
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 52-61.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0368
Previous Articles Next Articles
					
													DUAN Qing1,2,3( ), CAI Jingjing4, DU Wenwen1,2,3, YANG Nan4, WANG Xiangning1,2,3, JIA Wenjie1,2,3, MA Lulin1,2,3(
), CAI Jingjing4, DU Wenwen1,2,3, YANG Nan4, WANG Xiangning1,2,3, JIA Wenjie1,2,3, MA Lulin1,2,3( )
)
												  
						
						
						
					
				
Received:2021-04-08
															
							
																	Revised:2021-11-16
															
							
															
							
																	Online:2022-03-05
															
							
																	Published:2022-04-13
															
						Contact:
								MA Lulin   
																	E-mail:271022855@qq.com;272912111@qq.com
																					CLC Number:
DUAN Qing, CAI Jingjing, DU Wenwen, YANG Nan, WANG Xiangning, JIA Wenjie, MA Lulin. Pollen Viability and in Vitro Germination of Dahlia Cultivars[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 52-61.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0368
| pH | 花粉萌发率/% | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
| 5.0 | 15.4 | 17.2 | 14.8 | 15.80±1.25 | 3154.367 | 4 | 788.592 | 31.527 | 10 | 3.153 | 250.135 | 0.000** | ||
| 5.5 | 45.6 | 44.3 | 42.8 | 44.23±1.40 | ||||||||||
| 6.0 | 56.3 | 58.1 | 60.7 | 58.37±2.21 | ||||||||||
| 6.5 | 53.2 | 49.5 | 50.1 | 50.93±1.99 | ||||||||||
| 7.0 | 47.9 | 44.3 | 46.8 | 46.33±1.84 | ||||||||||
| pH | 花粉萌发率/% | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
| 5.0 | 15.4 | 17.2 | 14.8 | 15.80±1.25 | 3154.367 | 4 | 788.592 | 31.527 | 10 | 3.153 | 250.135 | 0.000** | ||
| 5.5 | 45.6 | 44.3 | 42.8 | 44.23±1.40 | ||||||||||
| 6.0 | 56.3 | 58.1 | 60.7 | 58.37±2.21 | ||||||||||
| 6.5 | 53.2 | 49.5 | 50.1 | 50.93±1.99 | ||||||||||
| 7.0 | 47.9 | 44.3 | 46.8 | 46.33±1.84 | ||||||||||
| 培养温度/℃ | 花粉萌发率/% | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
| 15 | 36.8 | 39.4 | 37.3 | 37.83±1.38 | 2158.38 | 4 | 539.595 | 21.153 | 10 | 2.115 | 255.087 | 0.000** | ||
| 20 | 53.4 | 52.1 | 51.9 | 52.47±0.81 | ||||||||||
| 25 | 59.7 | 61.2 | 58.4 | 59.77±1.40 | ||||||||||
| 30 | 51.2 | 50.5 | 54.1 | 51.93±1.91 | ||||||||||
| 35 | 27.9 | 24.8 | 26.3 | 26.33±1.55 | ||||||||||
| 培养温度/℃ | 花粉萌发率/% | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
| 15 | 36.8 | 39.4 | 37.3 | 37.83±1.38 | 2158.38 | 4 | 539.595 | 21.153 | 10 | 2.115 | 255.087 | 0.000** | ||
| 20 | 53.4 | 52.1 | 51.9 | 52.47±0.81 | ||||||||||
| 25 | 59.7 | 61.2 | 58.4 | 59.77±1.40 | ||||||||||
| 30 | 51.2 | 50.5 | 54.1 | 51.93±1.91 | ||||||||||
| 35 | 27.9 | 24.8 | 26.3 | 26.33±1.55 | ||||||||||
| 培养时间/h | 花粉萌发率/% | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
| 1.0 | 56.2 | 57.5 | 56.9 | 56.9±0.65 | 163.156 | 4 | 40.789 | 13.76 | 10 | 1.376 | 29.643 | 0.000** | ||
| 1.5 | 56.7 | 59.3 | 58.3 | 58.1±1.31 | ||||||||||
| 2.0 | 59.7 | 63.2 | 62.4 | 61.8±1.83 | ||||||||||
