Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 16-21.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0638
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Ping1(), BI Haibin1, YANG Yunfeng1, ZHUO Ma1, ZHAO Qingqing2, WEN Tinggang3, CHEN Yuli1(
)
Received:
2024-10-23
Revised:
2025-02-10
Online:
2025-04-15
Published:
2025-04-11
LIU Ping, BI Haibin, YANG Yunfeng, ZHUO Ma, ZHAO Qingqing, WEN Tinggang, CHEN Yuli. Effects of Plant Growth Regulators on Growth, Development and Lodging Resistance of Intercropped Soybeans[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(11): 16-21.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0638
处理 | 倒1叶 | 倒2叶 | 倒3叶 |
---|---|---|---|
M1R1 | 46.6ab | 48.3abc | 49.7a |
M1R2 | 48.0ab | 49.9ab | 48.5ab |
M1R3 | 44.4c | 48.2abc | 46.1b |
M1R4 | 47.5ab | 49.4ab | 47.8ab |
M2R1 | 48.6a | 50.4a | 50.2a |
M2R2 | 47.1ab | 47.8bc | 50.2a |
M2R3 | 46.1bc | 46.6c | 48.8ab |
M2R4 | 47.7ab | 49.9ab | 49.6a |
处理 | 倒1叶 | 倒2叶 | 倒3叶 |
---|---|---|---|
M1R1 | 46.6ab | 48.3abc | 49.7a |
M1R2 | 48.0ab | 49.9ab | 48.5ab |
M1R3 | 44.4c | 48.2abc | 46.1b |
M1R4 | 47.5ab | 49.4ab | 47.8ab |
M2R1 | 48.6a | 50.4a | 50.2a |
M2R2 | 47.1ab | 47.8bc | 50.2a |
M2R3 | 46.1bc | 46.6c | 48.8ab |
M2R4 | 47.7ab | 49.9ab | 49.6a |
处理 | 叶层含氮量/% | 叶层氮积累量/(g/m2) | RVI | NDVI | LAI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1R1 | 3.01ab | 0.29ab | 3.55b | 0.56b | 2.22ab |
M1R2 | 3.00ab | 0.29ab | 3.57ab | 0.56b | 2.19ab |
M1R3 | 2.93b | 0.29ab | 3.60ab | 0.55b | 2.18ab |
M1R4 | 2.92b | 0.28b | 3.37b | 0.53b | 2.16b |
M2R1 | 3.09ab | 0.31ab | 3.75ab | 0.57ab | 2.28ab |
M2R2 | 3.22a | 0.34a | 3.99a | 0.60a | 2.44a |
M2R3 | 2.55c | 0.20c | 2.81c | 0.48c | 1.77c |
M2R4 | 2.20d | 0.15c | 2.36d | 0.41d | 1.56c |
处理 | 叶层含氮量/% | 叶层氮积累量/(g/m2) | RVI | NDVI | LAI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1R1 | 3.01ab | 0.29ab | 3.55b | 0.56b | 2.22ab |
M1R2 | 3.00ab | 0.29ab | 3.57ab | 0.56b | 2.19ab |
M1R3 | 2.93b | 0.29ab | 3.60ab | 0.55b | 2.18ab |
M1R4 | 2.92b | 0.28b | 3.37b | 0.53b | 2.16b |
M2R1 | 3.09ab | 0.31ab | 3.75ab | 0.57ab | 2.28ab |
M2R2 | 3.22a | 0.34a | 3.99a | 0.60a | 2.44a |
M2R3 | 2.55c | 0.20c | 2.81c | 0.48c | 1.77c |
M2R4 | 2.20d | 0.15c | 2.36d | 0.41d | 1.56c |
处理 | 茎粗/cm | 茎秆抗折力/N | 地上部干重/(g/株) | 主茎长/cm | 茎秆干重/(g/株) | 茎秆充实度/(g/cm) | 抗倒伏指数(N/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1R1 | 0.716b | 168.72ab | 31.33ab | 77.66a | 7.49bc | 0.10ab | 0.048ab |
