Effect on Wheat Quality Characters: Inorganic Nitrogen and Phosphate Decrement and Organic Manure Application Amount

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20200300188

Abstract

Abstract:

To explore the relationship between inorganic NP decrement, organic manure application amount and wheat quality characters under non-irrigated field, the effects of inorganic NP decrement and organic manure application amount on wheat quality characters were studied with randomized block design and large-district contrast method. The results showed that the grain (protein content), flour and dough quality were improved with the application amount increase under the treatments of traditional NP application, traditional single N application, NP decrement application and single N decrement application. Among them, traditional NP was better than NP decrement, and there was significant difference in grain (protein content), flour, dough quality (formation time, stability time) (P<0.05); traditional single N application was better than traditional single P application, and there was significant difference in grain (protein content), flour, dough quality (P<0.01); single N decrement was better than single P decrement, and there was significant difference in grain (protein content), flour and dough quality (P<0.01); the traditional application and NP decrement applications were better than traditional single N application and single N decrement application with the same N dosage; there was no difference in grain (protein content), flour, dough quality between traditional single N and single N decrement, traditional single P and single P decrement were same as above. There was a positive correlation between the two kinds of organic manure application amount (x) and grain (protein content), flour, dough quality characters (y); the stability (coefficient of variation) of bulk density was the minimum with inorganic NP and different application amounts of organic manure, but the sedimentation value was the maximum. The study clarified the relationship between inorganic NP decrement, organic manure application amount and wheat quality characters, and analyzed the collaborative improvement technical way of inorganic NP decrement and wheat quality. This research could provide theoretical and technical support for reducing fertilizer application to realize green planting.

Key words: wheat, quality character, inorganic NP decrement, organic manure, green planting

CLC Number:

Ma Aiping, Cui Huanhu, Kang Xiuli, Jing Hua, Wang Yuzhi, Zhang Jiancheng. Effect on Wheat Quality Characters: Inorganic Nitrogen and Phosphate Decrement and Organic Manure Application Amount[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(2): 7-13.