| 2.5 | 65.6 | 63.6 | 64.9 | 64.7±1.01 | ||||||||||
| 3.0 | 65.1 | 65.3 | 64.2 | 64.9±0.59 | ||||||||||
| 培养时间/h | 花粉萌发率/% | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
| 1.0 | 56.2 | 57.5 | 56.9 | 56.9±0.65 | 163.156 | 4 | 40.789 | 13.76 | 10 | 1.376 | 29.643 | 0.000** | ||
| 1.5 | 56.7 | 59.3 | 58.3 | 58.1±1.31 | ||||||||||
| 2.0 | 59.7 | 63.2 | 62.4 | 61.8±1.83 | ||||||||||
| 2.5 | 65.6 | 63.6 | 64.9 | 64.7±1.01 | ||||||||||
| 3.0 | 65.1 | 65.3 | 64.2 | 64.9±0.59 | ||||||||||
| 处理组 | 因素 | 萌发率/% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | ① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 4.3 | 3.0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5.7 | 6.5 | 4.7 | 5.6 | |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8.3 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 8.7 | |
| 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9.6 | 8.4 | 8.1 | 8.7 | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 15.8 | 14.4 | 14.6 | 14.9 | |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23.8 | 21.4 | 22.7 | 22.6 | |
| 7 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 30.5 | 31.7 | 33.1 | 31.8 | |
| 8 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 36.6 | 38.2 | 35.2 | 36.7 | |
| 9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 28.6 | 26.4 | 25.3 | 26.7 | |
| 10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 54.7 | 53.7 | 55.2 | 54.5 | |
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 59.7 | 57.2 | 58.9 | 58.6 | |
| 12 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 61.3 | 63.4 | 61.6 | 62.1 | |
| 13 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 24.4 | 25.7 | 25.4 | 25.2 | |
| 14 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 56.3 | 54.8 | 54.9 | 55.3 | |
| 15 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 56.7 | 56.3 | 58.1 | 57.0 | |
| 16 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 44.6 | 49.3 | 48.3 | 47.4 | |
| 均值K1 | 6.500 | 17.460 | 32.900 | |||||
| 均值K2 | 26.500 | 34.530 | 34.922 | |||||
| 均值K3 | 50.500 | 39.025 | 31.867 | |||||
| 均值K4 | 46.233 | 38.718 | 30.043 | |||||
| 极值R | 44.000 | 21.565 | 4.879 | |||||
| 处理组 | 因素 | 萌发率/% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | ① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 4.3 | 3.0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5.7 | 6.5 | 4.7 | 5.6 | |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8.3 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 8.7 | |
| 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9.6 | 8.4 | 8.1 | 8.7 | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 15.8 | 14.4 | 14.6 | 14.9 | |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23.8 | 21.4 | 22.7 | 22.6 | |
| 7 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 30.5 | 31.7 | 33.1 | 31.8 | |
| 8 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 36.6 | 38.2 | 35.2 | 36.7 | |
