Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 9-15.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0245
Previous Articles Next Articles
QIAO Yue1(), HU Cheng2(
), WAN Jianhua1, XU Hualin1, LIU Maojun1, GUO Weihong1, DAI Li1, ZHANG Chunhua1, DENG Chaoran1
Received:
2023-03-21
Revised:
2023-08-19
Online:
2024-02-22
Published:
2024-02-22
QIAO Yue, HU Cheng, WAN Jianhua, XU Hualin, LIU Maojun, GUO Weihong, DAI Li, ZHANG Chunhua, DENG Chaoran. Effects of Different Fertilization Patterns on Rice Yield and Nutrient Use Efficiency[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 9-15.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0245
处理 | 肥料种类 | 施肥总量 | 基肥 | 分蘖肥 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | 复合肥 | 尿素 | 过磷酸钙 | 氯化钾 | 有机肥 | 尿素 | |||
CK | ─ | ─ | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||
T1 | 25-10-16 | 219 | 60 | 96 | 600 | — | — | — | — | 150 | |
T2 | 25-10-16+3000 kg/hm2有机肥 | 264 | 105 | 126 | 600 | — | — | — | 3000 | 150 | |
T3 | 18-8-9 | 219 | 60 | 96 | 750 | 32.55 | — | 47.55 | — | 150 | |
T4 | 18-6-6 | 219 | 60 | 96 | 833.4 | — | 79.95 | 76.5 | — | 150 | |
T5 | 22-9-15 | 219 | 60 | 96 | 640.05 | 169.95 | 20.55 | — | — | — |
处理 | 肥料种类 | 施肥总量 | 基肥 | 分蘖肥 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | 复合肥 | 尿素 | 过磷酸钙 | 氯化钾 | 有机肥 | 尿素 | |||
CK | ─ | ─ | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||
T1 | 25-10-16 | 219 | 60 | 96 | 600 | — | — | — | — | 150 | |
T2 | 25-10-16+3000 kg/hm2有机肥 | 264 | 105 | 126 | 600 | — | — | — | 3000 | 150 | |
T3 | 18-8-9 | 219 | 60 | 96 | 750 | 32.55 | — | 47.55 | — | 150 | |
T4 | 18-6-6 | 219 | 60 | 96 | 833.4 | — | 79.95 | 76.5 | — | 150 | |
T5 | 22-9-15 | 219 | 60 | 96 | 640.05 | 169.95 | 20.55 | — | — | — |
处理 | 有效穗数/(穗/蔸) | 每穗粒数/(粒/穗) | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 13.33d | 152.98d | 78.78d | 24.98b | 6459.60e |
T1 | 14.00c | 163.85c | 84.19c | 26.25a | 8786.00d |
T2 | 14.67c | 164.92c | 84.80bc | 26.40a | 9161.30c |
T3 | 15.33bc | 167.22bc | 85.06bc | 26.50a | 9398.50bc |
T4 | 18.00a | 180.84a | 86.57a | 26.78a | 10478.90a |
T5 | 16.33b | 172.79b | 85.68ab | 26.70a | 9689.95b |
处理 | 有效穗数/(穗/蔸) | 每穗粒数/(粒/穗) | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 13.33d | 152.98d | 78.78d | 24.98b | 6459.60e |
T1 | 14.00c | 163.85c | 84.19c | 26.25a | 8786.00d |
T2 | 14.67c | 164.92c | 84.80bc | 26.40a | 9161.30c |
T3 | 15.33bc | 167.22bc | 85.06bc | 26.50a | 9398.50bc |
T4 | 18.00a | 180.84a | 86.57a | 26.78a | 10478.90a |
T5 | 16.33b | 172.79b | 85.68ab | 26.70a | 9689.95b |
处理 | 生产100 kg穗吸氮量/kg | 氮肥贡献率/% | 氮肥偏生产力/(kg/kg) | 氮肥农学利用率/(kg/kg) | 氮肥表观利用率/% | 土壤氮素依存率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.87d | ─ | ─ | ─ | ─ | ─ |
T1 | 1.53c | 26.46d | 40.12d | 10.62d | 28.08c | 47.78c |
T2 | 1.56bc | 29.44c | 41.83c | 12.34c | 30.27c | 45.82b |
T3 | 1.67a | 31.27bc | 42.92bc | 13.42bc | 38.13b | 40.19a |
T4 | 1.64ab | 38.33a | 47.85a | 18.35a | 45.27a | 36.11a |
T5 | 1.57bc | 33.33b | 44.25b | 14.75b | 36.03b | 41.53b |
处理 | 生产100 kg穗吸氮量/kg | 氮肥贡献率/% | 氮肥偏生产力/(kg/kg) | 氮肥农学利用率/(kg/kg) | 氮肥表观利用率/% | 土壤氮素依存率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.87d | ─ | ─ | ─ | ─ | ─ |
T1 | 1.53c | 26.46d | 40.12d | 10.62d | 28.08c | 47.78c |
