Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (15): 147-151.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb19020010
Special Issue: 烟草种植与生产
Previous Articles Next Articles
Liu Zhiqiang1,2, Zhao Zhengxiong3()
Received:
2019-02-11
Revised:
2019-04-18
Online:
2020-05-25
Published:
2020-05-21
Contact:
Zhao Zhengxiong
E-mail:zhaozx0801@163.com
CLC Number:
Liu Zhiqiang, Zhao Zhengxiong. Study on Determination Method of Total Potassium in Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(15): 147-151.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb19020010
部位 | 浓度/(mol/L) | 用量/mL | 浸提时间/min | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.1 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 60 | |||
上部叶 | 3.88 | 4.21 | 4.20 | 4.18 | 3.79 | 4.11 | 4.21 | 4.18 | 4.07 | 4.23 | 4.22 | 4.20 | ||
中部叶 | 4.22 | 4.59 | 4.59 | 4.58 | 4.09 | 4.44 | 4.58 | 4.57 | 4.38 | 4.59 | 4.58 | 4.60 | ||
下部叶 | 4.57 | 4.97 | 4.97 | 4.95 | 4.50 | 4.82 | 4.97 | 4.95 | 4.79 | 4.99 | 4.98 | 4.96 | ||
茎 | 3.35 | 3.77 | 3.77 | 3.75 | 3.42 | 3.66 | 3.78 | 3.76 | 3.62 | 3.79 | 3.78 | 3.76 | ||
根 | 2.33 | 2.64 | 2.64 | 2.62 | 2.28 | 2.52 | 2.64 | 2.61 | 2.49 | 2.66 | 2.64 | 2.62 |
部位 | 浓度/(mol/L) | 用量/mL | 浸提时间/min | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.1 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 60 | |||
上部叶 | 3.88 | 4.21 | 4.20 | 4.18 | 3.79 | 4.11 | 4.21 | 4.18 | 4.07 | 4.23 | 4.22 | 4.20 | ||
中部叶 | 4.22 | 4.59 | 4.59 | 4.58 | 4.09 | 4.44 | 4.58 | 4.57 | 4.38 | 4.59 | 4.58 | 4.60 | ||
下部叶 | 4.57 | 4.97 | 4.97 | 4.95 | 4.50 | 4.82 | 4.97 | 4.95 | 4.79 | 4.99 | 4.98 | 4.96 | ||
茎 | 3.35 | 3.77 | 3.77 | 3.75 | 3.42 | 3.66 | 3.78 | 3.76 | 3.62 | 3.79 | 3.78 | 3.76 | ||
根 | 2.33 | 2.64 | 2.64 | 2.62 | 2.28 | 2.52 | 2.64 | 2.61 | 2.49 | 2.66 | 2.64 | 2.62 |
部位 | 浓度 | 用量 | 浸提时间 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.1 mol/L | 0.5 mol/L | 1 mol/L | 2 mol/L | 10 mL | 20 mL | 30 mL | 40 mL | 20 min | 30 min | 40 min | 60 min | |||
上部叶 | 3.48 | 3.81 | 4.20 | 4.21 | 3.62 | 3.92 | 4.21 | 4.20 | 3.72 | 4.08 | 4.22 | 4.23 | ||
中部叶 | 3.95 | 4.26 | 4.59 | 4.58 | 3.90 | 4.30 | 4.60 | 4.60 | 4.07 | 4.42 | 4.60 | 4.61 | ||
下部叶 | 4.30 | 4.60 | 4.98 | 4.98 | 4.35 | 4.64 | 4.97 | 4.99 | 4.40 | 4.83 | 4.99 | 4.99 | ||
茎 | 3.30 | 3.52 | 3.76 | 3.78 | 3.31 | 3.54 | 3.78 | 3.79 | 3.37 | 3.64 | 3.79 | 3.78 | ||
根 | 2.25 | 2.43 | 2.66 | 2.66 | 2.18 | 2.40 | 2.67 | 2.65 | 2.27 | 2.52 | 2.65 | 2.66 |
部位 | 浓度 | 用量 | 浸提时间 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.1 mol/L | 0.5 mol/L | 1 mol/L | 2 mol/L | 10 mL | 20 mL | 30 mL | 40 mL | 20 min | 30 min | 40 min | 60 min | |||
上部叶 | 3.48 | 3.81 | 4.20 | 4.21 | 3.62 | 3.92 | 4.21 | 4.20 | 3.72 | 4.08 | 4.22 | 4.23 | ||
