不同基因型玉米品种灌浆及高产早熟特性研究

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18060028

中国农学通报 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (30): 16-21.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18060028

所属专题：生物技术；玉米

不同基因型玉米品种灌浆及高产早熟特性研究

洪德峰, 张学舜, 马俊峰, 卫晓轶, 王稼苜, 魏锋, 马毅, 唐振海, 彭东

河南省新乡市农业科学院河南新乡 453000

收稿日期:2018-06-06 修回日期:2018-08-07 接受日期:2018-08-24 出版日期:2019-10-25 发布日期:2019-10-25
通讯作者: 洪德峰
基金资助:
现代农业产业技术体系建设专项“国家玉米产业技术体系新乡综合试验站”(CARS-02-68)；河南省玉米育种重大科技专项“宜机收玉米优异种质创制与新品种选育”(161100110500-0103)；河南省科技开放合作项目“利用油份自动核磁共振测定技术进行辅助玉米种质改良创新” (172106000047)。

Characteristics of Grain Filling and High Yield and Early Maturity of Different Genotypes of Maize

Received:2018-06-06 Revised:2018-08-07 Accepted:2018-08-24 Online:2019-10-25 Published:2019-10-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探明不同基因型玉米品种产量、熟期及籽粒灌浆之间的差异，为玉米机收熟期选择提供理论依据。选择‘新单68’、‘新单61’、‘郑单958’三个品种，通过研究其亲本、生育期、品质及籽粒鲜重、体积、干重的变化，并对其产量及产量构成因素进行比较分析。结果表明，‘新单68’亲本早熟性好，籽粒粗淀粉含量高，生育期短，‘新单61’和‘新单68’的籽粒体积均小于‘郑单958’，‘新单61’‘新单68’的籽粒体积没有明显差异。‘郑单958’籽粒干重自授粉平稳增加，‘新单61’、‘新单68’授粉24天内，干重快速增加，之后增速放缓。‘新单68’产量显著高于‘郑单958’，‘新单68’和‘新单61’的含水量显著低于‘郑单958’。总而言之，‘新单68’生育期短，粗淀粉含量高，后期灌浆快，穗轴较细，说明‘新单68’籽粒容易脱水，适宜机械化收获籽粒。

关键词: 水稻, 水稻, 晒田, 土壤含水量, 有效分蘖数, 成穗率

Abstract: The aims are to illustrate the differences of yield, maturity and grain filling in different maize genotypes, and to provide a basis for the maturity selection of maize mechanized harvest. Three maize varieties ‘Xindan 68’,‘Xindan 61’and‘Zhengdan 958’were used as the experimental materials, the changes of growth period, quality, fresh weight of kernel, volume and dry weight of kernel were studied. The yield and yield components were compared and analyzed. The results showed that compared with‘Zhengdan 958’, the parent of‘Xindan 68’had earlier maturity, higher starch content and short growth period. The kernel volume of‘Xindan 68’and‘Xindan 61’had not obvious difference. The kernel dry weight of‘Zhengdan 958’ increased steadily after pollination. In 24 days after pollination, the kernel dry weight of‘Xindan 61’and ‘Xindan 68’increased rapidly, while after 24 days, they increased slowly. The yield of‘Xindan 68’was significantly higher than that of‘Zhengdan 958’, the moisture content of‘Xindan 68’and‘Xindan 61’were significantly lower than that of‘Zhengdan 958’. In conclusion,‘Xindan 68’has short growth period, high starch content, quick grain fill at later stages, and thinner ear axis, which indicate that the kernel of‘Xindan 68’ is easy for dehydration and suitable for mechanized harvest.

洪德峰,张学舜,马俊峰,卫晓轶,王稼苜,魏锋,马毅,唐振海,彭东. 不同基因型玉米品种灌浆及高产早熟特性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(30): 16-21.

