Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 52-61.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0368
Previous Articles Next Articles
DUAN Qing1,2,3(), CAI Jingjing4, DU Wenwen1,2,3, YANG Nan4, WANG Xiangning1,2,3, JIA Wenjie1,2,3, MA Lulin1,2,3(
)
Received:
2021-04-08
Revised:
2021-11-16
Online:
2022-03-05
Published:
2022-04-13
Contact:
MA Lulin
E-mail:271022855@qq.com;272912111@qq.com
CLC Number:
DUAN Qing, CAI Jingjing, DU Wenwen, YANG Nan, WANG Xiangning, JIA Wenjie, MA Lulin. Pollen Viability and in Vitro Germination of Dahlia Cultivars[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 52-61.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0368
pH | 花粉萌发率/% | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
5.0 | 15.4 | 17.2 | 14.8 | 15.80±1.25 | 3154.367 | 4 | 788.592 | 31.527 | 10 | 3.153 | 250.135 | 0.000** | ||
5.5 | 45.6 | 44.3 | 42.8 | 44.23±1.40 | ||||||||||
6.0 | 56.3 | 58.1 | 60.7 | 58.37±2.21 | ||||||||||
6.5 | 53.2 | 49.5 | 50.1 | 50.93±1.99 | ||||||||||
7.0 | 47.9 | 44.3 | 46.8 | 46.33±1.84 |
pH | 花粉萌发率/% | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
5.0 | 15.4 | 17.2 | 14.8 | 15.80±1.25 | 3154.367 | 4 | 788.592 | 31.527 | 10 | 3.153 | 250.135 | 0.000** | ||
5.5 | 45.6 | 44.3 | 42.8 | 44.23±1.40 | ||||||||||
6.0 | 56.3 | 58.1 | 60.7 | 58.37±2.21 | ||||||||||
6.5 | 53.2 | 49.5 | 50.1 | 50.93±1.99 | ||||||||||
7.0 | 47.9 | 44.3 | 46.8 | 46.33±1.84 |
培养温度/℃ | 花粉萌发率/% | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
15 | 36.8 | 39.4 | 37.3 | 37.83±1.38 | 2158.38 | 4 | 539.595 | 21.153 | 10 | 2.115 | 255.087 | 0.000** | ||
20 | 53.4 | 52.1 | 51.9 | 52.47±0.81 | ||||||||||
25 | 59.7 | 61.2 | 58.4 | 59.77±1.40 | ||||||||||
30 | 51.2 | 50.5 | 54.1 | 51.93±1.91 | ||||||||||
35 | 27.9 | 24.8 | 26.3 | 26.33±1.55 |
培养温度/℃ | 花粉萌发率/% | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
15 | 36.8 | 39.4 | 37.3 | 37.83±1.38 | 2158.38 | 4 | 539.595 | 21.153 | 10 | 2.115 | 255.087 | 0.000** | ||
20 | 53.4 | 52.1 | 51.9 | 52.47±0.81 | ||||||||||
25 | 59.7 | 61.2 | 58.4 | 59.77±1.40 | ||||||||||
30 | 51.2 | 50.5 | 54.1 | 51.93±1.91 | ||||||||||
35 | 27.9 | 24.8 | 26.3 | 26.33±1.55 |
培养时间/h | 花粉萌发率/% | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
1.0 | 56.2 | 57.5 | 56.9 | 56.9±0.65 | 163.156 | 4 | 40.789 | 13.76 | 10 | 1.376 | 29.643 | 0.000** | ||
1.5 | 56.7 | 59.3 | 58.3 | 58.1±1.31 | ||||||||||
2.0 | 59.7 | 63.2 | 62.4 | 61.8±1.83 | ||||||||||
2.5 | 65.6 | 63.6 | 64.9 | 64.7±1.01 | ||||||||||
3.0 | 65.1 | 65.3 | 64.2 | 64.9±0.59 |
培养时间/h | 花粉萌发率/% | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
1.0 | 56.2 | 57.5 | 56.9 | 56.9±0.65 | 163.156 | 4 | 40.789 | 13.76 | 10 | 1.376 | 29.643 | 0.000** | ||
1.5 | 56.7 | 59.3 | 58.3 | 58.1±1.31 | ||||||||||
2.0 | 59.7 | 63.2 | 62.4 | 61.8±1.83 | ||||||||||
2.5 | 65.6 | 63.6 | 64.9 | 64.7±1.01 | ||||||||||
3.0 | 65.1 | 65.3 | 64.2 | 64.9±0.59 |
处理组 | 因素 | 萌发率/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | ① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | ||