| 9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 28.6 | 26.4 | 25.3 | 26.7 | |
| 10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 54.7 | 53.7 | 55.2 | 54.5 | |
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 59.7 | 57.2 | 58.9 | 58.6 | |
| 12 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 61.3 | 63.4 | 61.6 | 62.1 | |
| 13 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 24.4 | 25.7 | 25.4 | 25.2 | |
| 14 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 56.3 | 54.8 | 54.9 | 55.3 | |
| 15 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 56.7 | 56.3 | 58.1 | 57.0 | |
| 16 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 44.6 | 49.3 | 48.3 | 47.4 | |
| 均值K1 | 6.500 | 17.460 | 32.900 | |||||
| 均值K2 | 26.500 | 34.530 | 34.922 | |||||
| 均值K3 | 50.500 | 39.025 | 31.867 | |||||
| 均值K4 | 46.233 | 38.718 | 30.043 | |||||
| 极值R | 44.000 | 21.565 | 4.879 | |||||
| 变异来源 | 平方和 | df | 均方 | F值 | P值 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 14695.04 | 3 | 4898.347 | 138.955 | 0.000** | 
| B | 3739.092 | 3 | 1246.364 | 35.357 | 0.000** | 
| C | 149.608 | 3 | 49.869 | 1.415 | 0.000** | 
| 误差 | 1339.547 | 38 | 35.251 | 0.253 | 
| 变异来源 | 平方和 | df | 均方 | F值 | P值 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 14695.04 | 3 | 4898.347 | 138.955 | 0.000** | 
| B | 3739.092 | 3 | 1246.364 | 35.357 | 0.000** | 
| C | 149.608 | 3 | 49.869 | 1.415 | 0.000** | 
| 误差 | 1339.547 | 38 | 35.251 | 0.253 | 
| 品种 | 花粉萌发率/% | 多重比较 | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ① | ② | ③ | 平均 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
| 波彻儿 | 76.47 | 78.15 | 81.53 | 78.72±2.58 | A | 25373.879 | 21 | 1208.28 | 340.791 | 44 | 7.745 | 156.003 | 0.000** | |
| 回忆 | 76.05 | 81.74 | 75.2 | 77.66±3.56 | A | |||||||||
| 紫珠 | 72.56 | 75.70 | 76.92 | 75.06±2.25 | AB | |||||||||
| 绿野仙踪 | 75.66 | 75.03 | 77.28 | 75.99±1.16 | AB | |||||||||
| 锦瑟 | 69.11 | 75.69 | 71.96 | 72.25±3.30 | B | |||||||||
| 琳达夫人 | 67.42 | 70.17 | 73.96 | 70.52±3.28 | BC | |||||||||
| 简.万.斯卡法拉 | 68.91 | 70.72 | 71.57 | 70.40±1.36 | BC | |||||||||
| 芬克里夫的错觉 | 68.66 | 62.73 | 68.13 | 66.51±3.28 | C | |||||||||
| 白色飘雪 | 56.96 | 68.2 | 66.37 | 63.84±6.03 | C | |||||||||
| 疯狂的爱 | 71.29 | 66.22 | 63.7 | 67.07±3.87 | C | |||||||||
| 热情似火 | 61.09 | 56.71 | 53.94 | 57.25±3.61 | D | |||||||||
| 雪莲花 | 58.24 | 55.67 | 56.83 | 56.91±1.29 | D | |||||||||
| 金色火炬 | 53.54 | 56.42 | 54.22 | 54.73±1.51 | DE | |||||||||
| 彩色收益 | 49.64 | 51.74 | 52.23 | 51.20±1.38 | E | |||||||||
| 潇洒 | 46.97 | 47.25 | 40.83 | 45.02±3.63 | F | |||||||||
| 可美大地 | 40.19 | 40.52 | 41.37 | 40.69±0.61 | F | |||||||||
| 紫霞 | 46.65 | 42.78 | 41.84 | 43.76±2.55 | F | |||||||||
| 欢乐万圣节 | 21.92 | 25.51 | 26.92 | 24.78±2.58 | G | |||||||||
| 黄金缕 | 29.63 | 31.21 | 27.22 | 29.35±2.01 | G | |||||||||
| 琳达 | 25.36 | 29.92 | 27.76 | 27.68±2.28 | G | |||||||||
| 爱丁堡 | 29.28 | 26.18 | 25.39 | 26.95±2.06 | G | |||||||||
