
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 149-156.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0615
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-09-27
Revised:2025-01-13
Online:2025-03-25
Published:2025-03-25
YANG Ruimeng, YAN Guoyong. Invasion Trajectory and Control Prospects of Spartina alterniflora in Yellow River Delta[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 149-156.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0615
| 假说 | 定义 | 参考文献 |
|---|---|---|
| 表型可塑性假说 Phenotypic plasticity hypothesis | 拥有同一种基因型的个体,由于环境的不同而表现出的不同性状的适应特征 | [ |
| 繁殖体压力假说 Propagule pressure hypothesis | 外来植物成功入侵的概率常与繁殖体引入的数量与次数呈正相关; 繁殖体越多,成功入侵的可能性越大 | [ |
| 理想杂草特征假说 Ideal weed characteristics hypothesis | 外来种本身在形态、生理、生态、遗传和行为等方面具备先天优势, 帮助外来物种在新的生境中迅速定殖 | [ |
| 天敌释放假说 Enemy release hypothesis | 外来物种进入到新的区域后由于缺乏天敌, 可将用于抵御天敌的资源用于生长和繁殖 | [ |
| 新武器假说 New weapon hypothesis | 入侵者在新分布区环境中能释放抑制潜在竞争者的化感物质 | [ |
| 资源有效性的增强假说 The fluctuating resource hypothesis | 物种的扩植和建群均需要环境资源,资源水平的提高为入侵提供了更高的可能性 | [ |
| 互惠共生假说 Mutualism hypothesis | 2个或多个生物体相互受益,存在于所有类型的生态系统中, 参与构建生态系统的组成并维持其稳定 | [ |
| 假说 | 定义 | 参考文献 |
|---|---|---|
| 表型可塑性假说 Phenotypic plasticity hypothesis | 拥有同一种基因型的个体,由于环境的不同而表现出的不同性状的适应特征 | [ |
| 繁殖体压力假说 Propagule pressure hypothesis | 外来植物成功入侵的概率常与繁殖体引入的数量与次数呈正相关; 繁殖体越多,成功入侵的可能性越大 | [ |
| 理想杂草特征假说 Ideal weed characteristics hypothesis | 外来种本身在形态、生理、生态、遗传和行为等方面具备先天优势, 帮助外来物种在新的生境中迅速定殖 | [ |
| 天敌释放假说 Enemy release hypothesis | 外来物种进入到新的区域后由于缺乏天敌, 可将用于抵御天敌的资源用于生长和繁殖 | [ |
| 新武器假说 New weapon hypothesis | 入侵者在新分布区环境中能释放抑制潜在竞争者的化感物质 | [ |
| 资源有效性的增强假说 The fluctuating resource hypothesis | 物种的扩植和建群均需要环境资源,资源水平的提高为入侵提供了更高的可能性 | [ |
| 互惠共生假说 Mutualism hypothesis | 2个或多个生物体相互受益,存在于所有类型的生态系统中, 参与构建生态系统的组成并维持其稳定 | [ |
| [1] |
葛芳, 田波, 周云轩, 等. 海岸带典型盐沼植被消浪功能观测研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(8):1784-1792.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
pmid: 22624213 |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
于冬雪, 韩广轩, 王晓杰, 等. 互花米草入侵对黄河口潮沟形态特征和植物群落分布的影[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(1):42.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
张俪文, 王安东, 赵亚杰, 等. 黄河三角洲滨海湿地芦苇遗传变异及其与生境盐度的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(8):2362-2368.
|
| [11] |
宋增磊. 微生物在黄河三角洲互花米草与日本鳗草生态竞争中的作用及机制分析[D]. 烟台: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所), 2023.
|
| [12] |
张帆, 刘长安, 姜洋. 滩涂盐沼湿地退化机制研究[J]. 海洋开发与管理, 2008, 25(8):99-101.
|
| [13] |
任广波, 刘艳芬, 马毅, 等. 现代黄河三角洲互花米草遥感监测与变迁分析[J]. 激光生物学报, 2014, 23(6):596-603,608.
|
| [14] |
王学金, 陈立强, 宋玉敏, 等. 三角洲地区黄河水资源利用现状及对策[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2013(1):18-19.
|
| [15] |
林琳, 刘健, 陈学群, 等. 黄河三角洲1961—2000 年水资源时空变化特征[J]. 水资源保护, 2012, 28(1):29-33.
|
| [16] |
李昱蓉, 武海涛, 张森, 等. 互花米草入侵和持续扩张下黄河三角洲滨海湿地潮沟的形态特征及其变化[J]. 湿地科学, 2021, 19(1):88-97.
|
| [17] |
陈方涛, 刘国宁, 李秋霞, 等. 互花米草入侵对湿地生态环境的影响及治理——以山东省为例[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2023, 41(8):109-113.
|
| [18] |
王健生, 田新元, 袁琳, 等. 中国改革报[EB/OL]. Http://www.cfgw.net.cn/epaper/content/202402/23/content_64866.htm, 2024-02-23/2024-06-22.
|
| [19] |
刘建, 李钧敏, 余华, 等. 植物功能性状与外来植物入侵[J]. 生物多样性, 2010, 18(6):569.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
doi: 10.1126/science.290.5491.521 pmid: 11039934 |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
doi: 10.1111/mec.13013 pmid: 25421056 |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
pmid: 16913942 |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
doi: 10.1086/650373 pmid: 20100104 |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
pmid: 12783298 |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
于祥, 田家怡, 李建庆, 等. 黄河三角洲外来入侵物种米草的分布面积与扩展速度[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2009, 28(6):684-686.
