
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 47-52.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20191100842
Special Issue: 生物技术
• Research article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xiaocong Zhang(
), Wanwen Yu, Jinfeng Cai, Ying Guo, Guibin Wang(
)
Received:2019-11-15
Revised:2020-02-18
Online:2020-04-05
Published:2020-03-19
CLC Number:
Xiaocong Zhang, Wanwen Yu, Jinfeng Cai, Ying Guo, Guibin Wang. Effects of Ginkgo biloba Exocarp Extracts on Mulberry Leaf Growth, Physiological Indexes and Cocoon Quality[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(10): 47-52.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20191100842
| 处理 | 单株平均枝条长/cm | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/cm | 单叶叶面积/cm2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 77.03±1.32d | 15.50±0.36d | 12.43±0.21c | 116.07±14.20d |
| A | 83.93±0.96c | 17.15±0.39c | 13.37±0.45bc | 133.17±6.40cd |
| B | 92.33±2.93a | 17.42±0.22c | 13.97±0.56ab | 145.47±6.21bc |
| C | 92.53±1.03a | 19.33±0.42a | 14.37±0.60ab | 155.87±4.42ab |
| D | 88.37±1.57b | 19.00±0.70ab | 14.90±0.78a | 168.37±9.47a |
| E | 87.47±0.42b | 18.13±0.49bc | 14.03±0.17ab | 154.50±5.14ab |
| 处理 | 单株平均枝条长/cm | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/cm | 单叶叶面积/cm2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 77.03±1.32d | 15.50±0.36d | 12.43±0.21c | 116.07±14.20d |
| A | 83.93±0.96c | 17.15±0.39c | 13.37±0.45bc | 133.17±6.40cd |
| B | 92.33±2.93a | 17.42±0.22c | 13.97±0.56ab | 145.47±6.21bc |
| C | 92.53±1.03a | 19.33±0.42a | 14.37±0.60ab | 155.87±4.42ab |
| D | 88.37±1.57b | 19.00±0.70ab | 14.90±0.78a | 168.37±9.47a |
| E | 87.47±0.42b | 18.13±0.49bc | 14.03±0.17ab | 154.50±5.14ab |
| 处理 | 净光合速率/[µmol/(m2·s)] | 单株叶产量/(g/株) |
|---|---|---|
| CK | 4.90±0.17b | 792.71±47.32b |
| A | 5.00±0.17ab | 830.43±24.01b |
| B | 5.70±0.51a | 964.93±36.84a |
| C | 5.80±0.25a | 1054.28±49.70a |
| D | 5.70±0.29ab | 1035.07±103.85a |
| E | 5.50±0.60ab | 979.03±29.43a |
| 处理 | 净光合速率/[µmol/(m2·s)] | 单株叶产量/(g/株) |
|---|---|---|
| CK | 4.90±0.17b | 792.71±47.32b |
| A | 5.00±0.17ab | 830.43±24.01b |
| B | 5.70±0.51a | 964.93±36.84a |
| C | 5.80±0.25a | 1054.28±49.70a |
| D | 5.70±0.29ab | 1035.07±103.85a |
| E | 5.50±0.60ab | 979.03±29.43a |
| 处理 | 全茧量/g | 茧层量/g | 茧层率/% | 茧产量/(g/100头) | 茧丝产量/(g/100头) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 1.89±0.03b | 0.39±0.02b | 20.84±0.85b | 184.30±1.47a | 38.62±0.89c |
| A | 1.92±0.05b | 0.42±0.02b | 21.80±0.77ab | 183.93±2.32a | 39.63±0.96bc |
| B | 1.97±0.10ab | 0.44±0.01ab | 22.60±0.64a | 191.73±4.89a | 43.32±0.49ab |
| C | 2.11±0.07a | 0.49±0.02a | 23.22±0.91a | 200.42±1.28a | 46.52±0.46a |
| D | 2.05±0.09ab | 0.47±0.03a | 22.91±0.39a | 194.01±1.28a | 44.49±0.46a |
| E | 2.03±0.03ab | 0.46±0.01a | 22.68±0.22a | 195.78±1.28a | 44.62±0.46a |
| 处理 | 全茧量/g | 茧层量/g | 茧层率/% | 茧产量/(g/100头) | 茧丝产量/(g/100头) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 1.89±0.03b | 0.39±0.02b | 20.84±0.85b | 184.30±1.47a | 38.62±0.89c |
| A | 1.92±0.05b | 0.42±0.02b | 21.80±0.77ab | 183.93±2.32a | 39.63±0.96bc |
| B | 1.97±0.10ab | 0.44±0.01ab | 22.60±0.64a | 191.73±4.89a | 43.32±0.49ab |
| C | 2.11±0.07a | 0.49±0.02a | 23.22±0.91a | 200.42±1.28a | 46.52±0.46a |
| D | 2.05±0.09ab | 0.47±0.03a | 22.91±0.39a | 194.01±1.28a | 44.49±0.46a |
| E | 2.03±0.03ab | 0.46±0.01a | 22.68±0.22a | 195.78±1.28a | 44.62±0.46a |
| 处理 | 叶面积 | 单株产量 | 氮含量 | 可溶性蛋白含量 | 全茧量 | 茧层量 | 茧层率 | 茧产量 | 茧丝产量 | 隶属函数均值 | 名次 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.022 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 6 |
| A | 0.327 | 0.144 | 0.470 | 0.226 | 0.136 | 0.300 | 0.403 | 0.000 | 0.128 | 0.237 | 5 |
