Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (25): 47-51.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0857
Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Zhiqiang(), DU Huiying, LI Cheng, GUO Song, TIAN Mei, YANG Wanbang, YU Rong
Received:
2021-09-03
Revised:
2022-02-10
Online:
2022-09-05
Published:
2022-08-26
CLC Number:
WANG Zhiqiang, DU Huiying, LI Cheng, GUO Song, TIAN Mei, YANG Wanbang, YU Rong. Genetic Distance and Heterosis of Quantitative Characters of Watermelon[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 47-51.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0857
亲本 | 果实形状 | 果实外观 | 果肉颜色 | 种子颜色 |
---|---|---|---|---|
A01 | 圆形 | 浅绿底,深绿条带 | 粉红 | 黄褐,带麻点 |
A02 | 圆形 | 绿底,墨绿条带 | 粉红 | 黑色,带黄斑 |
A03 | 圆形 | 浅绿底,深绿网纹 | 大红 | 黄褐 |
A04 | 圆形 | 绿底,深绿宽花条 | 大红 | 浅黄 |
B01 | 椭圆 | 浅绿底,深绿条带 | 深红 | 黄褐 |
B02 | 圆形 | 深绿底,墨绿条带 | 大红 | 黄褐 |
B03 | 椭圆 | 浅绿底,深绿网纹 | 粉红 | 浅黄,带褐斑 |
B04 | 椭圆 | 浅绿底,深绿网纹 | 粉红 | 浅黄,带褐斑 |
亲本 | 果实形状 | 果实外观 | 果肉颜色 | 种子颜色 |
---|---|---|---|---|
A01 | 圆形 | 浅绿底,深绿条带 | 粉红 | 黄褐,带麻点 |
A02 | 圆形 | 绿底,墨绿条带 | 粉红 | 黑色,带黄斑 |
A03 | 圆形 | 浅绿底,深绿网纹 | 大红 | 黄褐 |
A04 | 圆形 | 绿底,深绿宽花条 | 大红 | 浅黄 |
B01 | 椭圆 | 浅绿底,深绿条带 | 深红 | 黄褐 |
B02 | 圆形 | 深绿底,墨绿条带 | 大红 | 黄褐 |
B03 | 椭圆 | 浅绿底,深绿网纹 | 粉红 | 浅黄,带褐斑 |
B04 | 椭圆 | 浅绿底,深绿网纹 | 粉红 | 浅黄,带褐斑 |
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 1 | ||||||
X2 | 0.4002 | 1 | |||||
X3 | 0.6976 | 0.7893* | 1 | ||||
X4 | 0.4198 | 0.3617 | 0.5498 | 1 | |||
X5 | 0.0631 | -0.0707 | -0.3214 | -0.6660 | 1 | ||
X6 | 0.2795 | -0.2404 | -0.3031 | -0.4962 | 0.8833** | 1 | |
X7 | -0.1965 | 0.0360 | 0.1986 | -0.2108 | 0.1394 | 0.0378 | 1 |
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 1 | ||||||
X2 | 0.4002 | 1 | |||||
X3 | 0.6976 | 0.7893* | 1 | ||||
X4 | 0.4198 | 0.3617 | 0.5498 | 1 | |||
X5 | 0.0631 | -0.0707 | -0.3214 | -0.6660 | 1 | ||
X6 | 0.2795 | -0.2404 | -0.3031 | -0.4962 | 0.8833** | 1 | |
X7 | -0.1965 | 0.0360 | 0.1986 | -0.2108 | 0.1394 | 0.0378 | 1 |
主成分 | 特征值 | 贡献率/% | 累积贡献率/% |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3.0425 | 43.4643 | 43.4643 |
2 | 1.8773 | 26.8185 | 70.2828 |
3 | 1.1921 | 17.0305 | 87.3132 |
4 | 0.5967 | 8.5245 | 95.8378 |
5 | 0.2513 | 3.5897 | 99.4274 |
6 | 0.0374 | 0.5339 | 99.9613 |
7 | 0.0027 | 0.0387 | 100 |
主成分 | 特征值 | 贡献率/% | 累积贡献率/% |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3.0425 | 43.4643 | 43.4643 |
2 | 1.8773 | 26.8185 | 70.2828 |
3 | 1.1921 | 17.0305 | 87.3132 |
4 | 0.5967 | 8.5245 | 95.8378 |
5 | 0.2513 | 3.5897 | 99.4274 |
6 | 0.0374 | 0.5339 | 99.9613 |
7 | 0.0027 | 0.0387 | 100 |
指标 | 主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 | 主成分4 | 主成分5 | 主成分6 | 主成分7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主蔓长度 | 0.2787 | 0.5349 | -0.3152 | 0.3558 | -0.3466 | 0.2123 | -0.4950 |
坐果节位 | 0.3846 | 0.324 | 0.2232 | -0.6797 | 0.2483 | -0.2399 | -0.3408 |
单果重 | 0.4851 | 0.3213 | 0.2306 | 0.0367 | -0.3137 | -0.0154 | 0.7129 |
