Effects of Intercropping of Flue-cured Tobacco and Aromatic Plants on Growth, Development, Yield and Quality of Tobacco Plants

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0571

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the effect of intercropping of flue-cured tobacco and aromatic plants on the growth, development, yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco, field experiments were carried out to study the intercropping of flue-cured tobacco with lily, chrysanthemum, citronella and purple jasmine. The results showed that the effect of aromatic plant intercropping on plant height, stem circumference and pitch of flue-cured tobacco was not obvious, but the leaf area of different parts of flue-cured tobacco decreased to a certain extent. Intercropping with lily and chrysanthemum could increase nicotine and potassium content of flue-cured tobacco in middle leaf, and reduce sugar content at the same time. Nitrogen-alkali ratio and sugar-alkali ratio of upper and middle leaves were closer to the standard range of high quality tobacco leaves. The intercropping of flue-cured tobacco and aromatic plants mainly had significant effects on the aroma quality, irritation and strength of flue-cured tobacco, among which the treatment of lily and citronella intercropped with flue-cured tobacco had the most significant improvement on the sensory quality of flue-cured tobacco. Flue-cured tobacco intercropping with lily had the most significant effect on flue-cured tobacco yield, output value, average price, the proportion of high-grade tobacco and the proportion of middle leaves. In general, the intercropping of flue-cured tobacco with lily has the best effect on the growth, development, yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco.

Key words: flue-cured tobacco, aromatic plants, intercropping, growth and development, yield and quality

ZHANG Xi, LIANG Zengfa, LUO Qiang, CAI Zhengxue, LI Huaiyuan. Effects of Intercropping of Flue-cured Tobacco and Aromatic Plants on Growth, Development, Yield and Quality of Tobacco Plants[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(19): 7-11.

Figures/Tables 4

References 25

[1]	汤宏, 刘文祥, 曾掌权, 等. 烤烟连作障碍产生的原因及消减措施研究进展[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2022(10):107-110.
[2]	谭小兵, 朱媛, 杨焕文, 等. 烤烟根系分泌物自毒效应研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(7):1518-1522.
[3]	钟淑敏, 廖晓兰. 作物自毒作用研究进展[J]. 作物研究, 2022, 36(3):269-274.
[4]	刘福童, 李茂森, 闫超超, 等. 烤烟连作条件下土壤微生物群落结构变化及驱动因素分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2023, 42(2):139-146.
[5]	刘卉, 张黎明, 周清明, 等. 烤烟连作下连续施用生物炭对烤烟黑胫病、干物质及产质量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(7):1435-1441. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.07.1435
[6]	张雪, 王一帆, 高玉红, 等. 胡麻与禾豆间作对其光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2023, 32(7):983-993.
[7]	雷雲翔, 陆思豪, 应晓成, 等. 不同间作方式对玉米/大豆的光合性能、产量和土壤微生态特征的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2023, 40(3):610-618.
[8]	景艺卓, 郭笑恒, 王晓丽, 等. 间作生姜对烤烟产质量、土壤细菌数量及理化性质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2022, 54(1):86-94.
[9]	许代香, 杨建峰, 苏杭, 等. 间作模式下作物根际土壤代谢物对微生物群落的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(11):65-80. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2023005
[10]	刘冰冰, 郭书贤, 陈兴, 等. 烤烟K326与香料植物间作模式下根际土可培养细菌多样性及功能[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47(8):2436-2449.
[11]	郭向阳. 6种食用芳香植物挥发性成分的GC-MS/GC-O分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(18):299-307.
[12]	朱小洁, 周翔宇, 范航, 等. 9种唇形科芳香植物挥发性萜类成分的比较分析[J]. 植物研究, 2020, 40(5):696-705. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2020.05.008
[13]	郇兆蔚, 欧巧明, 丁兰. 3种天然二萜的化感作用及机制的研究[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(1):81-92. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2022.01.009
[14]	平晓燕, 王铁梅. 植物化感作用的生态学意义及在草地生态系统中的研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(8):175-184. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2017383
[15]	高菲菲, 祁文龙, 邓秀梅, 等. 烤烟间作不同芳香植物对土壤养分的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(6):1612-1613.
[16]	张开虹, 桑维钧, 何世芳, 等. 不同作物间作对烤烟根际土壤细菌群落组成及功能的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2020, 48(04):80-86.
[17]	周德海, 高峰, 王在军, 等. 间作桔梗对烤烟主要农艺性状及效益的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2014, 46(9):60-62.
[18]	卜令铎, 计思贵, 李江舟, 等. 赤霉素对玉溪山地和坝地烤烟上部叶开片和产质量的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2018, 51(6):9-18.
[19]	郁进元, 何岩, 赵忠福, 等. 长宽法测定作物叶面积的校正系数研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2007(2):37-39.
[20]	韩富根. 烟草品质分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2014:41-56.
[21]	刘国顺. 烟草栽培学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2017:12-21.
[22]	彭晟, 陈兴, 杨莹, 等. 间作芳香植物对烤烟农艺和经济性状的影响初探[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2014, 29(1):144-148.
[23]	刘涛, 曹建敏, 郭存, 等. 不同烤烟品种化学成分及致香物质差异分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2023, 44(2):74-82.
[24]	张志灵, 林隆, 张炳辉, 等. 不同部位烤烟主要化学成分特征及其与感官评吸质量的关系[J]. 江西农业学报, 2022, 34(6):28-33.
[25]	周文, 郭笑恒, 徐锐. 烤烟间作半夏对烤烟生长及产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(7):161-169.

