Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (20): 97-105.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0270
Previous Articles Next Articles
XU Yanggui(), LI Zhuxian, LIANG Jianyi, TU Yuting, PENG Yiping, ZHONG Wenliang, HUANG Jichuan(
)
Received:
2025-03-31
Revised:
2025-05-15
Online:
2025-07-15
Published:
2025-07-21
XU Yanggui, LI Zhuxian, LIANG Jianyi, TU Yuting, PENG Yiping, ZHONG Wenliang, HUANG Jichuan. Effect of Phosphorus-solubilizing Bacteria on Soil Properties and Growth of Mustard in Acidic Phosphorus-rich Soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(20): 97-105.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0270
处理 | pH | 有机质/% | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根际土 | 50% RD | 4.92±0.09ab* | 0.99±0.04b | 237.7±26.6a | 196.1±7.9b** | 152.7±14.6a* |
50% RD+PSB | 4.65±0.04c | 0.94±0.02b | 147.1±13.5b* | 105.8±9.4c | 77.1±9.2b** | |
RD | 5.03±0.02a*** | 0.92±0.01b | 246.9±13.3a* | 241.9±5.8a*** | 128.3±2.6a** | |
RD+PSB | 4.80±0.02bc* | 1.00±0.01a | 157.7±19.4b* | 120.5±10.3c* | 77.1±6.1b** | |
非根际土 | 50% RD | 4.59±0.02BC | 0.93±0.03B | 203.5±12.2A | 128.7±4.7B | 114.7±3.1A |
50% RD+PSB | 4.74±0.06A | 0.90±0.02B | 203.0±4.6A | 125.1±7.1B | 122.4±1.7A | |
RD | 4.54±0.03C | 0.91±0.01B | 199.2±6.8A | 155.4±5.5A | 102.2±2.1B | |
RD+PSB | 4.67±0.01AB | 1.03±0.02A | 202.1±3.3A | 156.4±1.9A | 115.7±5.6A |
处理 | pH | 有机质/% | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根际土 | 50% RD | 4.92±0.09ab* | 0.99±0.04b | 237.7±26.6a | 196.1±7.9b** | 152.7±14.6a* |
50% RD+PSB | 4.65±0.04c | 0.94±0.02b | 147.1±13.5b* | 105.8±9.4c | 77.1±9.2b** | |
RD | 5.03±0.02a*** | 0.92±0.01b | 246.9±13.3a* | 241.9±5.8a*** | 128.3±2.6a** | |
RD+PSB | 4.80±0.02bc* | 1.00±0.01a | 157.7±19.4b* | 120.5±10.3c* | 77.1±6.1b** | |
非根际土 | 50% RD | 4.59±0.02BC | 0.93±0.03B | 203.5±12.2A | 128.7±4.7B | 114.7±3.1A |
50% RD+PSB | 4.74±0.06A | 0.90±0.02B | 203.0±4.6A | 125.1±7.1B | 122.4±1.7A | |
RD | 4.54±0.03C | 0.91±0.01B | 199.2±6.8A | 155.4±5.5A | 102.2±2.1B | |
RD+PSB | 4.67±0.01AB | 1.03±0.02A | 202.1±3.3A | 156.4±1.9A | 115.7±5.6A |
处理 | 交换性钠 | 交换性钙/ (cmol/kg) | 交换性镁/ (cmol/kg) | 交换性钾/ (cmol/kg) | TEB/ (cmol/kg) | 有效铜/ (mg/kg) | 有效锌/ (mg/kg) | 有效锰/ (mg/kg) | 交换性铝/ [cmol(1/3Al3+)/kg] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根际土 | 50% RD | 1.93±0.45ab | 2.00±0.28b | 0.23±0.01a* | 0.43±0.04a | 4.62±0.39a | 0.47±0.01ab | 2.48±0.04ab | 0.58±0.04a | 1.06±0.12c* |
