Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 36-43.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0149
Previous Articles Next Articles
SUN Hui1(), WU Zhongneng1(
), MIAO Tingting1, LIU Junlong1, SU Xiaohua2, DING Changjun2, CAO Zhihua1, YAN Caixia1, WANG Tao3
Received:
2022-03-03
Revised:
2022-05-18
Online:
2023-01-15
Published:
2023-01-17
SUN Hui, WU Zhongneng, MIAO Tingting, LIU Junlong, SU Xiaohua, DING Changjun, CAO Zhihua, YAN Caixia, WANG Tao. Effects of Different Fertilization Treatments on Soil Microbial Communities in Poplar Forest Land[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(2): 36-43.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0149
序号 | N/(g/株) | P/(g/株) | K/(g/株) | 有机肥/(g/株) | 土壤改良生物菌肥/(g/株) | 胸径增长量/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1(CK) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.02±0.31 |
7 | 125 | 500 | 75 | 0 | 100 | 3.49±0.38 |
8 | 125 | 750 | 50 | 500 | 0 | 3.57±0.34 |
11 | 250 | 500 | 0 | 500 | 200 | 3.50±0.28 |
12 | 250 | 750 | 25 | 0 | 150 | 2.95±0.36 |
13 | 500 | 0 | 75 | 500 | 150 | 3.61±0.60 |
14 | 500 | 250 | 50 | 0 | 200 | 3.36±0.87 |
序号 | N/(g/株) | P/(g/株) | K/(g/株) | 有机肥/(g/株) | 土壤改良生物菌肥/(g/株) | 胸径增长量/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1(CK) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.02±0.31 |
7 | 125 | 500 | 75 | 0 | 100 | 3.49±0.38 |
8 | 125 | 750 | 50 | 500 | 0 | 3.57±0.34 |
11 | 250 | 500 | 0 | 500 | 200 | 3.50±0.28 |
12 | 250 | 750 | 25 | 0 | 150 | 2.95±0.36 |
13 | 500 | 0 | 75 | 500 | 150 | 3.61±0.60 |
14 | 500 | 250 | 50 | 0 | 200 | 3.36±0.87 |
Group | Sobs | Shannon | Chao1 | Ace | Goods_coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK-B | 3347.00 | 9.34 | 4138.42 | 4182.58 | 0.9837 |
CK-M | 3055.00 | 9.15 | 3881.71 | 3986.47 | 0.9824 |
CK-T | 3455.33 | 9.80 | 4272.29 | 4287.36 | 0.9826 |
No7-B | 3438.67 | 9.84 | 4051.53 | 4063.65 | 0.9874 |
No7-M | 3319.33 | 9.72 | 3976.34 | 3944.28 | 0.9868 |
No7-T | 3495.00 | 9.88 | 4203.44 | 4236.30 | 0.9836 |
No8-B | 3322.33 | 9.74 | 4084.36 | 4081.54 | 0.9850 |
No8-M | 3409.33 | 9.74 | 4119.42 | 4156.46 | 0.9855 |
No8-T | 3432.33 | 9.85 | 4164.05 | 4219.20 | 0.9834 |
No11-B | 3296.67 | 9.43 | 3998.44 | 4029.59 | 0.9862 |
No11-M | 3523.33 | 9.75 | 4224.76 | 4224.76 | 0.9864 |
No11-T | 3552.33 | 9.86 | 4280.66 | 4289.15 | 0.9860 |
No12-B | 3449.67 | 9.63 | 4181.76 | 4199.78 | 0.9865 |
No12-M | 3496.00 | 9.83 | 4257.92 | 4257.81 | 0.9852 |
No12-T | 3511.33 | 9.84 | 4237.53 | 4229.56 | 0.9855 |
No13-B | 3540.67 | 9.75 | 4138.10 | 4165.27 | 0.9885 |
No13-M | 3201.67 | 9.46 | 3791.41 | 3837.76 | 0.9870 |
No13-T | 3381.67 | 9.77 | 4025.50 | 4063.67 | 0.9861 |
No14-B | 3240.00 | 9.45 | 3956.09 | 3997.14 | 0.9858 |
No14-M | 3275.67 | 9.44 | 4058.64 | 4075.16 | 0.9843 |
No14-T | 3362.33 | 9.59 | 4042.36 | 4127.13 | 0.9847 |
Group | Sobs | Shannon | Chao1 | Ace | Goods_coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK-B | 3347.00 | 9.34 | 4138.42 | 4182.58 | 0.9837 |
