Effects of Different Transplanting Measures on Quality and Sensory Characteristics of Flue-cured Tobacco ‘CB-1'

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0217

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to further improve the industrial availability of tobacco raw materials, the effects of different transplanting measures on the quality and sensory characteristics of ‘CB-1' flue-cured tobacco variety were studied. Field growth period, occurrence of diseases and insect pests, yield and quality, internal chemical indexes, and smoking quality of tobacco leaves of each treatment were compared and analyzed. The results showed that the transplanting measure of ‘burned soil mixed with nutrient soil as filling hole fertilizer for transplanting + burned soil mixed with nutrient soil filling hole 20 days after transplanting as little clay' was more conducive to the root development of tobacco seedlings after transplanting, and could accelerate the growth and development of tobacco plants, improve the economic quality of cured tobacco leaves, enhance the nicotine content of lower tobacco leaves, reduce the nicotine content of upper tobacco leaves, and improve the smoking quality of tobacco leaves. In summary, this transplanting measure is the optimum for highlighting the quality and sensory characteristics of flue-cured tobacco ‘CB-1' variety and improving its industrial availability.

Key words: ‘CB-1', transplanting measure, yield and quality, sensory characteristics

CLC Number:

S859.84

WANG Peng, LIN Yong, XIE Xiaodan, HUANG Shiliang, GU Li, LI Mingjie, QIAN Sheng, ZHANG Zhongyi. Effects of Different Transplanting Measures on Quality and Sensory Characteristics of Flue-cured Tobacco ‘CB-1'[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(22): 15-19.

Figures/Tables 8

References 27

[1]	王初亮, 宋文峰, 关罗浩, 等. 云南红河烟区覆膜方式及移栽苗龄对烤烟产质量形成的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021(6):95-100.
[2]	高卫锴, 徐岩, 刘海业, 等. 移栽深度及覆膜和培土方式对烤烟产质量形成的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2018, 32(1):35-41.
[3]	赵萍. 烤烟膜内小苗不同苗龄移栽研究及大田示范[J]. 作物研究, 2014, 28(7):801-803.
[4]	董维光, 王涛, 林绍武, 等. 不同移栽方式对烤烟中下部烟叶质量的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(2):92-97.
[5]	段昶, 周家新, 金康, 等. 不同移栽方式对烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2021, 27(19):45-46.
[6]	程亚东, 贾孟, 孔明, 等. 不同井窖式移栽方式对烤烟生长发育及产质量的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33(4):69-73.
[7]	郭金平, 林水良, 陈德涵, 等. 不同覆盖方式对‘翠碧一号'小苗移栽产质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(28):31-36.
[8]	梁兵, 倪凤萍, 邵小东, 等. 不同海拔、移栽期及移栽方式对烤烟生长发育及产质量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(12):2648-2653.
[9]	曾宇, 朱启元, 韩助君, 等. 不同移栽期及移栽方式对烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 农业科学与技术, 2017, 18(11):2088-2091,2154.
[10]	谢勇波, 黄松青, 张万良, 等. 提高烤烟量与品质的研究进展[J]. 江西农业学报, 2012, 24(10):77.
[11]	包正元, 薛小平, 杨林, 等. 不同移栽期及移栽方式对“云烟85”生长发育及产质量的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2017(3):20-22.
[12]	刘天波, 段淑辉, 杨坤, 等. 长沙烟区不同移栽方式对烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2017, 31(1):55-58,81.
[13]	TENG W, LI W Q, LI C J. Comparison of N uptake and internal use efficiency in two tobacco varieties[J]. The crop journal, 2015, 3(1):80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2014.08.008 URL
[14]	LI Y L, CHENG J ZH, LI X Q, et al. Effects of biochar-based fertilizers on nutrient leaching in a tobacco-planting soil[J]. Chinese journal of geochemistry, 2019, 38(1):1-7.
[15]	XIE Z J, HE Y Q, XU CH X, et al. Effects of transplanting time on 15-nitrogen utilization and industrial quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 2017,41.
[16]	张国建. 烤烟品种CB-1化学成分变异分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2013, 26(3):914-917.
[17]	张鹏程, 陆引罡, 远红伟, 等. 不同移栽方式对烤烟田间长势和产质量影响的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(35):11491-11516.
[18]	侯加民, 张忠锋. 烤烟根系发育与烟叶产量质量关系的研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2003(2):16-18.
[19]	韩锦峰, 汪耀富, 张新堂. 土壤水分对烤烟根系发育和根系活力的影响[J]. 中国烟草, 1992(3):14-l7.
[20]	侯加民, 张忠锋. 烤烟根系发育与烟叶产量质量关系的研究[J]. 中国烟草, 2003(2):16-18
[21]	马新明, 刘国顺, 王小纯, 等. 烟草根系发育与地上部相关性的研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2002(3):26-29
[22]	王育军. 影响上部烟叶烟碱含量的主要农艺措施[J]. 中国农业文摘:农业工程, 2016, 28(4):44-46.
[23]	张黎明, 张明发, 田峰, 等. 湘西州烤烟烟碱含量的区域特征及其与烟叶评吸质量的关系[J]. 烟草科技, 2014(12):57-61.
[24]	沈晗, 杨凯, 任伟, 等. 影响上部烟叶感官质量的主要化学成分分析[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2019, 25(6):18-26.
[25]	陈伟, 王三根, 王玉明, 等. 不同生态区烤烟烟碱含量的变异分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2009, 17(2):285-290.
[26]	陈伟, 陈懿, 黄磊. 土壤与气候对烤后烟叶烟碱和钾含量的影响[J]. 土壤, 2013, 45(4):713-717.
[27]	刘国顺, 王彦亭, 汪耀富, 等. 烟草栽培学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.

