The Adaptability Evaluation of Sugar Beet Varieties Based on Grey Relational Analysis and Principal Component Analysis

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0269

Abstract

Abstract:

The aim is to screen out the most suitable sugar beet variety with high production quality and resistance to root rot in Harbin, Heilongjiang Province. In 2020, the test was carried out at the test base of Hulan Campus of Heilongjiang University, with 21 introduced KWS series and 1 BTS2730 sugar beet (KWS1197 as control) as the test materials, 4 indexes of root yield, sugar content, sugar yield and root rot were comprehensively evaluated by principal component analysis (PCA) and grey relation analysis (GRA). The sorts of the sugar beet varieties obtained by the two methods were roughly the same. The contribution rate of the first primary component (root yield) was 69.704%. The contribution rate of the second primary component (sugar content) was 26.283%, and the accumulated contribution rate was 95.987%, which could fully reflect the production quality of sugar beet. 6 varieties suitable for local planting selected by comprehensive evaluation value were better than the control: KWS0023 (0.8231)>KWS0015(0.7685)> KWS6661(0.7511)> KWS9921(0.7103)> KWS0860(0.7097) >BTS2730(0.7065) >CK(0.6823). The comprehensive evaluation value of other varieties was lower than the control. In conclusion, the principal component analysis and gray relational analysis could analyze sugar beet varieties more comprehensively, and the results obtained are reliable.

Key words: sugar beet, variety, principal component analysis, grey relational analysis, adaptability

CLC Number:

S566.3

Su Xinxin, Xiao Yang, Hu Xiaohang, Ma Yahuai, Li Yanli. The Adaptability Evaluation of Sugar Beet Varieties Based on Grey Relational Analysis and Principal Component Analysis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(30): 39-46.

Figures/Tables 10

References 26

[1]	韩志忠, 殷学云, 王军元. 对酒泉甜叶菊产业避免混乱如何步入良性发展的思考[J]. 中国糖料, 2017, 39(3):40-42.
[2]	乔志文, 王皙玮. 甜菜褐斑病化学防治喷洒次数研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(4):83-87.
[3]	刘奇, 王婧朏, 卢秉福. 黑龙江省制糖企业甜菜种植与收购调查分析[J]. 中国糖料, 2020, 42(1):71-76.
[4]	董玉良. 基于灰色关联度对山东小麦新品种(系)综合表现评价分析[J]. 现代农业, 2020, 26(9):77-78.
[5]	宋智美, 刘乃雁, 王元英, 等. 灰色关联度法在烤烟品种重要性状综合评价中的运用[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2011, 32(2):17-19,23.
[6]	马炳美. 灰色关联度分析在桂花品种评价中的应用[J]. 福建林业科技, 2020, 47(2):106-108.
[7]	杨涛, 周琴, 姜东, 等. 灰色关联分析法在不同小麦品种饼干品质评价中的应用[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(4):460-472.
[8]	陈彦云, 曹君迈, 黄丽红. 灰色关联度分析在甜菜抗病育种中的应用[J]. 宁夏大学学报, 2002, 23(3):272-274.
[9]	叶开梅, 陈泽辉, 祝云芳. 基于主成分分析与灰色关联度分析的玉米自交系综合评价[J]. 种子, 2019, 38(10):87-92,96
[10]	赵卫国, 王灏, 穆建新, 等. 甘蓝型油菜DH群体主要品质性状相关性及主成分分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(14):18-24.
[11]	黄志伟, 曹剑, 袁德梽, 等. 基于主成分聚类分析的中国油茶栽培区划[J]. 西部林业科学, 2016(3):155-160.
[12]	贾雪峰, 朱思明, 王强, 等. 新疆不同产地甜菜块根中元素含量的主成分和聚类分析[J]. 现代食品科技, 2015, 31(7):302-308.
[13]	胡晓航, 吴玉梅, 王皙玮, 等. 不同品种(系)甜菜氨基酸主成分分析与营养综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(27):69-75.
[14]	鲁兆新, 刘巧红, 罗成飞, 等. 双丰系列甜菜品种(系)产量、含糖与农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 中国甜菜糖业, 2010(3):22-24.
[15]	鲁兆新, 刘巧红, 罗成飞, 等. 对甜菜产量、含糖与农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 中国甜菜糖业, 2011(4):3-5.
[16]	魏常敏, 周文伟, 许卫猛, 等. 基于主成分和灰色关联度分析的鲜食糯玉米组合综合评价[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2020, 48(7):9-13.
[17]	范继征, 石达金, 吕巨智, 等. 基于关联度、主成分和聚类分析的西南区玉米组合评价[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(1):102-110.
[18]	张凡, 薛鑫, 刘国涛, 等. 基于灰色关联度分析法和聚类分析法筛选小麦高产优质新品种(系)的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(27):6-13.
[19]	杨芳, 张成, 乔岩. 陇东旱地冬小麦新品系产量与农艺性状的灰色关联度及主成分分析[J]. 陇东学院学报, 2005, 26(1):4-9.
[20]	邓聚龙. 灰色系统基本方法[M]. 武汉: 华中理工大学出版社. 1987.
[21]	冯海萍, 苏存录, 谢华, 等. 基于主成分分析的宁南山区露地栽培小型甘蓝品种的综合评价[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2020, 33(11):68-71.
[22]	严圭, 李辉捷, 华之梦, 等. 基于主成分分析的芝麻品质综合评价[J]. 作物科学, 2020, 42(6):1139-1150.
[23]	张立明, 李翠芳, 董心久, 等. 甜菜块根农艺性状的遗传变异及相关性和主成分分析[J]. 中国糖料, 2011(4):12-14.
[24]	王学伟. 应用灰色系统理论关联分析法对甜菜新品种比较试验的综合评估[J]. 种子科技, 2009(4):15-16.
[25]	陈彦云, 曹君迈, 等. 甜菜抗(耐)丛根病杂交组合品种的灰色关联度分析[J]. 中国甜菜糖业, 2001(4):38-40.
[26]	窦士树, 马海涛, 朱红彩. 河南省夏大豆新品种产量与主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(12):2535-2538.