|
| [50] |
邓自发, 安树青, 智颖飙, 等. 外来种互花米草入侵模式与爆发机制[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(8):2678-2686.
|
| [51] |
doi: 10.1111/mec.15192 pmid: 31339595 |
| [52] |
pmid: 19886483 |
| [53] |
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01418.x pmid: 20002494 |
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
宋君. 植物间的他感作用[J]. 生态学杂志, 1990, 9(6):43-47.
|
| [68] |
杜玮, 何池全, 陈玉丽, 等. 入侵植物互花米草水浸液对莴苣的化感效应[J]. 环境科学学报, 2009, 29(4):869-875.
|
| [69] |
doi: 10.1126/science.1136674 pmid: 18487183 |
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
李博. 植物入侵生态学:互花米草案例研究[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2022.
|
| [72] |
doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0972-y pmid: 28547417 |
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
骆永明. 中国海岸带可持续发展中的生态环境问题与海岸科学发展[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2016, 31(10):1133-1142.
|
| [80] |
王蔚, 张凯, 汝少国. 米草生物入侵现状及防治技术研究进展[J]. 海洋科学, 2003, 27(7):38-42.
|
| [81] |
李富荣, 陈俊勤, 陈沐荣, 等. 互花米草防治研究进展[J]. 生态环境, 2007, 16(6):1795-1800.
|
| [82] |
郭云文, 陈莉丽, 卢百灵, 等. 我国对互花米草的研究进展[J]. 草业与畜牧, 2007, 9:1-5.
|
| [83] |
杨东, 万福绪. 外来入侵种互花米草的研究进展[J]. 植物保护, 2014, 40(2):5-10.
|
| [84] |
谢宝华, 韩广轩. 外来入侵种互花米草防治研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(10):3464.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201810.006 |
| [85] |
管伟, 廖宝文, 邱凤英, 等. 利用无瓣海桑控制入侵种互花米草的初步研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2009, 22(4):603-607.
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
侯清晨, 冯燕楼, 周玉洁, 等. 植物入侵机制的主要假说[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11):3105-3115.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202211.005 |
| [88] |
doi: 10.1007/s004420000456 pmid: 28547337 |
| [89] |
doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12028 pmid: 23790204 |
| [1] | ZHAO Ming, CHANG Chunyan, WANG Zhuoran, ZHAO Gengxing. Driving Force Analysis and Prediction Simulation of Soil Salinization in Coastal Area of Yellow River Delta [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 75-83. |
| [2] | LIANG Haibo, LI Shengdong, LIU Fenghua, CAO Yongchang, WANG Xiangling, XU Yan. Characteristics of Maize Yield and Fertilizer Efficiency in Yellow River Delta Based on Meta Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(4): 103-110. |
| [3] | GAN Guojuan, LIU Xiu, LUO Zhaohui, LIANG Ping, YANG Jingjun, LI Jinhua, TIAN Hongdeng. Analysis of Research Hotspots and Frontier of Spartina alterniflora Based on Big Data Visualization of CiteSpace [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(20): 135-145. |
| [4] | LIU Hongyuan, ZHOU Zhihua, WANG Nana, WANG Yanjun. Wetland Ecosystem Health Assessment in the Yellow River Delta Nature Reserve [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 74-78. |
| [5] | Li Xiaoyan, Meng Juan, Niu Ruirui, Zhai Honglian, Xue Pengfei. Soil Nutrient Characteristics of Fraxinus chinensis Plantation in Yellow River Delta Under Different Planting Patterns [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(12): 53-57. |
| [6] | . Changes in Particle Composition Affect Salt Content and Wheat Growth in Clay Saline Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(11): 88-94. |
| [7] | . New Occurrence Characteristics and Control Strategies of Sugarcane Diseases and Insect Pests in Yunnan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(32): 119-124. |
| [8] | . Water-Fertilizer Coupling Affecting Root Morphology and Distribution of Wheat in Saline Alkali Land in the Yellow River Delta [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(10): 1-10. |
| [9] | . Research Process of Maize Stem Rot in China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(30): 130-134. |
| [10] | . Evaluation of Soil Improvement Effect in Different Saline Plantations Based on Factor Analysis: A Case Study of the Yellow River Delta [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(28): 50-54. |
| [11] | Jia Limei,Mao Weibing,Sun Yuxia,Zheng Qiankun and Chang Hongjuan. Effects of Different Modified Materials on Physical Properties of Clayey Saline Soil and Yield of Cotton [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(13): 81-87. |
| [12] | Zhang Yuwen,Mao Weibing,Liu Hongmin,Sun Yuxia,Jia Limei and Zheng Qiankun. Effects of Straw Turnover on Physical Properties of Coastal Saline Clay and Cotton Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(6): 75-80. |
| [13] | . Research on Spatial-temporal Changes and the Driving Force of Land Use in the Yellow River Delta [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(32): 172-177. |
| [14] | . Evaluation on Urban Land Intensive Utilization Based on GIS: A Case Study of Yellow River Delta City Group [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(11): 179-185. |
| [15] | . Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Value for Long-term Plantations in Saline-alkali Soils of the Yellow River Delta [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(34): 17-23. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
