Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (30): 21-28.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0019
Special Issue: 生物技术; 资源与环境; 园艺
Previous Articles Next Articles
LUO Wei1(), ZHOU Wei1, WANG Zhenguo2, LI Yan2, YU Wenhao1, YANG Zhiqiang1, YU Zhonghao1, LI Ziwen1, ZHOU Yaxing1(
)
Received:
2022-01-06
Revised:
2022-05-02
Online:
2022-10-25
Published:
2022-10-27
Contact:
ZHOU Yaxing
E-mail:1915004531@qq.com;zhouyaxing3@163.com
CLC Number:
LUO Wei, ZHOU Wei, WANG Zhenguo, LI Yan, YU Wenhao, YANG Zhiqiang, YU Zhonghao, LI Ziwen, ZHOU Yaxing. Twenty-four Sweet Sorghum Materials: Comprehensive Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits and Biological Yield[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 21-28.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0019
编号 | 极大值 | 极小值 | 变异幅度 | 均值 | 标准差 | 变异系数/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 | 350 | 279.3 | 70.7 | 312.19 | 19.49 | 6.24 |
茎粗 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 1.92 | 0.08 | 4.18 |
主穗长度 | 48.7 | 23.3 | 25.4 | 28.96 | 5.43 | 18.75 |
茎秆长度 | 325.7 | 254.3 | 71.4 | 280.70 | 19.23 | 6.85 |
穗粒数 | 3099.3 | 2038 | 1061.3 | 2089.63 | 204.75 | 9.80 |
千粒重 | 30.3 | 23 | 7.3 | 25.00 | 1.52 | 6.09 |
生物产量 | 8838.7 | 5920 | 2918.7 | 7363.63 | 674.10 | 9.15 |
糖锤度 | 18.5 | 16.5 | 2 | 17.44 | 0.53 | 3.01 |
榨汁率 | 41.6 | 29.5 | 12.1 | 33.12 | 2.18 | 6.58 |
编号 | 极大值 | 极小值 | 变异幅度 | 均值 | 标准差 | 变异系数/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 | 350 | 279.3 | 70.7 | 312.19 | 19.49 | 6.24 |
茎粗 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 1.92 | 0.08 | 4.18 |
主穗长度 | 48.7 | 23.3 | 25.4 | 28.96 | 5.43 | 18.75 |
茎秆长度 | 325.7 | 254.3 | 71.4 | 280.70 | 19.23 | 6.85 |
穗粒数 | 3099.3 | 2038 | 1061.3 | 2089.63 | 204.75 | 9.80 |
千粒重 | 30.3 | 23 | 7.3 | 25.00 | 1.52 | 6.09 |
生物产量 | 8838.7 | 5920 | 2918.7 | 7363.63 | 674.10 | 9.15 |
糖锤度 | 18.5 | 16.5 | 2 | 17.44 | 0.53 | 3.01 |
榨汁率 | 41.6 | 29.5 | 12.1 | 33.12 | 2.18 | 6.58 |
编号 | 因子1 | 因子2 | 因子3 | 因子4 | 因子5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 | 0.5871 | -0.0831 | -0.1905 | 0.1637 | 0.2432 |
茎粗 | 0.2862 | 0.2682 | 0.3534 | 0.3482 | -0.2846 |
主穗长度 | 0.0217 | 0.3477 | -0.4509 | 0.5121 | -0.1352 |
茎秆长度 | 0.589 | -0.1818 | -0.0655 | 0.0218 | 0.2853 |
穗粒数 | 0.4217 | 0.0174 | 0.004 | -0.6216 | -0.349 |
千粒重 | 0.0711 | 0.4364 | -0.4845 | -0.0929 | 0.0526 |
生物产量 | -0.0941 | 0.4911 | 0.1563 | -0.2681 | 0.7129 |
糖锤度 | 0.101 | 0.5598 | 0.1455 | -0.2018 | -0.3373 |
榨汁率 | 0.155 | 0.1476 | 0.5924 | 0.2856 | 0.1167 |
特征值 | 2.455 | 2.0847 | 1.6392 | 0.9851 | 0.6488 |