50% RD+PSB | 0.82±0.01c*** | 1.28±0.08c* | 0.18±0.00b | 0.25±0.03b* | 2.53±0.10b** | 0.45±0.00ab** | 1.89±0.07c** | 0.50±0.02a | 1.95±0.18a* | |
RD | 2.09±0.07a** | 2.58±0.10a | 0.21±0.00a | 0.36±0.02a | 5.26±0.18a* | 0.52±0.05a | 2.79±0.11a | 0.60±0.05a | 0.54±0.07d*** | |
RD+PSB | 1.22±0.03bc | 1.53±0.07bc** | 0.22±0.00a | 0.24±0.01b | 3.21±0.06b* | 0.39±0.01b* | 2.41±0.18b | 0.67±0.09a | 1.46±0.02b** | |
非际土 | 50% RD | 1.53±0.13A | 1.89±0.07B | 0.19±0.00B | 0.36±0.02BA | 3.98±0.15A | 0.53±0.01A | 2.37±0.07B | 0.48±0.01A | 1.68±0.04B |
50% RD+PSB | 1.54±0.04A | 1.70±0.05C | 0.17±0.00B | 0.41±0.02A | 3.82±0.05A | 0.52±0.00AB | 2.30±0.05B | 0.51±0.04A | 1.44±0.03C | |
RD | 1.39±0.02A | 2.21±0.03A | 0.22±0.00A | 0.34±0.00AB | 4.17±0.03A | 0.48±0.01B | 2.37±0.04B | 0.46±0.01A | 2.00±0.04A | |
RD+PSB | 1.46±0.07A | 2.16±0.09A | 0.22±0.01A | 0.31±0.04B | 4.15±0.17A | 0.49±0.02B | 2.62±0.11A | 0.54±0.05A | 1.31±0.02D |
处理 | 交换性钠 | 交换性钙/ (cmol/kg) | 交换性镁/ (cmol/kg) | 交换性钾/ (cmol/kg) | TEB/ (cmol/kg) | 有效铜/ (mg/kg) | 有效锌/ (mg/kg) | 有效锰/ (mg/kg) | 交换性铝/ [cmol(1/3Al3+)/kg] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根际土 | 50% RD | 1.93±0.45ab | 2.00±0.28b | 0.23±0.01a* | 0.43±0.04a | 4.62±0.39a | 0.47±0.01ab | 2.48±0.04ab | 0.58±0.04a | 1.06±0.12c* |
50% RD+PSB | 0.82±0.01c*** | 1.28±0.08c* | 0.18±0.00b | 0.25±0.03b* | 2.53±0.10b** | 0.45±0.00ab** | 1.89±0.07c** | 0.50±0.02a | 1.95±0.18a* | |
RD | 2.09±0.07a** | 2.58±0.10a | 0.21±0.00a | 0.36±0.02a | 5.26±0.18a* | 0.52±0.05a | 2.79±0.11a | 0.60±0.05a | 0.54±0.07d*** | |
RD+PSB | 1.22±0.03bc | 1.53±0.07bc** | 0.22±0.00a | 0.24±0.01b | 3.21±0.06b* | 0.39±0.01b* | 2.41±0.18b | 0.67±0.09a | 1.46±0.02b** | |
非际土 | 50% RD | 1.53±0.13A | 1.89±0.07B | 0.19±0.00B | 0.36±0.02BA | 3.98±0.15A | 0.53±0.01A | 2.37±0.07B | 0.48±0.01A | 1.68±0.04B |
50% RD+PSB | 1.54±0.04A | 1.70±0.05C | 0.17±0.00B | 0.41±0.02A | 3.82±0.05A | 0.52±0.00AB | 2.30±0.05B | 0.51±0.04A | 1.44±0.03C | |
RD | 1.39±0.02A | 2.21±0.03A | 0.22±0.00A | 0.34±0.00AB | 4.17±0.03A | 0.48±0.01B | 2.37±0.04B | 0.46±0.01A | 2.00±0.04A | |
RD+PSB | 1.46±0.07A | 2.16±0.09A | 0.22±0.01A | 0.31±0.04B | 4.15±0.17A | 0.49±0.02B | 2.62±0.11A | 0.54±0.05A | 1.31±0.02D |
处理 | 氮利用率(NUEcrop) | 磷利用率(PUEcrop) | 钾利用率(KUEcrop) |
---|---|---|---|