Figures/Tables 8

References 37

[1]	池忠志, 赵广才, 常旭虹, 等. 施氮量对冬小麦籽粒蛋白质及其组分含量和比例的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2006,24(6):65-69.
[2]	刘霞, 李青常, 王振林, 等. 施氮水平对小麦子粒蛋白质组分和加工品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007,13(1):70-76.
[3]	刘钦普. 中国化肥投入区域差异及环境风险分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014,47(18):3596-3605.
[4]	曹雯梅, 刘松涛, 郑贝贝, 等. 小麦高产及超高产优化管理模式对氮素吸收分配、土壤硝态氮累积及产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2013,27(10):1567-1574.
[5]	李莎. 不同水氮处理对冬小麦生长、产量及品质影响的研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2012.
[6]	张永丽, 于振文. 灌水量对不同小麦品种籽粒品质、产量及土壤硝态氮含量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007,21(5):155-158,174.
[7]	宋大利, 侯胜鹏, 王秀斌, 等. 中国秸秆养分资源数量及替代化肥潜力[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24(1):1-21.
[8]	柴如山, 王擎运, 叶新新, 等. 中国主要粮食作物秸秆还田替代化学氮肥潜力[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019,38(11):2583-2593.
[9]	朱兆良, 金继运. 保障中国粮食安全的肥料问题[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(2):259-273.
[10]	牛新胜, 巨晓棠. 中国有机肥料资源及利用[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017,23(6):1462-1479.
[11]	耿维, 袁嫚嫚, 邬刚, 等. 安徽省作物养分供需分析及化肥减施潜力研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020,28(2):221-235.
[12]	马想, 徐明岗, 赵惠丽, 等. 中国典型农田土壤中有机物料腐解特征及驱动因子[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019,52(9):1564-1573.
[13]	邱韩英, 朱广力, 李宁, 等. 氮磷钾肥减量施用对小麦产量的影响试验初报[J]. 上海农业科技, 2019(02):113-114.
[14]	董园园, 张娜, 杭杰. 化肥减量对小麦生长发育及产量效益的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2019(12):142-146.
[15]	刘建, 魏亚凤, 杨美英, 等. 小麦宽空幅冬季培肥的产量表现、经济效益及化肥减施效应研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2015,27(12):59-63.
[16]	陈志龙, 陈杰, 许建平, 等. 有机肥氮替代部分化肥氮对小麦产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013,41(7):55-57.
[17]	张晶, 张定一, 王丽, 等. 不同有机肥和氮磷组合对旱地小麦的增产机理研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017,23(1):238-243.
[18]	马臣. 黄土高原旱地麦田有机无机肥配施的减氮增产及土壤环境效应研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2018.
[19]	郁洁, 蒋益, 徐春淼, 等. 不同有机物及其堆肥与化肥配施对小麦生长及氮素吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012,18(6):1293-1302.
[20]	张昊青. 黄土高原旱地麦田有机无机配施减氮增效作用研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2017.
[21]	王庆, 海江波, 岳忠娜, 等. 化肥减量对麦田土壤微生物量及微生物区系的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2012,32(3):484-487.
[22]	南镇武, 梁斌, 刘树堂, 等. 长期定位施肥对冬小麦籽粒品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2015,30(4):162-167.
[23]	蔡艳, 郝明德. 黄土高原长期施肥对小麦籽粒蛋白质营养品质的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2013,27(9):1378-1384.
[24]	伍晓轩, 杨洪坤, 朱杰, 等. 不同有机肥种类配施化学氮肥对丘陵旱地小麦产量和籽粒蛋白质品质的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2019,37(3):283-287,295.
[25]	孙建光, 徐晶, 宋彦耕. NY/T 394—2013,绿色食品肥料施用准则[S]. 中华人民共和国农业部, 2014: 2.
[26]	陈力平, 王正银, 黄云, 等. 土壤性状和营养物质对小麦品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2004,24(4):143-146.
[27]	姜瑛, 戚秀秀, 李祥剑, 等. 不同小麦品种的氮素利用特性研究[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019,39(6):702-708.
[28]	关二旗, 魏益民, 张波. 小麦籽粒品质与基因型及环境条件的关系[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2010,30(5):963-969.
[29]	樊虎玲, 郝明德, 李志西. 黄土高原旱地化肥和有机肥配施对小麦品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2005,23(5):72-76.
[30]	石玉, 于振文. 施氮量和氮肥底追比例对济麦20产量、品质及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2010,30(4):710-714.
[31]	马瑞琦, 亓振, 常旭虹, 等. 化控剂对冬小麦植株性状及产量品质的调节效应[J]. 作物杂志, 2018(1):133-140.
[32]	张久东, 包兴国, 曹卫东, 等. 长期施用绿肥减施化肥对毛叶苕子产草量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(6):66-70.
[33]	张久东, 包兴国, 王婷, 等. 增施绿肥与降低氮肥对小麦产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2011,25(5):998-1003.
[34]	黄国勤. 长江经济带稻田耕作制度绿色发展探讨[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020,28(1):1-7.
[35]	涂仕华, 韩秀英, 秦鱼生. 论中国有机农业的发展前景[J]. 西南农业学报, 2005,18(1):99-104.
[36]	赵鹏涛, 赵卫国, 罗红炼, 等. 小麦主要品质性状相关性及主成分分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(21):7-13.
[37]	姜兰芳, 马小飞, 王敏, 等. 山西小麦品种籽粒硬度与主要品质性状研究[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019,39(11):1309-1315.

有机肥	全氮/%	全磷/%	全钾/%
牛粪	0.937	0.198	1.42
羊粪	1.118	0.154	1.68

有机肥	全氮/%	全磷/%	全钾/%
牛粪	0.937	0.198	1.42
羊粪	1.118	0.154	1.68

处理	施肥模式	施肥量/(kg/hm²)
1	传统NP配施	N172.5+P₂O₅90
2	减量NP配施	N56.25 +P₂O₅23.40
3	传统单施N	N172.5+P₂O₅0.0
4	传统单施P	N0.0 +P₂O₅90.0
5	减量单施N	N56.25+P₂O₅0.0
6	减量单施P	N0.0+P₂O₅23.40
7	空白对照	N0.0+P₂O₅0.0

处理	施肥模式	施肥量/(kg/hm²)
1	传统NP配施	N172.5+P₂O₅90
2	减量NP配施	N56.25 +P₂O₅23.40
3	传统单施N	N172.5+P₂O₅0.0
4	传统单施P	N0.0 +P₂O₅90.0
5	减量单施N	N56.25+P₂O₅0.0
6	减量单施P	N0.0+P₂O₅23.40
7	空白对照	N0.0+P₂O₅0.0

有机肥种类	处理	施肥量/(t/hm²)
牛粪	1	21.5
	2	28.6
	3	35.8
羊粪	1	32.1
	2	42.9
	3	53.6