| B | 0.562 | 0.658 | 0.681 | 0.660 | 0.364 | 0.500 | 0.739 | 0.473 | 0.595 | 0.581 | 4 |
| C | 0.761 | 1.000 | 0.994 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.973 | 1 |
| D | 1.000 | 0.927 | 1.000 | 0.698 | 0.727 | 0.800 | 0.870 | 0.611 | 0.743 | 0.820 | 2 |
| E | 0.735 | 0.712 | 0.826 | 0.604 | 0.636 | 0.700 | 0.773 | 0.719 | 0.759 | 0.718 | 3 |
| 处理 | 叶面积 | 单株产量 | 氮含量 | 可溶性蛋白含量 | 全茧量 | 茧层量 | 茧层率 | 茧产量 | 茧丝产量 | 隶属函数均值 | 名次 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.022 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 6 |
| A | 0.327 | 0.144 | 0.470 | 0.226 | 0.136 | 0.300 | 0.403 | 0.000 | 0.128 | 0.237 | 5 |
| B | 0.562 | 0.658 | 0.681 | 0.660 | 0.364 | 0.500 | 0.739 | 0.473 | 0.595 | 0.581 | 4 |
| C | 0.761 | 1.000 | 0.994 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.973 | 1 |
| D | 1.000 | 0.927 | 1.000 | 0.698 | 0.727 | 0.800 | 0.870 | 0.611 | 0.743 | 0.820 | 2 |
| E | 0.735 | 0.712 | 0.826 | 0.604 | 0.636 | 0.700 | 0.773 | 0.719 | 0.759 | 0.718 | 3 |
| [1] | 曹福亮 . 中国银杏[M]. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 2002: 3. |
| [2] | 吴向阳, 仰榴青, 陈钧 , 等. 银杏外种皮综合利用的研究现状与发展[J]. 农业机械学报, 2003,34(6):164-166. |
| [3] | 曹福亮 . 中国银杏志[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2007: 139-140. |
| [4] | 赵东亚, 唐进根, 陈利红 .等 . 银杏外种皮提取物对植物种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2014,41(3):10-13. |
| [5] | 巨云为, 樊培峰, 杨雪云 , 等. 银杏外种皮用于病虫害防治研究进展[J]. 林业技术开发, 2008,22(2):6-8. |
| [6] | 韩帅, 苗志伟, 刘玉平 , 等. 银杏外种皮挥发性成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 2012,33(14):146-149. |
| [7] | 张红梅 . 银杏外种皮提取物浸种对三种植物种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 首都师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2014,35(4):49-52. |
| [8] | 姜晓明, 赵献军 . 银杏外种皮提取物对霉菌的抑制作用[J]. 西北农业学报, 2017,16(6):30-33. |
| [9] | 秦丹, 付迎康, 杜志雯 . 银杏叶和银杏外种皮提取液对松材线虫的毒杀作用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014,42(6):1697-1698,1775. |
| [10] | 张衡, 刘晓杰, 姚文红 , 等. 银杏外种皮中银杏酚酸的提取方法研究[J]. 青岛农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2012,29(2):147-151. |
| [11] | Isan K, Masamitsu O, Paulo C V . Antitumor agents form the cashew (Anacardium occidentale) apple juice[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 1993,41:1012-1016. |
| [12] | 杨继华, 陈冰, 黄燕华 , 等. 饲料中添加桑叶黄酮对吉富罗非鱼生长性能、体成分、抗氧化指标及抗亚硝酸盐应激能力的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2017,29(9):3403-3412. |
| [13] | 杨玲, 胡睿智, 夏嗣廷 , 等. 植物多糖的功能性研究进展及其在动物生产中的应用[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019,31(6):2534-2543. |
| [14] | 王文学, 胡仕叶, 杨胜特 . 桑树根外追肥对桑叶产量和质量的影响[J]. 农技服务, 2012,29(4):411-412. |
| [15] | 张衡锋, 李成忠, 高利利 , 等. 叶面喷施微肥对藏红花光合特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015,43(12):285-287. |
| [16] | 王学奎 . 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006: 195-198. |
| [17] | 张立军, 樊金娟 . 植物生理学实验教程[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2007: 57-72. |
| [18] | 孔祥生, 易现锋 . 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008: 160-162. |
| [19] | 张衡锋, 张焕朝, 韦庆翠 , 等. 4种微肥对番红花生长、品质及产量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2016,40(1):169-173. |
| [20] | 郁万文, 曹福亮 . 银杏外种皮汁液浸种对小麦萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 林业工程学报, 2011,25(5):75-77. |
| [21] | 张瑾, 王文婷, 王国霞 , 等. 银杏外种皮及银杏叶提取液对冬枣保鲜的影响研究[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2018,59(7):55-57. |
| [22] | 牛志电, 郭金华, 梅建设 , 等. AC试剂提高蚕桑产量和质量的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 1998,14(6):69-70. |
| [23] | 谢海彬, 田毅, 李前锋 . 银杏外种皮在杏鲍菇栽培中的应用初探[J]. 食用菌, 2009(6):39. |
| [24] | 鲁剑巍, 陈防, 廖志文 , 等. 氮钾肥配合施用对桑叶产量品质及蚕茧质量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007,13(4):719-724. |
| [25] | 王泽林 . 不同配方施肥对种茧育的影响[J]. 蚕桑通报, 2007,32(2):31-33. |
| [26] | 郭金华, 牛志电, 梅建设 , 等. NaHSO3对桑树光合作用及蚕茧产量和质量的影响[J]. 蚕业科学, 2001,27(2):83-86. |