贡献率% | 27.2776 | 23.1639 | 18.213 | 10.9456 | 7.2093 |
累计贡献率% | 27.2776 | 50.4415 | 68.6545 | 79.6002 | 86.8094 |
编号 | 因子1 | 因子2 | 因子3 | 因子4 | 因子5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 | 0.5871 | -0.0831 | -0.1905 | 0.1637 | 0.2432 |
茎粗 | 0.2862 | 0.2682 | 0.3534 | 0.3482 | -0.2846 |
主穗长度 | 0.0217 | 0.3477 | -0.4509 | 0.5121 | -0.1352 |
茎秆长度 | 0.589 | -0.1818 | -0.0655 | 0.0218 | 0.2853 |
穗粒数 | 0.4217 | 0.0174 | 0.004 | -0.6216 | -0.349 |
千粒重 | 0.0711 | 0.4364 | -0.4845 | -0.0929 | 0.0526 |
生物产量 | -0.0941 | 0.4911 | 0.1563 | -0.2681 | 0.7129 |
糖锤度 | 0.101 | 0.5598 | 0.1455 | -0.2018 | -0.3373 |
榨汁率 | 0.155 | 0.1476 | 0.5924 | 0.2856 | 0.1167 |
特征值 | 2.455 | 2.0847 | 1.6392 | 0.9851 | 0.6488 |
贡献率% | 27.2776 | 23.1639 | 18.213 | 10.9456 | 7.2093 |
累计贡献率% | 27.2776 | 50.4415 | 68.6545 | 79.6002 | 86.8094 |
组合 | 第一主成分得分 | 第二主成分得分 | 第三主成分得分 | 第四主成分得分 | 第五主成分得分 | 综合主成分得分 | 排名 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S8*T52 | 1.3647 | 1.5588 | 0.6998 | 0.4029 | 0.4817 | 1.0824 | 1 |
S499*K8 | 1.7922 | 0.6364 | -0.0803 | -0.5082 | 0.1802 | 0.6670 | 2 |
S13*W92 | 0.8919 | 1.5778 | -0.6836 | 0.2843 | 0.2112 | 0.6112 | 3 |
S499*T52 | 0.6217 | 1.1484 | 0.3311 | -0.0177 | 0.1666 | 0.5828 | 4 |
S798*T52 | 0.5035 | 1.2935 | 0.3833 | -0.0034 | -0.0291 | 0.5809 | 5 |
S13*H22 | 1.0916 | 0.7809 | -0.1410 | 0.1589 | 0.3756 | 0.5730 | 6 |
S798*W92 | 1.0404 | 0.7298 | -0.1039 | 0.2237 | 0.5356 | 0.5725 | 7 |
S499*H22 | 1.1136 | 0.5565 | -0.0659 | 0.4288 | 0.2424 | 0.5588 | 8 |
S499*W92 | 0.8831 | 0.8943 | -0.2396 | 0.0313 | 0.4224 | 0.5049 | 9 |
S499*T48 | 0.8431 | 0.5092 | 0.2025 | 0.0331 | 0.5876 | 0.4962 | 10 |
S798*B69 | 0.7124 | 0.6468 | -0.0289 | 0.2545 | 0.4872 | 0.4629 | 11 |
S8*H22 | 0.9964 | 0.2778 | -0.0197 | 0.3728 | 0.1441 | 0.4421 | 12 |
S499*B69 | 0.7761 | 0.5524 | -0.2854 | 0.2101 | 0.5413 | 0.4028 | 13 |
S8*W92 | 0.7555 | 0.4599 | -0.1458 | 0.1643 | 0.5115 | 0.3927 | 14 |
S798*H22 | 0.7463 | 0.2459 | 0.1210 | 0.3480 | 0.1543 | 0.3822 | 15 |
S798*K8 | 0.2395 | 0.9450 | 0.1426 | 0.0276 | 0.0903 | 0.3683 | 16 |
S8*T48 | 0.7329 | 0.2869 | 0.0912 | 0.1024 | 0.3050 | 0.3642 | 17 |
S13*T48 | 0.4296 | 0.7736 | -0.0130 | -0.2014 | 0.5437 | 0.3584 | 18 |
S8*K8 | 0.2667 | 0.6735 | 0.3237 | 0.1664 | 0.0271 | 0.3547 | 19 |
S13*T52 | 0.2874 | 0.8211 | 0.0259 | -0.1920 | 0.6952 | 0.3483 | 20 |
S798*T48 | 0.2818 | 0.7254 | 0.1671 | -0.0699 | 0.3701 | 0.3391 | 21 |
S13*K8 | 0.1620 | 0.8102 | 0.1504 | -0.1376 | 0.2575 | 0.3027 | 22 |
S8*B69 | 0.2951 | 0.8156 | -0.2015 | 0.1454 | 0.0853 | 0.2935 | 23 |
