Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 1-8.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0428
Special Issue: 小麦
GAO Xinmei(), SHI Zhanliang, ZHAO Yankun, LI Zhankun, SHAN Zilong, CAO Qiao, HAN Ran, HE Mingqi, FU Xiaoyi, MA Liang, GAO Zhenxian(
)
Received:
2023-06-06
Revised:
2023-09-04
Online:
2024-04-15
Published:
2024-04-11
GAO Xinmei, SHI Zhanliang, ZHAO Yankun, LI Zhankun, SHAN Zilong, CAO Qiao, HAN Ran, HE Mingqi, FU Xiaoyi, MA Liang, GAO Zhenxian. Analysis of High Yield and Quality of a New Wheat Line ‘Shi 17T5252’ Under Water-saving Irrigation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(11): 1-8.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0428
品种 | 处理 | 小区产量/(kg/hm2) | 穗数/(万穗/hm2) | 穗粒数/(粒/穗) | 千粒重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
石麦22 | W0 | 7265.75d | 912.00bc | 28.20bc | 36.37c |
W1 | 8163.60c | 992.00ab | 30.30ab | 35.87c | |
W2 | 9189.20b | 1036.00a | 28.07bc | 42.50b | |
石17T5252 | W0 | 7059.70d | 920.00bc | 27.00c | 42.40b |
W1 | 9006.25b | 872.00c | 28.33bc | 44.47b | |
W2 | 9884.10a | 922.00bc | 32.03a | 48.93a | |
品种 | F值 | 33.60* | 7.37 | 0.18 | 478.53** |
处理 | 305.05** | 0.64 | 8.09* | 54.01** | |
品种*处理 | 17.22** | 2.81 | 13.32** | 2.16 |
品种 | 处理 | 小区产量/(kg/hm2) | 穗数/(万穗/hm2) | 穗粒数/(粒/穗) | 千粒重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
石麦22 | W0 | 7265.75d | 912.00bc | 28.20bc | 36.37c |
W1 | 8163.60c | 992.00ab | 30.30ab | 35.87c | |
W2 | 9189.20b | 1036.00a | 28.07bc | 42.50b | |
石17T5252 | W0 | 7059.70d | 920.00bc | 27.00c | 42.40b |
W1 | 9006.25b | 872.00c | 28.33bc | 44.47b | |
W2 | 9884.10a | 922.00bc | 32.03a | 48.93a | |
品种 | F值 | 33.60* | 7.37 | 0.18 | 478.53** |
处理 | 305.05** | 0.64 | 8.09* | 54.01** | |
品种*处理 | 17.22** | 2.81 | 13.32** | 2.16 |
品种 | 处理 | 株高/cm | 穗长/cm | 粒长/mm | 粒宽/mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
石麦22 | W0 | 77.42ab | 7.79c | 6.58b | 3.29d |
W1 | 78.56ab | 8.51ab | 6.57b | 3.30d | |
W2 | 76.56b | 8.63a | 6.93a | 3.62b | |
石17T5252 | W0 | 77.61ab | 8.00bc | 6.97a | 3.59bc |
W1 | 80.00a | 8.40ab | 7.08a | 3.46c | |
W2 | 79.37a | 8.54ab | 7.10a | 3.77a | |
品种 | F值 | 9.73 | 0.01 | 65.20* | 42.21* |
处理 | 2.36 | 7.42* | 10.14** | 65.78** | |
品种*处理 | 1.21 | 0.44 | 4.71* | 3.68 |
品种 | 处理 | 株高/cm | 穗长/cm | 粒长/mm | 粒宽/mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
石麦22 | W0 | 77.42ab | 7.79c | 6.58b | 3.29d |
W1 | 78.56ab | 8.51ab | 6.57b | 3.30d | |
W2 | 76.56b | 8.63a | 6.93a | 3.62b | |
石17T5252 | W0 | 77.61ab | 8.00bc | 6.97a | 3.59bc |
W1 | 80.00a | 8.40ab | 7.08a | 3.46c | |
W2 | 79.37a | 8.54ab | 7.10a | 3.77a | |
品种 | F值 | 9.73 | 0.01 | 65.20* | 42.21* |
处理 | 2.36 | 7.42* | 10.14** | 65.78** | |
品种*处理 | 1.21 | 0.44 | 4.71* | 3.68 |
品种 | 处理 | 时期 | SPAD | Fv/Fm | Phi2 | qL | NPQt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石麦22 | W0 | 拔节期 | 48.43 ef | 0.66 a | 0.47 a | 0.47 abcd | 1.47 c |
