欢迎访问《中国农学通报》，
中国农学通报

中国农学通报 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (26): 266-273.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15030009

所属专题： 现代农业发展与乡村振兴

• 农业科技信息 • 上一篇    下一篇

农业科研机构科技创新能力评价研究

姜丽华1,2,谢能付1,2,刘世洪1,2   

  1. (1中国农业科学院农业信息研究所,北京 100081；2农业部农业信息服务技术重点实验室,北京 100081）
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-02 修回日期:2015-06-17 接受日期:2015-06-25 出版日期:2015-09-23 发布日期:2015-09-23
  • 通讯作者: 刘世洪
  • 基金资助:
    中国农业科学院科技创新工程“农业网络技术创新”(CAAS-ASTIP-201X-AII)。

Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Innovation Capacity of Agricultural Research Institutions

Jiang Lihua1,2, Xie Nengfu1,2, Liu Shihong1,2   

  1. (1Agricultural Information Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 2Key Lab of Agricultural Information Service Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081)
  • Received:2015-03-02 Revised:2015-06-17 Accepted:2015-06-25 Online:2015-09-23 Published:2015-09-23

PDF (PC)

549

摘要： 农业科研机构科技创新能力的强弱直接关乎中国农业科技进步水平和现代农业发展方式。为客观、全面地评价农业科研机构的创新能力，笔者立足系统科学和管理科学理论，深入分析农业科技创新过程，确定了创新要素，构建了适合农业科研机构的指标评价体系。采取层析分析法与综合评价法相结合，建立其模糊评价模型，并对国家级农业科研机构进行评价。根据评价结果将科研机构划分为科技创新型、科学创新型、技术创新型、基础实力型等4种类型，有助于调整科技体制改革的方向和力度，实现分类指导和管理。

关键词: 烟台苹果产区, 烟台苹果产区, 土壤pH, 土壤有机质, 土壤养分, 相关性

Abstract: The innovation capability of agricultural scientific research institutions will directly determine the progress of agricultural science and technology and the development way of modern agriculture. To objectively and comprehensively evaluate the innovation capability of agricultural scientific research institutions, the innovation process was analyzed, the innovation factors were explicated and an evaluation index system was built up in light of scientific theories on system and management. AHP and comprehensive evaluation method were combined to set up the fuzzy synthetic evaluation model which was applied to the national-level agricultural scientific research institutions. According to the results, the institutions were divided into four types which were scientific and technological innovation style, scientific innovation style, technological innovation style, and fundamental ability style. This classification method can not only adjust the direction and strength of science and technology system reform, but also implement classified guidance and management.