Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 105-111.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18080039
Previous Articles Next Articles
Guan Fei, Ye Mingliang, Ma Youhua
Received:
2018-08-09
Revised:
2018-11-07
Online:
2020-01-05
Published:
2020-01-07
Contact:
Ma Youhua
CLC Number:
Guan Fei, Ye Mingliang, Ma Youhua. The K Value of Soil Erosion in the Jianghuai Hilly Area: A Case of Feidong County[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(1): 105-111.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18080039
土类 | 剖面数量 | 亚类 | 剖面数量 | 面积/km2 | 总面积占比/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水稻土 | 21 | 淹育型水稻土 | 4 | 44.41 | 2 | ||
潴育型水稻土 | 11 | 973.09 | 44.1 | ||||
潜育型水稻土 | 5 | 202.20 | 9.2 | ||||
侧漂型水稻土 | 4 | 75.00 | 3.4 | ||||
黄褐土 | 9 | 黏磐黄褐土 | 8 | 785.99 | 35.6 | ||
黄褐土 | 1 | 6.94 | 0.3 | ||||
土类 | 剖面数量 | 亚类 | 剖面数量 | 面积/km2 | 总面积占比/% | ||
黄棕壤 | 3 | 黄棕壤性土 | 2 | 93.91 | 4.3 | ||
普通黄棕壤 | 1 | 11.82 | 0.5 | ||||
石灰岩土 | 1 | 黑色石灰土 | 1 | 9.25 | 0.4 | ||
紫色土 | 1 | 石灰性紫色土 | 1 | 3.15 | 0.1 |
土类 | 剖面数量 | 亚类 | 剖面数量 | 面积/km2 | 总面积占比/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水稻土 | 21 | 淹育型水稻土 | 4 | 44.41 | 2 | ||
潴育型水稻土 | 11 | 973.09 | 44.1 | ||||
潜育型水稻土 | 5 | 202.20 | 9.2 | ||||
侧漂型水稻土 | 4 | 75.00 | 3.4 | ||||
黄褐土 | 9 | 黏磐黄褐土 | 8 | 785.99 | 35.6 | ||
黄褐土 | 1 | 6.94 | 0.3 | ||||
土类 | 剖面数量 | 亚类 | 剖面数量 | 面积/km2 | 总面积占比/% | ||
黄棕壤 | 3 | 黄棕壤性土 | 2 | 93.91 | 4.3 | ||
普通黄棕壤 | 1 | 11.82 | 0.5 | ||||
石灰岩土 | 1 | 黑色石灰土 | 1 | 9.25 | 0.4 | ||
紫色土 | 1 | 石灰性紫色土 | 1 | 3.15 | 0.1 |
土壤类型 | 砂粒 | 粉粒 | 黏粒 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
相对极差 | 变异系数/% | 相对极差 | 变异系数/% | 相对极差 | 变异系数/% | |||
水稻土 | 2.92 | 76.33 | 0.54 | 17.82 | 1.69 | 48.58 | ||
黄褐土 | 2.30 | 75.42 | 0.53 | 17.09 | 1.47 | 47.49 | ||
黄棕壤 | 0.21 | 10.13 | 0.37 | 18.14 | 0.33 | 15.15 |
土壤类型 | 砂粒 | 粉粒 | 黏粒 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
相对极差 | 变异系数/% | 相对极差 | 变异系数/% | 相对极差 | 变异系数/% | |||
水稻土 | 2.92 | 76.33 | 0.54 | 17.82 | 1.69 | 48.58 | ||
黄褐土 | 2.30 | 75.42 | 0.53 | 17.09 | 1.47 | 47.49 | ||
