Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 81-87.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0441
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZENG Jie1(), YU Lang2, DABU Xilatu3, LI Yunju2(
)
Received:
2021-04-23
Revised:
2021-06-23
Online:
2022-03-25
Published:
2022-04-02
Contact:
LI Yunju
E-mail:zjcharlene123@163.com;93905507@qq.com
CLC Number:
ZENG Jie, YU Lang, DABU Xilatu, LI Yunju. Effects of Phosphorus-based Soil Conditioner on Growth of Chinese Cabbage in Low-phosphorus Red Soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 81-87.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0441
供试材料 | P2O5/% | N/% | K2O/% | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | As/(mg/kg) | Cd/(mg/kg) | Cr/(mg/kg) | Pb/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
尿素 | — | 46.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
过磷酸钙 | 14.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
K2SO4 | — | — | 51.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
土壤调理剂 | 6.27 | 1.14 | 0.45 | 7.92 | 400.62 | 11.21 | 1.24 | 66.05 | 17.34 |
磷矿泥 | 22.2 | — | — | 7.62 | — | 5.0 | 2.00 | 15.00 | 76.00 |
供试材料 | P2O5/% | N/% | K2O/% | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | As/(mg/kg) | Cd/(mg/kg) | Cr/(mg/kg) | Pb/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
尿素 | — | 46.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
过磷酸钙 | 14.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
K2SO4 | — | — | 51.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
土壤调理剂 | 6.27 | 1.14 | 0.45 | 7.92 | 400.62 | 11.21 | 1.24 | 66.05 | 17.34 |
磷矿泥 | 22.2 | — | — | 7.62 | — | 5.0 | 2.00 | 15.00 | 76.00 |
处理 | 尿素 | 过磷酸钙 | K2SO4 | 土壤调理剂 | 磷矿泥 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NP0K | 尿素+硫酸钾 | 0.431 | 0 | 0.355 | 0 | |
NPK | 尿素+过磷酸钙+硫酸钾 | 0.431 | 5 | 0.355 | 0 | |
1/2LKN | 尿素+1/2土壤调理剂+硫酸钾 | 0.161 | 0 | 0.258 | 5.5 | |
1LKN | 尿素+1土壤调理剂+硫酸钾 | 0.161 | 0 | 0.258 | 11 | |
2LKN | 尿素+2土壤调理剂+硫酸钾 | 0.161 | 0 | 0.258 | 22 | |
LWK | 尿素+磷矿泥+硫酸钾 | 0.431 | 0 | 0.355 | 0 | 3.093 |
处理 | 尿素 | 过磷酸钙 | K2SO4 | 土壤调理剂 | 磷矿泥 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NP0K | 尿素+硫酸钾 | 0.431 | 0 | 0.355 | 0 | |
NPK | 尿素+过磷酸钙+硫酸钾 | 0.431 | 5 | 0.355 | 0 | |
1/2LKN | 尿素+1/2土壤调理剂+硫酸钾 | 0.161 | 0 | 0.258 | 5.5 | |
1LKN | 尿素+1土壤调理剂+硫酸钾 | 0.161 | 0 | 0.258 | 11 | |
2LKN | 尿素+2土壤调理剂+硫酸钾 | 0.161 | 0 | 0.258 | 22 | |
LWK | 尿素+磷矿泥+硫酸钾 | 0.431 | 0 | 0.355 | 0 | 3.093 |
处理 | >5.0 mm | 5.0~2.0 mm | 2.0~1.0 mm | 1.0~0.5 mm | 0.5~0.25 mm | <0.25 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LWK | 0.033a | 2.20bc | 6.4a | 21.09ab | 3.498b | 66.77b |
