Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Soil Properties of Greenhouse Vegetable

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0060

Abstract

Abstract:

Taking ‘Shanghaiqing’ as the object, the effects of 4 different types of bio-organic fertilizer on the yield, quality and soil properties of greenhouse vegetable were studied to determine the best bio-organic fertilizer type suitable for promotion in Yuhang district, Hangzhou. The results showed that the application of bio-organic fertilizer could promote the growth of green vegetable, increase chlorophyll concentration, improve agronomic traits and increase biological yield. Compared with the control group, the application of Original bio-organic fertilizer had the best effect on promoting growth and increasing yield, with plant height, leaf number, root length and biological yield increased by 19.1%, 11.7%, 27.7% and 9.2%. Senjing bio-organic fertilizer had the second effect, which increased plant height, leaf number, root length and biological yield by 16.0%, 14.5%, 17.5% and 6.6%. In addition, the application of bio-organic fertilizer could enhance soil organic matter and nutrient content. The contents of organic matter, alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen, available potassium and available phosphorus were increased by 6.7%, 18.4%, 4.9% and 2.2%, respectively. Among them, the application of Tanggu bio-organic fertilizer had the largest increase in soil alkaline hydrolyzed nitrogen and available potassium, and the application of Zhinong bio-organic fertilizer and Original bio-organic fertilizer had the largest increase in soil organic matter content. Based on the above results, the Original bio-organic fertilizer and the Senjing bio-organic fertilizer could be used as the advantageous fertilizers for demonstration and popularization in the greenhouse vegetable in this region.

Key words: bio-organic fertilizer, greenhouse vegetable, growth, yield, soil

SU Guijun, LOU Ling, LI Dan, SHEN Jianguo, CHEN Haoran, HE Linhai, WANG Jingwen. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Soil Properties of Greenhouse Vegetable[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(34): 105-110.

Figures/Tables 10

References 25

[1]	张庆, 胡春胜, 刘彬彬, 等. 生物有机肥配施化肥对生菜生长和土壤环境的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2023, 31(5):725-741.
[2]	马力, 陈永忠, 陈隆升, 等. 生物有机肥的应用现状及前景展望[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2013(5):142-143.
[3]	王立刚, 李维炯, 邱建军, 等. 生物有机肥对作物生长、土壤肥力及产量的效益研究[J]. 土壤肥料, 2014(5):12-16.
[4]	王国中, 张亚平, 肖艳, 等. 生物有机肥在黄瓜上的应用效果研究[J]. 中国果菜, 2017, 37(11):77-79.
[5]	余剑, 王鑫, 刘海衡, 等. 生物有机肥在早春设施番茄上的应用效果研究[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2021(10):62-65.
[6]	陈胜文, 何国平, 陈纯秀, 等. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对蔬菜产量和品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(5):1160-1163. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20220663
[7]	范立慧, 何林海, 楼玲, 等. 生物有机肥在大棚青菜上的应用效果初探[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(5):916-918. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20220189
[8]	梁嘉伟, 余炜敏, 姚钰玲, 等. 生物有机肥对土壤质量及蔬菜产量的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(3):497-503. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.03.008
[9]	付丽军, 张爱敏, 王向东, 等. 生物有机肥改良设施蔬菜土壤的研究进展[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(3):1-5.
[10]	陆慧. 生物有机肥化肥配施对拱圆大棚土壤性状及茄子生长的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2023.
[11]	林瑞, 任海英, 安笑笑, 等. 生物有机肥对杨梅凋萎病防控及其树势恢复的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(7):1096-1104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2019.07.09
[12]	郑锡良, 任海英, 戚行江, 等. 生物有机肥复壮杨梅树势及改良果实品质的效应[J]. 中国南方果树, 2015, 44(6):59-62.
[13]	孔海民, 陆若辉, 曹雪仙, 等. 生物有机肥对葡萄品质、产量及土壤特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(1):77-79. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20212241
[14]	韩科峰, 李火良, 斯林林, 等. 生物有机肥对葡萄产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(8):1782-1784. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20220533
[15]	徐裕伦, 胡庆存, 胡德具, 等. 葡萄施用海晟宝生物有机肥的效果[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2014, 55(7):1025-1027.
[16]	阮学瑞. 配施生物有机肥对浙江红花油茶生长与叶片养分的影响[J]. 林业勘察设计, 2022(3):42-44.
[17]	俞茂昌, 韩文炎. 有机茶专用生物有机肥的示范应用效果[J]. 中国茶叶, 2012, 34(8):13-14.
[18]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,2007:15-18.
[19]	王一旦. 生物有机肥在小青菜上施用效果初探[J]. 上海农业科技, 2012(4):116.
[20]	苏珍英, 陆诚. 生物有机肥在西红柿上的应用效果[J]. 农业工程技术, 2023, 43(4):36-38.
[21]	王若靖, 冯嘉玥. 生物有机肥对盆栽草莓幼苗生长的影响[J]. 河北农机, 2022(18):70-72.
[22]	武金欢, 贺生兵, 郝燕, 等. 增施有机肥料(生物有机肥等)对葡萄的应用效果试验出报[J]. 农业科技与信息, 2023(11):68-72.
[23]	付丽军, 张爱敏, 王向东, 等. 生物有机肥改良设施蔬菜土壤的研究进展[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017, (3):1-5. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20220663
[24]	韦翔华, 李兴华, 冯宏, 等. 不同肥料对后茬土壤微生物及玉米生长的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(2):138-142.
[25]	陈立新, 苏毅, 杜文雅. 植酸酶微生物肥料对蔬菜的促长作用及后效效应[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 35(2):85-88.

