Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 99-105.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0241
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Xiangjie1,2(), YUAN Binqiao1,2, HUANG Tianxiang1,2, GENG Shubao3, ZHANG Jinyong1,2, TU Hongtao1,2(
)
Received:
2022-04-02
Revised:
2022-06-27
Online:
2023-03-15
Published:
2023-03-14
ZHAO Xiangjie, YUAN Binqiao, HUANG Tianxiang, GENG Shubao, ZHANG Jinyong, TU Hongtao. Optimization of Extraction Process of Garlic Straw by Response Surface Method and Determination of Acaricidal Toxicity of the Crude Extract[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 99-105.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0241
溶剂 | 毒力回归方程 | LC50/(g/L) | 95%置信限 | SE(B) | 相关系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
95%乙醇 | y=3.2591x+2.2421 | 7.0179 | 5.3587~10.5801 | 0.3020 | 0.8750 |
丙酮 | y=3.7488x+0.9644 | 11.9264 | 8.6683~35.7779 | 1.079 | 0.9779 |
正己烷 | y=4.5535x+1.0863 | 7.2359 | 6.0952~8.2115 | 0.7424 | 0.9965 |
石油醚 | y=3.6146x+2.3620 | 5.3677 | 4.3755~10.0782 | 0.5465 | 0.8815 |
乙酸乙酯 | y=5.4510x+0.0178 | 8.2035 | 7.4797~9.5454 | 0.8727 | 0.9636 |
乙醚 | y=3.8225x+2.0366 | 5.9603 | 4.5842~13.6520 | 0.5826 | 0.8556 |
溶剂 | 毒力回归方程 | LC50/(g/L) | 95%置信限 | SE(B) | 相关系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
95%乙醇 | y=3.2591x+2.2421 | 7.0179 | 5.3587~10.5801 | 0.3020 | 0.8750 |
丙酮 | y=3.7488x+0.9644 | 11.9264 | 8.6683~35.7779 | 1.079 | 0.9779 |
正己烷 | y=4.5535x+1.0863 | 7.2359 | 6.0952~8.2115 | 0.7424 | 0.9965 |
石油醚 | y=3.6146x+2.3620 | 5.3677 | 4.3755~10.0782 | 0.5465 | 0.8815 |
乙酸乙酯 | y=5.4510x+0.0178 | 8.2035 | 7.4797~9.5454 | 0.8727 | 0.9636 |
乙醚 | y=3.8225x+2.0366 | 5.9603 | 4.5842~13.6520 | 0.5826 | 0.8556 |
试验标号 | A温度/℃ | B时间/min | C次数/次 | D料液比/(mL/g) | Y粗提物溶出量/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 25 | 80 | 4 | 10 | 3.124 |
2 | 30 | 40 | 5 | 10 | 3.616 |
3 | 30 | 60 | 4 | 10 | 3.252 |
4 | 35 | 80 | 4 | 10 | 3.68 |
5 | 25 | 60 | 5 | 10 | 3.584 |
6 | 30 | 60 | 4 | 10 | 3.688 |
7 | 25 | 60 | 3 | 10 | 2.604 |
8 | 30 | 60 | 3 | 15 | 2.18 |
9 | 25 | 60 | 4 | 15 | 3.296 |
10 | 30 | 40 | 4 | 15 | 3.12 |
11 | 30 | 60 | 5 | 15 | 3.614 |
12 | 30 | 80 | 4 | 15 | 3.124 |
13 | 30 | 60 | 4 | 10 | 3.3 |
14 | 30 | 80 | 3 | 10 | 3.372 |
15 | 30 | 60 | 5 | 5 | 2.88 |
16 | 25 | 60 | 4 | 5 | 2.892 |
17 | 30 | 80 | 5 | 10 | 3.314 |