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 4.3 | 3.0 | |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5.7 | 6.5 | 4.7 | 5.6 | |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8.3 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 8.7 | |
4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9.6 | 8.4 | 8.1 | 8.7 | |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 15.8 | 14.4 | 14.6 | 14.9 | |
6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23.8 | 21.4 | 22.7 | 22.6 | |
7 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 30.5 | 31.7 | 33.1 | 31.8 | |
8 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 36.6 | 38.2 | 35.2 | 36.7 | |
9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 28.6 | 26.4 | 25.3 | 26.7 | |
10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 54.7 | 53.7 | 55.2 | 54.5 | |
11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 59.7 | 57.2 | 58.9 | 58.6 | |
12 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 61.3 | 63.4 | 61.6 | 62.1 | |
13 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 24.4 | 25.7 | 25.4 | 25.2 | |
14 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 56.3 | 54.8 | 54.9 | 55.3 | |
15 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 56.7 | 56.3 | 58.1 | 57.0 | |
16 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 44.6 | 49.3 | 48.3 | 47.4 | |
均值K1 | 6.500 | 17.460 | 32.900 | |||||
均值K2 | 26.500 | 34.530 | 34.922 | |||||
均值K3 | 50.500 | 39.025 | 31.867 | |||||
均值K4 | 46.233 | 38.718 | 30.043 | |||||
极值R | 44.000 | 21.565 | 4.879 |
处理组 | 因素 | 萌发率/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | ① | ② | ③ | 平均值 | ||
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 4.3 | 3.0 | |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5.7 | 6.5 | 4.7 | 5.6 | |
3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8.3 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 8.7 | |
4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9.6 | 8.4 | 8.1 | 8.7 | |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 15.8 | 14.4 | 14.6 | 14.9 | |
6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23.8 | 21.4 | 22.7 | 22.6 | |
7 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 30.5 | 31.7 | 33.1 | 31.8 | |
8 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 36.6 | 38.2 | 35.2 | 36.7 | |
9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 28.6 | 26.4 | 25.3 | 26.7 | |
10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 54.7 | 53.7 | 55.2 | 54.5 | |
11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 59.7 | 57.2 | 58.9 | 58.6 | |
12 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 61.3 | 63.4 | 61.6 | 62.1 | |
13 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 24.4 | 25.7 | 25.4 | 25.2 | |
14 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 56.3 | 54.8 | 54.9 | 55.3 | |
15 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 56.7 | 56.3 | 58.1 | 57.0 | |
16 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 44.6 | 49.3 | 48.3 | 47.4 | |
均值K1 | 6.500 | 17.460 | 32.900 | |||||
均值K2 | 26.500 | 34.530 | 34.922 | |||||
均值K3 | 50.500 | 39.025 | 31.867 | |||||
均值K4 | 46.233 | 38.718 | 30.043 | |||||
极值R | 44.000 | 21.565 | 4.879 |
