Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (21): 99-105.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0759
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Xinhui1,2(), ZHOU Qingyun2,3, XU Chao2(
), WU Meiyan3, SHUAI Hong1(
), ZHANG Quan2, ZHU Qihong2, ZHU Hanhua2, HUANG Daoyou2
Received:
2023-10-25
Revised:
2024-03-07
Online:
2024-07-25
Published:
2024-07-11
ZHANG Xinhui, ZHOU Qingyun, XU Chao, WU Meiyan, SHUAI Hong, ZHANG Quan, ZHU Qihong, ZHU Hanhua, HUANG Daoyou. Immobilization Remediation Effect of Several Passivation Materials on Heavy Metals in Soil of Lead Smelting Sites[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(21): 99-105.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0759
供试土壤 | pH | CEC/ (cmol/kg) | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 全氮/ (g/kg) | 重金属全量/(mg/kg) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cd | Pb | Zn | Mn | Fe | ||||||
济源某铅冶炼场地土壤 | 7.84 | 12.3 | 19.64 | 0.012 | 1.63 | 361.5 | 2728 | 771 | 618 | 30168 |
株洲某铅冶炼场地土壤 | 7.20 | 12.4 | 4.64 | 5.59 | 0.66 | 40.76 | 447 | 1621 | 588 | 26625 |
水泥 | 12.65 | 8.2 | 13.29 | 0.38 | 0.5 | 1.28 | 27.40 | 237 | 6492 | 24885 |
改性生物炭 | 7.93 | 17.0 | 107.97 | 14.37 | 8.25 | 0.21 | 4.46 | 61.57 | 14427 | 2315 |
改性谷壳灰 | 6.78 | 7.3 | 71.35 | 19.46 | 3.00 | 0.50 | 9.84 | 77.47 | 10775 | 1057 |
供试土壤 | pH | CEC/ (cmol/kg) | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 全氮/ (g/kg) | 重金属全量/(mg/kg) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cd | Pb | Zn | Mn | Fe | ||||||
济源某铅冶炼场地土壤 | 7.84 | 12.3 | 19.64 | 0.012 | 1.63 | 361.5 | 2728 | 771 | 618 | 30168 |
株洲某铅冶炼场地土壤 | 7.20 | 12.4 | 4.64 | 5.59 | 0.66 | 40.76 | 447 | 1621 | 588 | 26625 |
水泥 | 12.65 | 8.2 | 13.29 | 0.38 | 0.5 | 1.28 | 27.40 | 237 | 6492 | 24885 |
改性生物炭 | 7.93 | 17.0 | 107.97 | 14.37 | 8.25 | 0.21 | 4.46 | 61.57 | 14427 | 2315 |
改性谷壳灰 | 6.78 | 7.3 | 71.35 | 19.46 | 3.00 | 0.50 | 9.84 | 77.47 | 10775 | 1057 |
指标 | 浓度/ % | 济源某铅冶炼场地土壤 | 株洲某铅冶炼场地土壤 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水泥 | 改性生物炭 | 改性谷壳灰 | 水泥 | 改性生物炭 | 改性谷壳灰 | ||||||||
pH | 0 | 8.01±0.00 b | A | 8.01±0.00 a | A | 8.01±0.00 a | A | 8.03±0.03 d | A | 8.03±0.03 a | A | 8.03±0.03 a | A |
1 | 8.90±0.03 a | 7.74±0.01 b | 7.90±0.01 b | 8.92±0.04 c | 7.94±0.01 b | 7.99±0.00 ab | |||||||
2 | 9.45±0.04 a | 7.54±0.00 c | 7.53±0.02 c | 9.40±0.03 b | 7.79±0.01 c | 7.93±0.02 b | |||||||
4 | 9.85±0.12 a | 7.50±0.05 d | 7.31±0.02 d | 9.79±0.01 a | 7.63±0.03 d | 7.82±0.03 c | |||||||
DTPA-Cd/ (mg/kg) | 0 | 139.81±1.77 a | B | 139.81±1.77 a | A | 139.81±1.77 a | A | 9.43±0.21 a | B | 9.43±0.21 a | A | 9.43±0.21 a | A |