抽穗期 | 58.18 bcd | 0.63 ab | 0.43 ab | 0.49 abc | 1.83 bc | ||
灌浆期 | 67.43 a | 0.66 a | 0.42 ab | 0.35 fg | 1.48 c | ||
W1 | 拔节期 | 42.12 f | 0.60 bc | 0.46 a | 0.55 a | 2.34 ab | |
抽穗期 | 61.71 abc | 0.64 ab | 0.48 a | 0.48 abc | 1.70 bc | ||
灌浆期 | 63.24 abc | 0.68 a | 0.45 ab | 0.39 defg | 1.27 c | ||
W2 | 拔节期 | 42.12 f | 0.60 bc | 0.46 a | 0.55 a | 2.34 ab | |
抽穗期 | 61.71 abc | 0.64 ab | 0.48 a | 0.48 abc | 1.70 bc | ||
灌浆期 | 58.56 bcd | 0.69 a | 0.47 a | 0.41 cdef | 1.24 c | ||
石17T5252 | W0 | 拔节期 | 53.54 de | 0.64 ab | 0.43 ab | 0.44 bcde | 1.74 bc |
抽穗期 | 60.15 abcd | 0.54 c | 0.40 ab | 0.55 a | 3.08 a | ||
灌浆期 | 65.40 ab | 0.67 a | 0.37 b | 0.31 g | 1.46 c | ||
W1 | 拔节期 | 49.14 ef | 0.64 ab | 0.48 a | 0.52 ab | 1.7 bc | |
抽穗期 | 60.96 abcd | 0.65 ab | 0.47 a | 0.49 abc | 1.68 bc | ||
灌浆期 | 64.77 abc | 0.68 a | 0.43 ab | 0.37 efg | 1.28 c | ||
W2 | 拔节期 | 49.14 ef | 0.64 ab | 0.48 a | 0.52 ab | 1.7 bc | |
抽穗期 | 60.96 abcd | 0.65 ab | 0.47 a | 0.49 abc | 1.68 bc | ||
灌浆期 | 57.39 cd | 0.69 a | 0.43 ab | 0.37 efg | 1.22 c |
品种 | 处理 | 时期 | SPAD | Fv/Fm | Phi2 | qL | NPQt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石麦22 | W0 | 拔节期 | 48.43 ef | 0.66 a | 0.47 a | 0.47 abcd | 1.47 c |
抽穗期 | 58.18 bcd | 0.63 ab | 0.43 ab | 0.49 abc | 1.83 bc | ||
灌浆期 | 67.43 a | 0.66 a | 0.42 ab | 0.35 fg | 1.48 c | ||
W1 | 拔节期 | 42.12 f | 0.60 bc | 0.46 a | 0.55 a | 2.34 ab | |
抽穗期 | 61.71 abc | 0.64 ab | 0.48 a | 0.48 abc | 1.70 bc | ||
灌浆期 | 63.24 abc | 0.68 a | 0.45 ab | 0.39 defg | 1.27 c | ||
W2 | 拔节期 | 42.12 f | 0.60 bc | 0.46 a | 0.55 a | 2.34 ab | |
抽穗期 | 61.71 abc | 0.64 ab | 0.48 a | 0.48 abc | 1.70 bc | ||
灌浆期 | 58.56 bcd | 0.69 a | 0.47 a | 0.41 cdef | 1.24 c | ||
石17T5252 | W0 | 拔节期 | 53.54 de | 0.64 ab | 0.43 ab | 0.44 bcde | 1.74 bc |
抽穗期 | 60.15 abcd | 0.54 c | 0.40 ab | 0.55 a | 3.08 a | ||
灌浆期 | 65.40 ab | 0.67 a | 0.37 b | 0.31 g | 1.46 c | ||
W1 | 拔节期 | 49.14 ef | 0.64 ab | 0.48 a | 0.52 ab | 1.7 bc | |
抽穗期 | 60.96 abcd | 0.65 ab | 0.47 a | 0.49 abc | 1.68 bc | ||
灌浆期 | 64.77 abc | 0.68 a | 0.43 ab | 0.37 efg | 1.28 c | ||
W2 | 拔节期 | 49.14 ef | 0.64 ab | 0.48 a | 0.52 ab | 1.7 bc | |
抽穗期 | 60.96 abcd | 0.65 ab | 0.47 a | 0.49 abc | 1.68 bc | ||
灌浆期 | 57.39 cd | 0.69 a | 0.43 ab | 0.37 efg | 1.22 c |
品种 | 处理 | 容重/(g/L) | 蛋白含量/% | 湿面筋含量/% | 面筋指数/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
石麦22 | W0 | 810.67ab | 13.15b | 28.25a | 1.94d |
W1 | 800.33bc | 12.21c | 31.57a | 11.60c | |
W2 | 818.00a | 11.59d | 29.35ab | 3.10d | |
石17T5252 | W0 | 799.67c | 13.93a | 36.00bc | 11.48c |
W1 | 804.67bc | 14.14a | 37.32c | 23.61b | |
W2 | 804.33bc | 12.72bc | 34.68c | 35.68a | |
品种 | F值 | 75.94* | 543.63** | 62.535* | 60298.38** |
处理 | 2.6 | 30.80** | 2.691 | 139.43** | |
品种*处理 | 3.11 | 5.21* | 0.598 | 118.47** |
品种 | 处理 | 容重/(g/L) | 蛋白含量/% | 湿面筋含量/% | 面筋指数/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
