizhi1(), GUAN Wenling1(
), HAO Xiaohan1, SONG Jie2
Received:
2022-02-16
Revised:
2022-04-19
Online:
2023-01-05
Published:
2022-12-27
Contact:
GUAN Wenling
E-mail:719460822@qq.com;158066692@qq.com
CLC Number:
WANG Sizhi, GUAN Wenling, HAO Xiaohan, SONG Jie. Study on Germination Characteristics of Gaultheria procumbens Seeds[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 77-84.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0085
差异源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA3浓度(A) | 0.726 | 3 | 0.242 | 19.834** | 0.000 |
GA3浸种时间(B) | 0.011 | 2 | 0.005 | 0.432 | 0.654 |
A×B | 0.225 | 6 | 0.038 | 3.082* | 0.022 |
误差 | 0.293 | 24 | 0.012 | ||
总计 | 13.857 | 36 |
差异源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA3浓度(A) | 0.726 | 3 | 0.242 | 19.834** | 0.000 |
GA3浸种时间(B) | 0.011 | 2 | 0.005 | 0.432 | 0.654 |
A×B | 0.225 | 6 | 0.038 | 3.082* | 0.022 |
误差 | 0.293 | 24 | 0.012 | ||
总计 | 13.857 | 36 |
溶液浸泡时间/h | GA3浓度/(mg/L) | 萌发率/% |
---|---|---|
12 | 0 | 48.89±19.24aCD |
250 | 57.78±10.18aABC | |
500 | 56.67±0aBC | |
1000 | 65.56±10.18aABC | |
24 | 0 | 36.67±13.33bDE |
250 | 57.78±8.39abABC | |
500 | 71.11±13.48aAB | |
1000 | 70±14.53aABC | |
48 | 0 | 21.11±8.39bE |
250 | 66.67±12.02aABC | |
500 | 78.89±1.92aA | |
1000 | 78.89±5.09aA |
溶液浸泡时间/h | GA3浓度/(mg/L) | 萌发率/% |
---|---|---|
12 | 0 | 48.89±19.24aCD |
250 | 57.78±10.18aABC | |
500 | 56.67±0aBC | |
1000 | 65.56±10.18aABC | |
24 | 0 | 36.67±13.33bDE |
250 | 57.78±8.39abABC | |
500 | 71.11±13.48aAB | |
1000 | 70±14.53aABC | |
48 | 0 | 21.11±8.39bE |
250 | 66.67±12.02aABC | |
500 | 78.89±1.92aA | |
1000 | 78.89±5.09aA |
差异源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA3浓度(A) | 0.309 | 1 | 0.309 | 65.065** | 0.000 |
GA3浸种时间(B) | 0.003 | 2 | 0.001 | 0.266 | 0.771 |
A×B | 0.007 | 2 | 0.003 | 0.734 | 0.501 |
误差 | 0.057 | 12 | 0.005 | ||
总计 | 10.773 | 18 |
差异源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA3浓度(A) | 0.309 | 1 | 0.309 | 65.065** | 0.000 |
GA3浸种时间(B) | 0.003 | 2 | 0.001 | 0.266 | 0.771 |
A×B | 0.007 | 2 | 0.003 | 0.734 | 0.501 |
误差 | 0.057 | 12 | 0.005 | ||
总计 | 10.773 | 18 |
差异源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA3浓度(A) | 0.869 | 1 | 0.869 | 83.783** | 0.000 |
GA3浸种时间(B) | 0.015 | 2 | 0.008 | 0.723 | 0.495 |
温度(C) | 0.455 | 1 | 0.455 | 43.855** | 0.000 |
A×B | 0.041 | 2 | 0.021 | 1.983 | 0.160 |
A×C | 0.021 | 1 | 0.021 | 2.042 | 0.166 |
B×C | 0.003 | 2 | 0.002 | 0.155 | 0.857 |
A×B×C | 0.094 | 2 | 0.047 | 4.536* | 0.021 |
误差 | 0.249 | 24 | 0.010 | ||
总计 | 16.845 | 36 |
差异源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA3浓度(A) | 0.869 | 1 | 0.869 | 83.783** | 0.000 |
GA3浸种时间(B) | 0.015 | 2 | 0.008 | 0.723 | 0.495 |
温度(C) | 0.455 | 1 | 0.455 | 43.855** | 0.000 |