品种	根腐病/%	根产量/(m³/hm²)	含糖率/%	产糖量/(m³/hm²)
X0	31.934	76594.739	11.768	7765.155
KWS9921	4.385	69643.634	9.675	6738.022
KWS0860	15.095	60192.403	10.645	6407.481
KWS9962	4.984	58279.429	9.270	5402.503
KWS8157	31.934	14167.375	8.988	1273.293
KWS0069	10.034	58847.639	8.253	4856.401
KWS0015	1.074	76594.739	9.498	7274.585
KWS5104	6.697	54813.347	10.338	5666.330
KWS7748	10.362	64472.920	8.863	5713.913
KWS1051	8.071	55741.423	10.283	5731.612
KWS0060	31.286	32236.460	9.195	2964.143
KWS9967	10.934	52388.983	8.998	4713.699
KWS0023	0.847	65988.148	11.768	7765.155
KWS1250	5.998	47748.599	9.495	4533.730
KWS6673	4.940	57654.398	9.888	5700.579
KWS1176	23.385	34566.122	11.065	3824.741
KWS5106	11.874	50968.457	10.235	5216.622
KWS7772	2.264	67295.031	8.658	5826.067
KWS8844	6.675	60419.688	9.438	5702.108
KWS1197(CK)	10.958	51290.443	11.340	5816.336
KWS6661	1.588	73905.210	9.700	7168.805
KWS9899	6.618	46422.776	10.928	5072.849
BTS2730	4.193	73166.537	9.010	6592.305

品种	根腐病/%	根产量/(m³/hm²)	含糖率/%	产糖量/(m³/hm²)
X0	31.934	76594.739	11.768	7765.155
KWS9921	4.385	69643.634	9.675	6738.022
KWS0860	15.095	60192.403	10.645	6407.481
KWS9962	4.984	58279.429	9.270	5402.503
KWS8157	31.934	14167.375	8.988	1273.293
KWS0069	10.034	58847.639	8.253	4856.401
KWS0015	1.074	76594.739	9.498	7274.585
KWS5104	6.697	54813.347	10.338	5666.330
KWS7748	10.362	64472.920	8.863	5713.913
KWS1051	8.071	55741.423	10.283	5731.612
KWS0060	31.286	32236.460	9.195	2964.143
KWS9967	10.934	52388.983	8.998	4713.699
KWS0023	0.847	65988.148	11.768	7765.155
KWS1250	5.998	47748.599	9.495	4533.730
KWS6673	4.940	57654.398	9.888	5700.579
KWS1176	23.385	34566.122	11.065	3824.741
KWS5106	11.874	50968.457	10.235	5216.622
KWS7772	2.264	67295.031	8.658	5826.067
KWS8844	6.675	60419.688	9.438	5702.108
KWS1197(CK)	10.958	51290.443	11.340	5816.336
KWS6661	1.588	73905.210	9.700	7168.805
KWS9899	6.618	46422.776	10.928	5072.849
BTS2730	4.193	73166.537	9.010	6592.305