NPK | 0a | 1.84c | 3.72b | 17.49bc | 7.56a | 69.39ab |
2LKN | 0.021a | 2.51ab | 6.756a | 19.4abc | 5.49ab | 65.55bc |
1LKN | 0a | 2.61a | 6.42a | 22.55a | 7.73a | 60.69c |
1/2 LKN | 0a | 1.86c | 6.07a | 20.02abc | 6.645ab | 65.4bc |
NP0K | 0a | 1.095d | 3.92b | 15.92c | 6.136ab | 72.93a |
处理 | >5.0 mm | 5.0~2.0 mm | 2.0~1.0 mm | 1.0~0.5 mm | 0.5~0.25 mm | <0.25 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LWK | 0.033a | 2.20bc | 6.4a | 21.09ab | 3.498b | 66.77b |
NPK | 0a | 1.84c | 3.72b | 17.49bc | 7.56a | 69.39ab |
2LKN | 0.021a | 2.51ab | 6.756a | 19.4abc | 5.49ab | 65.55bc |
1LKN | 0a | 2.61a | 6.42a | 22.55a | 7.73a | 60.69c |
1/2 LKN | 0a | 1.86c | 6.07a | 20.02abc | 6.645ab | 65.4bc |
NP0K | 0a | 1.095d | 3.92b | 15.92c | 6.136ab | 72.93a |
处理 | 速效氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 全磷/(g/kg) | 全钾/(g/kg) | pH | CEC/(cmol/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
初始土壤 | 43.76 | 1.55 | 50.10 | 0.53 | 1.69 | 2.49 | 6.70 | 6.65 | 9.17 |
LWK | 95.5b | 1.88b | 149.36d | 0.8c | 1.61b | 1.7b | 6.81b | 7.74c | 10.83d |
NPK | 64.6c | 10.68a | 103.7e | 0.89bc | 1.82b | 2.22a | 6.71b | 12.63b | 13.74b |
2LKN | 73.59c | 2.43b | 177.5bc | 0.99ab | 2.32a | 2.22a | 7.18a | 18.1a | 15.17a |
1LKN | 92.13b | 2.32b | 171.6cd | 1.14a | 1.89b | 2.4a | 7.12a | 7.55c | 13.4bc |
1/2LKN | 102.2ab | 2.1b | 189.9b | 0.94bc | 1.66b | 2.14a | 6.72b | 7.3c | 12.01c |
NP0K | 109.5a | 2.38b | 268.4a | 0.99ab | 1.33c | 2.2a | 6.44c | 6.83c | 11.61d |
处理 | 速效氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 全磷/(g/kg) | 全钾/(g/kg) | pH | CEC/(cmol/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
初始土壤 | 43.76 | 1.55 | 50.10 | 0.53 | 1.69 | 2.49 | 6.70 | 6.65 | 9.17 |
LWK | 95.5b | 1.88b | 149.36d | 0.8c | 1.61b | 1.7b | 6.81b | 7.74c | 10.83d |
NPK | 64.6c | 10.68a | 103.7e | 0.89bc | 1.82b | 2.22a | 6.71b | 12.63b | 13.74b |
2LKN | 73.59c | 2.43b | 177.5bc | 0.99ab | 2.32a | 2.22a | 7.18a | 18.1a | 15.17a |
1LKN | 92.13b | 2.32b | 171.6cd | 1.14a | 1.89b | 2.4a | 7.12a | 7.55c | 13.4bc |
1/2LKN | 102.2ab | 2.1b | 189.9b | 0.94bc | 1.66b | 2.14a | 6.72b | 7.3c | 12.01c |
NP0K | 109.5a | 2.38b | 268.4a | 0.99ab | 1.33c | 2.2a | 6.44c | 6.83c | 11.61d |
处理 | 株高/cm | SPAD | 叶面积/cm2 | 地下部 干重/(g/盆) | 地上部 干重/(g/盆) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LWK | 16.8bc | 22.98a | 50.81b | 0.4bc | 2.46c |
NPK | 19.73a | 21.1a | 77.59a | 0.59a | 3.66a |
2LKN | 19.18ab | 21.18a | 78.40a | 0.48b | 3.05b |
1LKN | 16.83bc | 21.23a | 70.42a | 0.49b | 2.33c |
1/2LKN | 15.83c | 22.03a | 52.84b | 0.36c | 1.79d |
NP0K | 10.94d | 20.85a | 11.97c | 0.17d | 0.68e |