50% RD | 0.25±0.01c | 0.12±0.00b | 0.12±0.00c |
50% RD+PSB | 0.33±0.03b | 0.15±0.01a | 0.13±0.00b |
RD | 0.13±0.01d | 0.04±0.00d | 0.06±0.00d |
RD+PSB | 0.40±0.02a | 0.09±0.01c | 0.19±0.00a |
处理 | 氮利用率(NUEcrop) | 磷利用率(PUEcrop) | 钾利用率(KUEcrop) |
---|---|---|---|
50% RD | 0.25±0.01c | 0.12±0.00b | 0.12±0.00c |
50% RD+PSB | 0.33±0.03b | 0.15±0.01a | 0.13±0.00b |
RD | 0.13±0.01d | 0.04±0.00d | 0.06±0.00d |
RD+PSB | 0.40±0.02a | 0.09±0.01c | 0.19±0.00a |
处理 | 根生物量/(g/株) | 茎叶生物量/(g/株) | 植株生物量/(g/株) | 根/茎比 |
---|---|---|---|---|
50% RD | 0.32±0.02ab | 3.22±0.07c | 3.54±0.08c | 0.12±0.00b |
50% RD+PSB | 0.48±0.10a | 3.86±0.10b | 4.34±0.12b | 0.14±0.02b |
RD | 0.26±0.02b | 1.47±0.09d | 1.73±0.09d | 0.20±0.02a |
RD+PSB | 0.50±0.04a | 4.70±0.18a | 5.20±0.20a | 0.14±0.01b |
处理 | 根生物量/(g/株) | 茎叶生物量/(g/株) | 植株生物量/(g/株) | 根/茎比 |
---|---|---|---|---|
50% RD | 0.32±0.02ab | 3.22±0.07c | 3.54±0.08c | 0.12±0.00b |
50% RD+PSB | 0.48±0.10a | 3.86±0.10b | 4.34±0.12b | 0.14±0.02b |
RD | 0.26±0.02b | 1.47±0.09d | 1.73±0.09d | 0.20±0.02a |
RD+PSB | 0.50±0.04a | 4.70±0.18a | 5.20±0.20a | 0.14±0.01b |
[1] |
|
[2] |
李慧敏, 王瑞, 施卫明, 等. 菜地土壤解磷微生物特征及其在磷形态转化调控中的作用[J]. 土壤, 2020,52:668-675.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
宁建凤, 李彤, 曾瑞锟, 等. 珠三角赤红壤常年菜地土壤肥力质量评价[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(5):25-40.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2023301 |
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
叶维雁, 吴海波, 刘惠民, 等. 2株番木瓜根际促生菌的解磷解钾作用[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(6):247-251.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[D]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
张白鸽, 陈琼贤, 曹健, 等. 珠三角主菜区土壤交换性钙,镁的丰缺指标及分布特征[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2011,32:25-29.
|
[16] |
黄绍文, 高伟, 唐继伟, 等. 我国主要菜区耕层土壤盐分总量及离子组成[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(4):965-977.
|
[17] |
曹建华, 袁道先, 潘根兴. 岩溶生态系统中的土壤[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003(1):37-44.
doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2003.01.0037 |
[18] |
张璐, 蔡泽江, 王慧颖, 等. 中国稻田土壤有效态中量和微量元素含量分布特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(16):62-70.
|
[19] |
韩巍, 赵金月, 李豆豆, 等. 设施蔬菜大棚土壤氮磷钾养分富积降低土壤钙素的有效性[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(4):1019-1026.
|
[20] |
王筝, 鲁剑巍, 张文君, 等. 田间土壤钾素有效性影响因素及其评估[J]. 土壤, 2012, 44(6):898-904.