18 | 35 | 60 | 3 | 10 | 2.78 |
19 | 30 | 60 | 4 | 10 | 3.324 |
20 | 30 | 80 | 4 | 5 | 2.748 |
21 | 35 | 60 | 5 | 10 | 3.658 |
22 | 30 | 40 | 3 | 10 | 2.62 |
23 | 30 | 60 | 4 | 10 | 3.228 |
24 | 35 | 40 | 4 | 10 | 3.552 |
25 | 35 | 60 | 4 | 15 | 2.976 |
26 | 30 | 60 | 3 | 5 | 2.28 |
27 | 30 | 40 | 4 | 5 | 2.916 |
28 | 35 | 60 | 4 | 5 | 3.024 |
29 | 25 | 40 | 4 | 10 | 3.088 |
试验标号 | A温度/℃ | B时间/min | C次数/次 | D料液比/(mL/g) | Y粗提物溶出量/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 25 | 80 | 4 | 10 | 3.124 |
2 | 30 | 40 | 5 | 10 | 3.616 |
3 | 30 | 60 | 4 | 10 | 3.252 |
4 | 35 | 80 | 4 | 10 | 3.68 |
5 | 25 | 60 | 5 | 10 | 3.584 |
6 | 30 | 60 | 4 | 10 | 3.688 |
7 | 25 | 60 | 3 | 10 | 2.604 |
8 | 30 | 60 | 3 | 15 | 2.18 |
9 | 25 | 60 | 4 | 15 | 3.296 |
10 | 30 | 40 | 4 | 15 | 3.12 |
11 | 30 | 60 | 5 | 15 | 3.614 |
12 | 30 | 80 | 4 | 15 | 3.124 |
13 | 30 | 60 | 4 | 10 | 3.3 |
14 | 30 | 80 | 3 | 10 | 3.372 |
15 | 30 | 60 | 5 | 5 | 2.88 |
16 | 25 | 60 | 4 | 5 | 2.892 |
17 | 30 | 80 | 5 | 10 | 3.314 |
18 | 35 | 60 | 3 | 10 | 2.78 |
19 | 30 | 60 | 4 | 10 | 3.324 |
20 | 30 | 80 | 4 | 5 | 2.748 |
21 | 35 | 60 | 5 | 10 | 3.658 |
22 | 30 | 40 | 3 | 10 | 2.62 |
23 | 30 | 60 | 4 | 10 | 3.228 |
24 | 35 | 40 | 4 | 10 | 3.552 |
25 | 35 | 60 | 4 | 15 | 2.976 |
26 | 30 | 60 | 3 | 5 | 2.28 |
27 | 30 | 40 | 4 | 5 | 2.916 |
28 | 35 | 60 | 4 | 5 | 3.024 |
29 | 25 | 40 | 4 | 10 | 3.088 |
来源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 | 差异显著性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 | 3.99 | 14 | 0.29 | 6.71 | <0.01 | ** |
A | 0.1 | 1 | 0.1 | 2.29 | 0.15 | - |
B | 0.02 | 1 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.54 | - |
C | 1.94 | 1 | 1.94 | 45.7 | <0.01 | ** |
D | 0.21 | 1 | 0.21 | 4.83 | <0.05 | * |
AB | 2.12E-03 | 1 | 2.12E-03 | 0.05 | 0.82 | - |
AC | 2.60E-03 | 1 | 2.60E-03 | 0.06 | 0.8 | - |
AD | 0.05 | 1 | 0.05 | 1.2 | 0.29 | - |
BC | 0.28 | 1 | 0.28 | 6.53 | <0.05 | * |
BD | 0.01 | 1 | 7.40E-03 | 0.17 | 0.68 | - |
CD | 0.17 | 1 | 0.17 | 4.09 | 0.06 | - |
A2 | 2.09E-03 | 1 | 2.09E-03 | 0.05 | 0.82 | - |
B2 | 2.59E-03 | 1 | 2.59E-03 | 0.06 | 0.8 | - |
C2 | 0.26 | 1 | 0.26 | 6.19 | <0.05 | * |
D2 | 0.95 | 1 | 0.95 | 22.37 | <0.01 | ** |
残差 | 0.6 | 14 | 0.04 | - | - | - |
失拟项 | 0.45 | 10 | 0.05 | 1.28 | 0.43 | - |
纯误差 | 0.14 | 4 | 0.04 | - | - | - |