变异来源 | 平方和 | df | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 14695.04 | 3 | 4898.347 | 138.955 | 0.000** |
B | 3739.092 | 3 | 1246.364 | 35.357 | 0.000** |
C | 149.608 | 3 | 49.869 | 1.415 | 0.000** |
误差 | 1339.547 | 38 | 35.251 | 0.253 |
变异来源 | 平方和 | df | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 14695.04 | 3 | 4898.347 | 138.955 | 0.000** |
B | 3739.092 | 3 | 1246.364 | 35.357 | 0.000** |
C | 149.608 | 3 | 49.869 | 1.415 | 0.000** |
误差 | 1339.547 | 38 | 35.251 | 0.253 |
品种 | 花粉萌发率/% | 多重比较 | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
① | ② | ③ | 平均 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
波彻儿 | 76.47 | 78.15 | 81.53 | 78.72±2.58 | A | 25373.879 | 21 | 1208.28 | 340.791 | 44 | 7.745 | 156.003 | 0.000** | |
回忆 | 76.05 | 81.74 | 75.2 | 77.66±3.56 | A | |||||||||
紫珠 | 72.56 | 75.70 | 76.92 | 75.06±2.25 | AB | |||||||||
绿野仙踪 | 75.66 | 75.03 | 77.28 | 75.99±1.16 | AB | |||||||||
锦瑟 | 69.11 | 75.69 | 71.96 | 72.25±3.30 | B | |||||||||
琳达夫人 | 67.42 | 70.17 | 73.96 | 70.52±3.28 | BC | |||||||||
简.万.斯卡法拉 | 68.91 | 70.72 | 71.57 | 70.40±1.36 | BC | |||||||||
芬克里夫的错觉 | 68.66 | 62.73 | 68.13 | 66.51±3.28 | C | |||||||||
白色飘雪 | 56.96 | 68.2 | 66.37 | 63.84±6.03 | C | |||||||||
疯狂的爱 | 71.29 | 66.22 | 63.7 | 67.07±3.87 | C | |||||||||
热情似火 | 61.09 | 56.71 | 53.94 | 57.25±3.61 | D | |||||||||
雪莲花 | 58.24 | 55.67 | 56.83 | 56.91±1.29 | D | |||||||||
金色火炬 | 53.54 | 56.42 | 54.22 | 54.73±1.51 | DE | |||||||||
彩色收益 | 49.64 | 51.74 | 52.23 | 51.20±1.38 | E | |||||||||
潇洒 | 46.97 | 47.25 | 40.83 | 45.02±3.63 | F | |||||||||
可美大地 | 40.19 | 40.52 | 41.37 | 40.69±0.61 | F | |||||||||
紫霞 | 46.65 | 42.78 | 41.84 | 43.76±2.55 | F | |||||||||
欢乐万圣节 | 21.92 | 25.51 | 26.92 | 24.78±2.58 | G | |||||||||
黄金缕 | 29.63 | 31.21 | 27.22 | 29.35±2.01 | G | |||||||||
琳达 | 25.36 | 29.92 | 27.76 | 27.68±2.28 | G | |||||||||
爱丁堡 | 29.28 | 26.18 | 25.39 | 26.95±2.06 | G | |||||||||
兰花公主 | 12.16 | 11.44 | 11.64 | 11.75±0.37 | J |
品种 | 花粉萌发率/% | 多重比较 | 组间 | 组内 | F | P | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
① | ② | ③ | 平均 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | |||||
波彻儿 | 76.47 | 78.15 | 81.53 | 78.72±2.58 | A | 25373.879 | 21 | 1208.28 | 340.791 | 44 | 7.745 | 156.003 | 0.000** | |
回忆 | 76.05 | 81.74 | 75.2 | 77.66±3.56 | A | |||||||||
紫珠 | 72.56 | 75.70 | 76.92 | 75.06±2.25 | AB | |||||||||
绿野仙踪 | 75.66 | 75.03 | 77.28 | 75.99±1.16 | AB | |||||||||
锦瑟 | 69.11 | 75.69 | 71.96 | 72.25±3.30 | B | |||||||||
琳达夫人 | 67.42 | 70.17 | 73.96 | 70.52±3.28 | BC | |||||||||
简.万.斯卡法拉 | 68.91 | 70.72 | 71.57 | 70.40±1.36 | BC | |||||||||
芬克里夫的错觉 | 68.66 | 62.73 | 68.13 | 66.51±3.28 | C | |||||||||
白色飘雪 | 56.96 | 68.2 | 66.37 | 63.84±6.03 | C | |||||||||
疯狂的爱 | 71.29 | 66.22 | 63.7 | 67.07±3.87 | C | |||||||||
热情似火 | 61.09 | 56.71 | 53.94 | 57.25±3.61 | D | |||||||||
雪莲花 | 58.24 | 55.67 | 56.83 | 56.91±1.29 | D | |||||||||
金色火炬 | 53.54 | 56.42 | 54.22 | 54.73±1.51 | DE | |||||||||
彩色收益 | 49.64 | 51.74 | 52.23 | 51.20±1.38 | E | |||||||||
潇洒 | 46.97 | 47.25 | 40.83 | 45.02±3.63 | F | |||||||||
可美大地 | 40.19 | 40.52 | 41.37 | 40.69±0.61 | F | |||||||||