果皮厚度 | 0.4840 | -0.0836 | -0.2268 | 0.3430 | 0.7522 | 0.1197 | 0.0977 |
中心可溶固形物含量 | -0.4037 | 0.4831 | 0.0386 | -0.2109 | 0.2908 | 0.6588 | 0.1976 |
边可溶固形物含量 | -0.3723 | 0.5080 | -0.1718 | 0.2178 | 0.2312 | -0.6697 | 0.1560 |
果形指数 | -0.0573 | 0.0849 | 0.8457 | 0.4478 | 0.1263 | 0.0127 | -0.2401 |
指标 | 主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 | 主成分4 | 主成分5 | 主成分6 | 主成分7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主蔓长度 | 0.2787 | 0.5349 | -0.3152 | 0.3558 | -0.3466 | 0.2123 | -0.4950 |
坐果节位 | 0.3846 | 0.324 | 0.2232 | -0.6797 | 0.2483 | -0.2399 | -0.3408 |
单果重 | 0.4851 | 0.3213 | 0.2306 | 0.0367 | -0.3137 | -0.0154 | 0.7129 |
果皮厚度 | 0.4840 | -0.0836 | -0.2268 | 0.3430 | 0.7522 | 0.1197 | 0.0977 |
中心可溶固形物含量 | -0.4037 | 0.4831 | 0.0386 | -0.2109 | 0.2908 | 0.6588 | 0.1976 |
边可溶固形物含量 | -0.3723 | 0.5080 | -0.1718 | 0.2178 | 0.2312 | -0.6697 | 0.1560 |
果形指数 | -0.0573 | 0.0849 | 0.8457 | 0.4478 | 0.1263 | 0.0127 | -0.2401 |
组合 | 亲本间遗传距离 | 中亲优势/% | 超亲优势/% |
---|---|---|---|
A01×B01 | 1.0764 | 15.53 | 4.42 |
A01×B02 | 0.5253 | -8 | -15.96 |
A01×B03 | 0.8664 | 9.72 | 6.73 |
A01×B04 | 1.1196 | 7.87 | -2.5 |
A02×B01 | 0.585 | -5.43 | -8.81 |
A02×B02 | 0.5986 | 9.38 | 3.02 |
A02×B03 | 1.2744 | 2.77 | -12.18 |
A02×B04 | 0.6279 | 42.47 | 37.38 |
A03×B01 | 0.7297 | -13.57 | -13.57 |
A03×B02 | 1.1255 | 11.29 | 10 |
A03×B03 | 1.5121 | 0.62 | -11.27 |
A03×B04 | 0.5874 | 8.81 | 8.81 |
A04×B01 | 0.7518 | 3.02 | 0.68 |
A04×B02 | 0.3315 | 0.46 | -0.68 |
A04×B03 | 1.0936 | -13.13 | -21.82 |
A04×B04 | 0.8766 | 10.93 | 8.41 |
组合 | 亲本间遗传距离 | 中亲优势/% | 超亲优势/% |
---|---|---|---|
A01×B01 | 1.0764 | 15.53 | 4.42 |
A01×B02 | 0.5253 | -8 | -15.96 |
A01×B03 | 0.8664 | 9.72 | 6.73 |
A01×B04 | 1.1196 | 7.87 | -2.5 |
A02×B01 | 0.585 | -5.43 | -8.81 |
A02×B02 | 0.5986 | 9.38 | 3.02 |
A02×B03 | 1.2744 | 2.77 | -12.18 |
A02×B04 | 0.6279 | 42.47 | 37.38 |
A03×B01 | 0.7297 | -13.57 | -13.57 |
A03×B02 | 1.1255 | 11.29 | 10 |
A03×B03 | 1.5121 | 0.62 | -11.27 |
A03×B04 | 0.5874 | 8.81 | 8.81 |
A04×B01 | 0.7518 | 3.02 | 0.68 |
A04×B02 | 0.3315 | 0.46 | -0.68 |
A04×B03 | 1.0936 | -13.13 | -21.82 |
A04×B04 | 0.8766 | 10.93 | 8.41 |
[1] | 王志强, 郭松, 刘声锋, 等. 西瓜种质资源果实主要数量性状的主成分分析[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2014, 45(3):59-64. |
[2] | 刘来福. 作物数量性状的遗传距离及其测定[J]. 遗传学报, 1979, 6(3):349-355. |
[3] | 胡秉民, 张全德, 张明华, 等. 小麦定向育种中的亲本选配法[J]. 作物学报, 1990, 16(4):357-363. |
[4] | 张丙秀. 西瓜杂种优势生理生化预测方法的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2004:5-9. |
[5] | 胡安杰. 西瓜杂种优势预测及其在育种上的应用.[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2012:6-10. |
[6] | 孙东发, 李实蒉. 水稻几种不同细胞质主要性状的杂种优势效应及其遗传距离[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 1986, 4(1):139-147. |
[7] | 黄清阳, 高之仁, 荣廷昭. 玉米自交系间遗传距离与产量杂种优势、杂种产量的关系[J]. 遗传学报, 1991, 18(3):271-276. |
[8] | 李伯群, 余国东, 石有明, 等. 两系杂交小麦杂种优势、配合力及遗传距离分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2003, 23(3):17-21. |
[9] | 武耀廷, 张天真, 朱协飞, 等. 陆地棉遗传距离与杂种F1、F2产量及杂种优势的相关分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(1):22-28. |
