Effect on Seed Germination and Material Efficiency of Sugar Beet: Wood Vinegar Treatment

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0079

Abstract

Abstract:

The aims were to study the priming effect of different dilution degrees of wood vinegar on sugar beet single seed, and provide the basis for screening sugar beet seed coating material. In this experiment, the sugar beet single seed ‘TD805’ was used as the material, and the wood vinegar with different dilution degrees was used as the initiator to determine the germination potential, germination rate and other data. The results showed that the seed vigor of sugar beet seeds soaked in wood vinegar solution for 16 h was better than that of 8 h and 24 h, and the vigor index and material efficiency under P800 treatment were the highest, which increased by 102.58% and 40.09% respectively compared with CK treatment. The germination potential, germination rate and germination index under P1200 treatment were the highest, which increased by 6.34%, 5.34% and 71.84% respectively compared with CK treatment, and the conductivity decreased significantly compared with CK treatment. The experiment showed that the wood vinegar with different dilution degrees could improve seed vigor, accelerate the transformation of storage substances, and improve the utilization rate of seed nutrition. With the different treatment time and reagent dilution degree, the priming effect of sugar beet seeds was also different.

Key words: sugar beet seeds, wood vinegar, seed priming, material efficiency, vitality level

LIU Aijie, ZHANG Huizhong, XING Wang, WANG Maoqian. Effect on Seed Germination and Material Efficiency of Sugar Beet: Wood Vinegar Treatment[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(30): 28-35.

Figures/Tables 9

References 25

[1]	贾文奇. 浅析近代东北地区甜菜种植业发展的条件[J]. 农村实用技术, 2022, 251(10):81-82.
[2]	王茂芊, 王维成, 吴则东, 等. 我国甜菜种子引发研究进展[J]. 中国糖料, 2018, 40(5):70-72.
[3]	母军, 于志明, 李黎, 等. 木材剩余物的木酢液制备及其成分分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2008(2):129-132.
[4]	马连杰, 张慧, 卢文才, 等. 木醋液在农业生产中的应用研究进展[J]. 南方农业, 2018, 12(31):96-99.
[5]	高妍, 马鑫宇, 董旋, 等. 化肥配施木醋液对玉米产量及品质的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(4):866-873.
[6]	ZHANG K K, KHAN Z, LIU J H, et al. Germination and growth performance of water-saving and drought-resistant rice enhanced by seed treatment with wood vinegar and biochar under dry direct-seeded system[J]. Agronomy, 2022, 12(5):1223. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12051223 URL
[7]	连永刚. 木酢液应用对黄檗播种育苗的影响[J]. 林业科技, 2020, 45(4):26-28.
[8]	胡晋, 沈建平, 阮松林. 应用物质效率测定水稻种子活力的研究[J]. 种子, 1992(4):58-59.
[9]	胡亚丽, 聂靖芝, 吴霞, 等. 水杨酸引发对红麻幼苗耐盐性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(14):2696-2708. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.14.002
[10]	ÇAVUŞOǦLU K, TEPE B, KILIÇ S. Effects of salicylic acid pretreatment on the seed germination, seedling growth and leaf anatomy of barley under saline conditions[J]. Cereal research communications, 2014, 42(2):229-238. doi: 10.1556/CRC.2013.0049 URL
[11]	丛俊超, 胡华兵, 王荣华, 等. 不同浓度柠檬酸对甜菜种子的引发影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(20):13-19. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1146
[12]	MELLO A M D, STRECK N A, BLANKENSHIP E E, et al. Gibberellic acid promotes seed germination in Penstemon digitalis cv. Husker Red.[J]. Hortscience., 2009, 44(3):870-873. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.44.3.870 URL
[13]	刘小越, 兴旺, 刘大丽, 等. 苹果酸对甜菜种子的活力影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(12):33-40. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0581
[14]	丛俊超, 胡华兵, 王荣华, 等. 曲酸对甜菜种子萌发的影响[J]. 中国糖料, 2022, 44(4):64-68.
[15]	莫淑勋. 土壤中有机酸的产生、转化及对土壤肥力的某些影响[J]. 土壤学进展, 1986(4):1-10.
[16]	周春菊, 王林权, 李生秀, 等. 有机酸和维生素对玉米幼苗生长的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 1999(2):89-93.
[17]	LEE S, KIM S, PARK C. Salicylic acid promotes seed germination under high salinity by modulating antioxidant activity in Arabidopsis[J]. The new phytologist, 2010, 188(2):626-637. doi: 10.1111/nph.2010.188.issue-2 URL
[18]	何强, 王宇莹, 王雪艳, 等. 有机肥、有机酸配施化肥对绿洲棉田土壤微生物生物量和酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2021, 44(6):436-442.
[19]	张利亚, 刘霞, 师豪, 等. 木醋液对大棚草莓土壤pH、叶绿素、品质及产量的影响[J]. 中南农业科技, 2022, 43(1):22-23.
[20]	胡小凤, 李卓, 梁春莉. 木醋液应用研究进展[J]. 辽宁农业职业技术学院学报. 2019, 21(5):1-3.
[21]	PANITA S, PANITA K, LAKANA C, et al. Utilization of dendrocalamus asper backer bamboo charcoal and pyroligneous acid[J]. Energy procedia, 2015, 79:691-696. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.558 URL
[22]	陈萍, 朱洪吉, 王建刚. 气相色谱质谱法测定木醋液饮料中化学成分[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2016, 37(15):183-185.
[23]	吉晓晨. 木醋液处理种子对稻棉生长与产量的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2022.
[24]	马梦谣, 马红媛, 李绍阳, 等. 木醋液引发对盐胁迫下羊草种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(8):1588-1593.
[25]	周奕含, 孙扬, 何章, 等. 胚乳裂纹对玉米种子萌发过程中贮藏物质效率的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2015, 21(9):19-21.