参考文献

[1] Gouache David, Bris XL, Bogard M, Deudon O, Pagé C, Gate P. Evaluating agronomic adaptation options to increasing heat stress under climate change during wheat grain filling in France. European Journal of Agronomy, 2012, 39:62-70.
[2] Liu Y, Liang HY, Lv XK, Liu DD, Wen XX, Liao YC. Effect of polyamines on the grain filling of wheat under drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2016, 100:113-129.
[3] Liang WX, Zhang ZC, Wen XX, Liao YC, Liu Y. Effect of non-structural carbohydrate accumulation in the stem pre-anthesis on grain filling of wheat inferior grain. Field Crops Research, 2017, 211:66-76.
[4] Lv XK, Han J, Liao YC, Liu Y. Effect of phosphorus and potassium foliage application post-anthesis on grain filling and hormonal changes of wheat. Field Crops Research, 2017, 214:83-93.
[5] Wang GL, Kang MS, Moreno O. Genetic analyses of grain-filling rate and duration in maize. Field Crops Research, 1999, 61(3):211-222.
[6] Pommel B, Gallais A, Coque M, Quilleré I, Hirel B, Prioul JL, Andrieu B, Floriot M. Carbon and nitrogen allocation and grain filling in three maize hybrids differing in leaf senescence. European Journal of Agronomy, 2006, 24(3):203-211.
[7] Lu DL, Yang H, Shen X, Lu WP. Effects of high temperature during grain filling on physicochemical properties of waxy maize starch. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(2):309-316.
[8] Yu T, Li G, Liu P, Dong ST, Zhang JW, Zhao B. Proteomics analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) grain based on iTRAQ reveals molecular mechanisms of poor grain filling in inferior grains. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2017, 115:83-96.
[9]Lang YZ, Yang XD, Wang ME, Zhu QS. Effects of Lodging at Different Filling Stages on Rice Yield and Grain Quality. Rice Science, 2012, 19(4):315-319.
[10] Zhao YL, Xi M, Zhang XC, Lin ZM, Ding CQ, Tang S, Liu ZH, Wang SH, Ding YF. Nitrogen effect on amino acid composition in leaf and grain of japonica rice during grain filling stage. Journal of Cereal Science, 2015, 64:29-33.
[11] Jiang Q, Du YL, Tian XY, Wang QS, Xiong RH, Xu GC, Yan C, Ding YF. Effect of panicle nitrogen on grain filling characteristics of high-yielding rice cultivars. European Journal of Agronomy, 2016, 74:185-192.
[12] Okamura M, Arai-Sanoh Y, Yoshida H, Mukouyama T, Adachi S, Yabe S, Nakagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Taniguchi Y, Kobayashi N, Kondo M. Characterization of high-yielding rice cultivars with different grain-filling properties to clarify limiting factors for improving grain yield. Field Crops Research, 2018, 219:139-147.
[13] Tao ZQ, Chen YQ, Li C, Zou JX , Yan P, Yuan SF, Wu X, Sui P. The causes and impacts for heat stress in spring maize during grain filling in the North China Plain — A review. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(12):2677-2687.
[14] Zhai LC, Xu P, Zhang ZB, Li SK, Xie RZ, Zhai LF, Wei BH. Effects of deep vertical rotary tillage on dry matter accumulation and grain yield of summer maize in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China. Soil and Tillage Research, 2017, 170:167-174.
[15] Wang GL, Kang MS, Moreno O. Genetic analyses of grain-filling rate and duration in maize. Field Crops Research, 1999, 61(3):211-222.
[16] Martínez RD, Cirilo AG, Cerrudo A, Andrade FH, Reinoso L, Valentinuz OR, Balbi CN, GIzquierdo N. Changes of starch composition by postflowering environmental conditions in kernels of maize hybrids with different endosperm hardness. European Journal of Agronomy, 2017, 86:71-77.
[17] Bonelli LE, Monzon JP, Cerrudo A, Rizzalli RH, Andrade FH. Maize grain yield components and source-sink relationship as affected by the delay in sowing date. Field Crops Research, 2016, 198:215-225.
[18]Qin SJ, Zhang ZZ, Ning TY, Ren SZ, Su LC, Li ZJ. Abscisic acid and aldehyde oxidase activity in maize ear leaf and grain relative to post-flowering photosynthetic capacity and grain-filling rate under different water/nitrogen treatments. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2013, 70:9-80.
[19] Krishnan P, Chopra UK, Verma APS, Joshi DK, Chand I. Nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation characterisation of water status of developing grains of maize (Zea mays L.) grown at different nitrogen levels. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2014, 117(4):512-518.
[20] Zhao J, Xue QW, Jessup KE, Hao BZ, Hou XB, Marek TH, Xu WW, Evett SR, Shaughnessy SAO, Brauer DK. Yield and water use of drought-tolerant maize hybrids in a semiarid environment. Field Crops Research, 2018, 216:1-9.
[21] Ning P, Fritschi FB, Li CJ. Temporal dynamics of post-silking nitrogen fluxes and their effects on grain yield in maize under low to high nitrogen inputs. Field Crops Research, 2017, 204:249-259.
[22] Lu DL, Sun XL, Yan FB, Wang X, Xu RC, Lu WP. Effects of high temperature during grain filling under control conditions on the physicochemical properties of waxy maize flour. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2013, 98(1):302-310.
[23] Edreira JIR, Mayer LI, Otegui ME. Heat stress in temperate and tropical maize hybrids: Kernel growth, water relations and assimilate availability for grain filling. Field Crops Research, 2014, 166:162-172.
[24] Jia QM, Sun LF, Mou HY, Ali Shahzad, Liu DH, Zhang Yan, Zhang P. Ren XL, Jia ZK. Effects of planting patterns and sowing densities on grain-filling, radiation use efficiency and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in semi-arid regions. Agricultural Water Management, 2018, 201:287-298.
[25] GUO QC,KANG HY,LIU HQ,etc. Analysis of the Problems in maize breeding [J],China Seed Industry,2016,4: 4-9
[26] HOU JH,ZHENG HL,YANG LJ,ZHANG JH. Correlationg analysis between quality characters and agronomical traits in maize germplasm resources [J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2008,19:72-74
[27]Ribaut J M,Jiang C,Gonzalet-de-Leon D,Edmeades G O,Hoisington D A.Identification of quantitative traits loci under drought conditions in tropical maize:II.Yield components and markerassisted selection strategies,Theor Appl Genet,1997,94:887-896
[28]Messmer R,Fracheboud Y,Banziger M,Vargas M,Stamp P,Ribaut J M.Drought stress and tropical maize:QTL-by-enviroment interactions and stability of QTLs across environments for yield components and secondary traits. Theor Appl Genet,2009,119:913-930
[29]PENG B,WANG Y,LI YX,etc,Correlation analysis and conditional QTL analysis of grain yield and yield Components in maize[J].ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA.2010,36(10):1624-1633
[30] WU QP,GUO XP,HAN CW,WANG HF. KONG XMStudy on grain filling characteristics of high-yield maize cultivars[J] Shandong Agricultural Sciences,2015,47(4):30-33
[31] LIU X,LI ZX,WANG QC,LIU KC. Effects of Planting Density on Filling Process,Yield and Quality of Different Maize Varieties [J].Journal of Maize Sciences, 2007 15(6):75-78

