欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (16): 28-35.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16060084

所属专题: 生物技术

• 生物技术科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

5种方法提取真菌基因组DNA作为PCR模板效果的比较

李焕宇,付婷婷,张 云,吕天佑,李 远,徐秉良   

  1. 甘肃农业大学 植物保护学院 植物病理系,甘肃农业大学 植物保护学院 植物病理系,甘肃农业大学 植物保护学院 植物病理系,甘肃农业大学 植物保护学院 植物病理系,甘肃农业大学 植物保护学院 植物病理系,甘肃农业大学 植物保护学院 植物病理系
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-16 修回日期:2017-05-21 接受日期:2016-07-25 出版日期:2017-06-08 发布日期:2017-06-08
  • 通讯作者: 徐秉良
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“基于形态和分子特征的甘肃省煤污病菌分类和系统发育研究”(No.31300024);甘肃农业大学“伏羲人才计划”项 目(No.FXYC20130104)。

Effect Comparison of Five Methods to Extract Fungal Genomic DNA as PCR Templates

  • Received:2016-06-16 Revised:2017-05-21 Accepted:2016-07-25 Online:2017-06-08 Published:2017-06-08

摘要: 本研究旨在比较CTAB法、改良CTAB法、SDS法、氯化苄法和Chelex-100 法提取真菌DNA作为PCR模板的效果,以生长速率、菌落形态差异较大的11 个煤污病菌属真菌为研究对象,以核糖体RNA(rRNA)基因中的内转录间隔区(ITS)序列和28S rRNA基因部分序列的扩增率为指标,采用SPSS软件对结果进行方差分析。结果表明,CTAB法和改良CTAB法适用真菌范围最广,分别有7 个和9 个属真菌的扩增率都大于70%且无显著性差异;氯化苄法和Chelex-100 法适用范围居中,分别有6 个和8 个属真菌的扩增率较高且无显著性差异,扩增率分别大于70%和50%;SDS法适用范围最窄,有6 个属真菌的扩增率高于50%且无显著性差异。大多数煤污病菌至少有2 种及以上的DNA提取方法能够取得较好的效果,但链丝孢属真菌只有用氯化苄法提取DNA效果最好。采用改良CTAB法结合氯化苄法,能够满足所有供试煤污病菌类群真菌提取基因组DNA用作PCR反应模板的需要。

关键词: 噻呋酰胺, 噻呋酰胺, 种衣剂, 小麦纹枯病, 联合毒力, 防效

Abstract: The objective of this study was to compare the effect of fungal genomic DNA, which was extracted by five methods including CTAB method, modified CTAB method, SDS method, benzyl chloride method and Chelex-100 method, as PCR templates. Eleven sooty blotch and flyspeck (SBFS) fungal genera that exhibited different growth rates and colony characters were selected as tested fungi, and amplification percentages of PCR reactions of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and partial sequences of 28S rRNA gene of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) were used as indexes, and the results were analyzed with SPSS software. The results showed that the CTAB method and the modified CTAB method were suitable for most fungi, respectively with seven and nine tested fungal genera amplification percentage higher than 70% and had no significant differences. The benzyl chloride method and the Chelex-100 method were suitable for partial fungi, respectively with six and eight tested fungal genera amplification percentage higher than 70% and 50%, and had no significant differences. The SDS method was suitable for only a narrow range of fungi, with six tested fungal genera amplification percentage higher than 50% and had no significant differences. There were at least two methods that could perform well to extract DNA from most SBFS fungal genera, but only the benzyl chloride method gave the best DNA extraction result for the genus Scleroramularia. Using modified CTAB method combined with the benzyl chloride method could meet the need of extracting SBFS fungal genomic DNA as PCR templates.

中图分类号: