
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (28): 94-101.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0149
Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Ruiping(
), LI Yaping, NIU Jing, WANG Fu, WANG Peirong, WANG Rong, XIA Yuhong(
)
Received:2025-02-24
Revised:2025-08-18
Online:2025-10-05
Published:2025-10-10
WANG Ruiping, LI Yaping, NIU Jing, WANG Fu, WANG Peirong, WANG Rong, XIA Yuhong. Effects of Soil Conditioner on Physicochemical Properties of Soil and Sunflower Yield Under Drip Irrigation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(28): 94-101.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0149
| 土层深度 | S1 | CK1 | S2 | CK2 | S3 | CK3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~10 cm | 1.64b | 1.68a | 1.59c | 1.62bc | 1.60bc | 1.64b |
| 10~20 cm | 1.64ab | 1.68a | 1.62b | 1.64ab | 1.57c | 1.64ab |
| 20~40 cm | 1.66a | 1.66a | 1.62b | 1.65a | 1.54d | 1.57c |
| 40~60 cm | 1.57ab | 1.60a | 1.61a | 1.63a | 1.52bc | 1.50c |
| 平均值 | 1.63 | 1.66 | 1.61 | 1.64 | 1.56 | 1.59 |
| 土层深度 | S1 | CK1 | S2 | CK2 | S3 | CK3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~10 cm | 1.64b | 1.68a | 1.59c | 1.62bc | 1.60bc | 1.64b |
| 10~20 cm | 1.64ab | 1.68a | 1.62b | 1.64ab | 1.57c | 1.64ab |
| 20~40 cm | 1.66a | 1.66a | 1.62b | 1.65a | 1.54d | 1.57c |
| 40~60 cm | 1.57ab | 1.60a | 1.61a | 1.63a | 1.52bc | 1.50c |
| 平均值 | 1.63 | 1.66 | 1.61 | 1.64 | 1.56 | 1.59 |
| 处理 | 株高/m | 茎粗/mm | 盘径/cm | 单盘籽净重/g | 百粒净重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 202.7±40.4c | 35.5±3.9b | 29.3±2.6a | 172.2±34.4b | 14.2±3.0c | 3616.3±722.2b |
| S1 | 248.2±20.2b | 34.7±1.1b | 31.6±4.1ab | 196.5±42.5ab | 18.0±1.5ab | 4125.5±595.9ab |
| CK2 | 229.6±17.3bc | 35.1±4.0b | 28.1±4.5ab | 182.7±28.3ab | 17.0±1.4b | 3837.2±893.1ab |
| S2 | 249.2±22.3b | 40.7±5.4ab | 30.3±1.6ab | 195.1±28.4ab | 17.5±1.2ab | 4097.1±279.5ab |
| CK3 | 250.5±19.9b | 39.1±7.1ab | 26.5±3.9b | 194.4±13.3ab | 17.2±1.3b | 4081.9±593.9ab |
| S3 | 287.4±21.6a | 44.1±4.9a | 29.4±1.7ab | 218.3±16.2a | 19.9±2.2a | 4584.0±339.0a |
| 处理 | 株高/m | 茎粗/mm | 盘径/cm | 单盘籽净重/g | 百粒净重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 202.7±40.4c | 35.5±3.9b | 29.3±2.6a | 172.2±34.4b | 14.2±3.0c | 3616.3±722.2b |
| S1 | 248.2±20.2b | 34.7±1.1b | 31.6±4.1ab | 196.5±42.5ab | 18.0±1.5ab | 4125.5±595.9ab |
| CK2 | 229.6±17.3bc | 35.1±4.0b | 28.1±4.5ab | 182.7±28.3ab | 17.0±1.4b | 3837.2±893.1ab |
| S2 | 249.2±22.3b | 40.7±5.4ab | 30.3±1.6ab | 195.1±28.4ab | 17.5±1.2ab | 4097.1±279.5ab |
| CK3 | 250.5±19.9b | 39.1±7.1ab | 26.5±3.9b | 194.4±13.3ab | 17.2±1.3b | 4081.9±593.9ab |
| S3 | 287.4±21.6a | 44.1±4.9a | 29.4±1.7ab | 218.3±16.2a | 19.9±2.2a | 4584.0±339.0a |
| pH | 全盐 | 碱化度 | 全氮 | 容重 | 株高 | 茎粗 | 百粒净重 | 产量 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 1 | 0.798 | 0.665 | -0.772 | 0.672 | -0.565 | -0.551 | -0.375 | -0.590 |