处理	株高/cm	节距/cm	茎围/cm	叶面积/cm²
处理	株高/cm	节距/cm	茎围/cm	上部叶	中部叶	下部叶
CK	106.33±2.12a	5.84±0.24a	13.25±0.17a	2625.72±4.53a	3088.70±0.53a	3332.46±6.60a
T₁	106.33±1.98a	5.39±0.20a	13.17±0.48a	2367.97±1.10e	2720.11±3.44d	3286.43±2.19a
T₂	108.17±3.91a	5.30±0.27a	12.83±0.25a	2495.63±3.33c	2636.63±9.12e	2771.20±2.85b
T₃	102.83±2.65a	5.24±0.20a	13.50±0.55a	2546.04±8.81b	2852.48±4.52c	3307.49±3.01a
T₄	104.00±1.51a	5.29±0.08a	13.67±0.65a	2388.25±3.15d	2992.61±3.56b	2630.87±7.55b

处理	株高/cm	节距/cm	茎围/cm	叶面积/cm²
处理	株高/cm	节距/cm	茎围/cm	上部叶	中部叶	下部叶
CK	106.33±2.12a	5.84±0.24a	13.25±0.17a	2625.72±4.53a	3088.70±0.53a	3332.46±6.60a
T₁	106.33±1.98a	5.39±0.20a	13.17±0.48a	2367.97±1.10e	2720.11±3.44d	3286.43±2.19a
T₂	108.17±3.91a	5.30±0.27a	12.83±0.25a	2495.63±3.33c	2636.63±9.12e	2771.20±2.85b
T₃	102.83±2.65a	5.24±0.20a	13.50±0.55a	2546.04±8.81b	2852.48±4.52c	3307.49±3.01a
T₄	104.00±1.51a	5.29±0.08a	13.67±0.65a	2388.25±3.15d	2992.61±3.56b	2630.87±7.55b