石麦22 | W0 | 810.67ab | 13.15b | 28.25a | 1.94d |
W1 | 800.33bc | 12.21c | 31.57a | 11.60c | |
W2 | 818.00a | 11.59d | 29.35ab | 3.10d | |
石17T5252 | W0 | 799.67c | 13.93a | 36.00bc | 11.48c |
W1 | 804.67bc | 14.14a | 37.32c | 23.61b | |
W2 | 804.33bc | 12.72bc | 34.68c | 35.68a | |
品种 | F值 | 75.94* | 543.63** | 62.535* | 60298.38** |
处理 | 2.6 | 30.80** | 2.691 | 139.43** | |
品种*处理 | 3.11 | 5.21* | 0.598 | 118.47** |
[1] |
陆中央. 河北省80年代以来的水资源情势[J]. 海河水利, 1993(4):46-50.
|
[2] |
张子元, 张博雄, 周普松. 河北省水资源开发利用存在的问题及建议[J]. 水资源开发与管理, 2022, 8(11):12-17.
|
[3] |
李海泳, 殷贵鸿. 从国家粮食安全角度探讨我国小麦育种发展趋势[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(18):36-41.
|
[4] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165619 URL |
[5] |
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1194759 URL |
[6] |
高丽华. 基于Jensen模型的冬小麦非充分灌溉研究[D]. 天津: 天津农学院, 2014.
|
[7] |
满建国. 小麦测墒补灌技术及其生理基础的研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2015.
|
[8] |
冯连杰, 于振文, 张永丽, 等. 灌溉对小麦分蘖发生和不同茎蘖光合同化物生产分配及成穗的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6):1653-1667.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.21045 |
[9] |
吴强, 张永平, 董玉新, 等. 施氮量和灌水模式对小麦产量、品质和氮肥利用的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(3):334-342.
|
[10] |
张敏, 刘添, 李亚静, 等. 减少灌水次数对强筋小麦氮素积累转运和籽粒蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(7):802-809.
|
[11] |
郭振清, 刘添, 张敏, 等. 减少灌水次数对河北冬性强筋小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(6):731-737.
|
[12] |
徐学欣. 冬小麦节水高产灌溉模式的源—库性能及其协调机制[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2018.
|
[13] |
苏盛楠. 不同生育期灌水对小麦产量形成和水分利用效率的影响[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2018.
|
[14] |
孔祥. 外源亚精胺对水分亏缺下冬小麦小花发育及结实特性的调控效应[D]. 山东农业大学, 2019.
|
[15] |
高振贤, 史占良, 韩然, 等. 不同灌水模式对小麦产量,形态和生理特性的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(10):1234-1240.
|
[16] |
蔡斌, 王法宏, 张宾, 等. 冬前镇压和灌溉对冬小麦灌浆期旗叶光合特性和叶绿体超微结构的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(1):73-81.
|
[17] |
陈晓杰. 中国冬小麦抗旱指标评价、种质筛选及重要性状与SSR标记的关联分析[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2013.
|
[18] |
刘蕾蕾, 纪洪亭, 刘兵, 等. 拔节期和孕穗期低温处理对小麦叶片光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(23):4434-4468.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.23.004 |
[19] |
张喜英. 华北典型区域农田耗水与节水灌溉研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(10):1454-1464.
|
[20] |
李晓爽, 党红凯, 宋妮, 等. 分期定量春灌一水对麦田蒸散量与产量构成的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(9):280-289.
|
[21] |
刘志良, 李晓爽, 曹彩云, 等. 春灌一水时间对冬小麦灌浆特性和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021, 29(8):1296-1304.
|
[22] |
姚宁, 宋利兵, 刘健, 等. 不同生长阶段水分胁迫对旱区冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(12):2379-2389.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.12.011 |
[23] |
潘秋晓. 灌水次数对不同品质类型小麦产量和品质的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2022.
|
[24] |
刘盼. 小麦穗型发育关键基因Q的分子遗传调控机理研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2019.