CK-M | 3055.00 | 9.15 | 3881.71 | 3986.47 | 0.9824 |
CK-T | 3455.33 | 9.80 | 4272.29 | 4287.36 | 0.9826 |
No7-B | 3438.67 | 9.84 | 4051.53 | 4063.65 | 0.9874 |
No7-M | 3319.33 | 9.72 | 3976.34 | 3944.28 | 0.9868 |
No7-T | 3495.00 | 9.88 | 4203.44 | 4236.30 | 0.9836 |
No8-B | 3322.33 | 9.74 | 4084.36 | 4081.54 | 0.9850 |
No8-M | 3409.33 | 9.74 | 4119.42 | 4156.46 | 0.9855 |
No8-T | 3432.33 | 9.85 | 4164.05 | 4219.20 | 0.9834 |
No11-B | 3296.67 | 9.43 | 3998.44 | 4029.59 | 0.9862 |
No11-M | 3523.33 | 9.75 | 4224.76 | 4224.76 | 0.9864 |
No11-T | 3552.33 | 9.86 | 4280.66 | 4289.15 | 0.9860 |
No12-B | 3449.67 | 9.63 | 4181.76 | 4199.78 | 0.9865 |
No12-M | 3496.00 | 9.83 | 4257.92 | 4257.81 | 0.9852 |
No12-T | 3511.33 | 9.84 | 4237.53 | 4229.56 | 0.9855 |
No13-B | 3540.67 | 9.75 | 4138.10 | 4165.27 | 0.9885 |
No13-M | 3201.67 | 9.46 | 3791.41 | 3837.76 | 0.9870 |
No13-T | 3381.67 | 9.77 | 4025.50 | 4063.67 | 0.9861 |
No14-B | 3240.00 | 9.45 | 3956.09 | 3997.14 | 0.9858 |
No14-M | 3275.67 | 9.44 | 4058.64 | 4075.16 | 0.9843 |
No14-T | 3362.33 | 9.59 | 4042.36 | 4127.13 | 0.9847 |
Group | Sobs | Shannon | Chao1 | Ace | Goods_coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK-B | 513.33 | 4.31 | 779.13 | 836.08 | 0.9982 |
CK-M | 554.67 | 4.90 | 862.81 | 911.51 | 0.9979 |
CK-T | 587.67 | 4.16 | 880.48 | 934.70 | 0.9979 |
No7-B | 611.33 | 4.37 | 995.38 | 1024.38 | 0.9974 |
No7-M | 525.67 | 4.62 | 868.17 | 918.65 | 0.9979 |
No7-T | 583.00 | 3.94 | 885.05 | 908.06 | 0.9980 |
No8-B | 578.67 | 4.40 | 947.62 | 1032.92 | 0.9976 |
No8-M | 546.33 | 4.44 | 865.69 | 899.47 | 0.9979 |
No8-T | 546.67 | 4.49 | 841.31 | 858.01 | 0.9981 |
No11-B | 531.00 | 5.06 | 860.73 | 905.13 | 0.9980 |
No11-M | 516.33 | 4.02 | 797.82 | 835.71 | 0.9981 |
No11-T | 538.33 | 4.48 | 841.62 | 895.02 | 0.9980 |
No12-B | 662.67 | 5.40 | 1010.74 | 1065.36 | 0.9976 |
No12-M | 612.00 | 4.76 | 930.80 | 981.24 | 0.9977 |
No12-T | 631.33 | 5.56 | 1020.06 | 1028.16 | 0.9977 |
No13-B | 648.00 | 4.17 | 1029.11 | 1030.55 | 0.9976 |
No13-M | 537.67 | 5.27 | 784.96 | 822.39 | 0.9980 |
No13-T | 685.00 | 5.02 | 991.91 | 1039.54 | 0.9974 |
No14-B | 625.00 | 5.06 | 935.43 | 984.31 | 0.9979 |
No14-M | 657.00 | 4.73 | 998.05 | 999.13 | 0.9977 |
No14-T | 651.00 | 4.49 | 1008.68 | 994.98 | 0.9977 |
Group | Sobs | Shannon | Chao1 | Ace | Goods_coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK-B | 513.33 | 4.31 | 779.13 | 836.08 | 0.9982 |
CK-M | 554.67 | 4.90 | 862.81 | 911.51 | 0.9979 |
CK-T | 587.67 | 4.16 | 880.48 | 934.70 | 0.9979 |
No7-B | 611.33 | 4.37 | 995.38 | 1024.38 | 0.9974 |
No7-M | 525.67 | 4.62 | 868.17 | 918.65 | 0.9979 |
No7-T | 583.00 | 3.94 | 885.05 | 908.06 | 0.9980 |
No8-B | 578.67 | 4.40 | 947.62 | 1032.92 | 0.9976 |
No8-M | 546.33 | 4.44 | 865.69 | 899.47 | 0.9979 |
No8-T | 546.67 | 4.49 | 841.31 | 858.01 | 0.9981 |
No11-B | 531.00 | 5.06 | 860.73 | 905.13 | 0.9980 |