中部叶 | 3.95 | 4.26 | 4.59 | 4.58 | 3.90 | 4.30 | 4.60 | 4.60 | 4.07 | 4.42 | 4.60 | 4.61 | ||
下部叶 | 4.30 | 4.60 | 4.98 | 4.98 | 4.35 | 4.64 | 4.97 | 4.99 | 4.40 | 4.83 | 4.99 | 4.99 | ||
茎 | 3.30 | 3.52 | 3.76 | 3.78 | 3.31 | 3.54 | 3.78 | 3.79 | 3.37 | 3.64 | 3.79 | 3.78 | ||
根 | 2.25 | 2.43 | 2.66 | 2.66 | 2.18 | 2.40 | 2.67 | 2.65 | 2.27 | 2.52 | 2.65 | 2.66 |
部位 | 平行测定值/% | 平均值/% | 标准差 | 变异系数/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶 | 4.20 | 4.22 | 4.19 | 4.18 | 4.17 | 4.19 | 4.19 | 0.02 | 0.38 |
中部叶 | 4.59 | 4.58 | 4.62 | 4.57 | 4.64 | 4.61 | 4.60 | 0.02 | 0.52 |
下部叶 | 4.97 | 4.95 | 5.00 | 4.96 | 5.02 | 4.99 | 4.98 | 0.02 | 0.48 |
茎 | 3.77 | 3.78 | 3.76 | 3.80 | 3.74 | 3.82 | 3.78 | 0.03 | 0.69 |
根 | 2.64 | 2.67 | 2.63 | 2.61 | 2.68 | 2.66 | 2.65 | 0.02 | 0.91 |
部位 | 平行测定值/% | 平均值/% | 标准差 | 变异系数/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶 | 4.20 | 4.22 | 4.19 | 4.18 | 4.17 | 4.19 | 4.19 | 0.02 | 0.38 |
中部叶 | 4.59 | 4.58 | 4.62 | 4.57 | 4.64 | 4.61 | 4.60 | 0.02 | 0.52 |
下部叶 | 4.97 | 4.95 | 5.00 | 4.96 | 5.02 | 4.99 | 4.98 | 0.02 | 0.48 |
茎 | 3.77 | 3.78 | 3.76 | 3.80 | 3.74 | 3.82 | 3.78 | 0.03 | 0.69 |
根 | 2.64 | 2.67 | 2.63 | 2.61 | 2.68 | 2.66 | 2.65 | 0.02 | 0.91 |
部位 | 平行测定值/% | 平均值/% | 标准差 | 变异系数/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶 | 4.25 | 4.23 | 4.18 | 4.20 | 4.17 | 4.24 | 4.21 | 0.0302 | 0.72 |
中部叶 | 4.62 | 4.64 | 4.62 | 4.58 | 4.66 | 4.59 | 4.62 | 0.0273 | 0.59 |
下部叶 | 3.75 | 3.79 | 3.81 | 3.78 | 3.82 | 3.84 | 3.80 | 0.0291 | 0.77 |
茎 | 5.05 | 4.97 | 4.95 | 4.99 | 5.01 | 4.94 | 4.99 | 0.0373 | 0.75 |
根 | 2.7 | 2.65 | 2.64 | 2.72 | 2.63 | 2.67 | 2.67 | 0.0324 | 1.21 |
部位 | 平行测定值/% | 平均值/% | 标准差 | 变异系数/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶 | 4.25 | 4.23 | 4.18 | 4.20 | 4.17 | 4.24 | 4.21 | 0.0302 | 0.72 |
中部叶 | 4.62 | 4.64 | 4.62 | 4.58 | 4.66 | 4.59 | 4.62 | 0.0273 | 0.59 |
下部叶 | 3.75 | 3.79 | 3.81 | 3.78 | 3.82 | 3.84 | 3.80 | 0.0291 | 0.77 |
茎 | 5.05 | 4.97 | 4.95 | 4.99 | 5.01 | 4.94 | 4.99 | 0.0373 | 0.75 |
根 | 2.7 | 2.65 | 2.64 | 2.72 | 2.63 | 2.67 | 2.67 | 0.0324 | 1.21 |
部位 | 钾含量/mg | 加入的钾含量/mg | 总钾量/mg | 钾实测量/mg | 偏差 | 回收率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶 | 4.17 | 1.00 | 5.17 | 5.14 | -0.02 | 97.60 |
中部叶 | 4.66 | 1.00 | 5.66 | 5.64 | -0.01 | 98.57 |
下部叶 | 4.96 | 1.00 | 5.96 | 5.95 | -0.01 | 99.09 |
茎 | 3.83 | 1.00 | 4.83 | 4.87 | 0.04 | 103.57 |
根 | 2.60 | 1.00 | 3.60 | 3.59 | -0.01 | 99.29 |
部位 | 钾含量/mg | 加入的钾含量/mg | 总钾量/mg | 钾实测量/mg | 偏差 | 回收率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶 | 4.17 | 1.00 | 5.17 | 5.14 | -0.02 | 97.60 |
中部叶 | 4.66 | 1.00 | 5.66 | 5.64 | -0.01 | 98.57 |
下部叶 | 4.96 | 1.00 | 5.96 | 5.95 | -0.01 | 99.09 |
茎 | 3.83 | 1.00 | 4.83 | 4.87 | 0.04 | 103.57 |