处理 | 株高/cm | SPAD | 叶面积/cm2 | 地下部 干重/(g/盆) | 地上部 干重/(g/盆) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LWK | 16.8bc | 22.98a | 50.81b | 0.4bc | 2.46c |
NPK | 19.73a | 21.1a | 77.59a | 0.59a | 3.66a |
2LKN | 19.18ab | 21.18a | 78.40a | 0.48b | 3.05b |
1LKN | 16.83bc | 21.23a | 70.42a | 0.49b | 2.33c |
1/2LKN | 15.83c | 22.03a | 52.84b | 0.36c | 1.79d |
NP0K | 10.94d | 20.85a | 11.97c | 0.17d | 0.68e |
处理 | 磷含量/% | 磷累积量/(mg/盆) | 磷肥利用率/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地下部 | 地上部 | 地下部 | 地上部 | |||
LWK | 0.27b | 0.38a | 6.8bc | 9.23ab | 22.2 | |
NPK | 0.33a | 0.39a | 11.9a | 14.23a | 24.4 | |
2LKN | 0.27b | 0.34a | 8.33b | 10.37ab | 13.3 | |
1LKN | 0.25b | 0.38a | 5.78cd | 8.87ab | 22.2 | |
1/2LKN | 0.24b | 0.40a | 4.32d | 7.21b | 26.7 | |
NP0K | 0.135c | 0.28b | 0.91e | 1.9c | 0 |
处理 | 磷含量/% | 磷累积量/(mg/盆) | 磷肥利用率/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地下部 | 地上部 | 地下部 | 地上部 | |||
LWK | 0.27b | 0.38a | 6.8bc | 9.23ab | 22.2 | |
NPK | 0.33a | 0.39a | 11.9a | 14.23a | 24.4 | |
2LKN | 0.27b | 0.34a | 8.33b | 10.37ab | 13.3 | |
1LKN | 0.25b | 0.38a | 5.78cd | 8.87ab | 22.2 | |
1/2LKN | 0.24b | 0.40a | 4.32d | 7.21b | 26.7 | |
NP0K | 0.135c | 0.28b | 0.91e | 1.9c | 0 |
收获指标 | 土壤调理剂施用水平线性回归方程 | R² |
---|---|---|
植株地上部干重 | y = 0.0681x + 0.979 | 0.8819** |
植株地下部干重 | y = 0.0089x + 0.2475 | 0.6037** |
株高 | y = 0.2532x + 11.77 | 0.6541** |
叶面积 | y = 1.8483x + 26.72 | 0.7483** |
SPAD | y = -0.0008x + 21.331 | 0.00003 |
CEC | y = 0.5094x + 0.9245 | 0.9356** |
有机质 | y = 0.1132x + 11.421 | 0.4187** |
pH | y = 0.0225x + 6.54 | 0.6094** |
速效氮 | y = -1.1049x + 110.33 | 0.764** |
有效磷 | y = 0.0044x + 2.243 | 0.0395 |
速效钾 | y = -2.3689x + 235.04 | 0.5149** |
收获指标 | 土壤调理剂施用水平线性回归方程 | R² |
---|---|---|
植株地上部干重 | y = 0.0681x + 0.979 | 0.8819** |
植株地下部干重 | y = 0.0089x + 0.2475 | 0.6037** |
株高 | y = 0.2532x + 11.77 | 0.6541** |
叶面积 | y = 1.8483x + 26.72 | 0.7483** |
SPAD | y = -0.0008x + 21.331 | 0.00003 |
CEC | y = 0.5094x + 0.9245 | 0.9356** |
有机质 | y = 0.1132x + 11.421 | 0.4187** |
pH | y = 0.0225x + 6.54 | 0.6094** |
速效氮 | y = -1.1049x + 110.33 | 0.764** |
有效磷 | y = 0.0044x + 2.243 | 0.0395 |
速效钾 | y = -2.3689x + 235.04 | 0.5149** |
[1] | 于群英, 陈世勇, 马忠友, 等. 磷细菌筛选及其对苗期玉米生长的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(7):1257-1261. |
[2] | 姚显良, 于德芬. 红壤的物理性质及生产意义[J]. 土壤通报, 1982(3):224-236. |
[3] | 朱连奇, 许立民, 王艾萍. 福建建瓯山地红壤的物理化学特性[J]. 河南大学学报:自然科学版, 2003, 33(2):54-57. |
[4] | 何绪生, 李素霞, 李旭辉, 等. 控效肥料的研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998, 4(2):97-106. |
[5] |
KOCHIA L V. Cellular mechanisms of aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants[J]. Annual review plant physiology plant molecular biology, 1995, 46(1):237-260.