M1R2 | 0.737ab | 174.89a | 35.21ab | 75.43a | 8.78a | 0.12a | 0.049ab |
M1R3 | 0.681b | 165.44ab | 30.25b | 73.52a | 7.15bc | 0.10ab | 0.051ab |
M1R4 | 0.701ab | 128.29c | 29.40b | 77.91a | 7.01c | 0.09b | 0.039b |
M2R1 | 0.711ab | 168.19ab | 33.29ab | 76.27a | 8.09abc | 0.11ab | 0.047ab |
M2R2 | 0.731ab | 172.67a | 31.05ab | 73.50a | 7.92abc | 0.11ab | 0.058a |
M2R3 | 0.759ab | 162.87ab | 32.53ab | 69.12a | 8.00abc | 0.12a | 0.056a |
M2R4 | 0.779a | 145.39bc | 36.56a | 76.70a | 8.26ab | 0.11ab | 0.041b |
处理 | 茎粗/cm | 茎秆抗折力/N | 地上部干重/(g/株) | 主茎长/cm | 茎秆干重/(g/株) | 茎秆充实度/(g/cm) | 抗倒伏指数(N/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1R1 | 0.716b | 168.72ab | 31.33ab | 77.66a | 7.49bc | 0.10ab | 0.048ab |
M1R2 | 0.737ab | 174.89a | 35.21ab | 75.43a | 8.78a | 0.12a | 0.049ab |
M1R3 | 0.681b | 165.44ab | 30.25b | 73.52a | 7.15bc | 0.10ab | 0.051ab |
M1R4 | 0.701ab | 128.29c | 29.40b | 77.91a | 7.01c | 0.09b | 0.039b |
M2R1 | 0.711ab | 168.19ab | 33.29ab | 76.27a | 8.09abc | 0.11ab | 0.047ab |
M2R2 | 0.731ab | 172.67a | 31.05ab | 73.50a | 7.92abc | 0.11ab | 0.058a |
M2R3 | 0.759ab | 162.87ab | 32.53ab | 69.12a | 8.00abc | 0.12a | 0.056a |
M2R4 | 0.779a | 145.39bc | 36.56a | 76.70a | 8.26ab | 0.11ab | 0.041b |
处理 | 茎粗/cm | 茎秆抗折力/N | 地上部干重/(g/株) | 主茎长/cm | 茎秆干重/(g/株) | 茎秆充实度/(g/cm) | 抗倒伏指数(N/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1R1 | 0.699a | 198.69bc | 38.33a | 77.59a | 9.69bcd | 0.13bc | 0.047d |
M1R2 | 0.725a | 235.22a | 42.71a | 74.80a | 11.91a | 0.16a | 0.053ab |
M1R3 | 0.729a | 206.83abc | 37.63a | 75.86a | 9.41bcd | 0.12bc | 0.054ab |
M1R4 | 0.701a | 180.63c | 36.54a | 80.52a | 9.13cd | 0.11c | 0.044d |
M2R1 | 0.715a | 202.00bc | 36.63a | 79.83a | 9.90bcd | 0.12bc | 0.050c |
M2R2 | 0.709a | 220.30ab | 36.52a | 78.42a | 10.69ab | 0.14b | 0.055a |
M2R3 | 0.702a | 207.38abc | 37.89a | 76.89a | 10.58abc | 0.14b | 0.051bc |
M2R4 | 0.696a | 194.51bc | 37.01a | 79.16a | 8.77d | 0.11c | 0.046d |
处理 | 茎粗/cm | 茎秆抗折力/N | 地上部干重/(g/株) | 主茎长/cm | 茎秆干重/(g/株) | 茎秆充实度/(g/cm) | 抗倒伏指数(N/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1R1 | 0.699a | 198.69bc | 38.33a | 77.59a | 9.69bcd | 0.13bc | 0.047d |
M1R2 | 0.725a | 235.22a | 42.71a | 74.80a | 11.91a | 0.16a | 0.053ab |
M1R3 | 0.729a | 206.83abc | 37.63a | 75.86a | 9.41bcd | 0.12bc | 0.054ab |
