Effects of Ridge Planting on Tuber Yield of Helianthus tuberosus in Saline-Alkali Land of the Yellow River Delta

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0350

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effects of different cropping systems and planting densities on the yield of Helianthus tuberosus, two cropping systems were designed: ridge planting (A1) and flat planting (A2), and three row spacing experiments were carried out: 60 cm (B1), 80 cm (B2) and 100 cm (B3). The biomass of stem and leaf, the total tuber yield, and the individual tuber weight were analyzed. The results showed that the aboveground biomass, tuber yield and tuber size of H. tuberosus under ridge planting were higher than those under flat planting. From the perspective of feed collection and tuber yield, the optimal combination is A1B1. From the perspective of tuber marketability and tuber yield, the optimal combination is A1B3. Therefore, to promote H. tuberosus cropping system, suitable cultivation method can be selected according to the planting purpose. The results of this study can provide theoretical guidance for high-yield cultivation and efficient resource utilization of H. tuberosus in saline-alkali land.

Key words: saline-alkali land, Helianthus tuberosus, cropping system, planting density, yield

WANG Lu, GUO Hui, GUO Honghai, LIU Fangfang, HU Xinhui, LIU Zhenlin, JIA Xi. Effects of Ridge Planting on Tuber Yield of Helianthus tuberosus in Saline-Alkali Land of the Yellow River Delta[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(13): 13-18.

Figures/Tables 4

References 25

[1]	刘祖昕, 谢光辉. 菊芋作为能源植物的研究进展[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2012, 17(6):122-132.
[2]	阎秀峰, 李一蒙, 王洋. 改良松嫩盐碱草地的优良植物——菊芋[J]. 黑龙江大学自然科学学报, 2008, 25(6):812-816.
[3]	李雨露, 刘丽萍, 佟丽媛. 菊粉的特性及在食品中的应用[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, 34(13):392-394.
[4]	LONG X H, SHAO H B, LIU L, et al. Jerusalem artichoke: A sustainable biomass feedstock for biorefinery[J]. Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 2016, 54:1382-1388.
[5]	姜月, 张宝心, 张欢. 我国生物质能资源与利用[J]. 环球人文地理, 2017(9):143.
[6]	赵晓川, 王卓龙, 孙金艳. 菊芋在畜牧生产中的应用[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2006(6):39-40.
[7]	邱正明, 丁自立, 郭凤领, 等. 我国菊芋资源开发利用现状[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2013(16):13-15.
[8]	PUANGBUT D, JOGLOY S, VORASOOT N, et al. Variation of inulin content, inulin yield and water use efficiency for inulin yield in Jerusalem artichoke genotypes under different water regimes[J]. Agricultural water management, 2015, 152:142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.005 URL
[9]	MATÍAS J, ENCINAR J M, GONZÁLEZ J, et al. Optimisation of ethanol fermentation of Jerusalem artichoke tuber juice using simple technology for a decentralised and sustainable ethanol production[J]. Energy for sustainable development, 2015, 25:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2014.12.009 URL
[10]	CHENG Y, ZHOU W, GAO C, et al. Biodiesel production from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tuber by heterotrophic microalgae Chlorella protothecoides[J]. Journal of chemical technology & biotechnology biotechnology, 2010, 84(5):777-781.
[11]	KIM M, SHIN H K. The water-soluble extract of chicory influences serum and liver lipid concentrations, cecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations and fecal lipid excretion in rats[J]. The journal ofnutrition, 1998, 128(10):1731-1736.
[12]	史雪洁. 菊芋中菊糖的制备及在阿胶产品中的应用[D]. 烟台: 中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所, 2017.
[13]	乌日娜, 朱铁霞, 于永奇, 等. 菊芋的研究现状及开发潜力[J]. 草业科学, 2013, 30(8):1295-1300.
[14]	钟鹏, 苗丽丽, 刘杰, 等. 种植密度和方式对油莎豆块茎生长期光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2021, 43(6):9.
[15]	LAL R, VANDOREN D M. Influence of 25 years ofcontinuous corn production by three tillage methods on water infiltration for two soils in Ohio[J]. Soil &tillage research, 1990, 16(1-2):71-84.
[16]	庄舜尧, 钟敏, 孙晓, 等. 滨海盐碱地中垄作模式对菊芋生长及养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(24):197-201.
[17]	杨君, 姜吉禹. 海水灌溉条件下菊芋种植密度对土壤无机盐及产量的影响[J]. 吉林师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 30(2):17-18,25.
[18]	KAZUYUKI W, TOSHIO K. Effects of the capacity and composition of soil air on the growth and yield of sweet potato plants[J]. Japan journal crop science, 1964, 33(4):48-422.
[19]	杨洪宾, 徐成忠, 黄九柏, 等. 小麦垄作对冬前土壤物理性状及小麦生长发育的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2005(4):23-24.
[20]	马丽. 垄作栽培对夏玉米土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2013, 40(14):67-69,74.
[21]	曹力强. 起垄方式对旱地菊芋产量的影响试验[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2009(3):13-14.
[22]	王之杰, 郭天财, 王化岑, 等. 种植密度对超高产小麦生育后期光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2001(3):64-67.
[23]	金彦刚, 丁锦峰, 袁权, 等. 播期和密度对江苏淮北强筋小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(18):1-7. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0829
[24]	侯全刚, 李江, 李莉, 等. 种植密度对菊芋植物学性状及产量的影响[J]. 青海科技, 2005(1):24-25.
[25]	王丽慧. 不同耕地类型菊芋种植模式对比研究[J]. 青海农林科技, 2010(3):1-4,57.