处理编号	引发组合	处理时间/h	5 d发芽势/%	7 d发芽率/%	发芽指数	活力指数	物质效率/%
处理1	P500	8	51.33±12.66b	59.00±9.54bc	32.78±8.66cd	326.54±101.18bcd	56.61±6.52f
处理2	P500	16	61.66±4.73ab	65.00±2.62abc	38.96±7.30abc	412.93±73.48abc	72.10±1.2de
处理3	P500	24	58.00±2.00ab	61.00±0.94abc	37.00±1.50bc	433.50±47.75abc	74.44±1.13cd
CK	805	0	58.33±1.53ab	64.33±1.15abc	27.24±2.10d	247.94±30.66d	47.39±2.98g

处理编号	引发组合	处理时间/h	5 d发芽势/%	7 d发芽率/%	发芽指数	活力指数	物质效率/%
处理1	P500	8	51.33±12.66b	59.00±9.54bc	32.78±8.66cd	326.54±101.18bcd	56.61±6.52f
处理2	P500	16	61.66±4.73ab	65.00±2.62abc	38.96±7.30abc	412.93±73.48abc	72.10±1.2de
处理3	P500	24	58.00±2.00ab	61.00±0.94abc	37.00±1.50bc	433.50±47.75abc	74.44±1.13cd
CK	805	0	58.33±1.53ab	64.33±1.15abc	27.24±2.10d	247.94±30.66d	47.39±2.98g

处理编号	引发组合	处理时间/h	5 d发芽势/%	7 d发芽率/%	发芽指数	活力指数	物质效率/%
处理4	P800	8	57.33±7.51ab	61.67±8.02abc	37.27±6.07bc	388.17±80.51abc	68.02±0.52e
处理5	P800	16	63.67±4.04a	68.33±6.66abc	43.80±2.17ab	502.28±14.74a	87.48±1.48a
处理6	P800	24	64.33±2.52a	71.33±4.73a	41.41±3.08abc	480.56±62.83ab	80.20±0.33bc
CK	805	0	58.33±1.53ab	64.33±1.15abc	27.24±2.10d	247.94±30.66d	47.39±2.98g

处理编号	引发组合	处理时间/h	5 d发芽势/%	7 d发芽率/%	发芽指数	活力指数	物质效率/%
处理4	P800	8	57.33±7.51ab	61.67±8.02abc	37.27±6.07bc	388.17±80.51abc	68.02±0.52e
处理5	P800	16	63.67±4.04a	68.33±6.66abc	43.80±2.17ab	502.28±14.74a	87.48±1.48a
处理6	P800	24	64.33±2.52a	71.33±4.73a	41.41±3.08abc	480.56±62.83ab	80.20±0.33bc
CK	805	0	58.33±1.53ab	64.33±1.15abc	27.24±2.10d	247.94±30.66d	47.39±2.98g

处理编号	引发组合	处理时间/h	5 d发芽势/%	7 d发芽率/%	发芽指数	活力指数	物质效率/%
处理7	P1200	8	56.00±2.00ab	58.00±1.73c	37.97±3.72abc	364.16±66.38bcd	61.95±0.08f
处理8	P1200	16	64.67±4.51a	69.67±3.21ab	46.81±2.98a	483.03±31.60a	80.93±0.47b
处理9	P1200	24	57.67±1.15ab	60.67±0.58abc	39.31±1.08abc	408.72±10.33abc	70.06±0.23de
CK	805	0	58.33±1.53ab	64.33±1.15abc	27.24±2.10d	247.94±30.66d	47.39±2.98g