
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (34): 82-86.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0516
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Yanlan1(
), CAI Shujiang1, LI Xiaoliang1, HU Xinzhou1, LI Chengchun2, LI Yihua2, GAO Yuxi2, ZHANG Yurong1, YE Rong2, GUAN Xiang1, YANG Jincheng1(
)
Received:2025-06-13
Revised:2025-10-24
Online:2025-12-04
Published:2025-12-04
LI Yanlan, CAI Shujiang, LI Xiaoliang, HU Xinzhou, LI Chengchun, LI Yihua, GAO Yuxi, ZHANG Yurong, YE Rong, GUAN Xiang, YANG Jincheng. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Part of Chemical Fertilizer on Soil Nutrients and Yield of Fresh Broad Beans[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(34): 82-86.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0516
| 序号 | 品种名称 | 含量 | 试验用量/(kg/hm2) | 品种来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 尿素 | N≥46% | 30 | 云南云天化股份有限公司 |
| 2 | 过磷酸钙 | P2O5≥16% | 225 | |
| 3 | 农用硫酸钾 | K2O≥52% | 165 | |
| 4 | 精制有机肥(烟草型) | N 1.078%、P2O5 1.4553%、K2O 1.4476% | 1440 | 云南思创格科技有限责任公司 |
| 序号 | 品种名称 | 含量 | 试验用量/(kg/hm2) | 品种来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 尿素 | N≥46% | 30 | 云南云天化股份有限公司 |
| 2 | 过磷酸钙 | P2O5≥16% | 225 | |
| 3 | 农用硫酸钾 | K2O≥52% | 165 | |
| 4 | 精制有机肥(烟草型) | N 1.078%、P2O5 1.4553%、K2O 1.4476% | 1440 | 云南思创格科技有限责任公司 |
| 处理 | 有机肥替代比例(N含量占比%) | 尿素N | 过磷酸钙P | 硫酸钾 K | 有机肥N | 有机肥P | 有机肥K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 不施肥 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| CK2 | 全化肥 | 34.50 | 72.00 | 143.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 处理1 | 20 | 27.60 | 62.66 | 134.71 | 6.93 | 9.37 | 9.31 |
| 处理2 | 40 | 20.70 | 53.30 | 125.42 | 13.87 | 18.75 | 18.62 |
| 处理3 | 60 | 13.80 | 43.97 | 116.14 | 20.80 | 28.12 | 27.93 |
| 处理4 | 80 | 6.90 | 34.63 | 106.78 | 27.73 | 37.49 | 37.24 |
| 处理5 | 100 | 0.00 | 25.30 | 97.50 | 34.67 | 46.87 | 46.55 |
| 处理 | 有机肥替代比例(N含量占比%) | 尿素N | 过磷酸钙P | 硫酸钾 K | 有机肥N | 有机肥P | 有机肥K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 不施肥 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| CK2 | 全化肥 | 34.50 | 72.00 | 143.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 处理1 | 20 | 27.60 | 62.66 | 134.71 | 6.93 | 9.37 | 9.31 |
| 处理2 | 40 | 20.70 | 53.30 | 125.42 | 13.87 | 18.75 | 18.62 |
| 处理3 | 60 | 13.80 | 43.97 | 116.14 | 20.80 | 28.12 | 27.93 |
| 处理4 | 80 | 6.90 | 34.63 | 106.78 | 27.73 | 37.49 | 37.24 |
| 处理5 | 100 | 0.00 | 25.30 | 97.50 | 34.67 | 46.87 | 46.55 |
| 处理 | 有机肥替代比例(N含量占比)/% | 株高/cm | 叶苔数/苔 | 单株有效分枝数/枝 | 荚长/cm | 荚宽/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 不施肥 | 85.2±5.52d | 28.6±0.57c | 5±1a | 8.87±1ab | 1.9±0.06ab |
| CK2 | 全化肥 | 101.8±1.52b | 29.8±1.15bc | 7.4±1.53a | 9.9±0.32ab | 2.03±0.1ab |
| 处理1 | 20 | 111.4±2.89a | 32.2±2.52ab | 5.2±1.15a | 9.56±0.50ab | 1.93±0.05b |
| 处理2 | 40 | 104.6±2.31b | 30.6±1.53bc | 5.4±1.53a | 8.4±0.58b | 1.87±0.06b |