来源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 | 差异显著性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 | 3.99 | 14 | 0.29 | 6.71 | <0.01 | ** |
A | 0.1 | 1 | 0.1 | 2.29 | 0.15 | - |
B | 0.02 | 1 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.54 | - |
C | 1.94 | 1 | 1.94 | 45.7 | <0.01 | ** |
D | 0.21 | 1 | 0.21 | 4.83 | <0.05 | * |
AB | 2.12E-03 | 1 | 2.12E-03 | 0.05 | 0.82 | - |
AC | 2.60E-03 | 1 | 2.60E-03 | 0.06 | 0.8 | - |
AD | 0.05 | 1 | 0.05 | 1.2 | 0.29 | - |
BC | 0.28 | 1 | 0.28 | 6.53 | <0.05 | * |
BD | 0.01 | 1 | 7.40E-03 | 0.17 | 0.68 | - |
CD | 0.17 | 1 | 0.17 | 4.09 | 0.06 | - |
A2 | 2.09E-03 | 1 | 2.09E-03 | 0.05 | 0.82 | - |
B2 | 2.59E-03 | 1 | 2.59E-03 | 0.06 | 0.8 | - |
C2 | 0.26 | 1 | 0.26 | 6.19 | <0.05 | * |
D2 | 0.95 | 1 | 0.95 | 22.37 | <0.01 | ** |
残差 | 0.6 | 14 | 0.04 | - | - | - |
失拟项 | 0.45 | 10 | 0.05 | 1.28 | 0.43 | - |
纯误差 | 0.14 | 4 | 0.04 | - | - | - |
[1] |
王云帆, 王刚, 杨生玉, 等. 大蒜提取物防治黄瓜黑星病的初步研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2005(10):7-10.
|
[2] |
伍燕, 何元琴, 易君明, 等. 不同大蒜精油成分及生物活性对比分析[J]. 现代食品科技, 2020, 36(6):75-81,320
|
[3] |
张文杰, 王应强, 王辉, 等. 响应面法优化大蒜素提取工艺[J]. 农产品加工, 2021(16):36-39.
|
[4] |
张欢欢, 郭天璐, 王长彪, 等. 蒜素作为生物农药的研究进展与应用前景[J]. 山西农业科学, 2016, 44(4):557-559.
|
[5] |
常蒙蒙. 大蒜精油活性物质抑制麦蛾产卵作用的研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2016.
|
[6] |
吕中芳, 林守敏, 史建南, 等. 3种植物提取剂对土蜗杀灭效果的初步研究[J]. 台湾农业探索, 2012(1):76-78.
|
[7] |
鲁玉杰, 刘凤杰. 大蒜和芦荟提取物防治几种储粮害虫效果的研究[J]. 粮食储藏, 2003(3):14-17.
|
[8] |
孟和生, 王开运, 姜兴印. 二斑叶螨发生危害特点及防治对策[J]. 昆虫知识, 2001(1):52-54.
|
[9] |
涂洪涛, 张金勇, 陈汉杰, 等. 12种杀螨剂对山楂叶螨防效评价及其对天敌塔六点蓟马的影响[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2009, 31(3):213-218
|
[10] |
张金勇, 涂洪涛, 吴兆军, 等. 叶螨天敌塔六点蓟马生物学特性的研究[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2016, 53(1):71-75.
|
[11] |
李永夫, 罗安程. 植物源农药的研究和应用进展[J]. 科技通报, 2003(5):434-438.
|
[12] |
doi: 10.3954/1523-5475-30.0.38 URL |
[13] |
林连男, 王瑞琦, 张国珍, 等. 中华散尾鬼笔提取工艺响应面优化及其粗提物毒力测定[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2018, 40(1):80-84.
|
[14] |
中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T 1154.13—2008,农药室内生物测定试验准则[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
|
[15] |
doi: 10.18474/0749-8004-35.1.86 URL |
[16] |
|
[17] |
doi: 10.1080/10412905.2012.676777 URL |
[18] |
|
[19] |
doi: 10.1111/jen.2012.136.issue-4 URL |
[20] |
张碧薇, 杨峰, 樊继德. 大蒜有机硫化物提取工艺研究进展[J]. 中国调味品, 2020, 45(2):197-200.