黄棕壤 | 0.21 | 10.13 | 0.37 | 18.14 | 0.33 | 15.15 |
土壤类型 | 土壤质地 | K值 |
---|---|---|
水稻土 | 砂粒含量(SAN) | 0.281 |
粉粒含量(SIL) | 0.416 | |
黏粒含量(CLA) | -0.697** | |
土壤颗粒几何平均粒径(Dg) | -0.813** | |
黄褐土 | 砂粒含量(SAN) | 0.377 |
粉粒含量(SIL) | 0.484 | |
黏粒含量(CLA) | -0.694* | |
土壤颗粒几何平均粒径(Dg) | -0.993** |
土壤类型 | 土壤质地 | K值 |
---|---|---|
水稻土 | 砂粒含量(SAN) | 0.281 |
粉粒含量(SIL) | 0.416 | |
黏粒含量(CLA) | -0.697** | |
土壤颗粒几何平均粒径(Dg) | -0.813** | |
黄褐土 | 砂粒含量(SAN) | 0.377 |
粉粒含量(SIL) | 0.484 | |
黏粒含量(CLA) | -0.694* | |
土壤颗粒几何平均粒径(Dg) | -0.993** |
[1] | 张建春 . 安徽江淮丘陵区水土流失危害及其防治对策[J]. 中国水土保持, 2006,04:34-35,44. |
[2] | 黄淑玲, 方刚, 袁新田 , 等. 水土流失成因分析与治理措施——以安徽江淮丘陵地区为例[J]. 广东农业科学, 2010(01):147-149,153. |
[3] | 张卫 . 皖西大别山区不同土地利用类型的土壤抗侵蚀性——以安徽省岳西县为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(2):38-41. |
[4] | 梁音, 刘宪春, 曹龙熹 , 等. 中国水蚀区土壤可蚀性K值计算与宏观分布[J]. 中国水土保持, 2013(10):35-40. |
[5] | 翟伟峰, 许林书 . 东北典型黑土区土壤可蚀性K值研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2011,05:1209-1213. |
[6] | 王彬, 郑粉莉, 王玉玺 . 东北典型薄层黑土区土壤可蚀性模型适用性分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(6):126-131. |
[7] | 张科利, 蔡永明, 刘宝元 , 等. 黄土高原地区土壤可蚀性及其应用研究[J]. 生态学报, 2001,21(10):1687-1695. |
[8] | 张科利, 彭文英, 杨红丽 . 中国土壤可蚀性值及其估算[J]. 土壤学报, 2007,44(1):7-13. |
[9] | 王彬 . 土壤可蚀性动态变化机制与土壤可蚀性估算模型[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2013. |
[10] | Sharply A N, Williams J R . EPIC-Erosion/Productivity impact calculator: Model documentation[M]. U S Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin, 1990.No.1768-1772. |
[11] | 陆建忠, 陈晓玲, 李辉 , 等. 基于GIS/RS和USLE鄱阳湖流域土壤侵蚀变化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011,27(2):337-344. |
[12] | 王彬, 郑粉莉, 王玉玺 . 东北典型薄层土壤可蚀性模型适用性分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(6):126-131. |
[13] | 朱冰冰, 李占斌, 李鹏 , 等. 土地退化/恢复中土壤可蚀性动态变化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009,25(2):56-61. |
[14] | 张鹏宇, 王全九, 周蓓蓓 . 陕西省耕地土壤可蚀性因子[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(5):100-106. |
[15] |
Shirazi M A, Boersma L . A unifying quantitative analysis of soil texture[J]. Soil science society of America Journal, 1984,48(1):142-147.
