Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 53-57.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18120110
Previous Articles Next Articles
Li Xiaoyan, Meng Juan, Niu Ruirui, Zhai Honglian, Xue Pengfei
Received:
2018-12-26
Revised:
2019-01-09
Online:
2020-04-25
Published:
2020-04-21
CLC Number:
Li Xiaoyan, Meng Juan, Niu Ruirui, Zhai Honglian, Xue Pengfei. Soil Nutrient Characteristics of Fraxinus chinensis Plantation in Yellow River Delta Under Different Planting Patterns[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(12): 53-57.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18120110
土层 | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 有效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
上层 | 77.40±0.72c | 35.50±0.61c | 229.97±9.98b | 11.20±0.35c |
中层 | 52.90±0.52b | 12.10±0.72b | 225.00±1.88ab | 7.60±0.21b |
下层 | 48.20±1.19a | 8.60±0.10a | 190.00±3.76a | 5.40±0.12a |
土层 | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 有效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
上层 | 77.40±0.72c | 35.50±0.61c | 229.97±9.98b | 11.20±0.35c |
中层 | 52.90±0.52b | 12.10±0.72b | 225.00±1.88ab | 7.60±0.21b |
下层 | 48.20±1.19a | 8.60±0.10a | 190.00±3.76a | 5.40±0.12a |
株行(m×m) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 有效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1×1 | 112.00±9.43c | 15.27±1.32a | 259.10±12.04c | 8.01±0.46a |
2×2 | 100.03±0.12b | 28.60±1.42b | 149.60±3.0a | 8.51±0.22a |
3×3 | 77.40±0.72a | 35.50±0.61c | 229.97±9.98b | 11.20±0.35b |
株行(m×m) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 有效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1×1 | 112.00±9.43c | 15.27±1.32a | 259.10±12.04c | 8.01±0.46a |
2×2 | 100.03±0.12b | 28.60±1.42b | 149.60±3.0a | 8.51±0.22a |
3×3 | 77.40±0.72a | 35.50±0.61c | 229.97±9.98b | 11.20±0.35b |
株行(m×m) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 有效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1×1 | 80.12±2.55c | 15.43±0.23b | 405.10±1.57c | 10.60±0.4b |
2×2 | 68.10±3.88b | 8.20±0.12a | 184.33±5.16b | 6.15±0.01a |
3×3 | 46.09±6.45a | 38.60±1.99c | 176.83±0.33a | 12.90±0.31c |
株行(m×m) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 有效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1×1 | 80.12±2.55c | 15.43±0.23b | 405.10±1.57c | 10.60±0.4b |
2×2 | 68.10±3.88b | 8.20±0.12a | 184.33±5.16b | 6.15±0.01a |
3×3 | 46.09±6.45a | 38.60±1.99c | 176.83±0.33a | 12.90±0.31c |
株行(m×m) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 有效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1×1 | 68.80±2.18c | 8.12±0.30b | 180.33±5.06a | 6.75±0.02b |
2×2 | 48.20±1.19b | 8.60±0.10b | 190.09±3.76b | 5.40±0.12a |
3×3 | 43.40±2.81a | 11.10±0.70a | 267.50±1.58c | 5.47±0.33a |
株行(m×m) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 有效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1×1 | 68.80±2.18c | 8.12±0.30b | 180.33±5.06a | 6.75±0.02b |
2×2 | 48.20±1.19b | 8.60±0.10b | 190.09±3.76b | 5.40±0.12a |
3×3 | 43.40±2.81a | 11.10±0.70a | 267.50±1.58c | 5.47±0.33a |
套种作物 | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 有效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
