Effects of Jiabowen Soil Conditioner on Radish Yield and Quality and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb222-0197

Abstract

Abstract:

To improve the quality of soil and radish, appropriate soil conditioner and its application amount were studied, and the effects of Jiabowen soil conditioner on the yield and quality of radish and soil physical and chemical properties were explored by taking no soil conditioner as the control. The results showed that the application of Jiabowen soil conditioner could increase the yield, single root weight and good fruit rate of radish, and reduce the incidence rate of radish nematodes. The sugar content, alkalinity and color of radish pulp were improved by the conditioner. The soil organic matter, pH, alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium were increased. The number of soil bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes were increased too. The bulk density of soil was reduced, and the formation of water stable aggregates was improved. Therefore, the application of Jiabowen soil conditioner can increase radish yield, improve radish quality and soil structure, and enhance soil fertility and microbial diversity. The best application amount of Jiabowen soil conditioner is 4800 kg/hm².

Key words: soil conditioner, radish, yield, quality, soil structure, soil microbial quantity

YIN Liping, LIU Siyuan, CAI Chengmei, SHI Xiaoli, ZHU Xiaojuan, YUAN Guoming, WANG Jidong, ZHANG Hui, XU Cong, MA Hongbo. Effects of Jiabowen Soil Conditioner on Radish Yield and Quality and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 64-71.

Figures/Tables 12

References 22

[1]	荆锡光. 不同肥料处理对萝卜品质的影响[D]. 泰安: 农业大学, 2021:1-6.
[2]	隆志方, 王迪轩, 郭赛, 等. 萝卜科学施肥及注意事项[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2020, 7:68-71.
[3]	张丽娜, 塔秀成, 黄伟, 等. 微生物菌肥对萝卜土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(15):93-96.
[4]	MEI B L, ZHENG X H, XIE B H, et al. Characteristics of multiple-year nitrous oxide emissions from conventional vegetable fields in southeastern China[J]. Journal of geophysical research atmospheres, 2011, 116:12-13.
[5]	DENG J, ZHOU Z X, ZHENG X H, et al. Annual emissions of nitrous oxide and nitric oxide from rice-wheat rotation and vegetable fields: a case study in the Tai-Lake region, China[J]. Plant and soil, 2012, 360:37-53. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1223-6 URL
[6]	赵真真, 左广胜, 徐振同, 等. 重茬障碍的研究现状[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(7):186-190.
[7]	杜广红, 周晓琳, 马鸣超, 等. 不同施肥处理对土壤微生物学特性和作物产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2012(5):22-26.
[8]	ZHANG Q C, SHAMSI I H, XU D T. Chemical fertilizer and organic manure inputs in soil exhibit a vice versa pattern of microbial community structure[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2012, 57:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.02.012 URL
[9]	BHARDWAJ D, ANSARI M W, SAHOO R K. Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity[J]. Microbial cell factories, 2014, 13(1):66. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-13-66 URL
[10]	杨满兰, 刘瑛, 黄小英. 活性天然有机肥在萝卜上的研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2007, 19(9):81-82.
[11]	王东红. 蚯蚓粪对小白菜、樱桃萝卜生长和品质的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2010:14-16.
[12]	董越勇, 陆若辉, 周焱. 有机肥料对兰溪小萝卜生长及根际土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2005, 17(5):319-321.
[13]	刘晓霞, 陈红金, 虞轶俊. 骨炭的土壤改良培肥和小萝卜增产提质效应研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(5):150-155.
[14]	巨鹏, 邱凌, 贺光祥. 沼气发酵残留物对萝卜品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(19):8176-8177.
[15]	牛越先. 山西省坝地土壤肥力质量评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(5):262-265.
[16]	兰挚谦, 郑文德, 林薇, 等. 不同土壤改良剂对番茄生长和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(5):91-98.
[17]	韦婉羚, 罗兴录, 李亮, 等. 土壤调理剂不同用量对木薯产量和土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2017, 48(4):623-627.
[18]	张振文, 陆小静, 叶剑秋, 等. 木薯种植对土壤肥力影响的研究进展[J]. 广西农业科学, 2008, 39(5):639-643.
[19]	吴风芝, 刘德, 王东凯, 等. 大棚蔬菜连作年限对土壤主要理化性状的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 1998(4):5-8.
[20]	祁石刚, 高学双, 赵宇航, 等. 土壤改良剂对蔬菜作物产质量及设施土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020, 22:46-49.
[21]	郭永忠, 景春梅, 王峰, 等. BGA土壤调理剂对土壤结构及养分的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013, 22(12):87-90.
[22]	董少文, 马淑花, 初茉, 等. 粉煤灰基土壤调理剂作用下盐碱土壤微观结构变化规律[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 51(8):54-59.

编号	处理名称	基肥/(kg/hm²)	追肥尿素/(kg/hm²)	嘉博文调理剂/(kg/hm²)
1	常规施肥	600	150	0
2	嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²	600	150	4800
3	嘉博文调理剂用量减半2400 kg/hm²	600	150	2400
4	嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²，基肥减半，追肥减半	300	75	4800
5	嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²，基肥减少20%	480	150	4800
6	嘉博文新产品4800 kg/hm²	600	150	4800

编号	处理名称	基肥/(kg/hm²)	追肥尿素/(kg/hm²)	嘉博文调理剂/(kg/hm²)
1	常规施肥	600	150	0
2	嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²	600	150	4800
3	嘉博文调理剂用量减半2400 kg/hm²	600	150	2400
4	嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²，基肥减半，追肥减半	300	75	4800
5	嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²，基肥减少20%	480	150	4800
6	嘉博文新产品4800 kg/hm²	600	150	4800

处理	叶绿素SPAD	单长/cm	直径/cm	长宽比	单根重/g
常规施肥	45.88a	20.46a	8.13a	2.52a	763.03ab
嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²	44.57a	21.05a	8.36a	2.52a	801.64a
嘉博文调理剂用量减半2400 kg/hm²	44.26a	20.67a	8.24a	2.51a	773.85ab
嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²，基肥追肥均减半	41.65a	19.22a	7.83a	2.45a	725.07b
嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²，基肥减少20%	43.39a	19.73a	8.00a	2.46a	756.38ab
嘉博文新产品4800 kg/hm²	43.93a	20.74a	8.31a	2.49a	786.21ab

处理	叶绿素SPAD	单长/cm	直径/cm	长宽比	单根重/g
常规施肥	45.88a	20.46a	8.13a	2.52a	763.03ab
嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²	44.57a	21.05a	8.36a	2.52a	801.64a
嘉博文调理剂用量减半2400 kg/hm²	44.26a	20.67a	8.24a	2.51a	773.85ab
嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²，基肥追肥均减半	41.65a	19.22a	7.83a	2.45a	725.07b
嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²，基肥减少20%	43.39a	19.73a	8.00a	2.46a	756.38ab
嘉博文新产品4800 kg/hm²	43.93a	20.74a	8.31a	2.49a	786.21ab

处理	茎叶重/(kg/hm²)	果实重/(kg/hm²)	薯蔓比	优果率/%
常规施肥	13560ab	43950ab	3.24a	83.46a
嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²	15780a	51000a	3.23a	87.73a
嘉博文调理剂用量减半2400 kg/hm²	13350ab	43890ab	3.28a	83.58a
嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²，基肥追肥均减半	10860b	39720b	3.65a	82.45a
嘉博文调理剂4800 kg/hm²，基肥减少20%	12600ab	42150ab	3.35a	83.50a
嘉博文新产品4800 kg/hm²	11808ab	49110a	3.32a	86.64a