doi: 10.1146/arplant.1995.46.issue-1 URL |
[6] | 李杰, 石元亮, 陈智文. 我国南方红壤磷素研究概况[J]. 土壤通报, 2011, 42(03):763-768. |
[7] | BASHAN Y, KAMNEV A A, DE-BASHAN L E. A proposal for isolating and testing phosphate-solubilizing bacteria that enhance plant growth[J]. Biology & fertility of soils, 2013, 49(1):1-2. |
[8] |
DIEPENINGEN A, VOS O, KORTHALS G W, et al. Effects of organic versus conventional management on chemical and bio-logical parameters in agricultural soils[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2006, 31(1):120-135.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.03.003 URL |
[9] |
GNANDI K, TCHANGBEDJI G, KILLI K, et al. The impact of phosphate mine tailings on the bioaccumulation of heavy metals in marine fish and crustaceans from the coastal zone of Togo[J]. Mine water and the environment, 2006, 25(1):56-62.
doi: 10.1007/s10230-006-0108-4 URL |
[10] |
GNANDI K, TCHANGBEDJI G, KILLI K, et al. Processing of phosphate mine tailing by coagulation flocculation to reduce marine pollution in Togo:laboratory tests[J]. Mine water and the environment, 2005, 24(4):215-221.
doi: 10.1007/s10230-005-0102-2 URL |
[11] | GNANDI K, TCHANGBEDJI G, KILLI K, et al. The impact of phosphate mine tailings on the bioaccumulation of heavy metals in marine fish and crustaceans from the coastal zone of Togo[J]. Mine water & the environment, 2006, 25(1):56-62. |
[12] | 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999. |
[13] | 朱洪霞, 狄彩霞, 王正银, 等. 钙对酸性土壤不同品种莴笋产量和品质的效应[J]. 西南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2005, 27(4):456-463. |
[14] | 沈志良, 朱祖祥, 袁可能. 铁铝氧化物吸附磷的研究[J]. 浙江农业大学学报, 1990, 16(1):7-13. |
[15] | 陆文龙, 张福锁. 磷土壤化学行为研究进展[J]. 天津农业科学, 1998, 4(4):1-7. |
[16] | BHATTACHARYYA P, GHOSH G. Phosphorus use efficiency in Brinjal with FYM and sulphur[J]. Journal of the Indian society of soil science, 2001, 49(3):456-462. |
[17] | VANDANA T, ANIL P. Influence of soil inoculation with V.A.Mycorrhiza and phosphorus uptake in sesamum[J]. Intern.j.trop.agric, 1998, 16(4):201-209. |
[18] | NASH D M, HALLIWELLD J. Fertilizer phosphorus loss from pro-ductive grassing system[J]. Soil sci.soc.am.proc, 1999, 37(3):403-146. |
[19] | 黄庆, 林小明, 柯玉诗, 等. 多元酸性土壤调理剂在辣椒上的施用效果研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2007(1):42-44. |
[20] | 张俊华, 孙兆军, 贾科利, 等. 燃煤烟气脱硫废弃物及专用改良剂改良龟裂碱土的效果[J]. 西北农业学报, 2009, 18(5):208-212. |
[21] | 蓝佩玲, 廖新荣, 李淑仪, 等. 燃煤烟气脱硫副产物在酸性土上的农用价值与利用原理[J]. 生态环境, 2007, 16(4):1135-1138. |
[22] |
PYPERAS P, VERSTRAETE S, GONG P T, et al. Changes in mineral nitrogen,phosphrous availability and salt-extractable aluminium following the application of green residues in two weathered soils of south Vietnam[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2005, 37(1):163-172.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.06.018 URL |
[23] | 沈乒松, 张鼎华. 酸性土壤无机磷研究进展[J]. 福建林业科技, 2005(1):75-78. |
[24] | 陈德西, 何忠全, 郭云建, 等. 不同土壤调理剂对韭菜酸性土壤的改良效果[J]. 西南农业学报, 2012, 25(5):1751-1755. |
[25] | 李育鹏, 胡海燕, 李兆君, 等. 土壤调理剂对红壤pH值及空心菜产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2014(6):25-30. |
[26] | 黄庆, 林小明, 柯玉诗, 等. 多元酸性土壤调理剂在辣椒上的施用效果研究[J]. 广农业科学 2007(1):42-44. |
[27] | 郭和容, 陈琼贤, 郑少玲, 等. 营养型土壤改良剂对酸性土壤中磷的活化及玉米吸磷的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2004, 25(1):29-32. |
[1] | LAI Jia, WEI Shugu, HUANG Ling, SHENG Yuzhen, LIU Yong, ZHANG Qianfang, YE Pengsheng. Identification and Evaluation on Bolting Traits of Chinese Cabbage Group Germplasm Resources [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 41-47. |