| 全盐 | 1 | 0.903* | -0.823* | 0.951** | -0.926** | -0.795 | -0.817* | -0.911* | |
| 碱化度 | 1 | -0.600 | 0.953** | -0.816* | -0.796 | -0.691 | -0.775 | ||
| 全氮 | 1 | -0.770 | 0.835* | 0.674 | 0.749 | 0.889* | |||
| 容重 | 1 | -0.934** | -0.8977* | -0.823* | -0.917** | ||||
| 株高 | 1 | 0.795 | 0.965** | 0.993** | |||||
| 茎粗 | 1 | 0.648 | 0.797 | ||||||
| 百粒净重 | 1 | 0.952** | |||||||
| 产量 | 1 |
| pH | 全盐 | 碱化度 | 全氮 | 容重 | 株高 | 茎粗 | 百粒净重 | 产量 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 1 | 0.798 | 0.665 | -0.772 | 0.672 | -0.565 | -0.551 | -0.375 | -0.590 |
| 全盐 | 1 | 0.903* | -0.823* | 0.951** | -0.926** | -0.795 | -0.817* | -0.911* | |
| 碱化度 | 1 | -0.600 | 0.953** | -0.816* | -0.796 | -0.691 | -0.775 | ||
| 全氮 | 1 | -0.770 | 0.835* | 0.674 | 0.749 | 0.889* | |||
| 容重 | 1 | -0.934** | -0.8977* | -0.823* | -0.917** | ||||
| 株高 | 1 | 0.795 | 0.965** | 0.993** | |||||
| 茎粗 | 1 | 0.648 | 0.797 | ||||||
| 百粒净重 | 1 | 0.952** | |||||||
| 产量 | 1 |
| [1] |
马晨, 马履, 刘太祥, 等. 盐碱地改良利用技术研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2010, 23(2):28-32.
|
| [2] |
肖克飚, 吴普特, 雷金银, 等. 不同类型耐盐植物对盐碱土生物改良研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(12):2433-2240.
|
| [3] |
弋良朋, 王祖伟. 滨海盐渍土壤中不同类型盐生植物富集镉的效应[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(14):4656-4662.
|
| [4] |
王睿彤, 陆兆华, 孙景宽, 等. 土壤改良剂对黄河三角洲滨海盐碱土的改良效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(4):239-244.
|
| [5] |
刘易, 冯耀祖, 黄建, 等. 微咸水灌溉条件下施用不同改良剂对盐渍化土壤盐分离子分布的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(1):146-152.
|
| [6] |
郑祥洲, 郭宝玲, 王英男, 等. 施用新型土壤调理剂改善烟草产量品质及土壤理化性质[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(7):1278-1283.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.07.005 |
| [7] |
孙国锋, 顾祝禹, 黄博阳, 等. 有机肥配施土壤调理剂对玉米产量的影响[J]. 中南农业科技, 2023, 44(5):3-6.
|
| [8] |
周娟, 袁珍贵, 郭莉莉, 等. 土壤酸化对作物生长发育的影响及改良措施[J]. 作物研究, 2013, 27(1):96-102.
|
| [9] |
刘娟, 梁俊梅, 段玉, 等. 有机硅土壤调理剂和功能肥对盐碱地的改良及向日葵产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(23):77-81.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0129 |
| [10] |
杨羽. 不同土壤调理剂对土壤改良及冬瓜产量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2024(11):65-67.
|
| [11] |
李方杰, 王海洁, 郭好娟, 等. 土壤调理剂对砂姜黑土农田土壤理化性状和夏玉米生长的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(8):35-41.
|
| [12] |
张世昌, 吴凌云, 黄功标, 等. 土壤调理剂品种对水稻产量及土壤理化性状效应研究[J]. 基层农技推广, 2021, 9(12):59-62.
|
| [13] |
李华, 尤吾云, 李晓睿, 等. 生物质灰土壤调理剂改良酸性土壤的试验研究[J]. 肥料与健康, 2020, 47(4):5-7.
|
| [14] |
黄昌勇, 徐建明. 土壤学(第三版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,2011:32-49.
|
| [15] |
张绪美, 曹亚茹, 沈文忠, 等. 微生物肥对设施土壤次生盐渍化和番茄生产的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(5):119-126.
|
| [16] |
胡敏, 屈忠义, 王丽萍. 不同改良剂对河套灌区盐渍化土壤性状和葵花生长特性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(5):316-322.
|
| [17] |
李国柱. 盐碱土壤调理剂研究初探[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2020(12):29-32.
|
| [18] |
朱福军, 丁方军, 吴钦泉, 等. 含腐植酸土壤调理剂对盐碱土的淋洗效应[J]. 腐植酸, 2017(6):17-27.