| 兰花公主 | 12.16 | 11.44 | 11.64 | 11.75±0.37 | J | |||||||||
| 品种 | 花粉萌发率/% | 多重比较 | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ① | ② | ③ | 平均 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
| 波彻儿 | 76.47 | 78.15 | 81.53 | 78.72±2.58 | A | 25373.879 | 21 | 1208.28 | 340.791 | 44 | 7.745 | 156.003 | 0.000** | |
| 回忆 | 76.05 | 81.74 | 75.2 | 77.66±3.56 | A | |||||||||
| 紫珠 | 72.56 | 75.70 | 76.92 | 75.06±2.25 | AB | |||||||||
| 绿野仙踪 | 75.66 | 75.03 | 77.28 | 75.99±1.16 | AB | |||||||||
| 锦瑟 | 69.11 | 75.69 | 71.96 | 72.25±3.30 | B | |||||||||
| 琳达夫人 | 67.42 | 70.17 | 73.96 | 70.52±3.28 | BC | |||||||||
| 简.万.斯卡法拉 | 68.91 | 70.72 | 71.57 | 70.40±1.36 | BC | |||||||||
| 芬克里夫的错觉 | 68.66 | 62.73 | 68.13 | 66.51±3.28 | C | |||||||||
| 白色飘雪 | 56.96 | 68.2 | 66.37 | 63.84±6.03 | C | |||||||||
| 疯狂的爱 | 71.29 | 66.22 | 63.7 | 67.07±3.87 | C | |||||||||
| 热情似火 | 61.09 | 56.71 | 53.94 | 57.25±3.61 | D | |||||||||
| 雪莲花 | 58.24 | 55.67 | 56.83 | 56.91±1.29 | D | |||||||||
| 金色火炬 | 53.54 | 56.42 | 54.22 | 54.73±1.51 | DE | |||||||||
| 彩色收益 | 49.64 | 51.74 | 52.23 | 51.20±1.38 | E | |||||||||
| 潇洒 | 46.97 | 47.25 | 40.83 | 45.02±3.63 | F | |||||||||
| 可美大地 | 40.19 | 40.52 | 41.37 | 40.69±0.61 | F | |||||||||
| 紫霞 | 46.65 | 42.78 | 41.84 | 43.76±2.55 | F | |||||||||
| 欢乐万圣节 | 21.92 | 25.51 | 26.92 | 24.78±2.58 | G | |||||||||
| 黄金缕 | 29.63 | 31.21 | 27.22 | 29.35±2.01 | G | |||||||||
| 琳达 | 25.36 | 29.92 | 27.76 | 27.68±2.28 | G | |||||||||
| 爱丁堡 | 29.28 | 26.18 | 25.39 | 26.95±2.06 | G | |||||||||
| 兰花公主 | 12.16 | 11.44 | 11.64 | 11.75±0.37 | J | |||||||||
| [1] | 姚梅国, 王明启, 迟玉文. 大丽花品种资源的研究[J]. 吉林林学院学报, 1995,11(2):96-99. | 
| [2] | 李仁娜, 李艳, 王宏, 等. 西安地区50种大丽花的园林观赏性评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019. 3(3):68-72. | 
| [3] | 刘安成, 王庆, 庞长民. 我国大丽花园艺学研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2010(11):225-228. | 
| [4] | 刘成琴, 赵兴旺, 康志钰, 等. 5种通关藤花粉活力测定方法比较[J]. 云南农业大学学报:自然科学, 2021,36(1):179-182. | 
| [5] | 杨群力. 大丽花名优品种的引种及露地栽培技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009,25(11):108-116. | 
| [6] | 杨群力, 李仁娜, 李艳, 等. 国内大丽花品种资源保存现状及发展对策研究——以临洮大丽花为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017,33(7):98-103. | 
| [7] | KUMAR R, THAKUR P, GUPTA Y C, et al. Evaluation of Dahlia (Dahlia variabilis L.) cultivars for growth and flowering characteristics under sub-montane, sub-tropical low hill zone of Himachal Pradesh[J]. International journal of farm sciences, 2021,11(1-2):19-23. doi: 10.5958/2250-0499.2021.00005.7 URL | 
| [8] | 陈叶, 李荣, 赵明君. 乌鲁木齐市7种荷兰大丽花新品种引种栽培适应性研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021. 49(5):128-130,137. | 
| [9] | 杨群力, 王峰伟. 大丽花快速扦插繁殖技术的改进措施研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009,25(24):338-340. | 
| [10] | 袁震. 大丽花离体快繁技术研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2016. | 
| [11] | 杨婷. 大丽花组织培养与脱毒技术研究[D]. 保定:河北农业大学, 2014. | 