[2] | GUO Dongsen, WANG Lin, WEI Qishun, CUI Lianming, ZHOU Ying, GUO Chengbao. Physiological Regulation Effect of Feather Biodegradation Liquid on Chinese Cabbage Growth in Response to Salt Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 25-29. |
[3] | DU Qian, LI Lin, LIU Tienan, LIANG Suyu. Effects of Compound Microbial Fertilizer on Soil Microbial Diversity in Saline Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(2): 38-43. |
[4] | Li Bin, Li Yuefei, Tao Jiale, Wang Weijin, Qi Shigang, Gao Xueshuang. Improvement Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Secondary Salinized Soil in Protected Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(32): 116-119. |
[5] | Wu Panpan, Yang Sufen, Liu Shuwu, Wang Huanxiang, Zhang Xiaoning, Gu Limin, Liu Rui. Effects of Mixed Application of Biochar-based Soil Conditioner and Specific Fertilizers on Maize Microorganism and Enzyme Activities in Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(26): 66-73. |
[6] | Zhang Meizhi, Geng Yuhan, Zhang Wei, Lin Xin, Wen Jiaxu, Chen Xueli, Xiao Yang. The Role of Straw Biochar in Farmland: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(21): 59-65. |
[7] | Li Falin, Zhuang Mulai, Qian Xiaojie, Shi Guoqiang, Cao Minghua, Zhang Tianxiang, Lin Xiaolan, Wu Ying, Li Yan. Effects of Soil Remediation and Mulching with Grass-proof Cloth on Soil Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loss in Tableland Pomelo Orchard [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(10): 94-100. |
[8] | Pan Jingwen, Wang Hongyao, Li Lin, Zhang Shuning, Li Ying, Hou Xilin, Liu Tongkun. Autotetraploid Non-heading Chinese Cabbage Suzhouqing: Induction and Identification [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(30): 68-74. |
[9] | Lai Jia, Huang Ling, Wei Shugu, Dai Shundong, Sheng Yuzhen, Zhan Qianfang, Ye Pengsheng. Yield per Plant and Main Agronomic Characters of Chinese Cabbage: Relationship Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(29): 32-36. |
[10] | Li Chenyu, Lu Shuchang. Combined Application of Biochar and Alum in Winter Wheat-Summer Maize Multiple Cropping Area in North China: Effects on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Status [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(18): 97-103. |
[11] | Hu Dandan, Wang Huiming, Wu Changqiang, Hu Qiuping, Song Huijie, Liu Jinyou, Hu Huiwen. Boron Magnesium Calcium Soil Conditioner: Effects on Acidified Soil Inhibition in Red Soil Dry Land [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(11): 82-85. |
[12] | Wenxian Wu, Lei Zhang, Xiaoqin Huang, Xiaoxiang Yang, Yong Liu. Main Cultivars of Chinese Cabbage in Chengdu Plain: Identification and Evaluation of Clubroot Resistance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(10): 127-132. |
[13] | . Effects of Combined Pollution of Pb and Cd on Growth and Nutritional Quality of Chinese Cabbage Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(9): 12-21. |
[14] | . Residue Detection and Safety Evaluation of Malathion in Cabbage Mustard and Flowering Chinese Cabbage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(34): 139-143. |
[15] | . Grey Relation Analysis Between Yield per Plant and Main Agronomic Traits of Non-heading Chinese Cabbage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(32): 36-41. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||