|
[25] |
曹彩云, 党红凯, 郑春莲, 等. 不同灌溉模式对小麦产量、耗水及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2016, 31(S1):17-24.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2016.S1.003 |
[26] |
陈冬梅, 马永安, 刘保华. 不同落黄类型小麦品种的籽粒灌浆及叶片光合特性[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2008, 28(6):1063-1067.
|
[27] |
陈冬梅, 马永安, 苏玉环, 等. 不同落黄型小麦品种光合器官衰老及产量对花后高温的响应[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(12):1596-1603.
|
[28] |
王志敏, 王璞, 兰林旺, 等. 黄淮海地区优质小麦节水高产栽培研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2003, 19(4):22.
|
[29] |
杨晓婉, 朱志明, 马自清, 等. 小麦品质影响因子研究进展[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2019(5):30-38.
|
[30] |
doi: 10.1046/j.1439-037X.2003.00080.x URL |
[1] | HE Guohe, CHEN Haibin, DU Jianjun, ZHANG Weili, GUO Lihua, HU Yibo, YAN Zhaohua, ZHANG Jing. Effects of Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Nutrient Utilization in Western Guangdong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 1-8. |
[2] | CHENG Yujing, WANG Xiaoqiu, GE Lijiao, QIU Liang, ZHAI Caijiao, SONG Xudong, ZHANG Zhenliang, WANG Ximeng. Establishment of Evaluation Model for Eating Quality of Waxy Corn [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 157-164. |
[3] | YAO Jinbao, YANG Xueming, ZHANG Peng, FAN Xiangyun, YU Guihong, HE Yi, WANG Huadun. Analysis of Yield and Quality Traits of New Weak-Gluten Wheat Cultivar ‘Ningmai 36’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 20-24. |
[4] | LI Qian, ZHANG Yangli, YAN Miaomiao, HAO Shuangkui, NIE Song, SUN Jie, CAO Sanchao, WANG Na. Effect of Sowing Date, Planting Density and Nitrogen Application on Population Structure and Grain Quality of ‘Weimai 9’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 25-29. |
[5] | HOU Mengyuan. Cotton Yield Forecast in Shandong Province Based on Meteorological Key Factors [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 37-41. |
[6] | LIU Yu, YAN Shi, ZHAO Kaili, YU Yueyue, HAN Bao, ZHANG Jing, GUO Ning. Recommendation of Appropriate Phosphorus Application Rate for Lettuce in Vegetable Fields with Different Phosphorus Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 55-59. |
[7] | FAN Shanshan, CHEN Juan, WU Changchun, WANG Rui, ZHANG Xingang, CHEN Xiaohui, GAO Fei, WU Wenqiang. Effect of Alginic Acid Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Strawberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 60-65. |
[8] | DING Hao, GAO Haitao, BI Xiangjun, LI Shengdong. Effects of Different Sowing Methods on Yield Components and Flag Leaf Photosynthetic Characteristics of Winter Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 9-19. |
[9] | PANG Yinghua, GU Wanfan, JIN Xin, ZHANG Zhouna, JIN Yahui, ZHENG Hongfu. Soil Nutrient Status and Fertility Quality Evaluation of Jingshan Tea Garden in Yuhang District of Hangzhou City [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 97-105. |
[10] | ZHANG Shijie, YANG Bo, WANG Bingang, LIU Yun, ZHANG Xifeng, WANG Wenli, WANG Zeli, LI Shan. Effect of Organic Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Weibei Loess Tableland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 38-46. |
[11] | ZHANG Zhengzhen, MU Ruirui, WANG Jia, XU Can, CHEN Yongwei, ZHANG Zhansheng, WU Hongliang, KANG Jianhong. Effect of Potassium Application Rate on Absorption, Transport and Yield of Maize Potassium [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 47-56. |
[12] | YANG Han, HUANG Zhimou, QU Heping, CHAI Shasha, LI Yuwei, ZHAO Qingchun, QIN Xiaoyin. Effects of Optimal Fertilization on Yield, Nutrient Utilization and Soil Fertility of Edible Sweet Potato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 63-67. |
[13] | YANG Zhiwei, QIAN Aiping, ZHANG Wei, CAO Xiuxia. Effect of Planting Density on Lodging Resistance and Yield of Flax [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 1-5. |
[14] | LUO Li, LI Xiaodan, LIU Xuelu, LIU Xingyu, LI Quanxi, MAO Zixuan, MA Biao. Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Habitat Quality in the West Qinling Mountains Based on Land Use Change from 1990 to 2020 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 101-111. |
[15] | ZHAN Wenjie, ZHOU Ben, ZHU Linxing, WANG Min, ZHU Changtai, SHEN Qirong, GUO Shiwei. Effects of Trichoderma Bio-organic Fertilizer on Salinized Soil Fertility and Yield and Quality of Hang Cabbage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(7): 108-117. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||