M1R4 | 0.701a | 180.63c | 36.54a | 80.52a | 9.13cd | 0.11c | 0.044d |
M2R1 | 0.715a | 202.00bc | 36.63a | 79.83a | 9.90bcd | 0.12bc | 0.050c |
M2R2 | 0.709a | 220.30ab | 36.52a | 78.42a | 10.69ab | 0.14b | 0.055a |
M2R3 | 0.702a | 207.38abc | 37.89a | 76.89a | 10.58abc | 0.14b | 0.051bc |
M2R4 | 0.696a | 194.51bc | 37.01a | 79.16a | 8.77d | 0.11c | 0.046d |
指标 | 抗倒伏指数/(N/g) | 茎秆抗折力/N | 地上部干重(g/株) | 主茎长/cm | 茎秆干重/(g/株) | 茎秆充实度/(g/cm) | 茎粗/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抗倒伏指数/(N/g) | 1 | ||||||
茎秆抗折力/N | 0.831* | 1 | |||||
地上部干重/(g/株) | 0.293 | 0.705 | 1 | ||||
主茎长/cm | -0.645 | -0.757* | -0.786* | 1 | |||
茎秆干重/(g/株) | 0.651 | 0.897** | 0.732* | -0.633 | 1 | ||
茎秆充实度/(g/cm) | 0.641 | 0.902** | 0.768* | -0.731* | 0.972** | 1 | |
茎粗/cm | 0.724* | 0.614 | 0.461 | -0.619 | 0.457 | 0.384 | 1 |
指标 | 抗倒伏指数/(N/g) | 茎秆抗折力/N | 地上部干重(g/株) | 主茎长/cm | 茎秆干重/(g/株) | 茎秆充实度/(g/cm) | 茎粗/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抗倒伏指数/(N/g) | 1 | ||||||
茎秆抗折力/N | 0.831* | 1 | |||||
地上部干重/(g/株) | 0.293 | 0.705 | 1 | ||||
主茎长/cm | -0.645 | -0.757* | -0.786* | 1 | |||
茎秆干重/(g/株) | 0.651 | 0.897** | 0.732* | -0.633 | 1 | ||
茎秆充实度/(g/cm) | 0.641 | 0.902** | 0.768* | -0.731* | 0.972** | 1 | |
茎粗/cm | 0.724* | 0.614 | 0.461 | -0.619 | 0.457 | 0.384 | 1 |
处理 | 单株荚数/个 | 单株粒数/粒 | 百粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
M1R1 | 25.27ab | 65.93a | 22.71d | 1405.2ab |
M1R2 | 28.93a | 70.00a | 22.74d | 1567.5a |
M1R3 | 26.07ab | 63.33a | 23.09c | 1533.3ab |
M1R4 | 25.33ab | 61.93a | 22.11e | 1285.4b |
M2R1 | 27.73a | 66.13a | 24.65a | 1498.5ab |
M2R2 | 25.47ab | 65.73a | 23.32c | 1528.7ab |
M2R3 | 24.87ab | 62.07a | 23.86b | 1477.2ab |
M2R4 | 20.40b | 50.93b | 23.24c | 1423.1ab |
处理 | 单株荚数/个 | 单株粒数/粒 | 百粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
M1R1 | 25.27ab | 65.93a | 22.71d | 1405.2ab |
M1R2 | 28.93a | 70.00a | 22.74d | 1567.5a |
M1R3 | 26.07ab | 63.33a | 23.09c | 1533.3ab |
M1R4 | 25.33ab | 61.93a | 22.11e | 1285.4b |
M2R1 | 27.73a | 66.13a | 24.65a | 1498.5ab |
M2R2 | 25.47ab | 65.73a | 23.32c | 1528.7ab |
M2R3 | 24.87ab | 62.07a | 23.86b | 1477.2ab |
M2R4 | 20.40b | 50.93b | 23.24c | 1423.1ab |
[1] |
王禹, 李干琼, 喻闻, 等. 中国大豆生产现状与前景展望[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(21):201-207.
|
[2] |
李国清, 丛新军, 李国瑜, 等. 鲁中地区肥料与根瘤菌合理配施对大豆生长的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2021, 40(5):682-687.