| 处理3 | 60 | 102.6±2.52b | 34.25±1.15a | 6±2.65a | 9.34±0.58ab | 1.94±0.03ab |
| 处理4 | 80 | 93.6±5.51c | 32.4±3.21ab | 5.8±0.58a | 8.93±1ab | 1.97±0.17ab |
| 处理5 | 100 | 100.8±5.51b | 30.3±0.58bc | 5.6±3.21a | 9.23±0.58ab | 2.04±0.21a |
| 处理 | 有机肥替代比例(N含量占比)/% | 株高/cm | 叶苔数/苔 | 单株有效分枝数/枝 | 荚长/cm | 荚宽/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 不施肥 | 85.2±5.52d | 28.6±0.57c | 5±1a | 8.87±1ab | 1.9±0.06ab |
| CK2 | 全化肥 | 101.8±1.52b | 29.8±1.15bc | 7.4±1.53a | 9.9±0.32ab | 2.03±0.1ab |
| 处理1 | 20 | 111.4±2.89a | 32.2±2.52ab | 5.2±1.15a | 9.56±0.50ab | 1.93±0.05b |
| 处理2 | 40 | 104.6±2.31b | 30.6±1.53bc | 5.4±1.53a | 8.4±0.58b | 1.87±0.06b |
| 处理3 | 60 | 102.6±2.52b | 34.25±1.15a | 6±2.65a | 9.34±0.58ab | 1.94±0.03ab |
| 处理4 | 80 | 93.6±5.51c | 32.4±3.21ab | 5.8±0.58a | 8.93±1ab | 1.97±0.17ab |
| 处理5 | 100 | 100.8±5.51b | 30.3±0.58bc | 5.6±3.21a | 9.23±0.58ab | 2.04±0.21a |
| 处理 | 有机肥替代比例(N含量占比)/% | 单株荚数/荚 | 单荚粒数/粒 | 百荚鲜重/g | 百粒鲜重/g | 鲜荚产量/(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 不施肥 | 25.67±3.06c | 1.93±1a | 965±34b | 263.3±21.5a | 15708.59±1.28c |
| CK2 | 全化肥 | 29±3.61c | 1.87±1a | 889.5±27.61b | 257.8±10.07a | 17504.84±3.36abc |
| 处理1 | 20 | 43.6±3.76a | 2.18±0.58a | 1082.1±98.97a | 265.5±37.45a | 18092.31±3.08ab |
| 处理2 | 40 | 34±5.57abc | 2.06±0a | 925.1±35.09b | 247±18.33a | 17014.48±1.96bc |
| 处理3 | 60 | 33.67±1.53abc | 1.89±1a | 877.4±49.34b | 234.3±39.72a | 17197.95±3.33bc |
| 处理4 | 80 | 25±3.61c | 1.89±1a | 936.5±18.45b | 256.2±50.95a | 19406.26±1.52a |
| 处理5 | 100 | 42±7ab | 2.01±1a | 910.9±19.92b | 237.3±38.21a | 16005.03±3.10bc |
| 处理 | 有机肥替代比例(N含量占比)/% | 单株荚数/荚 | 单荚粒数/粒 | 百荚鲜重/g | 百粒鲜重/g | 鲜荚产量/(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 不施肥 | 25.67±3.06c | 1.93±1a | 965±34b | 263.3±21.5a | 15708.59±1.28c |
| CK2 | 全化肥 | 29±3.61c | 1.87±1a | 889.5±27.61b | 257.8±10.07a | 17504.84±3.36abc |
| 处理1 | 20 | 43.6±3.76a | 2.18±0.58a | 1082.1±98.97a | 265.5±37.45a | 18092.31±3.08ab |
| 处理2 | 40 | 34±5.57abc | 2.06±0a | 925.1±35.09b | 247±18.33a | 17014.48±1.96bc |
| 处理3 | 60 | 33.67±1.53abc | 1.89±1a | 877.4±49.34b | 234.3±39.72a | 17197.95±3.33bc |
| 处理4 | 80 | 25±3.61c | 1.89±1a | 936.5±18.45b | 256.2±50.95a | 19406.26±1.52a |
| 处理5 | 100 | 42±7ab | 2.01±1a | 910.9±19.92b | 237.3±38.21a | 16005.03±3.10bc |
| 处理 | 有机肥替代比例 (N含量占比)/% | pH | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 水解性氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 氮肥偏生产力/ (kg/kg) | 肥料贡献率/ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基础土样 | 8.12 | 47.0 | 180.0 | 91.6 | 362 | |||
| CK1 | 不施肥 | 8.02 | 38.2 | 143.3 | 92.0 | 310 | 455.32 | — |
| CK2 | 全化肥 | 8.09 | 47.2 | 155.3 | 83.5 | 317 | 507.39 | 10.26 |
| 处理1 | 20 | 8.06 | 45.9 | 146.7 | 85.1 | 321 | 524.41 | 13.18 |
| 处理2 | 40 | 8.01 | 45.2 | 152.7 | 89.4 | 362 | 493.17 | 7.68 |
| 处理3 | 60 | 7.98 | 44.4 | 159.4 | 85.6 | 389 | 498.49 | 8.66 |