根 | 2.60 | 1.00 | 3.60 | 3.59 | -0.01 | 99.29 |
部位 | 钾含量/mg | 加入的钾含量/mg | 总钾量/mg | 钾实测量/mg | 偏差 | 回收率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶 | 4.23 | 1.00 | 5.23 | 5.22 | -0.01 | 98.75 |
中部叶 | 4.60 | 1.00 | 5.60 | 5.63 | +0.03 | 102.75 |
下部叶 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 6.05 | +0.05 | 105.25 |
茎 | 3.80 | 1.00 | 4.80 | 4.77 | -0.03 | 96.75 |
根 | 2.66 | 1.00 | 3.66 | 3.64 | -0.02 | 98.25 |
部位 | 钾含量/mg | 加入的钾含量/mg | 总钾量/mg | 钾实测量/mg | 偏差 | 回收率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶 | 4.23 | 1.00 | 5.23 | 5.22 | -0.01 | 98.75 |
中部叶 | 4.60 | 1.00 | 5.60 | 5.63 | +0.03 | 102.75 |
下部叶 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 6.05 | +0.05 | 105.25 |
茎 | 3.80 | 1.00 | 4.80 | 4.77 | -0.03 | 96.75 |
根 | 2.66 | 1.00 | 3.66 | 3.64 | -0.02 | 98.25 |
部位 | 盐酸浸提法 | 乙酸浸提法 | 硫酸消煮法 | 盐酸相对误差/% | 乙酸相对误差/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶 | 4.21±0.06 | 4.23±0.06 | 4.15±0.10 | +1.22 | +1.74 |
中部叶 | 4.58±0.11 | 4.62±0.16 | 4.65±0.15 | -1.49 | -0.74 |
下部叶 | 4.97±0.13 | 5.00±0.17 | 4.93±0.20 | +0.84 | +1.35 |
茎 | 3.78±0.14 | 3.79±0.12 | 3.73±0.17 | +1.33 | +1.80 |
根 | 2.64±0.09 | 2.65±0.09 | 2.61±0.08 | +0.86 | +1.53 |
提取时间 | 30 min | 40 min | 180 min | — | — |
t值 | 0.935 | 2.240 | — | — | — |
部位 | 盐酸浸提法 | 乙酸浸提法 | 硫酸消煮法 | 盐酸相对误差/% | 乙酸相对误差/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶 | 4.21±0.06 | 4.23±0.06 | 4.15±0.10 | +1.22 | +1.74 |
中部叶 | 4.58±0.11 | 4.62±0.16 | 4.65±0.15 | -1.49 | -0.74 |
下部叶 | 4.97±0.13 | 5.00±0.17 | 4.93±0.20 | +0.84 | +1.35 |
茎 | 3.78±0.14 | 3.79±0.12 | 3.73±0.17 | +1.33 | +1.80 |
根 | 2.64±0.09 | 2.65±0.09 | 2.61±0.08 | +0.86 | +1.53 |
提取时间 | 30 min | 40 min | 180 min | — | — |
t值 | 0.935 | 2.240 | — | — | — |
[1] | Hsiao T C and Läuchli A . Role of potassium in plant-water relations. Advances in Plant Nutrition’ (B. Tinker and A. Läuchli, eds.)[M]. New York: Praeger Scientific, 1986: 281-312. |
[2] | Wyn Jones R G, Brady C J, Speirs J . Ionic and osmotic relations in plant cells. In 'Recent Advances in the Biochemistry of Cereals’ (D. L. Laidman and R. G. Wyn Jones, eds.)[M]. London: Academic Press, 1979: 63-103. |
[3] | Suelter C H . Enzymes activated by monovalent cations[J]. Science, 1970,168:789-795. |
[4] | Läuchli A and Pflüger R . Potassium transport through plant cell membranes and metabolic role of potassium in plants[J]. Ipi Research Topics, 1980: 111-163. |
[5] | Kanai S, Ohkura K, Adu-Gyamfi J J , et al. Depression of sink activity precedes the inhibition of biomass production in tomato plants subjected to potassium deficiency stress[J]. J Exp Bot, 2007,58:2917-2928. |
[6] | Pettigrew W T . Potassium influences on yield and quality production for maize, wheat, soybean and cotton[J]. Physiol Plant, 2008,133:670-681. |