处理	移栽期(月/日)	团棵期(月/日)	现蕾期(月/日)	初花期(月/日)	打顶期(月/日)	脚叶成熟期(月/日)	腰叶成熟期(月/日)	顶叶成熟期(月/日)
T1	1/1	3/1	4/2	4/23	4/3	5/1	5/25	6/22
T2	1/1	3	4/2	4/19	4/2	5	5/19	6/18
T3	1/1	3	4/2	4/17	4/2	4/3	5/16	6/15
T4	1/1	2/3	4/1	4/14	4/2	4/3	5/12	6/1

处理	移栽期(月/日)	团棵期(月/日)	现蕾期(月/日)	初花期(月/日)	打顶期(月/日)	脚叶成熟期(月/日)	腰叶成熟期(月/日)	顶叶成熟期(月/日)
T1	1/1	3/1	4/2	4/23	4/3	5/1	5/25	6/22
T2	1/1	3	4/2	4/19	4/2	5	5/19	6/18
T3	1/1	3	4/2	4/17	4/2	4/3	5/16	6/15
T4	1/1	2/3	4/1	4/14	4/2	4/3	5/12	6/1

处理	株高/cm	茎围/cm	节距/cm	有效叶数/片	最大叶面积/cm²
T1	100.6cD	9.5aB	6.1cC	11dD	1601.23cC
T2	103.8bC	9.6aB	6.5bB	12cC	1609.67cC
T3	105.5bB	10.1aA	6.5bB	13bB	1657.96bB
T4	107.6aA	10.7aA	6.8aA	15aA	1706.87aA

处理	株高/cm	茎围/cm	节距/cm	有效叶数/片	最大叶面积/cm²
T1	100.6cD	9.5aB	6.1cC	11dD	1601.23cC
T2	103.8bC	9.6aB	6.5bB	12cC	1609.67cC
T3	105.5bB	10.1aA	6.5bB	13bB	1657.96bB
T4	107.6aA	10.7aA	6.8aA	15aA	1706.87aA

处理	花叶病发病率	根茎病发病率	赤星病发病率
T1	10	12	3
T2	12	10	4
T3	11	6	4
T4	12	2	3