处理	株高/cm	叶片数/片	根系长度/cm
T1(CK)	11.31bB	8.06bB	4.26cB
T2	13.47aA	9.00aA	5.40aA
T3	13.12aA	9.23aA	4.97abAB
T4	13.06aAB	9.39aA	4.78abcAB
T5	13.19aAB	9.44aA	4.57bcAB

处理	株高/cm	叶片数/片	根系长度/cm
T1(CK)	11.31bB	8.06bB	4.26cB
T2	13.47aA	9.00aA	5.40aA
T3	13.12aA	9.23aA	4.97abAB
T4	13.06aAB	9.39aA	4.78abcAB
T5	13.19aAB	9.44aA	4.57bcAB

处理	Ⅰ	Ⅱ	Ⅲ	平均	差异性分析
处理	Ⅰ	Ⅱ	Ⅲ	平均	5%	1%
T1(CK)	45.19	45.46	44.73	45.13	b	B
T2	45.92	45.96	45.53	45.80	a	AB
T3	46.30	45.49	46.16	45.98	a	A
T4	45.81	45.76	46.01	45.86	a	AB
T5	45.98	45.80	46.10	45.96	a	A

处理	Ⅰ	Ⅱ	Ⅲ	平均	差异性分析
处理	Ⅰ	Ⅱ	Ⅲ	平均	5%	1%
T1(CK)	45.19	45.46	44.73	45.13	b	B
T2	45.92	45.96	45.53	45.80	a	AB
T3	46.30	45.49	46.16	45.98	a	A
T4	45.81	45.76	46.01	45.86	a	AB
T5	45.98	45.80	46.10	45.96	a	A

处理	株高/cm	总叶片数/片	最大叶长/cm	最大叶宽/cm	叶片厚度/mm	单株重/g
T1(CK)	24.01aA	21.2cB	22.4aA	8.38aA	0.37bA	114.3cB
T2	24.81aA	23.23aA	22.95aA	8.63aA	0.43aA	140.7aA
T3	24.72aA	22.3abAB	22.52aA	8.61aA	0.39bA	139.7aA
T4	23.87aA	22.4bAB	22.25aA	8.34aA	0.38bA	131.3bA
T5	23.54aA	22.17bAB	22.25aA	8.69aA	0.38bA	130.0bA