| [12] | 宋亚东, 大丽花栽培技术[J]. 甘肃农业, 2021(7):86-88. | 
| [13] | 范苏鲁, 苑兆和, 冯立娟, 等. 干旱胁迫对大丽花生理生化指标的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011,22(3):651-657. | 
| [14] | 范苏鲁, 苑兆和, 冯立娟, 等. 水分胁迫对大丽花光合作用,蒸腾和气孔导度的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(8):119-122. | 
| [15] | AZUMA M, ONOZAKI T, ICHIMURA K. Difference of ethylene production and response to ethylene in cut flowers of dahlia (Dahlia variabilis) cultivars[J]. Scientia horticulturae, 2020,273:109635. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109635 URL | 
| [16] | 张云仙. 大丽花散粉与结实特性初步研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2017. | 
| [17] | 赵统利, 周翔, 朱朋波, 等. 百合花粉生活力测定方法的比较研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2006(5):88,144. | 
| [18] | 曹明华, 杨俊杰, 苏金强, 等. 天宝野生蕉花粉活力快速检测方法筛选[J]. 福建热作科技, 2018,43(2):15-17. | 
| [19] | 詹妮, 黄烈健. 大叶相思花粉离体萌发适宜条件及活力检测方法[J]. 林业科学, 2016,52(2):67-73. | 
| [20] | 陈家瑞. 孢粉染色新技术[J]. 植物杂志, 1987(4):24-25,50. | 
| [21] | 杜文文, 段青, 杨楠, 等. 30种观叶秋海棠花粉活力检验方法筛选及活力测定[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021,34(7):1521-1527. | 
| [22] | 杜玉虎, 张绍铃, 姜雪婷, 等. 果梅花粉离体萌发及花粉管生长特性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006,26(9):1846-1852. | 
| [23] | 孙爱芹, 常伟光, 韩斌, 等. 不同枣品种花粉生活力及贮藏方法研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(1):166-168. | 
| [24] | 秦晓君, 潘磊, 牛永志, 等. 烟草花粉活力检测方法筛选[J]. 云南大学学报:自然科学版, 2020,42(3):592-598. | 
| [25] | STONE J L, THOMSON J D, DENT-ACOSTA S J. Assessment of pollen viability in hand-pollination experiments: a review[J]. American journal of botany, 1995,82(9):1186-1197. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1995.82.issue-9 URL | 
| [26] | 张露, 李世峰, 蒋雪彬, 等. 矾根花粉离体萌发培养基组分及培养条件的优化[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(30):64-70. | 
| [27] | 詹妮, 黄烈健. 厚荚相思花粉活力测定及贮藏研究[J]. 种子, 2015,34(11):1-4. | 
| [28] | 刘自刚, 呼天明, 杨亚丽, 等. 桔梗花粉萌发与花粉管生长研究[J]. 植物研究, 2011,31(3):271-276. | 
| [29] | 王四清, 陈俊愉. 菊花和几种其他菊科植物花粉的试管萌发[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1993,15(4):56-60. | 
| [30] | 赵宏波, 陈发棣, 房伟民. 栽培小菊和几种菊属植物花粉离体萌发研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2005(2):22-27. | 
| [31] | 赵宏波, 房伟民, 陈发棣. 梅花花粉离体萌发和花粉管生长研究[J]. 广西植物, 2007,27(3):393-396. | 
| [32] | 张涛, 黄敏. 蔗糖和PEG对山茶花花粉离体萌发的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2009(1):101-102. | 
| [33] | 郝家臣. 核桃楸花粉活力测定方法比较[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2017(1):67-68. | 
| [34] | 袁宝东. 平榛花粉活力测定方法比较[J]. 防护林科技, 2017(3):24-25. | 
| [35] | 权秋梅, 黎云祥, 吴春梅, 等. 淫羊藿花粉萌发及花粉管生长研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2007. 27(10):2001-2008. | 
| [36] | 龚新越, 黎云祥, 权秋梅, 等. 巫山淫羊藿花粉萌发及花粉管生长研究[J]. 西华师范大学学报, 2011,32(4):309-316. | 
| [37] | 涂清芳, 贾雪晴, 姜自红, 等. 4种方法检测8个菊花品种花粉活力的比较[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019,47(2):109-111. | 
| [38] | 马杰, 王嵩, 马维, 等. 不同培养基组分对油桃花粉萌发的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016,44(6):264-265. | 
