Park and Road Green Space in Yangpu District, Shanghai: Soil Physical Properties and Electrical Conductivity

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb19030106

Abstract

Abstract: The paper aims to provide data support for soil improvement and management. The author measured the soil physical properties of park and road green space in Yangpu district, Shanghai by cutting ring method, the electrical conductivity by portable soil moisture meter, and the soil hydraulic by portable osmotic apparatus. The results showed that: the soil conductivity of Yangpu district was slightly higher than the standard value of 0.05 mS/cm3, and the soil aeration was poor, the soil non-capillary porosity was 5.88% lower than the requirement of urban landscape planting; the soil bulk density of road green was 0.03 g/cm3 higher than the standard, the total soil porosity was 2.42% lower than the ideal standard of urban landscape planting, and the park green space complied with a standard; the soil water content and water holding capacity of road green space were significantly lower than those of park green space. Loosening the surface soil in time, increasing the humus content in the soil by accumulating bark and litter to reduce the soil compaction, and strengthening the daily maintenance and management to prevent the disturbance of the destruction of manmade factor, during the plant greening planting process, we can improve the soil quality from the aspect of enriching the plant community structure.

CLC Number:

S151.9

References

[1]刘源,王浩. 城市公园绿地生态性发展研究[J]. 福建林业科技, 2014, 41(1) : 194-198.
[2]朱国庆. 成都市城区主要道路绿地植物景观的研究[D]. 四川: 西南交通大学, 2012.
[3]邓琳,杜楠楠,于宁. 齐齐哈尔市公园绿地土壤理化性质分析研究[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2017, (01上) : 151-154.
[4]李宁,张俊叶,司志国. 郑州市公园绿地表层土壤酶活性与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 云南林业科技, 2014, 43(4) : 123-127.
[5]张崇宝. 长春市街路土壤分析与改善措施[J]. 中国园林, 2004, 20(10) : 42-44.
[6]伍海兵,方海兰,彭红玲,等. 典型新建绿地上海辰山植物园的土壤物理性质分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012 , 26(6) :85-90.
[7]邹明珠,王艳春,刘燕. 北京城市绿地土壤研究现状及问题[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2012, (3) : 1-6.
[8]Craul P J. Urban soil in landscape design[M]. Canada : John Wiley＆Sons, Inc, 1992.
[9]吴玉红. 基于田块尺度的土壤质量评价指标体系及方法探讨[D]. 陕西: 西北农林科技大学, 2010.
[10]陈祥,包兵,张晓艳. 园林土壤质量管理现状分析及其对策探讨[J]. 农技服务, 2008, 25(3) : 32-33.
[11]刘艳,王成,彭镇华,等. 北京市崇文区不同类型绿地土壤酶活性及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J].东北林业大学学报, 2010, 38(4) : 66-70.
[12]杨新敏. 城市园林绿地土壤调查简报[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 1990, 8(4) : 383-384.
[13]陈建勇,张江山,郑育毅. 基于熵权的物元分析法在土壤重金属污染评价中的应用[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2011, 18(5) : 57-60.
[14]尹伯仁,周丕生,方海兰,等. 上海大树移植的本底土质量调查与评价[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2004, 22(4) : 373-377.
[15]方海兰,陈玲,黄懿珍,等. 上海新建绿地的土壤质量现状和对策[J]. 林业科学, 2007, 43(A01) : 89-94.
[16]陈祥,包兵,胡艳燕,等. 城市园林栽植土质量标准的对比分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2010, (21) : 141-144.
[17]刘为华,张桂莲,徐飞,等. 上海城市森林土壤理化性质[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2009, 26(2) : 155-163.
[18]张琪,方海兰,杨意,等. 上海市浦东公路绿地土壤肥力质量评价[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2007, 26(4) : 491-495.
[19]郝瑞军,方海兰,沈烈英,等. 上海中心城区公园土壤的肥力特征分析[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011, 2011(5) : 20-26.
[20]郝瑞军. 上海城市绿地土壤肥力特征分析与评价[J]. 上海农业学报, 2014, 30(1) : 79-84.
[21]于宁,邓琳. 齐齐哈尔市主城区绿地土壤质量评价[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2015, (15) : 148-151.
[22]邹明珠. 北京市园林绿化种植土壤质量标准的编制研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2012.
[23]Reisinger T W, Simmons G L, Pope P E. The impact of timber harvesting on soil properties and seedling growth in the South[J]. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 1988 , 12(1) :58-67.
[24]陈祥,包兵. 重庆主城区园林土壤存在的主要问题及改良措施[J]. 现代农业科技, 2008(23) : 58-59.
[25]Zisa R P, Halverson H G, Stout B B. Establishment and early growth of conifers on compact soils in urban areas[M]. U.S. : Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 1980 .
[26]马秀梅. 北京城市不同绿地类型土壤及大气环境研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2007.
[27]刘毓,王震,刘红权,等. 济南市主要公园及道路绿地土壤肥力特征及综合评价研究[C]. IFLA亚太区, 上海市绿化和市容管理局, 中国风景园林学会, 2012.
[28]王成,郄光发,彭镇华. 有机地表覆盖物在城市林业建设中的应用价值[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005 , 16(11) : 2213-2217.
[29]项建光,方海兰,杨意,等. 上海典型新建绿地的土壤质量评价[J]. 土壤, 2004, 36(4) : 424-429.
[30]杨柳,何腾兵,童倩倩,等. 喀斯特地区城市公园绿地土壤养分状况调查[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2011 , 39(5) :87-90.
[31]邵海林. 太原市主要街道绿地土壤状况研究[J]. 园林科技, 2011, (4) :30-32.
[32]程萌田. 霾及沙尘颗粒物中水溶性无机离子的浓度及其对环境的影响[D]. 甘肃: 甘肃农业大学, 2013.
[33]钱建英. 退役化工企业污染场地健康风险评估[J]. 能源环境保护, 2016, 30(6) : 44-47.
[34]李建钊. 德夯风景名胜区旅游道路建设工程环境影响评价[D]. 湖南: 湖南大学, 2014.