南瓜 | 45.78±3.54a | 6.91±0.54a | 296.84±7.89b | 8.43±0.5ab |
大豆 | 64.49±2.72c | 7.24±0.43b | 279.67±3.54b | 8.88±0.30ab |
地瓜 | 49.40±3.12a | 6.84±0.57a | 240.84±5.01a | 7.82±0.54a |
苜蓿 | 63.43±0.09c | 7.83±1.05b | 382.95±5.89d | 9.22±0.68ab |
未套种 | 61.70±1.89b | 6.57±0.98a | 276.30±5.44b | 9.53±0.77b |
套种作物 | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 有效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
南瓜 | 45.78±3.54a | 6.91±0.54a | 296.84±7.89b | 8.43±0.5ab |
大豆 | 64.49±2.72c | 7.24±0.43b | 279.67±3.54b | 8.88±0.30ab |
地瓜 | 49.40±3.12a | 6.84±0.57a | 240.84±5.01a | 7.82±0.54a |
苜蓿 | 63.43±0.09c | 7.83±1.05b | 382.95±5.89d | 9.22±0.68ab |
未套种 | 61.70±1.89b | 6.57±0.98a | 276.30±5.44b | 9.53±0.77b |
土层 | 米径 | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 有效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
上层 | <4 cm | 68.71 ±2.59c | 7.87±0.37a | 338.59±11.98c | 8.36±0.49a |
6~8 cm | 48.13 ±3.76b | 35.48±0.70b | 340.70±23.47b | 11.75±0.33b | |
>10 cm | 32.79 ±2.49a | 39.96±0.35c | 296.72±23.09a | 11.52±0.25b | |
中层 | <4 cm | 43.74±2.39b | 6.68±0.26a | 226.88±4.08c | 5.41±0.15c |
6~8 cm | 43.76±1.88b | 12.89±1.15b | 145.38±2.52a | 4.81±0.06b | |
>10 cm | 25.03±0.68a | 15.34±0.69c | 172.21±2.56b | 4.46±0.15a | |
下层 | <4 cm | 44.37±0.39c | 11.81±0.17c | 197.94±4.98b8b | 6.98±0.02c |
6~8 cm | 41.89±0.43b | 10.88±0.07b | 190.13±6.36b | 6.49±0.09b | |
>10 cm | 26.61±0.23a | 10.04±0.02a | 139.94±8.00a | 5.78±0.10a |
土层 | 米径 | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 有效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
上层 | <4 cm | 68.71 ±2.59c | 7.87±0.37a | 338.59±11.98c | 8.36±0.49a |
6~8 cm | 48.13 ±3.76b | 35.48±0.70b | 340.70±23.47b | 11.75±0.33b | |
>10 cm | 32.79 ±2.49a | 39.96±0.35c | 296.72±23.09a | 11.52±0.25b | |
中层 | <4 cm | 43.74±2.39b | 6.68±0.26a | 226.88±4.08c | 5.41±0.15c |
6~8 cm | 43.76±1.88b | 12.89±1.15b | 145.38±2.52a | 4.81±0.06b | |
>10 cm | 25.03±0.68a | 15.34±0.69c | 172.21±2.56b | 4.46±0.15a | |
下层 | <4 cm | 44.37±0.39c | 11.81±0.17c | 197.94±4.98b8b | 6.98±0.02c |
6~8 cm | 41.89±0.43b | 10.88±0.07b | 190.13±6.36b | 6.49±0.09b | |
>10 cm | 26.61±0.23a | 10.04±0.02a | 139.94±8.00a | 5.78±0.10a |
[1] | 胡小燕, 段爱国, 张建国 , 等. 南亚热带杉木人工成熟林密度对土壤养分效应研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018,31(3):15-23. |
[2] |
杜虎, 曾馥平, 宋同清 , 等. 广西主要森林土壤有机碳空间分布及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016,40(4):282-291.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0199 URL |
[3] | 郑姗姗, 吴鹏飞, 马祥庆 . 森林土壤养分空间异质性研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2014,27(4):13-17. |
[4] | 刘建明, 姚颖, 刘忠玲 , 等. 不同林分密度榛子天然林土壤养分特征研究[J]. 林业工程, 2018,34(3):1-5. |
[5] | 杨承栋 . 森林土壤学科研究进展与展望[J]. 土壤学报, 2008,45(5):881-891. |
[6] | 毛波, 董希斌 . 大兴安岭低质山杨林改造效果的综合评价[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016,44(8):7-12. |
[7] | 袁伟斌 . 不同密度杂种落叶松人工林土壤肥力变化特征[D]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学, 2008. |
[8] | 孙楠, 李亚洲 . 杂种落叶松林下土壤变化规律的研究[J]. 林业科技, 2017,42(6):15-18. |
[9] |
Kardol P, Wardle D A . How understanding aboveground-belowground linkages can assist restoration ecology[J]. Trends in Ecology &Evolution, 2010,25(11):670-679.