| 处理4 | 80 | 7.89 | 40.7 | 149.0 | 90.4 | 328 | 562.50 | 19.05 |
| 处理5 | 100 | 7.80 | 39.7 | 144.5 | 92.0 | 367 | 463.91 | 1.85 |
| 处理 | 有机肥替代比例 (N含量占比)/% | pH | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 水解性氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 氮肥偏生产力/ (kg/kg) | 肥料贡献率/ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基础土样 | 8.12 | 47.0 | 180.0 | 91.6 | 362 | |||
| CK1 | 不施肥 | 8.02 | 38.2 | 143.3 | 92.0 | 310 | 455.32 | — |
| CK2 | 全化肥 | 8.09 | 47.2 | 155.3 | 83.5 | 317 | 507.39 | 10.26 |
| 处理1 | 20 | 8.06 | 45.9 | 146.7 | 85.1 | 321 | 524.41 | 13.18 |
| 处理2 | 40 | 8.01 | 45.2 | 152.7 | 89.4 | 362 | 493.17 | 7.68 |
| 处理3 | 60 | 7.98 | 44.4 | 159.4 | 85.6 | 389 | 498.49 | 8.66 |
| 处理4 | 80 | 7.89 | 40.7 | 149.0 | 90.4 | 328 | 562.50 | 19.05 |
| 处理5 | 100 | 7.80 | 39.7 | 144.5 | 92.0 | 367 | 463.91 | 1.85 |
| [1] |
郑卓杰. 中国食用豆类学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版,1997:141-166.
|
| [2] |
吕春雨, 廖芳丽, 陈宏伟, 等. 41份非洲地区和我国湖北蚕豆种质资源产量性状的鉴定与评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2018, 49(12):2356-2363.
|
| [3] |
马钰. 蚕豆SSR标记的开发及遗传连锁图谱的构建[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2012.
|
| [4] |
缪士毅. 立夏时节蚕豆鲜[J]. 养生月刊, 2020, 41(6):74-75.
|
| [5] |
于海天, 王丽萍, 吕梅媛, 等. 早熟鲜食秋蚕豆主要农艺性状与鲜食产量相关及通径分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(4):711-717.
|
| [6] |
何海琼. 蚕豆高产种植技术及管理[J]. 南方农机, 2017, 48(10):128.
|
| [7] |
庄应强, 屠娟丽, 费伟英, 等. 不同鲜食蚕豆品种产量性状及营养成分比较[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(32):52-54.
|
| [8] |
缪亚梅, 王学军, 陈满峰, 等. 鲜食蚕豆主要农艺性状的遗传变异相关性和主成分分析[J]. 河北农业科学, 2010, 14(10):95-97.
|
| [9] |
朱正梅, 吕学高, 石丽敏, 等. 我国鲜食蚕豆育种概况[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2020, 7:14-16.
|
| [10] |
蒋刚, 李经勇, 周凤云, 等. 有机肥和无机肥与土壤调节剂配施对水稻产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(17):8892-8893.
|
| [11] |
赵满兴, 刘慧, 白二磊, 等. 腐殖酸肥或生物有机肥替代部分化肥对土壤肥力、红枣产量和品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(6):981-987.
|
| [12] |
陈香碧, 胡亚军, 秦红灵, 等. 稻作系统有机肥替代部分化肥的土壤氮循环及增产机制[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(3):1033-1042.
|
| [13] |
谢育利, 张野, 苏天明, 等. 化肥减量配施不同有机肥对油麦菜及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2002, 34(2):87-92.
|
| [14] |
田巧凤, 王李妍, 赵子胥, 等. 有机无机肥配施对设施蚕豆产量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2022, 43(2):36-44.
|
| [15] |
王圣泽, 聂金, 费丹丹, 等. 有机肥部分替代化肥对青花菜生长、品质及土壤状况的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2022, 35(4):56-62.
|
| [16] |
王吉平, 何铁光, 张雨, 等. 有机肥替代部分化肥对‘桂甜糯525’产量品质和土壤环境的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(9):2594-2600.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2021.09.021 |
| [17] |
徐兴阳, 张晓伟, 刘忠华, 等. 有机无机复混肥配施钾长石土壤调理剂对烤烟产质量及养分利用率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(15):104-110.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0457 |
| [18] |
赵满兴, 刘慧, 白二磊, 等. 腐植酸肥或生物有机肥替代部分化肥对土壤肥力、红枣产量和品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(6):981-987.