| [1] | GUAN Luohao, YANG Xin, LI Chao, ZHANG Yanling, ZHANG Guangfu, LI Yongliang, ZHOU Hanping, WANG Guangshan, ZHONG Shuai, DAI Huaxin. Influence of Remained Leaves on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Tengchong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 10-15. |
| [2] | LOU Dezhao, TU Nana, LU Fuping, WANG Shuchang, WU Huazhou. Effect of Pruning Height in Winter on the Yield and Quality of Mulberry Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 23-28. |
| [3] | HOU Jianlin, LI Sijun, HE Mingyu, XIAO Hanqian, XIANG Tiejun, HUANG Jie, LI Wujin, XIAO Yansong, JIANG Zhimin, XU Junhua, DENG Xiaohua. Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on the Growth, Dry Matter Accumulation, Yield and Quality of Paddy-tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 39-43. |
| [4] | ZUO Yanchun, WANG Honglin, YAN Xu, ZHOU Xiaokang, XIAO Lian, KOU Jing, CHEN Yi’an, DU Zhouhe. Feeding Value of Summer-pruning Twigs of Fruit Mulberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 105-110. |
| [5] | WANG Zheng, LIU Jiuyu, KAN Hongwei, HUANG Shaoli, LI Zhi, DONG Shuchao, LIU Yangxu, LI Xiaoting, YANG Xiaobin, LI Xiancai. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Root Morphology and Leaf Quality of ‘Hongda’ Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 1-7. |
| [6] | ZHANG Bo, TAN Wei, ZHOU Jie, LI Xiaolin, YE Lei, YANG Xuezhen. Different Particle Sizes of Mulberry Chips Affect Yield and Quality of Ganoderma lucidum During Substitute Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(22): 39-43. |
| [7] | WANG Hanxin, ZHANG Tong, ZHANG Lingfeng, YU Mingyue, LI Hongjiao. Study on the Difference of Resveratrol of Mulberry Varieties in Different Phenological Periods and Storage Conditions [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(22): 55-61. |
| [8] | ZHANG Liqin, YIN Hongyan, MU Shuyuan, FU Junhui, LI Yan. Evaluation of the Salt Tolerance of Five Hybrid Mulberry Germplasms [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(17): 62-68. |
| [9] | JIANG Wenqiang, MIAO Linghong, GAO Liang, ZHU Yuejie, LIN Yan, LUO Chenhao, QIAN Linjie, CHEN Shiyou, ZHANG Weina, SHI Dalin, LIU Bo, SHEN Huaishun, GE Xianping. Study on Nutrients and Quality Improvement of Liquid Fermented Mulberry Leaf Meal by Bacillus zhangzhouensis Using Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(16): 145-154. |
| [10] | Zhang Bo, Tan Wei, Li Xiaolin, Ye Lei, Zhou Jie. The Cultivation Techniques of Ganoderma lucidum with Mulberry Branches: Research Status, Issues and Suggestions [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(4): 74-78. |
| [11] | Jiang Shouan, Xu Yongbo, Liu Xiaobing. Effects of Spraying Different Potassic Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(5): 42-45. |
| [12] | Wang Xie, Wang Yong, Zhang Jianhua, Guo Haixia. Land Management Area: Effects on the Income of Modern Sericulture Industry in Fucheng [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(34): 160-164. |
| [13] | Li Haiwei, Li Yingjia, Rong Sihua, Wu Gengxuan, Zhang Jinhua, Zhang Lianzheng, Zhu Siqi, Huang Xiaoliang, Huang Guanqing. Mulberry Leaf Powder: Effects on Growth Performance and Organ Development of 1-28 Day Age of ‘Frizzle’ Broilers [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(11): 113-117. |
| [14] | 胡桂萍,石旭平,王礼献,曹红妹,王军文,杜贤明 and . Micro-environmental Characteristics of Cd and Pb Polluted Soil After Remediation by Mulberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(24): 66-72. |
| [15] | . Effects of Altitude, Transplanting Time and Topping Modes on Yield and Quality of‘CB-1’Tobacco Leaf [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(16): 39-45. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||