1 | 91.83±0.82 b | 137.03±1.47 a | 148.7±1.13 a | 3.81±0.15 b | 7.07±0.19 b | 7.32±0.05 b | |||||||
2 | 82.32±0.7 c | 132.43±3.25 a | 132.71±3.13 a | 3.17±0.06 c | 6.53±0.07 c | 6.85±0.05 c | |||||||
4 | 65.57±0.3 d | 114.65±1.73 b | 118.98±0.89 b | 2.53±0.06 d | 5.68±0.07 d | 6.58±0.03 c | |||||||
DTPA-Pb/ (mg/kg) | 0 | 514.1±13.1 a | A | 514.1±13.1 a | A | 514.1±13.1 a | A | 280.1±10.6 a | A | 280.1±10.6 a | A | 280.1±10.6 a | A |
1 | 403.2±5.3 b | 425.4±6.7 b | 506.4±17.5 a | 172.5±6.8 b | 182.4±5.9 b | 197.5±11.04 b | |||||||
2 | 354.49±4.0 c | 386.9±11.2 b | 409.3±174 b | 156.1±2.6 b | 134.4±4.2 c | 165.6±7.8 b | |||||||
4 | 284.1±5.6 d | 319.9±6.8 c | 322.3±5.0 c | 158.0±5.6 b | 103.3±2.0 d | 128.5±1.5 c | |||||||
DTPA-Zn/ (mg/kg) | 0 | 46.92±0.86 a | B | 46.92±0.86 c | A | 46.92±0.86 d | A | 76.98±2.07 a | B | 76.98±2.07 a | A | 76.98±2.07 a | A |
1 | 36.2±0.64 b | 61.98±1.32 b | 63.63±1.48 c | 46.35±2.28 b | 72.2±1.96 a | 72.6±1.35 a | |||||||
2 | 37.92±0.11 b | 69.35±1.85 a | 69.21±1.84 b | 37.26±1.55 c | 72.01±9.22 a | 77.66±5.76 a | |||||||
4 | 29.78±0.44 c | 69.77±1.61 a | 76.49±1.17 a | 31.28±0.37 c | 76.40±1.52 a | 79.18±2.03 a | |||||||
DTPA-Fe/ (mg/kg) | 0 | 16.15±0.34 c | A | 16.15±0.34 a | B | 16.15±0.34 b | B | 11.18±0.15 c | A | 11.18±0.24 a | B | 11.18±0.24 a | B |
1 | 17.36±0.75 c | 12.47±0.15 b | 17.41±0.18 a | 10.82±0.22 c | 8.64±0.07 b | 10.60±0.09 b | |||||||
2 | 24.48±0.24 b | 11.6±0.41 bc | 16.11±0.32 b | 16.20±0.29 b | 8.73±0.08 b | 10.34±0.06 b | |||||||
4 | 35.96±1.2 a | 10.76±0.28 c | 14.62±0.16 c | 27.16±0.38 a | 7.75±0.09 c | 9.84±0.11 c | |||||||
DTPA-Mn/ (mg/kg) | 0 | 14.08±0.87 a | C | 14.08±0.87 c | A | 14.08±0.87 c | B | 32.24±2.74 a | B | 32.24±2.74 d | A | 32.24±2.74 b | B |
1 | 13.32±1.99 a | 49.19±8.47 b | 34.76±3.59 b | 13.52±0.33 b | 60.72±1.36 c | 32.92±1.45 b | |||||||
2 | 12.66±0.71 a | 56.28±0.86 ab | 41.07±0.5 b | 10.83±0.12 b | 107.21±3.55 b | 38.26±0.62 b | |||||||
4 | 12.14±0.47 a | 71.77±0.25 a | 54.95±0.49 a | 9.96±0.22 b | 205.90±7.80 a | 55.95±5.08 a |
指标 | 浓度/ % | 济源某铅冶炼场地土壤 | 株洲某铅冶炼场地土壤 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水泥 | 改性生物炭 | 改性谷壳灰 | 水泥 | 改性生物炭 | 改性谷壳灰 | ||||||||
pH | 0 | 8.01±0.00 b | A | 8.01±0.00 a | A | 8.01±0.00 a | A | 8.03±0.03 d | A | 8.03±0.03 a | A | 8.03±0.03 a | A |
1 | 8.90±0.03 a | 7.74±0.01 b | 7.90±0.01 b | 8.92±0.04 c | 7.94±0.01 b | 7.99±0.00 ab | |||||||
2 | 9.45±0.04 a | 7.54±0.00 c | 7.53±0.02 c | 9.40±0.03 b | 7.79±0.01 c | 7.93±0.02 b | |||||||