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.001 URL pmid: 20888063 |
[10] | 李永涛, 王霞, 王晓磊 , 等. 黄河三角洲白蜡人工林空气PM2.5浓度变化规律的研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2018,30(10):94-99. |
谢晓梅 . 土壤与植物营养学实验[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2014. | |
[11] | 李国雷 . 密度调控对针叶人工林地被和土壤影响的研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2007. |
[12] |
Yanai R D, Currie W S, Goodale C L . Soil carbon dynamics after forest harvest: an ecosystem paradigm reconsidered[J]. Ecosystems, 2003,6(3):197-212.
doi: 10.1007/s10021-002-0206-5 URL |
[13] | 林开敏, 俞新妥, 何智英 , 等. 不同密度杉木林分生物量结构与土壤肥力差异研究[J]. 林业科学, 1996(5):386-387. |
[14] | 许松葵, 王相娥, 谢腾芳 , 等. 不同密度大叶相思幼林的土壤肥力[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2008,29(2):79-81. |
[15] | 刘勇, 李国雷, 李瑞生 , 等. 密度调控对油松人工林土壤肥力的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2008,23(6):18-23. |
[16] | 赵汝东, 樊剑波, 何园球 , 等. 林分密度对马尾松林下土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤, 2012,44(2):297-301. |
[17] | 李红燕, 胡铁成, 曹群虎 , 等. 旱地不同绿肥品种和种植方式提高土壤肥力的效果[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016,22(05):1310-1318. |
[18] | 高文杰, 程飞, 廖博一 , 等. 套种绿肥对桉树人工林土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2018,1(34):1-5. |
[19] | 李银平, 徐文修, 陈冰 , 等. 绿肥种植模式对连作棉田土壤肥力及棉花产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2010,19(09):149-153. |
[20] | 朱虹, 钮福祥, 徐飞 , 等. 钾肥对甘薯产量、品质及淀粉RVA特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016,45(5):138-139. |
[21] | 王荫墀, 胡兆盛 . 甘薯需肥特性的研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 1981(1):7-12. |
[22] | 李春光, 陆昆典, 李兆贵 , 等. 木薯套种西瓜或南瓜的高产高效栽培模式[J]. 江西农业学报, 2011,23(9):30-32. |
[23] | 陈华安 . 南方温室大鹏厚皮南瓜与彩色辣椒套种一年三熟高效种植模式[J]. 广西农业科学2009, 40(6):745-748. |
[24] | 林正眉, 侯琼昭, 罗刚跃 , 等. 桉树林下套种对牧草糙毛假地豆的生长和林地土壤养分的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2017,44(12):45-52. |
[25] | 李国雷, 刘勇, 徐扬 , 等. 间伐强度对油松人工林植被发育的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2007(2):70-75. |
[26] |
范少辉, 赵建诚, 苏文会 , 等. 不同密度毛竹林土壤质量综合评价[J]. 林业科学, 2015,51(10):1-9.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20151001 URL |
[27] | Hernández J, Pino A D, Vance E D , et al. Eucalyptus, and Pinus, stand density effects on soil carbon requestration[J]. Forest Ecology & Management, 2016,368:28-38. |
[28] | 吴俊杰, 刘方春, 马丙尧 , 等. 滨海盐碱地白蜡的施肥效应[J]. 应用研究, 2013,27(5):57-60. |
[1] | SUN Shuqing, DING Wei, SUN Rui, ZHANG Xicai, LAN Guoyu, CHEN Wei, YANG Chuan, WU Zhixiang. Soil Bacterial Community of Rubber Plantations of Different Ages of Stand: Composition and Diversity Study [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 93-100. |
[2] | QIN Naiqun, MA Qiaoyun, GAO Jingwei, YANG Pu, CAI Jinlan, HAO Yingchun, LI Yanmei, JI Hongce, LIAO Xiangzheng. Effects of Biogas Residue Application on Nutrient and Heavy Metal Content in Soil and Yield of Crops Under Peanut-wheat Rotation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 58-63. |
[3] | CHEN Hui, ZHOU Xiaoyue, TAN Cheng, ZHANG Yongchun, WANG Jidong, MA Hongbo. Effects of Milk Vetch Returning to Field on the Content of Soil Nutrient and Heavy Metal [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 80-85. |