No11-M | 516.33 | 4.02 | 797.82 | 835.71 | 0.9981 |
No11-T | 538.33 | 4.48 | 841.62 | 895.02 | 0.9980 |
No12-B | 662.67 | 5.40 | 1010.74 | 1065.36 | 0.9976 |
No12-M | 612.00 | 4.76 | 930.80 | 981.24 | 0.9977 |
No12-T | 631.33 | 5.56 | 1020.06 | 1028.16 | 0.9977 |
No13-B | 648.00 | 4.17 | 1029.11 | 1030.55 | 0.9976 |
No13-M | 537.67 | 5.27 | 784.96 | 822.39 | 0.9980 |
No13-T | 685.00 | 5.02 | 991.91 | 1039.54 | 0.9974 |
No14-B | 625.00 | 5.06 | 935.43 | 984.31 | 0.9979 |
No14-M | 657.00 | 4.73 | 998.05 | 999.13 | 0.9977 |
No14-T | 651.00 | 4.49 | 1008.68 | 994.98 | 0.9977 |
[1] |
惠昊, 王亚茹, 林鑫宇, 等. 不同森林经营模式对土壤氮含量及酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020(420):1-10.
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
韩亚飞, 伊文慧, 王文波, 等. 基于高通量测序技术的连作杨树人工林土壤细菌多样性研究[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2014, 49(5):1-6.
|
[4] |
姜啸虹, 尹杰. 杨树速生丰产林土壤退化原因分析及恢复对策[J]. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2010, 43(4):68-71.
|
[5] |
佘婷. 杨树人工林林下植被对土壤微生物特性的影响[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2019.
|
[6] |
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3109 pmid: 24056930 |
[7] |
张雅坤, 彭赛, 宋倩云, 等. 不同施肥模式对杨树人工林土壤微生物功能多样性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(5):1-8.
|
[8] |
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.03.005 URL |
[9] |
周伟, 徐莉, 余元春, 等. 沼液施肥对杨树林地土壤微生物量碳氮的影响[J]. 林业科技开发, 2015, 29(1):49-51.
|
[10] |
刘捷豹, 陈光水, 郭剑芬, 等. 森林土壤酶对环境变化的响应研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(1):110-117.
|
[11] |
鲍勇, 高颖, 曾晓敏, 等. 中亚热带3种典型森林土壤碳氮含量和酶活性的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(4):508-516.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2017.0311 |
[12] |
doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.06.006 URL |
[13] |
邓娇娇, 朱旭文, 张岩, 等. 辽西北风沙区不同人工林土壤真菌群落结构及功能特征[J]. 林业科学研究, 2020, 33(1):44-54.
|
[14] |
doi: 10.1007/s13225-018-0401-0 URL |
[15] |
张树萌, 黄懿梅, 倪银霞, 等. 宁南山区人工林草对土壤真菌群落的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(4):1449-1458.
|
[16] |
张军. 黑土区防护林土壤质量评价及其土壤细菌多样性研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2020.
|
[17] |
谭秀梅, 王华田, 孔令刚, 等. 杨树人工林连作土壤中酚酸积累规律及对土壤微生物的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2008, 43(1):14-19.
|
[18] |
孙家兴, 赵玉森, 辛颖, 等. 黑土区不同林龄杨树农田防护林土壤养分变化[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(3):59-62,90.
|
[19] |
卢伟伟, 耿慧丽, 张伊蕊, 等. 生物质炭对杨树人工林土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(4):143-149.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.10.005 pmid: 24120625 |
[22] |
汪其同, 高明宇, 刘梦玲, 等. 基于高通量测序的杨树人工林根际土壤真菌群落结构[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(4):1177-1183.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201704.004 |
[23] |
doi: 10.1007/s00300-013-1410-9 URL |
[24] |
王国兵, 郭娇娇, 曹国华, 等. 不同施肥模式对杨树人工林土壤微生物生物量C、N、P的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(5):1-7.
|
[25] |
任嘉红, 李浩, 刘辉, 等. 吡咯伯克霍尔德氏菌JK-SH007对杨树根际微生物数量及功能多样性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(5):126-133.