| [1] | HU Yingfeng, XIA Qiping. Comparison of Different Methods of Pollen Viability Determination and Preliminary Study on in Vitro Culture——Taking Yulania cylindrica as an Example [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 43-47. | 
| [2] | Pan Dongmei, Yang Chuanlun, Zhang Xinqing, Ni Jianlong, Wang Xiuzhi, Wang Chun. BBD-response Surface Methodology Optimizes the Cultivation Conditions of Producing Gliotoxin by Trichoderma viride [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(3): 111-116. | 
| [3] | Jiang Huibing, Yang Shengmei, Sun Yunnan, Chen Linbo, Tang Yichun. Flowering Biological Characteristics of Male Sterile Wild Tea Plants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(13): 75-81. | 
| [4] | . Optimization of Medium Components and Cultivation Condition for Pollen Germination in Vitro in Heuchera Plants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(30): 64-70. | 
| [5] | . Viability and Germination Characteristics of Cornus spp. Pollen Grain [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(28): 62-67. | 
| [6] | . Pollen viability and stigma receptivity study of Phalaenopsis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(11): 54-58. | 
| [7] | Sun Yaqiang,Wu Cuiyun,Wang De and Wang Zhiqiang. Comparative Study on Floral Organ Structure, Pollen Morphology and Viability of Ziziphus acdiojujuba [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(4): 87-91. | 
| [8] | Sun Yalin,Ke Weidong,Huang Xinfang,Dong Hongxia,Zhang Longhui and He Yanhong. Determination of Taro Pollen Viability and Choice of the Best Storage Method [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(4): 62-67. | 
| [9] | . Study on the Pollen Viability of‘Caozhou’Chaenomeles speciosa’s Traditional Cultivation Types and Specific Germplasms [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(4): 144-147. | 
| [10] | . The Variation of the Pollen Viabilities of Transgenic Rice B68-1 at Different Temperatures and Humidity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(30): 21-27. | 
| [11] | . Studies on the Intraspecific Cross-Compatibility of Asiatic Hybrid Lily Cultivars [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(13): 173-177. | 
| [12] | . Study on Viability Testing Methods and Germinating Characteristics of Peach Pollen [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(21): 207-212. | 
| [13] | . Studies on Determination Methods of Pollen Viability of Narcissus spp. [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(17): 242-245. | 
| [14] | . Influence of Different Cultivation Conditions on Stalk Physical Characteristicsof Medium Matured Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(15): 172-178. | 
| [15] | . Comparison of Pollen Viability Determining Methods for Miscanthus sinensis Anderss [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 25(24): 147-150. | 
| Viewed | ||||||
| Full text |  | |||||
| Abstract |  | |||||