[4] | GESANG Dunzhun. Soil Nutrient Status Analysis and Soil Fertility Comprehensive Evaluation in Luolong County of Changdu City in Tibet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 30-34. |
[5] | WANG Lixia, YIN Xiaomin, LIU Yongxia, LIAN Zihao, WANG Bizun, HE Yingdui. Change Characteristics of Microbial Community in the Rhizosphere of Papaya Under Papaya-Leek Intercropping [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 66-76. |
[6] | PAN Xue, CAI Liqun, DONG Bo, NIE Guangyun. The Quality Grade and Nutrient Characteristics of Cultivated Land in Pingchuan District [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(29): 118-128. |
[7] | JIANG Shihua, CHI Zaixiang, ZENG Xiaoshan, YANG Xiuxun, MO Qingzhong, CHEN Jinmei, LEI Ying. Meteorological Conditions for Late Blight Occurrence on Winter-planting Potato in Guizhou Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 129-137. |
[8] | MAO Sishuai, LI Renkun, ZHOU Jihua, WANG Junying. Effect of Planting Density on Stem Tip, Yield and Planting Benefit of Facility Leaf-vegetable Sweet Potato in North China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 13-18. |
[9] | LIU Hongyuan, ZHOU Zhihua, WANG Nana, WANG Yanjun. Wetland Ecosystem Health Assessment in the Yellow River Delta Nature Reserve [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 74-78. |
[10] | HU Yi, WANG Jing, LI Gang. Soil Nutrient Characteristics and Fertility Grade Evaluation of Newly-increased Farmland in Weibei Dryland: A Case Study of Heyang County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 94-100. |
[11] | YANG Min, CHEN Xiuhu, PI Xiaojuan, GUO Feng, CHEN Xinmiao, HU Jiewen. Migration and Distribution Characteristics of Available Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Rice Terrace Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 50-55. |
[12] | QUAN Shengxiang, SHI Xuefeng, LIU Xiaoyue, LI Changwu, GE Yi, ZHANG Yan. Effects of Amaranthus hypochondriacus Enhanced by Biodegradable Chelating Agent on the Remediation of Cadmium Contaminated Farmland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 85-89. |
[13] | DING Mingliang, LIU Jia, LI Shaoxiang, YANG Zhonghui, BAI Yingwen, ZHANG Yanjun, LI Hongsheng, XIONG Shian, YANG Mujun, LIU Kun. Responses of Yield and Quality Traits of New Wheat Variety ‘Yunmai 110’ to Different Planting Densities [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(24): 1-7. |
[14] | LIN Xiyue, LEI Zhengping, WU Xianqun, HUANG Suhua, SHAO Caihong, YANG Shulin, LI Mingqiang, LIU Jinping, GAN Jinhua, WEN Nanhui. The Damage Reduction Effect of Narrowing Harvester Track and Wide-narrow Row Planting in the Mechanized Harvesting of Ratooning Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 150-155. |
[15] | GUO Wen, DAI Xixi, MO Nan, ZHANG Yingqing, YU Chen, TIAN Jiang, GENG Zhide, LI Lu. Soybean Planting and Soybean Commodities’ Import and Export Trade Structure in ASEAN Countries [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 156-164. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||