A×B | 0.041 | 2 | 0.021 | 1.983 | 0.160 |
A×C | 0.021 | 1 | 0.021 | 2.042 | 0.166 |
B×C | 0.003 | 2 | 0.002 | 0.155 | 0.857 |
A×B×C | 0.094 | 2 | 0.047 | 4.536* | 0.021 |
误差 | 0.249 | 24 | 0.010 | ||
总计 | 16.845 | 36 |
温度 | GA3浓度/(mg/L) | 溶液浸泡时间/h | 萌发率/% |
---|---|---|---|
24 h25℃ | 0 | 12 | 48.89±19.24de |
24 | 36.67±13.34ef | ||
48 | 21.11±8.39f | ||
1000 | 12 | 65.56±10.18cd | |
24 | 70.00±14.53bc | ||
48 | 78.89±5.09abc | ||
12 h25℃+12 h15℃ | 0 | 12 | 63.33±5.03cd |
24 | 60.67±13.32cd | ||
48 | 64.67±4.16cd | ||
1000 | 12 | 92.00±2.00a | |
24 | 90.00±5.29a | ||
48 | 85.33±5.77ab |
温度 | GA3浓度/(mg/L) | 溶液浸泡时间/h | 萌发率/% |
---|---|---|---|
24 h25℃ | 0 | 12 | 48.89±19.24de |
24 | 36.67±13.34ef | ||
48 | 21.11±8.39f | ||
1000 | 12 | 65.56±10.18cd | |
24 | 70.00±14.53bc | ||
48 | 78.89±5.09abc | ||
12 h25℃+12 h15℃ | 0 | 12 | 63.33±5.03cd |
24 | 60.67±13.32cd | ||
48 | 64.67±4.16cd | ||
1000 | 12 | 92.00±2.00a | |
24 | 90.00±5.29a | ||
48 | 85.33±5.77ab |
处理 | 发芽率/% | 株高/mm | 根长/mm |
---|---|---|---|
常规播种 | 9.65±2.23a | 13.31±5.31b | |
无菌萌发GA3浓度0 mg/L | 63.88±0.4a | 11.74±2.48a | 5.52±1.07c |
无菌萌发GA3浓度500 mg/L | 64.63±6.25a | 12.46±2.28a | 6.77±0.83c |
无菌萌发GA3浓度1000 mg/L | 60.37±4.45a | 12.11±2.68a | 8.96±2.79bc |
无菌萌发GA3浓度1500 mg/L | 65.71±2.26a | 12.17±3.01a | 18.15±4.22a |
处理 | 发芽率/% | 株高/mm | 根长/mm |
---|---|---|---|
常规播种 | 9.65±2.23a | 13.31±5.31b | |
无菌萌发GA3浓度0 mg/L | 63.88±0.4a | 11.74±2.48a | 5.52±1.07c |
无菌萌发GA3浓度500 mg/L | 64.63±6.25a | 12.46±2.28a | 6.77±0.83c |
无菌萌发GA3浓度1000 mg/L | 60.37±4.45a | 12.11±2.68a | 8.96±2.79bc |
无菌萌发GA3浓度1500 mg/L | 65.71±2.26a | 12.17±3.01a | 18.15±4.22a |
[1] |
MIDDLETON, DAVID J. Taxonomic studies in the Gaultheria group of genera of the tribe Andromedeae (Ericaceae)[J]. Edinburgh journal of botany, 1991, 48(3):283.
doi: 10.1017/S0960428600003024 URL |
[2] | 王银环, 陆露, 王跃华, 等. 中国白珠树属植物种质资源调查与评价利用[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(S2):378-389,410. |
[3] | TROCK D K. Flora of North America[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009:513-514. |
[4] | 王意成. 欧洲流行的几种杜鹃花科常绿灌木[J]. 花木盆景(花卉园艺), 2005(9):6-7. |
[5] | MICHEL P, GRANICA S, ROSIŃSKA K, et al. Biological and chemical insight into Gaultheria procumbens fruits: a rich source of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant salicylate glycosides and procyanidins for food and functional application[J]. Food & function, 2020,11. |
[6] | 马小军, 赵玲, 杜程芳, 等. 滇白珠及其同属药用植物研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2001(10):84-88. |
[7] |
KRON K A, CHASE M W. Systematics of the Ericaceae, Empetraceae, Epacridaceae and related taxa based upon rbcl sequence data[J]. Annals of the missouri botanical garden, 1993, 80(3):735-741.