品种	根腐病/%	根产量/(m³/hm²)	含糖率/%	产糖量/(m³/hm²)
KWS9921	0.137	0.909	0.822	0.868
KWS0860	0.472	0.786	0.905	0.825
KWS9962	0.156	0.761	0.788	0.696
KWS8157	1	0.185	0.764	0.164
KWS0069	0.314	0.768	0.701	0.625
KWS0015	0.034	1	0.807	0.937
KWS5104	0.210	0.716	0.878	0.730
KWS7748	0.324	0.842	0.753	0.736
KWS1051	0.253	0.728	0.874	0.738
KWS0060	0.980	0.421	0.781	0.382
KWS9967	0.342	0.684	0.765	0.607
KWS0023	0.027	0.862	1	1
KWS1250	0.188	0.623	0.807	0.584
KWS6673	0.155	0.753	0.840	0.734
KWS1176	0.732	0.451	0.940	0.493
KWS5106	0.372	0.665	0.870	0.672
KWS7772	0.071	0.879	0.736	0.750
KWS8844	0.209	0.789	0.802	0.734
KWS1197(CK)	0.343	0.670	0.964	0.749
KWS6661	0.050	0.965	0.824	0.923
KWS9899	0.207	0.606	0.929	0.653
BTS2730	0.131	0.955	0.766	0.849

品种	根腐病/%	根产量/(m³/hm²)	含糖率/%	产糖量/(m³/hm²)
KWS9921	0.137	0.909	0.822	0.868
KWS0860	0.472	0.786	0.905	0.825
KWS9962	0.156	0.761	0.788	0.696
KWS8157	1	0.185	0.764	0.164
KWS0069	0.314	0.768	0.701	0.625
KWS0015	0.034	1	0.807	0.937
KWS5104	0.210	0.716	0.878	0.730
KWS7748	0.324	0.842	0.753	0.736
KWS1051	0.253	0.728	0.874	0.738
KWS0060	0.980	0.421	0.781	0.382
KWS9967	0.342	0.684	0.765	0.607
KWS0023	0.027	0.862	1	1
KWS1250	0.188	0.623	0.807	0.584
KWS6673	0.155	0.753	0.840	0.734
KWS1176	0.732	0.451	0.940	0.493
KWS5106	0.372	0.665	0.870	0.672
KWS7772	0.071	0.879	0.736	0.750
KWS8844	0.209	0.789	0.802	0.734
KWS1197(CK)	0.343	0.670	0.964	0.749
KWS6661	0.050	0.965	0.824	0.923
KWS9899	0.207	0.606	0.929	0.653
BTS2730	0.131	0.955	0.766	0.849

品种	根腐病/%	根产量/(m³/hm²)	含糖率/%	产糖量/(m³/hm²)
KWS9921	0.863	0.091	0.178	0.132
KWS0860	0.528	0.214	0.095	0.175
KWS9962	0.844	0.239	0.212	0.304
KWS8157	0	0.815	0.236	0.836
KWS0069	0.686	0.232	0.299	0.375
KWS0015	0.966	0	0.193	0.063
KWS5104	0.790	0.284	0.122	0.270
KWS7748	0.676	0.158	0.247	0.264
KWS1051	0.747	0.272	0.126	0.262
KWS0060	0.020	0.579	0.219	0.618
KWS9967	0.658	0.316	0.235	0.393
KWS0023	0.973	0.138	0	0
KWS1250	0.812	0.377	0.193	0.416
KWS6673	0.845	0.247	0.160	0.266
KWS1176	0.268	0.549	0.060	0.507
KWS5106	0.628	0.335	0.130	0.328
KWS7772	0.929	0.121	0.264	0.250
KWS8844	0.791	0.211	0.198	0.266
KWS1197(CK)	0.657	0.330	0.036	0.251
KWS6661	0.950	0.035	0.176	0.077
KWS9899	0.793	0.394	0.071	0.347
BTS2730	0.869	0.045	0.234	0.151
MAX=0.973486,MIN=0