|
[3] |
丁娇, 韩晓增, 邹文秀, 等. 长期施肥对大豆生长状况及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(5):778-783.
|
[4] |
邹俊林. 套作大豆苗期茎秆抗倒特征及其与木质素合成的关系研究[D]. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2015.
|
[5] |
王竹, 贺阳冬, 杨继芝, 等. 套作模式下播期对不同熟性大豆茎叶形态及产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2009(8):40-45.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2009.08.011 |
[6] |
刘卫国, 蒋涛, 余跃辉, 等. 大豆苗期茎秆对隐蔽胁迫响应的生理机制初探[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2010, 32(3):395-402.
|
[7] |
钟开珍, 梁江, 韦清源, 等. 大豆种质倒伏性遗传及其与主要农艺性状的相关分析[J]. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(5):703-706.
|
[8] |
贺春林, 李卫东, 薛应离, 等. 夏大豆品种抗倒伏性的遗传研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 1993, 27(2):196-200.
|
[9] |
范冬梅, 杨振, 马占洲, 等. 多环境条件下大豆倒伏性相关形态性状的QTL分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 13(12):2518-2552.
|
[10] |
向达兵, 郭凯, 雷婷, 等. 磷钾营养对套作大豆茎秆形态和抗倒性的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2010, 32(3):395-402.
|
[11] |
梁建秋, 于晓波, 吴海英, 等. 密度及烯效唑喷施对套作大豆南夏豆25抗倒性及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2017, 36(1):33-40.
|
[12] |
田兴. 调节剂混用对大豆抗性酶及抗倒伏性的影响[D]. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2018.
|
[13] |
任果香, 盛晋华, 刘学义, 等. 烯效唑对春大豆生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 现代农业科学, 2008, 15(6):26-28.
|
[14] |
闫艳红, 杨文钰, 杨小丽, 等. 叶面喷施烯效唑对大豆农艺性状的影响[J]. 青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 25(3):215-218.
|
[15] |
万燕, 杨文钰. 不同生长调节剂叶面喷施对套作大豆形态及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2009, 28(1):63-66.
|
[16] |
郭凯. 磷、钾营养对套作大豆钾素积累分配和植株抗倒性能的影响[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2009.
|
[17] |
陈喜凤, 孙宁, 谷岩, 等. 钾调控对大豆茎秆抗倒性能的影响[J]. 吉林农业科学, 2013, 38(5):25-28.
|
[18] |
李淑贤. 硅对套作大豆的耐荫抗倒效应及提高产量的机理研究[D]. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2019.
|
[19] |
谢甫娣, 董钻, 王晓光, 等. 大豆倒伏对植株性状和产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 1993, 12(1):81-85.
|
[20] |
王曙明. 大豆倒伏问题应引起高度重视[J]. 大豆科技, 2009(1):7.
|
[21] |
周蓉, 涂赣英, 沙爱华, 等. 大豆种质的倒伏性调查及其相关农艺性状分析[J]. 大豆科学, 2007, 26(1):41-44.
|
[22] |
张中华. 不同大豆品种间茎秆特性与抗倒伏性关系研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2022.
|
[23] |
程彬, 刘卫国, 王莉, 等. 种植密度对玉米-大豆带状间作下大豆光合、产量及茎秆抗倒的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(19):4084-4096.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.19.005 |
[24] |
|
[25] |
周青, 潘国庆, 施作家. 不同时期用硅肥对水稻群体质量及产量的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2001(3):25-27.
|
[26] |
张翠珍, 邵长泉, 孟凯, 等. 水稻施用硅肥效果及适宜用量的研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 1997(3):44-45.
|
[27] |
梁瑞凤. 水稻倒伏对产量及品质的影响及对策[J]. 中国农村小康科技, 2007(8):24.
|
[28] |
牟英辉, 陈志梁, 程艳波, 等. 硅肥对大豆农艺性状、产量及品质的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(4):625-629.
|
[29] |
杨庆凯, 桂明珠, 武天龙. 大豆品种抗倒伏能力与产量、植株形态、茎解剖性状的相关分析[J]. 大豆科学, 1986(2):113-116.