[10] | 王黎明, 严洪冬, 焦少杰, 等. 基于配合力和遗传距离的甜高粱杂种优势预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(14):2786-2794. |
[11] | 董艺, 冯羽飞, 许忠民, 等. SSR标记遗传距离与结球甘蓝杂种优势的关系分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(5):934-946. |
[12] | 张锡顺, 杨建国, 杨若菡, 等. 蓖麻数量性状遗传距离与杂种优势关系的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(3):633-640. |
[13] | 许明辉. 烟草数量性状遗传距离与杂种优势关系的研究[J]. 遗传, 1999, 21(5):47-50. |
[14] | 乌云塔娜, 石凤翎, 薛晓兰, 等苜蓿SSR遗传距离与杂种优势的相关性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(6):1237-1244. |
[15] | SU J SH, ZHANG F, YANG X CH, et al. Combining ability, heterosis, genetic distance and their intercorrelations for waterlogging tolerance traits in chrysanthemum[J]. Euphytica, 2015, 213(2):1-15. |
[16] | 刘政国, 肖喜祝, 李加振, 等. 苦瓜数量性状遗传距离与杂种优势关系的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2004, 20(5):199-202. |
[17] | 赵应忠, 刘红艳. 芝麻雄性不育系与核心种质间的遗传距离和杂种优势[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2005, 27(1):36-40. |
[18] | CHEN SH K, ZHOU CH P, HE X D, et al. Enhanced correlations of EST-SSR-based genetic distance with hybrid performance, specific hybridizing ability, and heterosis using effect-increasing and effect-decreasing alleles: A case study in Eucalyptus Lher[J]. Tree genetic & genomes, 2020, 16(3):1274-1281. |
[19] | MARCON F, MARTÍINEZ E J, RODRÍGUEZ G R, et al. Genetic distance and the relationship with heterosis and reproductive behavior in tetraploid bahiagrass hybrids[J]. Molecular breeding, 2019, 39(6):1-13. |
[20] | 曹小玲, 黄建都, 谢鑫鑫, 等. SRAP分子标记预测萝卜遗传距离与杂种优势的相关性[J]. 蔬菜, 2018, 46(8):11-17. |
[21] | 夏立新, 陈德富, 哈玉洁, 等. 黄瓜亲本间分子遗传距离与杂种优势的相关性[J]. 南开大学学报:自然科学, 2001, 46(2):91-94. |
[22] | 冯建, 刘童光, 戴祖云, 等. 甜瓜数量性状遗传距离与杂种优势研究[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2008(3):13-18. |
[23] | 唐启义. DPS数据处理系统:实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010:600-614. |
[24] | 商连光, 高振宇, 钱前. 作物杂种优势遗传基础的研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2017, 52(1):10-18. |
[25] | 梁耀平, 王世杰, 陈豫梅, 等. 西瓜亲本遗传差异与杂种优势的相关性[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2012, 28(3):622-626. |
[1] | GAO Wenrui, SUN Yanjun, HAN Bing, FEI Cong, WANG Xiansheng, XU Gang. Effects of Low Light on Quality and Sucrose Metabolism of Watermelon Fruit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 56-61. |
[2] | LU Qianqian, FENG Linjiao, WANG Shuang, GULIZHATI·Baoerhan , CHU Ren, ZHOU Long. Effects of Compound Saline-alkali Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Table Grapes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 62-70. |
[3] | JI Kun, WANG Bin, ZHAO Bowen, XUE Hao, WU Jianmin, ZHU Xiaojian, WANG Yixin, ZHAO Haijun, HAN Zanping. Different Maize Germplasm Materials: Grey Correlation Analysis of Plant and Ear-kernel Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 27-32. |
[4] | ZHOU Xiaohong. The Crop Yield Estimation Model Based on Multiple Regression Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 152-156. |