不同基因型玉米品种灌浆及高产早熟特性研究

Characteristics of Grain Filling and High Yield and Early Maturity of Different Genotypes of Maize

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	白玛仁增, 顿玉多吉, 德例归吉, 德吉央宗, 益西多吉, 边巴次仁. 星-地结合对水稻高温热害监测模型的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 133-141.
[2]	罗先富, 刘文强, 潘孝武, 董铮, 刘三雄, 刘利成, 阳标仁, 盛新年, 李小湘. 应用剩余杂合体衍生的近等基因系定位水稻株高QTL[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 1-5.
[3]	黄钰, 陈斌, 肖关丽. 云南哈尼族地方水稻‘月亮谷’对褐飞虱取食危害的生理反应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 123-129.
[4]	李兴华, 王欢, 张盛, 蔡星星, 周强, 周楠. 氮肥用量与运筹方式对晚籼稻产量及花后干物质积累与转运的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 6-13.
[5]	王一凡, 劳晓璨, 余丽萍, 叶海龙. 水稻‘甬优15’分期播种的气象条件适宜性试验研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 106-109.
[6]	李雪枫, 王坚, 叶晓园, 张秀婷, 王丽学. 苦瓜植株水浸提液对水稻种子萌发和秧苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(6): 1-7.
[7]	闫蕴韬, 何兮, 张海清, 贺记外. 水稻种子耐贮性研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 1-8.
[8]	翟彩娇, 张蛟, 崔士友, 陈澎军. 盐逆境对耐盐水稻穗部性状及产量构成因素的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(4): 1-9.
[9]	李荣田, 时柳, 黄丽莹, 刘长华. 利用分子选择培育水稻‘吉粳88’(hd2/hd4)导入系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(33): 1-9.
[10]	伊嘉雯, 冯棣, 朱崴, 亓娜, 滕奉魁, 卢小引. 不同品种水稻发芽阶段耐盐性对比研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(33): 10-14.
[11]	张博, 石峰, 宋福强. AMF复合菌剂对寒地水稻光合作用和生长效应的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(33): 15-22.
[12]	雷俊, 赵福年, 卢国阳, 姚瑞, 牛海洋, 李文举, 杨蕙宁. 黄土高原半干旱区春小麦产量变动的影响因子分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(32): 55-62.
[13]	许丹阳, 李虹颖, 孙义祥, 邬刚, 王家宝, 袁嫚嫚, 王佩旋, 张祥明, 束孝海. 不同比例有机无机肥配施对水稻产量与氮素利用率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 1-5.
[14]	王洋, 张瑞, 周雨晴, 刘永昊, 刘高生, 戴其根. 基于文献计量的国内水稻耐盐性研究态势分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 147-153.
[15]	李舟, 杨雅云, 戴陆园, 张斐斐, 阿新祥, 董超, 王斌, 汤翠凤. 水稻白叶枯病抗性基因和相关因子研究利用进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(30): 91-99.