|
| [19] |
张玉凤, 林海涛, 王江涛, 等. 盐碱土壤调理剂对玉米生长及土壤的改良效果[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(1):134-138.
|
| [20] |
董平. 施地佳盐碱土壤调理剂在枸杞上的施用效果[J]. 农村科技, 2013(5):30-31.
|
| [21] |
高昕. 生物有机型盐碱地调理剂田间效果评价[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2018.
|
| [22] |
丁龙平, 杨倩. 不同浓度微生物菌剂对黄瓜土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2022, 28(2):111-113.
|
| [23] |
任立军, 赵文琪, 陈松岭, 等. 有机肥和土壤调理剂组合对设施土壤氮素和番茄产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(12):70-77.
|
| [1] | ZHOU Huaping, ZHANG Zhouna, ZHANG Mingkui. Forms and Spatial Distribution of Soil Phosphorus in Subtropical Natural Forest Land [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 107-116. |
| [2] | TANG Yingying, TANG Xian, ZHAO Jianrong. Impact of Long-term Fertilization Based on Meta-analysis on Stability of Soil Aggregates in Chinese Farmland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 117-126. |
| [3] | SONG Kai, GAO Yu, ZUO Yutian, LIU Yang. Meta-analysis of Total Organic Carbon in Agricultural Soils Under Biochar Amendment Model [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 125-131. |
| [4] | LI Yangyang, CHEN Shuaimin, XU Minghong, CHI Chang, MA Wei, WANG Yinping, SONG Yan, FAN Zuowei, WU Haiyan. Effects of Microbial Product Coupling Urea on Straw Decomposition Rate and Yield of Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 18-24. |
| [5] | TIAN Cuiling, TIAN Jialiang. Effect of Spraying Alginate Enhancing Solution at Different Growth Stages on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 25-31. |
| [6] | HUANG Wenyin, ZHANG Baige, CHANG Jingjing, CHEN Xiao, LI Jing, CHEN Lei, ZHAO Junhong, LUO Mouxiong, SONG Zhao. Effect of Exogenous Inositol on Yield and Quality of Tomatoes Under Salt Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 73-80. |
| [7] | WANG Feng, ZHU Shijun, YING Hong, CHAI Weigang, DAI Yaolu, YUAN Qing, JIN Shuquan. Effect of Organic Amendment Combined with Moderate Deep Ploughing on Productivity Improvement of Hilly Reclaimed Rice Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 91-98. |
| [8] | WANG Junjiang, YIN Yuanhong, LU Chusheng, LU Zhanhua, CAI Haoyang, YE Qunhuan, LIAO Jiahui, LU Yusheng, LIANG Kaiming, FU Youqiang. Effect of Irrigation on Rice Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency During Critical Growth Period Under Drought Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 1-10. |
| [9] | LI Lin, YAN Yun, KANG Jiangfei, MENG Qihan, FANG Shefa, CHEN Yingmin, GUO Jianqiu. The Effects of Sowing Date and Density on Growth Process, Photosynthetic Characteristics, Agronomic Traits, Yield, and Quality of ‘Luodou 1304’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 11-18. |
| [10] | XUE Yuansai, WANG Xijiu, ZOU Shiguo, ZHANG Shoufu, LIU Guangya, HAN Wei, SUN Xian. Effect of Compound Oligosaccharides on Yield of Typical Crops in Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 50-56. |
| [11] | MA Zhuo, ZHOU Hanbing, ZHAO Manxing, ZHANG Xia, WANG Xin, MA Danni. Effects of Fulvic Acid Potassium on Nutrient Absorption, Yield and Quality of Apples in Yan’an Mountain Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 63-68. |
| [12] | WANG Cheng, LI Guorui, DI Jianjun, LUO Rui, LI Mingjing, HUANG Fenglan. Effects of Castor Bean Microbial Enzyme Biological Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Cherry Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 69-75. |
| [13] | WANG Zhigang, SHI Guangzhi, LIU Zhidu, GUO Liyue. Research on Ecological Management and Integrated Utilization of Saline-alkali Land [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 98-104. |
| [14] | SU Dan, WANG Zicheng, JIA Junying, SUN Dezhi, LI Zhijun, GUO Yuan, ZHUANG Defeng. Effects of Water Regulation on Growth Characteristics of Atractylodes chinensis and Yield and Quality of Crude Material [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 75-83. |
| [15] | LI Menghan, HU Wenping, DONG Xin, PHURBU Samdrup, ZONG Baji. Effects of Sowing Density and Harvest Time on Yield of Foodstuff Maize in Linzhi City [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 9-14. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||