欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 35-41.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17020112

所属专题: 资源与环境 农业生态 耕地保护

• 资源 环境 生态 土壤 气象 • 上一篇    下一篇

2002-2015年临夏州耕地生态足迹动态研究

周丽萍,戚瑞生,冯进军   

  1. 临夏回族自治州农业技术推广站,临夏回族自治州农业节水与土壤肥料管理站,临夏回族自治州农业技术推广站
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-27 修回日期:2017-04-21 接受日期:2017-05-11 出版日期:2018-01-23 发布日期:2018-01-23
  • 通讯作者: 戚瑞生
  • 基金资助:
    临夏州科技计划项目“临夏州耕地地力评价项目”(2016-N-2-007)。

Dynamic Analysis of Ecological Footprint of Arable Land in Linxia Prefecture During 2002—2015

冯进军   

  • Received:2017-02-27 Revised:2017-04-21 Accepted:2017-05-11 Online:2018-01-23 Published:2018-01-23

摘要: 为了解临夏州耕地资源的可持续发展状况,运用生态足迹模型对临夏州2002-2015年耕地的生态足迹进行了动态分析和研究。研究结果表明,2002-2015年,临夏州人均耕地生态足迹由0.2858hm2/人增长至0.4753hm2/人,增长了66.31%。2002-2015年,人均耕地生态承载力从0.2775hm2/人下降至0.2431hm2/人,下降了12.40%,呈下降趋势。临夏州耕地未出现生态盈余,人均耕地生态赤字由0.0083hm2/人增长至0.2322hm2/人,增长了26.98倍,整个研究时间尺度内生态赤字呈较快增长趋势。表明临夏州农业生产超出了耕地的生态承载力范围,再加之人口的持续增长,人地关系愈发紧张,引起耕地生态系统的不稳定性在不断加剧,临夏州耕地资源的利用为不可持续发展状态,最后根据存在问题提出了一些建议。

关键词: 藜麦, 藜麦, 营养成分, 产品开发, 发展潜力

Abstract: To study the sustainable development state of arable land resource in Linxia prefecture, the authors used the model of ecological footprint to dynamically analyze the ecological footprint of arable land in Linxia prefecture during 2002-2015. The results showed that per capita ecological footprint of arable land in Linxia prefecture increased from 0.2858 hm2 to 0.4753 hm2, which increased by 66.31% during 2002- 2015. Ecological capacity of per capita decreased from 0.2775 hm2 to 0.2431 hm2, which decreased by 12.40% during 2002-2015. Arable land in Linxia prefecture did not have ecological surplus, ecological deficit of per capita grew from 0.0083 hm2 to 0.2322 hm2, which increased by 26.98 times. Throughout the study time scale, the ecological deficit showed a rapid growth trend. The results showed that agricultural production of arable land resources in Linxia prefecture was beyond the scope of ecological capacity, coupled with the growth of population, the relation between people and arable land became more and more tense, resulting in growing instability of arable land ecosystem, and the use of arable land resources was in an unsustainable state. Finally, the authors put forward some recommendations accordingly.