4 | 9.85±0.12 a | 7.50±0.05 d | 7.31±0.02 d | 9.79±0.01 a | 7.63±0.03 d | 7.82±0.03 c | |||||||
DTPA-Cd/ (mg/kg) | 0 | 139.81±1.77 a | B | 139.81±1.77 a | A | 139.81±1.77 a | A | 9.43±0.21 a | B | 9.43±0.21 a | A | 9.43±0.21 a | A |
1 | 91.83±0.82 b | 137.03±1.47 a | 148.7±1.13 a | 3.81±0.15 b | 7.07±0.19 b | 7.32±0.05 b | |||||||
2 | 82.32±0.7 c | 132.43±3.25 a | 132.71±3.13 a | 3.17±0.06 c | 6.53±0.07 c | 6.85±0.05 c | |||||||
4 | 65.57±0.3 d | 114.65±1.73 b | 118.98±0.89 b | 2.53±0.06 d | 5.68±0.07 d | 6.58±0.03 c | |||||||
DTPA-Pb/ (mg/kg) | 0 | 514.1±13.1 a | A | 514.1±13.1 a | A | 514.1±13.1 a | A | 280.1±10.6 a | A | 280.1±10.6 a | A | 280.1±10.6 a | A |
1 | 403.2±5.3 b | 425.4±6.7 b | 506.4±17.5 a | 172.5±6.8 b | 182.4±5.9 b | 197.5±11.04 b | |||||||
2 | 354.49±4.0 c | 386.9±11.2 b | 409.3±174 b | 156.1±2.6 b | 134.4±4.2 c | 165.6±7.8 b | |||||||
4 | 284.1±5.6 d | 319.9±6.8 c | 322.3±5.0 c | 158.0±5.6 b | 103.3±2.0 d | 128.5±1.5 c | |||||||
DTPA-Zn/ (mg/kg) | 0 | 46.92±0.86 a | B | 46.92±0.86 c | A | 46.92±0.86 d | A | 76.98±2.07 a | B | 76.98±2.07 a | A | 76.98±2.07 a | A |
1 | 36.2±0.64 b | 61.98±1.32 b | 63.63±1.48 c | 46.35±2.28 b | 72.2±1.96 a | 72.6±1.35 a | |||||||
2 | 37.92±0.11 b | 69.35±1.85 a | 69.21±1.84 b | 37.26±1.55 c | 72.01±9.22 a | 77.66±5.76 a | |||||||
4 | 29.78±0.44 c | 69.77±1.61 a | 76.49±1.17 a | 31.28±0.37 c | 76.40±1.52 a | 79.18±2.03 a | |||||||
DTPA-Fe/ (mg/kg) | 0 | 16.15±0.34 c | A | 16.15±0.34 a | B | 16.15±0.34 b | B | 11.18±0.15 c | A | 11.18±0.24 a | B | 11.18±0.24 a | B |
1 | 17.36±0.75 c | 12.47±0.15 b | 17.41±0.18 a | 10.82±0.22 c | 8.64±0.07 b | 10.60±0.09 b | |||||||
2 | 24.48±0.24 b | 11.6±0.41 bc | 16.11±0.32 b | 16.20±0.29 b | 8.73±0.08 b | 10.34±0.06 b | |||||||
4 | 35.96±1.2 a | 10.76±0.28 c | 14.62±0.16 c | 27.16±0.38 a | 7.75±0.09 c | 9.84±0.11 c | |||||||
DTPA-Mn/ (mg/kg) | 0 | 14.08±0.87 a | C | 14.08±0.87 c | A | 14.08±0.87 c | B | 32.24±2.74 a | B | 32.24±2.74 d | A | 32.24±2.74 b | B |
1 | 13.32±1.99 a | 49.19±8.47 b | 34.76±3.59 b | 13.52±0.33 b | 60.72±1.36 c | 32.92±1.45 b | |||||||
2 | 12.66±0.71 a | 56.28±0.86 ab | 41.07±0.5 b | 10.83±0.12 b | 107.21±3.55 b | 38.26±0.62 b | |||||||
4 | 12.14±0.47 a | 71.77±0.25 a | 54.95±0.49 a | 9.96±0.22 b | 205.90±7.80 a | 55.95±5.08 a |
pH | DTPA-Cd | DTPA-Pb | DTPA-Zn | DTPA-Fe | DTPA-Mn | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 1 | -0.283** | -0.128 | -0.806** | 0.730** | -0.553** |
DTPA-Cd | 1 | 0.944** | 0.069 | 0.185 | -0.157 | |
DTPA-Pb | 1 | -0.026 | 0.262** | -0.305** | ||
DTPA-Zn | 1 | -0.595** | 0.516** | |||
DTPA-Fe | 1 | -0.528** | ||||
DTPA-Mn | 1 |
pH | DTPA-Cd | DTPA-Pb | DTPA-Zn | DTPA-Fe | DTPA-Mn | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 1 | -0.283** | -0.128 | -0.806** | 0.730** | -0.553** |
DTPA-Cd | 1 | 0.944** | 0.069 | 0.185 | -0.157 | |
DTPA-Pb | 1 | -0.026 | 0.262** | -0.305** | ||
DTPA-Zn | 1 | -0.595** | 0.516** | |||
DTPA-Fe | 1 | -0.528** | ||||
DTPA-Mn | 1 |
[1] |
doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2023.02.007 pmid: 37778831 |
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
曹心德, 魏晓欣, 代革联, 等. 土壤重金属复合污染及其化学钝化修复技术研究进展[J]. 环境工程学报, 2011, 5(7):1441-1453.
|
[5] |
吴霄霄, 曹榕彬, 米长虹, 等. 重金属污染农田原位钝化修复材料研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019, 36(3):253-263.
|
[6] |
周青云. 固化/钝化材料对铅冶炼场地土壤中Cd、Pb、Zn的固定效果研究[D]. 武汉: 长江大学, 2023:1-3.
|
[7] |
吕浩阳, 费杨, 王爱勤, 等. 甘肃白银东大沟铅锌镉复合污染场地水泥固化稳定化原位修复[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(9):3897-3906.
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
易轩韬, 欧阳坤, 辜娇峰, 等. 谷壳灰硅肥改善土壤质量降低水稻镉砷累积的效应[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 40(7):2581-2588.
|
[10] |
郭炳跃, 杨锟鹏, 张璟, 等. 二氧化锰/氨基改性生物炭对铅、镉复合污染土壤的钝化修复研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2023, 39(3):422-428.
|
[11] |
李晓晖, 艾仙斌, 李亮, 等. 新型改性稻壳生物炭材料对镉污染土壤钝化效果的研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(9):1901-1908.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.09.021 |
[12] |
苏焱, 全妍红, 宦紫嫣, 等. 磷改性生物炭对云南某铅锌矿周边农田铅锌污染土壤修复效果的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(3):93-102.
|
[13] |
张学庆, 费宇红, 田夏, 等. 磷改性生物炭对Pb、Cd复合污染土壤的钝化效果[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2017, 39(9):1017-1020.
|
[14] |
郝金才, 李柱, 吴龙华, 等. 铅镉高污染土壤的钝化材料筛选及其修复效果初探[J]. 土壤, 2019, 51(4):752-759.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第3版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000:163-165.
|
[17] |
鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2000:24-26.
|
[18] |
刘千钧, 李想, 周阳媚, 等. 针铁矿-富里酸复合材料对铅镉污染土壤的钝化修复性能[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(12):5623-5628.
|
[19] |
刘雅, 辜娇峰, 周航, 等. 谷壳灰对稻田土壤镉、砷生物有效性及糙米镉、砷累积的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2020, 40(7):2581-2588.
|
[20] |
戴胜伟, 王方园, 王磊, 等. 改性山竹壳钝化Cd、Cu、Zn复合污染土壤的研究[J]. 环境保护科学, 2022, 48(2):109-115.
|
[21] |
史力争, 陈惠康, 吴川, 等. 赤泥及其复合钝化剂对土壤铅、镉和砷的稳定效应[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2018, 35(5):617-626.
doi: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2018.05.008 |
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
李伟亚, 刘希灵, 李志贤, 等. 生物炭对湘潭锰矿区土壤重金属的固化效应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(7):122-128.