[5] | ZHENG Benchuan, ZHANG Jinfang, JIANG Jun, CUI Cheng, CHAI Liang, HUANG Youtao, ZHOU Zhengjian, LI Haojie, JIANG Liangcai. Correlation Analysis of Main Traits and Yield of Brassica napus ‘Chuanyou’ Varieties with Different Maturity Stages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 7-17. |
[6] | FU Yanyan, LI Yunfeng, HAN Dong, MA Shuqing. Water Surplus and Deficit of Maize Growing Season and Its Effect on Yield in Major Grain Producing Areas of Jilin Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 99-105. |
[7] | YAO Jinbao, YANG Xueming, ZHOU Miaoping, ZHANG Peng. Analysis of Yield and Its Components of Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Jiangsu Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 15-19. |
[8] | DONG Hongye, XU Ting, LIU Wenhao, LI Qiang, LIU Yantao. Peanut in the Southeastern Margin of Tarim Basin of Xinjiang: Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Agronomic Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 26-30. |
[9] | Tsewang Thondup, DU Jun, , Phuntsok Samten. Spatial-temporal Change of Negative Accumulated Temperature in the Main Agricultural Regions of the Yarlung Zangbo River and Its Two Tributaries of Tibet During 1981-2020 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 99-105. |
[10] | HUA Limin, LIU Huiying, XUE Yinghao, LAN Xiping, WANG Yitao, CAI Guangxing. Quantitative Assessment on Comprehensive Effects of Mulching Films by Integrated Evaluation Index Method [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 76-80. |
[11] | LIU Cuilan, WANG Kaifang, WU Dejun, YAN Liping, LI Shanwen, WANG Fang, REN Fei, WANG Yinhua. Responses of Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Fraxinus Clones to Coastal Saline-Alkaline Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 7-16. |
[12] | GUO Yulin, ZHANG Liguo, ZHENG Zhong, WANG Chunwei, XU Quanzhong, WU Yunxi, LI Guangpeng, SU Xiaohu, ZHANG Li. Study on the Correlation Between Serum Reproductive Hormone Content and Superovulation Effect in Dairy Meade Sheep [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 90-96. |
[13] | YU Zhonghao, ZHOU Wei, LI Zhigang, LI Ziwen, JIA Juanxia, ZHOU Yaxing. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Traits of Soybean in Inner Mongolia from 2002 to 2021 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 14-21. |
[14] | GAO Wenrui, SUN Yanjun, HAN Bing, LI Decui, FEI Cong, WANG Xiansheng, XU Gang. Effects of Low Light on Plant Growth and Fruit Development of Watermelon [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 39-45. |
[15] | LU Mengyao, LIU Dehu, LU Xueli, LIANG Heng, SUN Yuanyuan, LIU Yalin, SONG Tingqiang, FAN Haisheng. Construction of Flood Disaster Risk Assessment Model Based on Principal Component Analysis in Hubei Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 119-127. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||