种植方式	种植密度	地上茎叶	地下块茎
A1	B1	27123.02±2927.00a	27281.75±4240.14a
	B2	21011.90±1875.96ab	20565.48±1383.45ab
	B3	23976.19±1541.85ab	25369.05±1154.70ab
A2	B1	25396.83±4293.81ab	25992.06±7011.78ab
	B2	19315.48±1999.94b	15610.12±3553.90b
	B3	19928.57±1368.37b	22333.33±1879.78b

种植方式	种植密度	地上茎叶	地下块茎
A1	B1	27123.02±2927.00a	27281.75±4240.14a
	B2	21011.90±1875.96ab	20565.48±1383.45ab
	B3	23976.19±1541.85ab	25369.05±1154.70ab
A2	B1	25396.83±4293.81ab	25992.06±7011.78ab
	B2	19315.48±1999.94b	15610.12±3553.90b
	B3	19928.57±1368.37b	22333.33±1879.78b

变异来源	变异来源	自由度	平方和	均方	F值	F_0.05	F_0.01
主区部分	区组间	2	34099740.76	17049870.38	32.06^*	19.00	99.00
	A	1	43066197.11	43066197.11	80.99^*	18.51	98.50
	Ea	2	1063463.52	531731.76
	总变异	5	78229401.40
副区部分	B	2	228128268.49	114064134.25	3.31	6.94	18.00
	A×B互作	2	10085412.93	5042706.46	0.15	6.94	18.00
	Eb	4	137946519.12	34486629.78
	总变异	17	454389601.93

变异来源	变异来源	自由度	平方和	均方	F值	F_0.05	F_0.01
主区部分	区组间	2	34099740.76	17049870.38	32.06^*	19.00	99.00
	A	1	43066197.11	43066197.11	80.99^*	18.51	98.50
	Ea	2	1063463.52	531731.76
	总变异	5	78229401.40
副区部分	B	2	228128268.49	114064134.25	3.31	6.94	18.00
	A×B互作	2	10085412.93	5042706.46	0.15	6.94	18.00
	Eb	4	137946519.12	34486629.78
	总变异	17	454389601.93