部位	处理	烟碱/%	总糖/%	还原糖/%	总氮/%	钾/%	氮碱比	糖碱比
上部叶	CK	3.21±0.01a	16.54±0.42a	13.94±0.16a	2.09±0.09b	2.55±0.23a	0.65±0.28b	5.15±0.15b
	T₁	3.29±0.03a	16.08±0.75a	13.35±0.58a	2.13±0.05b	2.61±0.06a	0.65±0.17b	4.89±0.24b
	T₂	3.62±0.01a	15.90±0.86a	13.06±0.62a	2.07±0.05b	2.33±0.04a	0.57±0.32b	4.39±0.24b
	T₃	3.24±0.03a	15.28±0.52a	12.14±0.29a	2.12±0.06b	2.83±0.03a	0.65±0.30b	4.72±0.17b
	T₄	2.21±0.01b	15.63±1.37a	12.97±0.97a	2.37±0.04b	2.53±0.08a	1.07±0.41a	7.07±0.62a
中部叶	CK	1.44±0.01d	19.57±0.37a	15.92±0.38a	2.01±0.04a	3.27±0.16b	1.40±0.02d	13.59±0.26b
	T₁	1.85±0.01c	17.94±0.12bc	13.65±0.14b	2.00±0.08a	3.83±0.03a	1.08±0.19c	9.70±0.07c
	T₂	1.96±0.01b	17.26±0.23c	15.15±0.24a	1.96±0.06a	3.90±0.08a	1.00±0.09e	8.81±0.12d
	T₃	1.25±0.01e	20.31±0.17a	13.74±0.17b	1.93±0.09a	3.16±0.08b	1.54±0.19a	16.25±0.12a
	T₄	2.00±0.01a	18.47±0.25b	13.74±0.15b	2.07±0.06a	3.68±0.17a	1.04±0.10b	9.24±0.13cd

部位	处理	烟碱/%	总糖/%	还原糖/%	总氮/%	钾/%	氮碱比	糖碱比
上部叶	CK	3.21±0.01a	16.54±0.42a	13.94±0.16a	2.09±0.09b	2.55±0.23a	0.65±0.28b	5.15±0.15b
	T₁	3.29±0.03a	16.08±0.75a	13.35±0.58a	2.13±0.05b	2.61±0.06a	0.65±0.17b	4.89±0.24b
	T₂	3.62±0.01a	15.90±0.86a	13.06±0.62a	2.07±0.05b	2.33±0.04a	0.57±0.32b	4.39±0.24b
	T₃	3.24±0.03a	15.28±0.52a	12.14±0.29a	2.12±0.06b	2.83±0.03a	0.65±0.30b	4.72±0.17b
	T₄	2.21±0.01b	15.63±1.37a	12.97±0.97a	2.37±0.04b	2.53±0.08a	1.07±0.41a	7.07±0.62a
中部叶	CK	1.44±0.01d	19.57±0.37a	15.92±0.38a	2.01±0.04a	3.27±0.16b	1.40±0.02d	13.59±0.26b
	T₁	1.85±0.01c	17.94±0.12bc	13.65±0.14b	2.00±0.08a	3.83±0.03a	1.08±0.19c	9.70±0.07c
	T₂	1.96±0.01b	17.26±0.23c	15.15±0.24a	1.96±0.06a	3.90±0.08a	1.00±0.09e	8.81±0.12d
	T₃	1.25±0.01e	20.31±0.17a	13.74±0.17b	1.93±0.09a	3.16±0.08b	1.54±0.19a	16.25±0.12a
	T₄	2.00±0.01a	18.47±0.25b	13.74±0.15b	2.07±0.06a	3.68±0.17a	1.04±0.10b	9.24±0.13cd

处理	香气质	香气量	浓度	杂气	刺激性	余味	劲头	甜度
CK	6.49b	6.80a	6.59a	6.50a	6.20b	6.50a	4.50b	3.50a
T₁	6.90a	6.70a	6.80a	6.40a	6.50a	6.50a	4.70a	3.30a
T₂	6.50b	6.80a	6.50a	6.30a	6.00b	6.30a	4.50b	3.50a
T₃	6.50b	6.80a	6.50a	6.50a	6.50a	6.50a	4.80a	3.40a
T₄	6.50b	6.80a	6.80a	6.30a	6.20b	6.30a	4.50b	3.40a