doi: 10.2307/2399857 URL |
[8] | 朱宏芬, 刘健, 徐兵兵. 高丛蓝莓杂交育种及种子萌发研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(36):55-57,69. |
[9] | 丁亦男, 兰兰, 张丽娇, 等. 赤霉素对蓝莓种子发芽影响的研究[J]. 长春师范学院学报, 2013, 32(12):78-80. |
[10] | 刘有春, 杨艳敏, 王莉, 等. 越橘种子破除休眠、萌发及快速成苗方案优化[J]. 果树学报, 2018, 35(9):1147-1154. |
[11] | 解玮佳, 李世峰, 彭绿春, 等. 一种平铺白珠树的组培快速繁殖方法[P]. 中国专利, CN106489748B,2018-12-21. |
[12] | 陈婷, 邓志芬, 龙宇庭, 等. GA3浸种处理对五种晚花杜鹃种子萌发的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2021, 41(6):946-952. |
[13] | 马诗雨, 杜娟, 李叶芳, 等. 滇南杜鹃种子萌发特性研究[J]. 种子, 2019, 38(9):73-76,80. |
[14] | 郑福超, 耿兴敏, 胡义红, 等. 温度及浸种对杜鹃种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 福建林业科技, 2016, 43(4):125-129. |
[15] | 黄承玲, 周洪英, 黄家涌, 等. 迷人杜鹃种子特性与萌发实验研究[J]. 种子, 2009, 28(8):96-98. |
[16] | 钟登慧, 陈训, 欧静, 等. 桃叶杜鹃种子特性与萌发条件研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2013, 281(2):68-70. |
[17] | 黄承玲, 赵孝梨, 刘广超. 2种高山杜鹃种子萌发特性研究[J]. 种子, 2017, 36(1):40-42. |
[18] | 周晓君, 朱薪燃, 张凯, 等. 杜鹃属植物种子生理生态特征研究[J]. 林业科技, 2021, 46(5):51-55. |
[19] | 李畅, 刘晓青, 何丽斯, 等. 映山红种子特性观测及萌发试验[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2019, 46(6):22-28. |
[20] | 樊丛令, 陈训, 邢晋宁. 不同处理对露珠杜鹃种子萌发的影响[J]. 种子, 2011, 30(4):106-108. |
[21] | 张亚平, 金晓玲, 曾艳, 等. 植物叶色呈色机理及化学物质的调控[J]. 北方园艺, 2017(14):180-184. |
[22] | 陈兵. 植物生长调节剂对红花木莲幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2014. |
[23] | 张慧宁. 紫叶稠李组织培养体系的建立及组培苗色素含量变化的研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2020. |
[24] | 赵冰. 光照时间和赤霉素浓度对太白杜鹃种子萌发的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2014(2):60-63. |
[25] | 甄成, 李淑娟, 张玉双, 等. 蓝莓种间杂交及杂交种子的无菌萌发[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016, 44(1):52-55. |
[26] | 郑晟, 邓赞, 张凌云. 大白杜鹃种子无菌萌发及幼苗生长条件研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2014(11):77-80. |
[1] | XU Xinyang, ZHANG Yuejian, SHEN Jia, SHOU Weisong. Methods for Breaking Seed Dormancy of Thick-skinned Muskmelon ‘Cuixue 5’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 41-44. |
[2] | SUN Yin, HAO Jun, FANG Yifu, ZHANG Qian, JIANG Nannan. Mutagenic Effect of 60Co-γ on Tissue Culture Seedlings of Paphiopedilum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(15): 45-52. |
[3] | SHI Jiaqi, SA Rula, LING Yu, SA Rulaqiqige, FAN Fu, ZHANG Xueting. Effects of Straw Addition in Saline-alkaline Soil on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth Characteristics of Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(36): 13-18. |
[4] | Li Wenming, Ma Jiancang, Lei Yuming, Xing Huiqin, Shang Liqi. Effect of Different Temperature and Time on Seed-borne Fungi and Seed Germination of Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(32): 10-14. |
[5] | Sa Rula, Zhang Xueting, Yang Hengshan, Zhang Yun, Xu Yonghui. Straw Fermentation Broth: Effects on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth Characteristics of Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(18): 14-18. |
[6] | Wang Pengshan, Jia Lin, Zhang Jinlong, Ci Huacong, Liu Luyao, Li Zhiming. Comparative Study on Salt Tolerance of Apocynum venetum Under Different Salt Stresses [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(12): 39-44. |
[7] | Zhu Yanxia, Chen Dongliang, Huang Yanfen. Germination Characteristics of Scoparia dulcis Seeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(10): 72-76. |
[8] | Zhang Ruibo, Yuan Xiaojing, Zou Hongfei, Gao Yingbin, Qin Haiyan. Effects of Magnetic Field on Seed Germination and Seedling Stress Resistance of Bupleurum chinense [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(8): 50-54. |
[9] | You Xiuhua, Bai Jing, Liu Juncheng, Liu Jinshan, Cai Changtang, Chen Yan, Li Ning. The Seedling Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Tsuga longibracteata Under Different Treatments of Fallen Wood [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(31): 20-27. |
[10] | Liu Xiaozhou, Zhang Xinjian, Yi Huilin, Zhou Renchao, Tan Guangwen. The Cadmium and Lead Tolerance of Six Species of Melastoma Plants During Germination [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(31): 42-48. |
[11] | Zhou Yanghai, Cai Cong, Yue Xiali. N-nitro-2,4,6-trifluoroaniline Affects Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(3): 129-134. |
[12] | He Lifang, Guo Shirong, Yan Jun, Zhu Weimin. Effects of Different Treatments on the Antioxidant System and Hormones During the Germination of Celery Seeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(22): 31-37. |
[13] | Xue Lin, Sun Yutong, Sheng Mingyue, Ni Hongtao. Nanomaterials: Effects on Seed Germination and Growth and Development of Crop [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(21): 33-39. |
[14] | Ni Wanchao, Shu Hongmei, Guo Shuqiao, Jiang Lu, He Xiaolan, Cui Xiaoxia, Gong Yuanyong. Seed Germination of Rice Cultivars: Differences in Physiological Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(2): 1-5. |
[15] | Xu Yan, Xu Xianying, Chong Peifang, Liu Hujun. Comparison of Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of 7 Kinds of Psammophytes and Xerophytes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(19): 62-67. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||