[7] | Wang M, Zheng Q S, Shen Q R , et al. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2013,14:7370-7390. |
[8] | Erel R, Yermiyahu U, Ben-Gal A , et al. Modification of non-stomatal limitation and photoprotection due to K and Na nutrition of olive trees[J]. J Plant Physiol, 2015,177:1-10. |
[9] |
Zörb C, Senbayram M. Peiter E . Potassium in agriculture—status and perspectives[J]. J Plant Physiol, 2014,171:656-669.
doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.08.008 URL |
[10] | 刘国顺 . 烟草栽培学[M]. 北京: 中国国农业出版社, 2003. |
[11] | Leyonie J P, Etourneaud F . Fertilizer and Tobacco[J]. Tob Reporter, 1996,4:69-72. |
[12] | 韩富根 . 烟草化学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2010. |
[13] | 方力, 李樱 . 烟草中钾元素含量的分析方法研究[J]. 烟草科技, 1996(4):18-19. |
[14] | 王鹏, 谭兰兰, 戴亚 , 等. 烟草中钾含量测定前处理方法的改进[J]. 烟草科技, 2004(2):34-35. |
[15] | 方金豹 . NY/T 2017-2011,植物中氮、磷、钾的测定[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011. |
[16] | 刘国顺, 叶协锋, 王英元 , 等. 水浸提对烤烟叶片钾含量的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2003(5):37-39. |
[17] | 慕文耀 . 用盐酸提取火焰光度法测定烟叶中的钾[J]. 烟草科技, 1999(2):28-29. |
[18] | 吴玉萍, 王东丹, 李琼珍 , 等. 盐酸浸提-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定烟草中的多元素[J]. 分析化学, 2002(3):315-317. |
[19] | 李雅如, 吴朋 . 1%盐酸直接提取烟草中钾进行原子吸收测定[J]. 烟草科技, 1991(3):29-32. |
[20] | 郝春玲 . 火焰光度法测定烟草中钾含量的预处理方法[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2010,16(13):47-48. |
[1] | HUANG Hao, XIE Jin, YUAN Wenbin, WANG Chuliang, CHEN Kunhua, ZENG Fandong, LIANG Zengfa, SU Zhao, WANG Wei. Effects of Different Organic Materials on Root Characteristics and Accumulation of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 51-57. |
[2] | LI Dongxue, WANG Yiliu, HUAN Weiwei, BU Lingduo, WANG Ruizhi, LIU Hao, LU Dianjun, WANG Huoyan, CHEN Xiaoqin. Nutrient Content of Tobacco Leaves and Root Zone Soil Affected by Citrate Soluble Potassium Fertilizer in Yuxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 67-73. |
[3] | BAI Wei, HU Yang, HU Qingqing, CUI Jinli, ZHANG Baoying, YANG Sumei. Effect of Main Cultivation Factors on Yield of Oil Sunflower in North Hebei [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 17-22. |
[4] | LI Sen, FENG Di, ZHANG Jingmin, ZHU Haiyan, PENG Dianliang, WANG Zhihe, WANG Qinqin. Effects of Fulvic Acid Potassium on Germination and Seedling Growth of Cherry Radish Under NaCl Solution Hydroponics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 48-53. |
[5] | GUAN Luohao, YANG Xin, LI Chao, ZHANG Yanling, ZHANG Guangfu, LI Yongliang, ZHOU Hanping, WANG Guangshan, ZHONG Shuai, DAI Huaxin. Influence of Remained Leaves on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Tengchong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 10-15. |