|
| [19] |
陈香碧, 胡亚军, 秦红灵, 等. 稻作系统有机肥替代部分化肥的土壤氮循环特征及增产机制[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(3):1033-1042.
|
| [20] |
宋震震, 李絮花, 李娟, 等. 有机肥和化肥长期施用对土壤活性有机氮组分及酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(3):525-533.
|
| [21] |
黄晶, 刘立生, 马常宝, 等. 近30年中国稻区氮素平衡及氮肥偏生产力的时空变化[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(6):987-998.
|
| [1] | LI Yangyang, CHEN Shuaimin, XU Minghong, CHI Chang, MA Wei, WANG Yinping, SONG Yan, FAN Zuowei, WU Haiyan. Effects of Microbial Product Coupling Urea on Straw Decomposition Rate and Yield of Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 18-24. |
| [2] | TIAN Cuiling, TIAN Jialiang. Effect of Spraying Alginate Enhancing Solution at Different Growth Stages on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 25-31. |
| [3] | HUANG Wenyin, ZHANG Baige, CHANG Jingjing, CHEN Xiao, LI Jing, CHEN Lei, ZHAO Junhong, LUO Mouxiong, SONG Zhao. Effect of Exogenous Inositol on Yield and Quality of Tomatoes Under Salt Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 73-80. |
| [4] | WANG Feng, ZHU Shijun, YING Hong, CHAI Weigang, DAI Yaolu, YUAN Qing, JIN Shuquan. Effect of Organic Amendment Combined with Moderate Deep Ploughing on Productivity Improvement of Hilly Reclaimed Rice Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 91-98. |
| [5] | WANG Junjiang, YIN Yuanhong, LU Chusheng, LU Zhanhua, CAI Haoyang, YE Qunhuan, LIAO Jiahui, LU Yusheng, LIANG Kaiming, FU Youqiang. Effect of Irrigation on Rice Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency During Critical Growth Period Under Drought Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 1-10. |
| [6] | LI Lin, YAN Yun, KANG Jiangfei, MENG Qihan, FANG Shefa, CHEN Yingmin, GUO Jianqiu. The Effects of Sowing Date and Density on Growth Process, Photosynthetic Characteristics, Agronomic Traits, Yield, and Quality of ‘Luodou 1304’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 11-18. |
| [7] | WU Suxia, ZHAO Peng, FAN Hairong, SONG Shitao, CHEN Lina, JIN Changmin, CUI Yue. Effect of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Growth Trait of Millet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 19-24. |
| [8] | TANG Chaochen, CHEN Diwen, ZHOU Wenling, YANG Yiling, AO Junhua, WANG Zhangying, HUANG Zhenrui. Effects of Liquid Fertilizers Compounded from Hydrothermal Cracking Products on Sweet Potato Growth and Nutrient Utilization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 39-49. |
| [9] | XUE Yuansai, WANG Xijiu, ZOU Shiguo, ZHANG Shoufu, LIU Guangya, HAN Wei, SUN Xian. Effect of Compound Oligosaccharides on Yield of Typical Crops in Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 50-56. |
| [10] | MA Zhuo, ZHOU Hanbing, ZHAO Manxing, ZHANG Xia, WANG Xin, MA Danni. Effects of Fulvic Acid Potassium on Nutrient Absorption, Yield and Quality of Apples in Yan’an Mountain Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 63-68. |
| [11] | WANG Cheng, LI Guorui, DI Jianjun, LUO Rui, LI Mingjing, HUANG Fenglan. Effects of Castor Bean Microbial Enzyme Biological Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Cherry Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 69-75. |
| [12] | SU Dan, WANG Zicheng, JIA Junying, SUN Dezhi, LI Zhijun, GUO Yuan, ZHUANG Defeng. Effects of Water Regulation on Growth Characteristics of Atractylodes chinensis and Yield and Quality of Crude Material [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 75-83. |
| [13] | LI Menghan, HU Wenping, DONG Xin, PHURBU Samdrup, ZONG Baji. Effects of Sowing Density and Harvest Time on Yield of Foodstuff Maize in Linzhi City [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 9-14. |
| [14] | WANG Lili, ZHU Shijun, LU Xiaohong, JIN Shuquan. Biological Effects of Trichoderma W1 Bio-organic Fertilizer on Coastal Tomato Planting [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 100-106. |
| [15] | LI Laping, LI Xiaozhen, YANG Shuhua, YUE Xinli, SUN Mengxia, YANG Chuncang. Study on Effect of Weed-control Cloth on Growth, Development and Yield of Datong Daylily [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 107-114. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||