|
[25] |
姚梦东. 磷改性生物炭的制备及其对重金属镉和铅的吸附机制研究[D]. 天津: 天津理工大学, 2022:27-28.
|
[26] |
刘蕾. 磷基改性生物炭的制备及对铅镉污染土壤的钝化修复[D]. 长安: 长安大学, 2022:1.
|
[27] |
doi: S0045-6535(17)30239-4 pmid: 28235742 |
[28] |
李哲泳. 制备改性稻壳炭对水体和土壤中Cd和Se的吸附固定及机制研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2021:37-38.
|
[1] | LI Dongxue, LIU Xinyuan, SONG Zhengxiong, LI Haohao, ZHAO Shimin, WANG Yiliu, HUAN Weiwei, WANG Huoyan, LU Dianjun, CHEN Xiaoqin, WANG Yujie. Potassium Conversion Characteristics of Mineral Potassium Fertilizer in Chinese Typical Tobacco-planting Soil and Preliminary Evaluation of Increasing Potassium Content in Tobacco Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(21): 84-90. |
[2] | LV Yuze, CAI Baiyan. Research Progress on AMF-mediated Mycorrhizal Plants Resistance to Heavy Metal Pb Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(2): 77-83. |
[3] | XU Xiao, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Mingkui, HUANG Qiaoling, YIN Xianyuan. Remediation Effect and Safety Evaluation of Different Passivation Materials Applied in Cadmium and Arsenic Compound Contaminated Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(17): 43-48. |
[4] | YANG Xiaojun, ZHANG Tangwei, CI Rendeji, WU Xuelian. Effect of Pb and As Interaction on Quality of Highland Barley [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(14): 148-156. |
[5] | HUANG Renquan, YUAN Ting, SONG Lala, QIN Lijun. Reduction of As Accumulation by Heterologous Expression of Halomonas Peripheral Phosphate-binding Protein Gene PBP in Transgenic Tobaccos [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(12): 70-79. |
[6] | ZHAO Wei, ZHAO Chuanyue, KONG Hao, XIE Xingtong, WANG Li. Comparison of Combined Transformation Ability of Pleurotus pulmonarius and Protaetia brevitarsis Larvae to 11 Kinds of Forest Fruit Branch Waste [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(11): 134-141. |
[7] | PAN Hongyang, ZHANG Kai, FAN Xiaoxu. Effects of Soil Factors on Atrazine Adsorption Kinetics and Microbial Remediation of Contaminated Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 97-104. |
[8] | TENG Bingqin, MA Qianqian, WU Jun, DUAN Xuejiao, BI Dongmei, CAI Liqun. Effects of Biochar Addition on Cd Enrichment in Lettuce [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 90-96. |
[9] | LIU Yuanyuan, TU Guoliang. Available Trace Elements in Cultivated Soil in Pingliang City: Abundance and Deficiency Evaluation and Influencing Factors [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 83-92. |
[10] | WANG Hang, YAO Yuanhua, ZHANG Dandan, LIU Lan, ZHU Wenge, QIU Miaowen. Research Progress on Key Technologies for Improving the Availability of Upper Flue-cured Tobacco Leaves in Northern Guangdong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(34): 16-21. |
[11] | LV Bolong, LI Guozhu. Differential Analysis of Organic Acids in Different Origins of Raspberry based on HPLC Combined with Multivariate Statistical Methods [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(29): 129-136. |
[12] | ZHANG Wei, CHANG Feiyang, ZHANG Peiyan, ZHANG Peifeng, ZHANG Xuemei. The Response of the Main Functional Components of Red Raspberry Fruit and Leaves to Organic Fertilizer Application [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(27): 36-44. |
[13] | ZHANG Yujia, LI Guanghui, CHEN Hong. Study on Remediation of Acidic Cadmium Contaminated Soil by Lime and Organic Material [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(27): 52-58. |
[14] | PENG Jie, LIU Yin, WU Ronghua, FENG Hui, CHAN Yuan, YANG Yipeng, ZHANG Hua. Research Progress of Double Flower and Its Molecular Mechanism [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(19): 65-72. |
[15] | LIU Shuhong, CHEN Jin, JIANG Huidan, HU Zhixin, HE Aiguo, DAI Yanjiao. Sedum plumbizincicola Straw Drying with Different De-Enzyme Methods [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(18): 61-66. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||