doi: 10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800010026x URL |
[16] | Wang B, Zheng F L, Rmkens M J M . Comparison of soil erodibility factors in USLE, RUSLE2, EPIC and Dg models based on a Chinese soil erodibility database[J]. Soil and Plant science, 2013,63(1):69-79. |
[17] | 胡宏祥, 马友华 . 卡庆斯基制与美国制间土粒分析结果的转换[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2004,06:1156-1157. |
[18] | 蔡永明, 张科利, 李双才 . 不同粒径制间土壤质地资料的转换问题研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2003,40(4):511-517. |
[19] | 谢毅文, 陈晓宏, 王兆礼 , 等. 土壤质地转换中优选插值方法研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2009,28(3):50-52,57. |
[20] | 郭中领, 张科利, 董建志 , 等. 利用分形理论解决不同土粒分级标准间土壤质地资料的转换问题[J]. 地理科学, 2011,31(10):1254-1260. |
[21] | 袁志发, 周静芋 . 多元统计分析[M] 北京: 科学出版社, 2002. |
[22] | 王彬 . 东北典型薄层黑土区土壤可蚀性关键因子分析与土壤可蚀性计算[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2009. |
[23] | 周宁, 李超, 琚存勇 , 等. 黑龙江省土壤可蚀性K值特征分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015,31(10):182-189. |
[24] | 梁音, 史学正 . 长江以南东部丘陵山区土壤可蚀性 K值研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 1999,6(2):47-52. |
[1] | JIANG Jia, CHEN Jinpeng, WEI Jiangqiao, GUO Xuhao, CHE Zhiping, TIAN Yue’e, CHEN Genqiang, LIU Shengming. Synergistic Effect of Fludioxonil and Tebuconazole Against Fusarium graminearum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 116-120. |
[2] | DING Qixun, TANG Mengmeng, LI Zijie, JIANG Wenjuan, ZHANG Xuewei, MA Youhua. Cultivated Land Quality Grade Evaluation of High-standard Farmland in Guoyang County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 46-52. |
[3] | SUN Xijun, DENG Rui, LV Shuang, GAO Ying, CAI Miao, GOU Qiaohong, ZHAO Juan. Spatial Variability Characteristics of Farmland Soil Organic Matter in Xi'an [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 43-53. |
[4] | LU Mengyao, LIU Dehu, LU Xueli, LIANG Heng, SUN Yuanyuan, LIU Yalin, SONG Tingqiang, FAN Haisheng. Construction of Flood Disaster Risk Assessment Model Based on Principal Component Analysis in Hubei Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 119-127. |
[5] | SONG Yingfang, HONG Huangxi, LI Zhuoli, CHENG Zhiyong, ZHANG Lixiang. Tea Saponin: Research Progress on Its Effect of Pest Control and Synergism [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 119-124. |
[6] | WANG Qing, FANG Wensheng, LI Yuan, WANG Qiuxia, YAN Dongdong, CAO Aocheng. Advances in New Nematicides and Their Action Mechanism [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 100-107. |
[7] | JIANG Yuqin, XIE Xianjin, HUANG Da. Influence of Cultivated Land Quality on Cultivated Land Productivity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 75-80. |
[8] | CHAO Ying, FU Gangfeng, YAN Xianghui, HANG Zhongqiao, YANG Quangang, WANG Hui, PAN Hong, LOU Yanhong, ZHUGE Yuping. Effects of Organic Fertilizer on Crop Quality, Soil Fertility and Environment: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(29): 103-107. |
[9] | ZHANG Yufeng, SUN Jiangtao, LI Qingsong, FAN Liyao, WEN Qian. The Willingness and Influencing Factors of Farmers’ Homestead Exit in the Agricultural Area of Eastern Henan: An Example of Fugou County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(2): 150-156. |
[10] | LI Yahua, ZHANG Xiangqian, AN Qi, WU Di, LIU Zhanyong, SUN Feng, ZHANG Dejian, GAO Min, ZHANG Guoying, XING Jun. Evaluation Methods of Cultivated Land Fertility and Their Practical Application: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(15): 60-68. |
[11] | ZHANG Jie, CHEN Meiqiu, ZHANG Shuxian, ZHANG Yuqin. The Recognition Degree of Adjustment Methods of Farmers’ Land Contract Right from the Perspective of Livelihood Capital [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(11): 137-143. |
[12] | Gulinaer ·Suoerdahan, LI Xiaoyan, SHI Zhenyu, XING Zihan, WU Haitao. The Impact of Construction Land Expansion on Arable Land Resources in Changchun [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(11): 89-95. |
[13] | GAO Lin, LU Wenting, LIN Changhua, CHEN Xiaoyuan, FENG Huimin. Development Characteristics of Typical Soil Profile of Fragrant Taro Region in Northern Guangdong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(10): 85-91. |
[14] | Hong Li, Pang Songling, Geng Meiyun. Advances in the Practice of Urban Historical Heritage Protection and Management Based on GIS Technology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(8): 145-150. |
[15] | Yan Jixuan, Kang Xia, Zhang Meihua, Sun Dongyuan, Qiao Hongqiang. Agricultural Land Transfer Behavior and Influencing Factors of Yongchang County in Hexi Corridor [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(5): 143-148. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||