[6] | HAN Min, YANG Pengwu, HE Yuqin, HU Xueqiong, ZHU Yong. Prediction of the Disaster Risk of Overcast and Rainy Days on Flue-cured Tobacco Planting in Yunnan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 69-75. |
[7] | HOU Jianlin, LI Sijun, HE Mingyu, XIAO Hanqian, XIANG Tiejun, HUANG Jie, LI Wujin, XIAO Yansong, JIANG Zhimin, XU Junhua, DENG Xiaohua. Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on the Growth, Dry Matter Accumulation, Yield and Quality of Paddy-tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 39-43. |
[8] | ZHANG Zhiling, LIN Haibin, WANG Xinwang, LIN Long, CHEN Xingfeng, GAO Weimin, LIN Zubin, CHEN Qingwen. The Correlation Between the Starch Content and the Appearance Quality and Sensory Quality of Fujian Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 136-141. |
[9] | WANG Yuemin, KE Yuqin, XIE Rongrong, LI Chunying, LI Wenqing. Effects of Spraying Microelement-fertilizer on Physiological Metabolism of Tobacco Plant at Mature Stage Under Localized Fertilization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 24-30. |
[10] | GUO Xiaoshan, WANG Linchuang, ZHAO Jianfeng, SUN Yudong, WANG Guolian, QU Haiyong, LUO Dexu, XU Wenzhao, YIN Lian. Effects of Nitrogen and Potassium on Saponin in Momordica charantia [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 43-48. |
[11] | LIANG Tian, ZHANG Xiaodong, ZHANG Yu, ZHANG Zuozhong, SI Riguleng, SU Budenggerile, NA Renhua. Effect of Bacterial Enzyme Preparation on Composting of Cow Manure Under Different C/N Conditions [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 77-82. |
[12] | CHEN Jianfeng, ZHAO Wenjun, FU Libo, YIN Mei, WANG Zhiyuan, WANG Wei, WANG Yingxue, YANG Yanxian, CHEN Hua. Influence of Fertilization System of Nutrient Critical Value for Optimum Yield of Tobacco on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Yuxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 1-6. |
[13] | CHENG Guofeng, HUANG Da, ZHAO Dongli, WANG Liqiang, CHENG Zhijie. Current Situation of Soil Fertility in Fluvo-aquic Soil Region of Henan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 101-105. |
[14] | BAI Wei, HU Yang, LI Feng, ZHANG Baoying, CUI Jinli, YANG Sumei. Effects of N, P and K Fertilizers on Yield Related Traits and Economic Benefits of Confectionary Sunflower [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 62-68. |
[15] | DONG Shiliang, ZHAN Siwen, HE Jiewang, QIU Tong, ZHANG Xueqiong, LIU Fengfeng. Quality Classification of Flue-cured Tobacco Based on HPLC Fingerprint Technique [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 151-157. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||