|
[30] |
周蓉, 王贤智, 陈海峰, 等. 大豆倒伏性及其相关性状的QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(1):57-65.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00057 |
[1] | CHEN Pengjun, ZHANG Jiao, HAN Jijun, MIAO Yuanqing, CUI Shiyou. Effects of Different Exogenous Silicon Fertilizers Application on Yield, Dry Matter and Nutrient Accumulation and Transport of Rice in Tidal Flat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 8-17. |
[2] | YANG Ying, FAN Li, YANG Zhichao, CAO Xinbo, GE Jingping. Application of COS and Microbial Metabolites in Agricultural Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 83-89. |
[3] | ZENG Duanxiang, YU Ning, DU Juan, ZENG Yao, WANG Lianying. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Fungi Inoculated in Vitro on Growth and Development of Tree Peony Vitroplantlets [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 55-60. |
[4] | LING Bo, LI Xiangyi, LIANG Yingying, WANG Hongchao, CHEN Xiaoling, XIE Zhanwen, ZHANG Yuting, CHENG Zuxin, LIN Lihui. Analysis of Genetic Effects on Stem Lodging Resistance in Hybrids of Indica and Japonica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(6): 1-9. |
[5] | MA Qianqian, PENG Guanyun, HUANG Tao, XIE Zhengwei, LI Shiyin. Effect of Fertilization Methods and Concentrations of Silicon Fertilizer on Fruit Quality of Plum ‘Qingcui’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 39-43. |
[6] | ZHANG Xingang. The Impact of Climate Warming on Growth, Development, and Yield of Winter Wheat in Northern Henan Province-Taking Qinyang City as an Example [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(3): 98-106. |
[7] | LI Xinghua, CAI Xingxing, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, LIU Xia, ZHOU Qiang. ‘Si te’ Late Indica Rice: Breeding, Yield Advantage and Growth and Development Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(3): 1-8. |
[8] | DU Nianzhi. Effects of AM Fungi on Carotenoids and Flavonoids in Mulberry Trees [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(11): 90-99. |
[9] | YANG Zhiwei, QIAN Aiping, ZHANG Wei, CAO Xiuxia. Effect of Planting Density on Lodging Resistance and Yield of Flax [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 1-5. |
[10] | ZHANG Zhongxin, WANG Xuefang, ZHANG Yaowen, GUAN Zhoubo, DONG Yuhong, ZHENG Lei, YANG Li. Research on Lodging Resistant Characteristics of Brassica napus L. Variety ‘Qinyou 1618’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 48-52. |
[11] | TAN Jianxin, TONG Jian, YUN Minzheng, JIANG Zhibing, LIANG Sha. Effects of Excessive Nitrogen Application on the Growth and Development of Highland Barley in Tibet Valley Agricultural Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(4): 6-13. |
[12] | WEI Feng, WEI Xiaoyi, SUN Pei, LIU Junheng, SHI Dakun, LI Fangjie, WANG Ruiping, LIU Hongyu, SONG Binbin. Heterosis Analysis of Lodging Resistance Related Traits and Lodging Resistance Evaluation Based on Principal Component Analysis in Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(35): 6-13. |
[13] | DU Yuhai, ZHAO Zongpeng, WANG Fei, LIU Lili, ZHANG Xunxia, MA Jun, LIN Bing, MA Mengmeng, ZHANG Qiang. Progress in the Application of Potassium-Solubilizing Bacteria in Promoting Tobacco Growth and Enhancing Stress Resistance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(30): 26-32. |
[14] | LANG Tao, YANG Feiyang, PU Zhigang, ZHANG Cong, LI Ming, YU Ma, QU Huijuan, WU Jingyu, ZHANG Lu, DIAO Du, FENG Junyan. Application of Transcriptome Sequencing Technology in Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L.) Research [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(30): 94-102. |
[15] | SHI Nuo, ZHU Hongqiang, WANG Shengfeng, GUAN Hui, ZHOU Yanbin, DU Yu, DAI Huijuan. Effects of Plant Growth Regulators on Growth Development and Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(28): 10-16. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||