|
[26] |
姬广海. 溶杆菌属及其在植物病害防治中的研究进展[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2011, 26(1):124-130.
|
[27] |
张颖, 杨悦, 韦庆慧, 等. 鞘氨醇单胞菌的特性及应用研究进展[J]. 化学与生物工程, 2021, 38(3):6-13.
|
[28] |
鹿连明, 杜丹超, 胡秀荣, 等. 三种侵染柑橘木虱的蜡蚧菌属真菌的生物学特性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(10):1738-1744.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2016.10.16 |
[1] | DU Shanshan, LUO Jing, YAO Qingqing, SUN Huijian, HE Zhongsheng, WANG Dongli. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Topdressing Rates on SPAD Value and Dry Matter Accumulation and Distribution of Upland Cotton in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 1-6. |
[2] | LI Yanlan, YANG Jincheng, JIN Hongyun, LUO Zhimin, LI Xiang, LI Zaofu, ZHANG Chunfan, HU Xinzhou, YU Zonghong, LIU Jianjian, GAO Shilan, AN Zhengyun, WANG Aiming, CAI Shujiang. Application Rates and Proportions of Organic Fertilizers: Control Effects on Three Diseases of Grain Pea [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 106-111. |
[3] | TI Junyang, ZHANG Yuqin, YANG Hengshan, ZHANG Ruifu, TAI Jicheng, SA Rula, HAN Meiqi. Effects of Soybean-Maize Rotation on Community Structure and Diversity of Soil Nitrogen-fixing Bacteria of Spring Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(2): 44-50. |
[4] | ZHANG Wu, HUANG Wenyan, LIU Yueyan, WANG Jianjian. Effects of Potassium Fertilizer Types on the Growth and Yield of Pepper [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(2): 57-62. |
[5] | WU Zhibin, HUANG Chao, LEI Yuan, JING Feng, LIU Zhandong. Water and Fertilizer Utilization Characteristics of Winter Wheat Under Different Yield Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 64-71. |
[6] | LI Xingxing, HAN Fang, ZHOU Xue, SU Leping, YUAN Hong’an. Research Progress of Selenium-enriched Millet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 1-6. |
[7] | LI Dongxue, WANG Yiliu, HUAN Weiwei, BU Lingduo, WANG Ruizhi, LIU Hao, LU Dianjun, WANG Huoyan, CHEN Xiaoqin. Nutrient Content of Tobacco Leaves and Root Zone Soil Affected by Citrate Soluble Potassium Fertilizer in Yuxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 67-73. |
[8] | CHEN Hui, ZHOU Xiaoyue, TAN Cheng, ZHANG Yongchun, WANG Jidong, MA Hongbo. Effects of Milk Vetch Returning to Field on the Content of Soil Nutrient and Heavy Metal [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 80-85. |
[9] | WANG Yan, ZHU Kaidi, SUN Hongren, ZHANG Jiping, LV Yucai, WANG Jian. Abundance-deficiency Index of Soil Nutrients and Appropriate Fertilizer Application Rates for Apple Planting in China: A Preliminary Study [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 69-78. |
[10] | ZHANG Yong, XU Zhi, GAO Lifang, DENG Yaqin, WANG Ruixue, WANG Yuyun. Effects of Partial Substitution of Chemical Fertilizer by Organic Fertilizer on Lettuce Yield in Newly Reclaimed Red Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 79-85. |
[11] | ZHANG Baohan, LIU Jingyi, YOU Jingjing, ZUO Qingsong. Effects of Phosphorus Fertilizer Rate on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Dry Matter Accumulation of Rapeseed in Coastal Saline Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 22-26. |
[12] | YANG Kexin, ZHAO Xin, GE Hong, YANG Shuhua, JIA Ruidong, KOU Yaping. Nutrition and Fertilizer Efficient Utilization Technology of Cut Chrysanthemum: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 52-58. |
[13] | SHA Yuexia, HUANG Zeyang, WEI Zhaoqing. Impact of Microbial Agent Broadcast Application on Microbial Community Structure of Saline-alkali Soil in Shizuishan of Ningxia [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 82-90. |
[14] | REN Xvrui, WANG Yihui, YANG Hongyu, YUAN Liang, ZHAO Yue. Resource Utilization System of Agricultural Organic Waste After Centralized Recovery and Treatment: A Case Study of Xingxian Village in Gannan County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 74-79. |
[15] | LI Wei, XU Zhonghua, ZHENG Mingjie. Effects of Leaching and Organic Fertilizer on Improvement of Saline-Alkali Soil and Growth of Sapindus mukorossi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 32-37. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||