紫霞 | 46.65 | 42.78 | 41.84 | 43.76±2.55 | F | |||||||||
欢乐万圣节 | 21.92 | 25.51 | 26.92 | 24.78±2.58 | G | |||||||||
黄金缕 | 29.63 | 31.21 | 27.22 | 29.35±2.01 | G | |||||||||
琳达 | 25.36 | 29.92 | 27.76 | 27.68±2.28 | G | |||||||||
爱丁堡 | 29.28 | 26.18 | 25.39 | 26.95±2.06 | G | |||||||||
兰花公主 | 12.16 | 11.44 | 11.64 | 11.75±0.37 | J |
[1] | 姚梅国, 王明启, 迟玉文. 大丽花品种资源的研究[J]. 吉林林学院学报, 1995,11(2):96-99. |
[2] | 李仁娜, 李艳, 王宏, 等. 西安地区50种大丽花的园林观赏性评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019. 3(3):68-72. |
[3] | 刘安成, 王庆, 庞长民. 我国大丽花园艺学研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2010(11):225-228. |
[4] | 刘成琴, 赵兴旺, 康志钰, 等. 5种通关藤花粉活力测定方法比较[J]. 云南农业大学学报:自然科学, 2021,36(1):179-182. |
[5] | 杨群力. 大丽花名优品种的引种及露地栽培技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009,25(11):108-116. |
[6] | 杨群力, 李仁娜, 李艳, 等. 国内大丽花品种资源保存现状及发展对策研究——以临洮大丽花为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017,33(7):98-103. |
[7] |
KUMAR R, THAKUR P, GUPTA Y C, et al. Evaluation of Dahlia (Dahlia variabilis L.) cultivars for growth and flowering characteristics under sub-montane, sub-tropical low hill zone of Himachal Pradesh[J]. International journal of farm sciences, 2021,11(1-2):19-23.
doi: 10.5958/2250-0499.2021.00005.7 URL |
[8] | 陈叶, 李荣, 赵明君. 乌鲁木齐市7种荷兰大丽花新品种引种栽培适应性研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021. 49(5):128-130,137. |
[9] | 杨群力, 王峰伟. 大丽花快速扦插繁殖技术的改进措施研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009,25(24):338-340. |
[10] | 袁震. 大丽花离体快繁技术研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2016. |
[11] | 杨婷. 大丽花组织培养与脱毒技术研究[D]. 保定:河北农业大学, 2014. |
[12] | 宋亚东, 大丽花栽培技术[J]. 甘肃农业, 2021(7):86-88. |
[13] | 范苏鲁, 苑兆和, 冯立娟, 等. 干旱胁迫对大丽花生理生化指标的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011,22(3):651-657. |
[14] | 范苏鲁, 苑兆和, 冯立娟, 等. 水分胁迫对大丽花光合作用,蒸腾和气孔导度的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(8):119-122. |
[15] |
AZUMA M, ONOZAKI T, ICHIMURA K. Difference of ethylene production and response to ethylene in cut flowers of dahlia (Dahlia variabilis) cultivars[J]. Scientia horticulturae, 2020,273:109635.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109635 URL |
[16] | 张云仙. 大丽花散粉与结实特性初步研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2017. |
[17] | 赵统利, 周翔, 朱朋波, 等. 百合花粉生活力测定方法的比较研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2006(5):88,144. |
[18] | 曹明华, 杨俊杰, 苏金强, 等. 天宝野生蕉花粉活力快速检测方法筛选[J]. 福建热作科技, 2018,43(2):15-17. |
[19] | 詹妮, 黄烈健. 大叶相思花粉离体萌发适宜条件及活力检测方法[J]. 林业科学, 2016,52(2):67-73. |
[20] | 陈家瑞. 孢粉染色新技术[J]. 植物杂志, 1987(4):24-25,50. |
[21] | 杜文文, 段青, 杨楠, 等. 30种观叶秋海棠花粉活力检验方法筛选及活力测定[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021,34(7):1521-1527. |
[22] | 杜玉虎, 张绍铃, 姜雪婷, 等. 果梅花粉离体萌发及花粉管生长特性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006,26(9):1846-1852. |
[23] | 孙爱芹, 常伟光, 韩斌, 等. 不同枣品种花粉生活力及贮藏方法研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(1):166-168. |
[24] | 秦晓君, 潘磊, 牛永志, 等. 烟草花粉活力检测方法筛选[J]. 云南大学学报:自然科学版, 2020,42(3):592-598. |
[25] |
STONE J L, THOMSON J D, DENT-ACOSTA S J. Assessment of pollen viability in hand-pollination experiments: a review[J]. American journal of botany, 1995,82(9):1186-1197.
doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1995.82.issue-9 URL |
[26] | 张露, 李世峰, 蒋雪彬, 等. 矾根花粉离体萌发培养基组分及培养条件的优化[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(30):64-70. |
[27] | 詹妮, 黄烈健. 厚荚相思花粉活力测定及贮藏研究[J]. 种子, 2015,34(11):1-4. |
[28] | 刘自刚, 呼天明, 杨亚丽, 等. 桔梗花粉萌发与花粉管生长研究[J]. 植物研究, 2011,31(3):271-276. |
[29] | 王四清, 陈俊愉. 菊花和几种其他菊科植物花粉的试管萌发[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1993,15(4):56-60. |
[30] | 赵宏波, 陈发棣, 房伟民. 栽培小菊和几种菊属植物花粉离体萌发研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2005(2):22-27. |
[31] | 赵宏波, 房伟民, 陈发棣. 梅花花粉离体萌发和花粉管生长研究[J]. 广西植物, 2007,27(3):393-396. |
[32] | 张涛, 黄敏. 蔗糖和PEG对山茶花花粉离体萌发的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2009(1):101-102. |
[33] | 郝家臣. 核桃楸花粉活力测定方法比较[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2017(1):67-68. |
[34] | 袁宝东. 平榛花粉活力测定方法比较[J]. 防护林科技, 2017(3):24-25. |
[35] | 权秋梅, 黎云祥, 吴春梅, 等. 淫羊藿花粉萌发及花粉管生长研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2007. 27(10):2001-2008. |
[36] | 龚新越, 黎云祥, 权秋梅, 等. 巫山淫羊藿花粉萌发及花粉管生长研究[J]. 西华师范大学学报, 2011,32(4):309-316. |
[37] | 涂清芳, 贾雪晴, 姜自红, 等. 4种方法检测8个菊花品种花粉活力的比较[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019,47(2):109-111. |
[38] | 马杰, 王嵩, 马维, 等. 不同培养基组分对油桃花粉萌发的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016,44(6):264-265. |
[1] | HU Yingfeng, XIA Qiping. Comparison of Different Methods of Pollen Viability Determination and Preliminary Study on in Vitro Culture——Taking Yulania cylindrica as an Example [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 43-47. |
[2] | Pan Dongmei, Yang Chuanlun, Zhang Xinqing, Ni Jianlong, Wang Xiuzhi, Wang Chun. BBD-response Surface Methodology Optimizes the Cultivation Conditions of Producing Gliotoxin by Trichoderma viride [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(3): 111-116. |
[3] | Jiang Huibing, Yang Shengmei, Sun Yunnan, Chen Linbo, Tang Yichun. Flowering Biological Characteristics of Male Sterile Wild Tea Plants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(13): 75-81. |
[4] | . Optimization of Medium Components and Cultivation Condition for Pollen Germination in Vitro in Heuchera Plants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(30): 64-70. |
[5] | . Viability and Germination Characteristics of Cornus spp. Pollen Grain [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(28): 62-67. |
[6] | . Pollen viability and stigma receptivity study of Phalaenopsis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(11): 54-58. |
[7] | Sun Yaqiang,Wu Cuiyun,Wang De and Wang Zhiqiang. Comparative Study on Floral Organ Structure, Pollen Morphology and Viability of Ziziphus acdiojujuba [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(4): 87-91. |
[8] | Sun Yalin,Ke Weidong,Huang Xinfang,Dong Hongxia,Zhang Longhui and He Yanhong. Determination of Taro Pollen Viability and Choice of the Best Storage Method [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(4): 62-67. |
[9] | . Study on the Pollen Viability of‘Caozhou’Chaenomeles speciosa’s Traditional Cultivation Types and Specific Germplasms [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(4): 144-147. |
[10] | . The Variation of the Pollen Viabilities of Transgenic Rice B68-1 at Different Temperatures and Humidity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(30): 21-27. |
[11] | . Studies on the Intraspecific Cross-Compatibility of Asiatic Hybrid Lily Cultivars [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(13): 173-177. |
[12] | . Study on Viability Testing Methods and Germinating Characteristics of Peach Pollen [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(21): 207-212. |
[13] | . Studies on Determination Methods of Pollen Viability of Narcissus spp. [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(17): 242-245. |
[14] | . Influence of Different Cultivation Conditions on Stalk Physical Characteristicsof Medium Matured Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(15): 172-178. |
[15] | . Comparison of Pollen Viability Determining Methods for Miscanthus sinensis Anderss [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 25(24): 147-150. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||