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
梁文君, 蔡泽江, 宋芳芳, 等. 不同母质发育红壤上玉米生长与土壤pH、交换性铝、交换性钙的关系[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(8):1544-1550.
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
于天一, 孙秀山, 石程仁, 等. 土壤酸化危害及防治技术研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(11):3137-3143.
|
[26] |
连旭东, 张璐, 刘思汝, 等. 作物产量对土壤pH的响应差异及其影响因素[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2023, 29(9):1618-1629.
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
杨阳, 刘秉儒. 荒漠草原不同植物根际与非根际土壤养分及微生物量分布特征[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(22):7562-7570.
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
李娟, 王文丽, 卢秉林. 解磷微生物菌剂对油菜生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2010(3):67-69.
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
GUOH,
|
[43] |
廖广丞, 陈晓萍, 余烨颖, 等. 磷肥减量与有机替代对露地辣椒产量品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 农业环境科学, 2024, 43(3):617-626.
|
[44] |
杜雷, 陈钢, 王素萍, 等. 不同磷水平下接种解磷菌剂对生菜促生效应及土壤磷素形态的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(15):49-53.
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
郝亚妮, 裴红宾, 高振峰, 等. 解磷菌协同秸秆替代磷肥对苦荞生长及产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2024(1):204-213.
|
[1] | ZHANG Zhongxin, WANG Xuefang, ZHANG Yaowen, GUAN Zhoubo, DONG Yuhong, ZHENG Lei, YANG Li. Research on Lodging Resistant Characteristics of Brassica napus L. Variety ‘Qinyou 1618’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 48-52. |
[2] | LIN Haiqing, LI Jing, LI Jiawei, WANG Jiahui, JIAO Jiabin, CHANG Jingjing, CHEN Xiao, ZHANG Baige, SONG Zhao. Effect of Magnesium Fertilizer Dosage on Yield, Quality and Nutrient Uptake of Four Leafy Vegetables [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(4): 74-82. |
[3] | Wan Yibing, Tang Lanlan, Zhan Ming, Shang Chunhui, Yuan Jiayi, Qin Mingguang. Dynamics of Carbon and Nitrogen in Root Exudation and Their Relations with Root Traits in Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(24): 31-38. |
[4] | Song Xiaoshuang, Yu Wenjing, Zhou Qi, Min Kai, Deng Xun. Isolation, Identification and Phosphate Solubilization Analysis of Phosphate-solubilizing Bacteria Derived from Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica Rhizosphere Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(32): 76-81. |
[5] | Ma Xiang, Jia Zhifeng, Zhao Yiwei. Bio-organic Fertilizer: Effects on the Growth of Oats Under Drought Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(2): 18-25. |
[6] | . Residue Detection and Safety Evaluation of Malathion in Cabbage Mustard and Flowering Chinese Cabbage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(34): 139-143. |
[7] | . Fertilization in Maize Season: Effects on Nutrient Uptake and Soil Nutrient Apparent Balance in Maize-rice Rotation System [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(7): 1-7. |
[8] | 王康平,,,刘海浪 and . Root-shoot Interaction Mechanism of High Yield and High Efficiency in Rice: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(5): 1-4. |
[9] | . Climate Suitability of Cabbage Mustard in Guizhou [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(25): 109-114. |
[10] | 张玉树. Effect of Multifunction Soil Conditioner on Tobacco Growth in Acid Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(2): 80-86. |
[11] | . Application of Special Controlled Release Fertilizer in Tobacco Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(10): 53-57. |
[12] | . Impact of Extreme Climatic Events on Mustard Cultivation in Fuling District, Chongqing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(29): 174-180. |
[13] | . Effects of Different Fertilizer Amounts and Cultivation Density on Ramie/Tuber Mustard [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(12): 239-243. |
[14] | . The Effects of Variety, Sowing Date and Seedling Way on Growth Period and Yield of the Second Quarter of Stem Mustard [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(9): 129-133. |
[15] | . The Influence of Four Substrates on Root and Leaf Traits of Actinidia chrysantha Cutting Seedling [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(21): 213-217. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||