S13*B69 | 0.1715 | 0.9379 | -0.3077 | 0.0128 | 0.2840 | 0.2648 | 24 |
组合 | 第一主成分得分 | 第二主成分得分 | 第三主成分得分 | 第四主成分得分 | 第五主成分得分 | 综合主成分得分 | 排名 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S8*T52 | 1.3647 | 1.5588 | 0.6998 | 0.4029 | 0.4817 | 1.0824 | 1 |
S499*K8 | 1.7922 | 0.6364 | -0.0803 | -0.5082 | 0.1802 | 0.6670 | 2 |
S13*W92 | 0.8919 | 1.5778 | -0.6836 | 0.2843 | 0.2112 | 0.6112 | 3 |
S499*T52 | 0.6217 | 1.1484 | 0.3311 | -0.0177 | 0.1666 | 0.5828 | 4 |
S798*T52 | 0.5035 | 1.2935 | 0.3833 | -0.0034 | -0.0291 | 0.5809 | 5 |
S13*H22 | 1.0916 | 0.7809 | -0.1410 | 0.1589 | 0.3756 | 0.5730 | 6 |
S798*W92 | 1.0404 | 0.7298 | -0.1039 | 0.2237 | 0.5356 | 0.5725 | 7 |
S499*H22 | 1.1136 | 0.5565 | -0.0659 | 0.4288 | 0.2424 | 0.5588 | 8 |
S499*W92 | 0.8831 | 0.8943 | -0.2396 | 0.0313 | 0.4224 | 0.5049 | 9 |
S499*T48 | 0.8431 | 0.5092 | 0.2025 | 0.0331 | 0.5876 | 0.4962 | 10 |
S798*B69 | 0.7124 | 0.6468 | -0.0289 | 0.2545 | 0.4872 | 0.4629 | 11 |
S8*H22 | 0.9964 | 0.2778 | -0.0197 | 0.3728 | 0.1441 | 0.4421 | 12 |
S499*B69 | 0.7761 | 0.5524 | -0.2854 | 0.2101 | 0.5413 | 0.4028 | 13 |
S8*W92 | 0.7555 | 0.4599 | -0.1458 | 0.1643 | 0.5115 | 0.3927 | 14 |
S798*H22 | 0.7463 | 0.2459 | 0.1210 | 0.3480 | 0.1543 | 0.3822 | 15 |
S798*K8 | 0.2395 | 0.9450 | 0.1426 | 0.0276 | 0.0903 | 0.3683 | 16 |
S8*T48 | 0.7329 | 0.2869 | 0.0912 | 0.1024 | 0.3050 | 0.3642 | 17 |
S13*T48 | 0.4296 | 0.7736 | -0.0130 | -0.2014 | 0.5437 | 0.3584 | 18 |
S8*K8 | 0.2667 | 0.6735 | 0.3237 | 0.1664 | 0.0271 | 0.3547 | 19 |
S13*T52 | 0.2874 | 0.8211 | 0.0259 | -0.1920 | 0.6952 | 0.3483 | 20 |
S798*T48 | 0.2818 | 0.7254 | 0.1671 | -0.0699 | 0.3701 | 0.3391 | 21 |
S13*K8 | 0.1620 | 0.8102 | 0.1504 | -0.1376 | 0.2575 | 0.3027 | 22 |
S8*B69 | 0.2951 | 0.8156 | -0.2015 | 0.1454 | 0.0853 | 0.2935 | 23 |
S13*B69 | 0.1715 | 0.9379 | -0.3077 | 0.0128 | 0.2840 | 0.2648 | 24 |
[1] | 李顺国, 刘猛, 刘斐, 等. 中国高粱产业和种业发展现状与未来展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(3):471-482. |
[2] | 张凯, 柏梁耀, 陈凤, 等. 甜高粱饲料资源开发与利用[J]. 北方牧业, 2021(19):25. |
[3] | 王同朝, 郭红艳, 李新美, 等. 甜高粱综合开发利用现状与前景[J]. 河南农业科学, 2004(8):29-32. |
[4] | 周亚星, 周伟, 徐寿军, 等. 不同生育时期甜高粱茎秆糖锤度与农艺性状及生物产量的相关分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(9):46-53. |
[5] | 张丽敏, 刘智全, 陈冰嬬, 等. 中国能源甜高粱育种现状及应用前景[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2012, 17(6):76-82. |
[6] |
RITTER K B, MCINTYRE C L, GODWIN I D, et al. An assessment of the genetic relationship between sweet and grain sorghums within Sorghum bicolor ssp. bicolor (L) Moench, using AFLP markers[J]. Euphytica, 2007, 157:161-176.
doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9408-4 URL |
[7] | 竟丽丽, 孙学永, 高正良, 邵希文. 安徽省发展高能作物甜高粱的必要性与可行性分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(13):7632-7634. |
[8] | 刘阳, 周伟, 王振国, 等. 甜高粱农艺性状杂种优势分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(20):6809-6816. |
[9] |
张丹, 王楠, 李超, 等. 甜高粱——一种优质的饲料作物[J]. 生物技术通报, 2019, 35(5):2-8.
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2018-0719 |
[10] | 朱鸿福, 王丽慧, 林语梵, 等. 宁夏黄灌区国外饲用高粱品种生产性能及饲用价值研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(5):40-46. |
[11] | 何思洋, 李蒙, 唐朝臣, 等. 能源高粱茎、叶中能源转化相关化学成分的近红外光谱模型构建与优化[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(12):34-44. |
[12] | 韩东倩, 韩立朴, 薛帅, 等. 基于能源利用的高粱配合力和杂种优势分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2012, 17(1):26-32. |
[13] | 金星娜, 王旭, 田新会, 等. 8个饲用甜高粱品种的农艺性能及营养品质[J]. 草业科学, 2021, 38(7):1362-1372. |
[14] | 何振富, 贺春贵, 陈平, 等. 不同甜高粱品种(系)农艺性状与产量、品质的相关性研究[J]. 中国饲料, 2021(13):84-91. |
[15] | 高进, 施庆华, 蔡立旺, 等. 甜高粱新品种(系)主要农艺性状与产量的灰色关联度分析[J]. 福建农业学报, 2018, 33(6):581-586. |
[16] | 冯国郡, 叶凯, 涂振东, 等. 甜高粱主要农艺性状相关性和主成分分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2010, 47(8):1552-1556. |
[17] | 班骞, 吴佳海, 苏生, 等. 甜高粱套种拉巴豆的主要农艺性状及产量表现[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2020, 48(6):6-9. |
[18] | 李资文, 李志刚, 周伟, 等. 高粱品系的主要农艺性状评价与综合分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(19):6503-6511. |
[19] | 陆平. 高粱种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. |
[20] | 李洪, 王瑞军, 王彧超, 等. 玉米杂交组合主要农艺性状与产量的多重分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(22):31-36. |
[21] | 王官, 刘璋, 薛丁丁, 等. 绿豆单株产量与主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(8):12-16. |
[22] | 赖佳, 黄玲, 韦树谷, 等. 不结球白菜单株产量与主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(32):36-41. |
[23] | 蒋聪, 刘慰华, 杨旭昆, 等. 灰色关联度分析和DTOPSIS法在云南粳稻品种综合评价中的应用[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(5):907-912. |
[24] | 张慧敏, 常鸿杰, 王二伟, 等. 灰色关联度分析法在小麦品种(系)筛选试验中的应用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(21):36-38. |
[25] | 杨金慧, 毛建昌, 李发民, 等. 玉米杂交种农艺性状与籽粒产量的相关和通径分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2003(4):28-30. |
[26] | 李春宏, 郭文琦, 张培通, 等. 江苏沿海滩涂地甜高梁农艺性状灰色关联度评价[J]. 草业科学, 2015, 32(2):241-247. |
[27] | 杨珍, 李斌, 赵军, 等. 甜高粱主要农艺性状与产量相关和通径分析[J]. 中国糖料, 2018, 40(4):16-19. |
[1] | LU Qianqian, FENG Linjiao, WANG Shuang, GULIZHATI·Baoerhan , CHU Ren, ZHOU Long. Effects of Compound Saline-alkali Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Table Grapes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 62-70. |
[2] | SHEN Jicheng, ZHAO Caixia, YE Fahui, LI Yaxin, LIU Demei, LIU Ruijuan, SHEN Yuhu, ZHANG Huaigang, CHEN Wenjie. Analysis of Germplasm Differentiation of Ledu Long Pepper Based on Agronomic Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 29-34. |
[3] | ZHENG Benchuan, ZHANG Jinfang, JIANG Jun, CUI Cheng, CHAI Liang, HUANG Youtao, ZHOU Zhengjian, LI Haojie, JIANG Liangcai. Correlation Analysis of Main Traits and Yield of Brassica napus ‘Chuanyou’ Varieties with Different Maturity Stages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 7-17. |