|
[21] |
张炳, 王耀, 王桂来, 等. 用4种不同有机溶剂从大蒜中提取大蒜素植物油回收率的比较研究[J]. 浙江化工, 2020, 51(5):10-13.
|
[1] | XUE Rui, SHEN Shaoyun, DENG Xizhou, CHEN Cong, PENG Yuejin, DU Guangzu, CHEN Bin. Metarhizium rileyi SL Strain Liquid Fermentation Conditions: Optimization by Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 135-143. |
[2] | SU Linhe, HUANG Dong, ZENG Weimin, ZHANG Yanlong. Extraction Optimization of Auricularia auricula Lectin and Study on Its Anti-tumor Activity in Vitro [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 143-150. |
[3] | WANG Xiangping, ZHANG Jianhai, FENG Binbin. Optimization of Extraction Technology for Hesperidin and Naringin from Citri medica var. sarcodactylis Under Ultrasonic-Assisted Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 113-119. |
[4] | ZHANG Junwei, ZHANG Xiaohu, XU Yucong. Effect of South Schisandra chinensis Ester B-Nisin-KGM Compound Coating Agent on Fresh Meat Preservation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 120-129. |
[5] | WANG Wenxuan, LI Yunpeng, XU Hening, ZHAO Xin, MA Rou, ZHANG Lina, ZHANG Yingying. Ultrasonic Extraction Process of Total Saponins from Leaves of Solanum torvum Swartz. [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 118-125. |
[6] | LI Jiahuan, WANG Xiaohui, JIANG Mingguo, SONG Fuqiang, CHANG Wei. Optimization of Culture Medium of Serendipita indica Based on Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 102-109. |
[7] | ZHENG Long. The Effect of N, P and K Fertilizers on Pakchoi Yield Based on Response Surface Method [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 20-24. |
[8] | LIU Lilan, QIU Qinqin, FAN Wenrong, TANG Jiao, HU Xiaobing, XIAO Wei, CHEN Ke. The Removal Process of Organophosphorus Pesticide Residues on the Surface of Commercial Fruits by Alkaline Electrolyzed Water [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(2): 133-140. |
[9] | ZHANG He, WAN Lu, YAN Jiajia, YOU Mengyao, ZENG Weimin, ZHENG Chunying. Response Surface Method for Optimizing the Fermentation Process of Acanthopanax senticosus with High Isofraxidin Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(19): 152-158. |
[10] | JIANG Wenqiang, MIAO Linghong, GAO Liang, ZHU Yuejie, LIN Yan, LUO Chenhao, QIAN Linjie, CHEN Shiyou, ZHANG Weina, SHI Dalin, LIU Bo, SHEN Huaishun, GE Xianping. Study on Nutrients and Quality Improvement of Liquid Fermented Mulberry Leaf Meal by Bacillus zhangzhouensis Using Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(16): 145-154. |
[11] | Ren Yanyun, Liu Guowei, Zhang Longping, Gao Yuanyuan, Chu Huimin, Li Yinfeng, Zhang Chenggang, Tan He. Effect of Garlic Straw Feeding on Weight Gain and Mutton Quality of Sheep [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(35): 93-97. |
[12] | Xu Dandan, Xu Yaqin, Juan Xing, Zhou Shoubiao, Wang Changbao, Hang Hua. Optimization of Extraction Process of Se-enriched Jerusalem artichoke Polysaccharides and Its Antioxidant Activity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(30): 121-127. |
[13] | Xiao Qinjian, Zhang Xiaohu, Gao Mengdie, Zhang Junwei. Extraction and Separation of Schisandrin B and Its Compound Preservative [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(12): 126-135. |
[14] | Xie Yongfei, Zhao Gang, Sun Na, Lv Yinping, Wu Yong, Shen Meichen, Lv Wenben, Gao Junshan. Proanthocyanidin Extraction Process from Brown Cotton Fiber: Optimized by Response Surface Method [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(12): 136-143. |
[15] | Yang Dandan, Yang Chuanlun, Zhang Xinqing, Pan Dongmei, Li Jiaming, Chen Zhenfa. Response Surface Methodology Applied to Spores Production by Solid-state Fermentation of Trichoderma Viride [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(36): 84-92. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||