[4] | YAO Jinbao, YANG Xueming, ZHOU Miaoping, ZHANG Peng. Analysis of Yield and Its Components of Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Jiangsu Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 15-19. |
[5] | DONG Hongye, XU Ting, LIU Wenhao, LI Qiang, LIU Yantao. Peanut in the Southeastern Margin of Tarim Basin of Xinjiang: Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Agronomic Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 26-30. |
[6] | ZHANG Nianguo, ZHOU Yuhua, PAN Guiping, ZHOU Wenyu, HOU Wenjie, LIU Benwei, YU Fei. Path Analysis of Morphological Trait Effects on Body Weight of Low-salinity Population of Exopalaemon carinicauda [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 141-147. |
[7] | LIU Cuilan, WANG Kaifang, WU Dejun, YAN Liping, LI Shanwen, WANG Fang, REN Fei, WANG Yinhua. Responses of Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Fraxinus Clones to Coastal Saline-Alkaline Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 7-16. |
[8] | HU Ping, FENG Minyu, WU Fengyu, CAO Heyu. Suitable Sowing Temperature for Direct Seeding Early Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 70-75. |
[9] | YU Zhonghao, ZHOU Wei, LI Zhigang, LI Ziwen, JIA Juanxia, ZHOU Yaxing. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Traits of Soybean in Inner Mongolia from 2002 to 2021 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 14-21. |
[10] | LU Mengyao, LIU Dehu, LU Xueli, LIANG Heng, SUN Yuanyuan, LIU Yalin, SONG Tingqiang, FAN Haisheng. Construction of Flood Disaster Risk Assessment Model Based on Principal Component Analysis in Hubei Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 119-127. |
[11] | ZHAO Lijuan, ZHI Jiazeng, ZHANG Jianchun, DU Hao, ZHOU Jinsong, LIU Xuemin, ZHANG Rongqin. Diversity Analysis of Leaf Phenotypic Characters of Musa spp. Germplasms [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 56-64. |
[12] | LUO Jingjing, WANG Heya, LIU Yantao. Comparative Study on Agronomic Traits and Yield Among Different Edible Sunflower Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 7-12. |
[13] | SHAO Rongfeng, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Yang, WANG Guan, CHANG Yuhui, BAI Wenbin, ZHAO Weijun. Mutagenic Effect of Colchicine on Sweet Sorghum ‘FH59’ Seeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 1-5. |
[14] | DING Xueshuang, ZHU Hongqing, DING Yingfeng, YAO Qiaomin, ZHANG Qingqing, YAO Chunxin, ZHOU Xiaogang, YANG Jiazhen, DING Yumei, CHEN Jia. The Field Application Effect of a Compound Microbial Agent on Sweet and Crisp Pea [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 15-19. |
[15] | WANG Zhiqiang, DU Huiying, LI Cheng, GUO Song, TIAN Mei, YANG Wanbang, YU Rong. Genetic Distance and Heterosis of Quantitative Characters of Watermelon [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 47-51. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||