T2 | 1.56bc | 29.44c | 41.83c | 12.34c | 30.27c | 45.82b |
T3 | 1.67a | 31.27bc | 42.92bc | 13.42bc | 38.13b | 40.19a |
T4 | 1.64ab | 38.33a | 47.85a | 18.35a | 45.27a | 36.11a |
T5 | 1.57bc | 33.33b | 44.25b | 14.75b | 36.03b | 41.53b |
处理 | 磷吸收量/(kg/hm2) | 磷肥偏生产力/(kg/kg) | 生产100 kg穗吸磷量/kg | 磷肥表观利用率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 16.82e | ─ | 0.26d | ─ |
T1 | 26.73d | 146.43d | 0.30c | 16.51d |
T2 | 27.96c | 152.69c | 0.31c | 18.57c |
T3 | 31.23b | 156.64bc | 0.33a | 24.02b |
T4 | 33.86a | 174.65a | 0.32b | 28.41a |
T5 | 30.64b | 161.50b | 0.32b | 23.04b |
处理 | 磷吸收量/(kg/hm2) | 磷肥偏生产力/(kg/kg) | 生产100 kg穗吸磷量/kg | 磷肥表观利用率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 16.82e | ─ | 0.26d | ─ |
T1 | 26.73d | 146.43d | 0.30c | 16.51d |
T2 | 27.96c | 152.69c | 0.31c | 18.57c |
T3 | 31.23b | 156.64bc | 0.33a | 24.02b |
T4 | 33.86a | 174.65a | 0.32b | 28.41a |
T5 | 30.64b | 161.50b | 0.32b | 23.04b |
[1] |
朱德峰, 张玉屏, 陈惠哲, 等. 中国水稻高产栽培技术创新与实践[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(17):3404-3414.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.17.008 |
[2] |
陈建国. 栽培技术对水稻高产的影响探析[J]. 南方农业, 2018, 12(2):22-25.
|
[3] |
doi: 10.1029/2001GB001398 URL |
[4] |
彭少兵, 黄见良, 钟旭华, 等. 提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35:1095-1103.
|
[5] |
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.05.004 URL |
[6] |
|
[7] |
邵蕾, 王丽霞, 张民, 等. 控释肥类型及氮素水平对氮磷钾利用率的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(4):170-175.
|
[8] |
高静, 徐明岗, 张文菊, 等. 长期施肥对我国6种旱地小麦磷肥回收率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(3):584-592.
|
[9] |
于淑芳, 杨力, 张民, 等. 控释尿素对小麦-玉米产量及土壤氮素的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2010, 9(9):1744-1749.
|
[10] |
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60716-9 URL |
[11] |
杨长明, 杨林章, 颜廷梅. 不同肥料处理对水稻群体干物质生产及养分吸收分配的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2004, 35(2):199-202.
|
[12] |
沈维良, 周广成, 刘朝武. 氮肥运筹方式对冬小麦结构及产量的影响[J]. 土壤, 2000(5):270-273.
|
[13] |
刘杏兰, 高宗, 刘存寿. 有机无机肥料配施的增产效益及对土壤肥力影响的定位研究[J]. 土壤学报, 1996, 33(2):138-147.
|
[14] |
杨天昱. 生物炭基肥对水稻产量及稻田土壤肥力特性的影响[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2020.
|
[15] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
|
[16] |
乔月, 朱建强, 吴启侠, 等. 不同氮肥对不同种植方式稻田径流氮流失与氨挥发的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(2):32-41.
|
[17] |
卜东升, 刘冬碧, 肖依波, 等. 江汉平原稻区16个水稻品种对氮肥的响应及其利用率差异[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(5):1182-1192.
|
[18] |
张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):915-924.
|
[19] |
张伟明, 孟军, 陈温福, 等. 生物炭对水稻根系形态与生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(8):1445-1451.
|
[20] |
乔志刚, 陈琳, 李恋卿, 等. 生物质炭基肥对水稻生长及氮素利用率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(5):175-180.
|
[21] |
陈琳, 乔志, 李恋卿, 等. 施用生物质炭基肥对水稻产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2013, 29(5):671-675
|
[22] |
张爱平, 刘汝亮, 高霁, 等. 生物炭对宁夏引黄灌区水稻产量及氮素利用率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(5):1352-1360.
|
[23] |
李菊梅, 徐明岗, 秦道珠, 等. 有机肥无机肥配施对稻田氣挥发和水稻产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11(1):51-56.
|
[24] |
彭耀林, 朱俊英, 唐建军, 等. 有机无机肥长期配施对水稻产量及干物质生产特性的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2004, 26(4):485-490.
|
[25] |
郭锦晶, 施俭, 杨锋. 不同配方有机无机复混肥在水稻上的应用效果试验[J]. 上海农业科技, 2011(3):92-94.
|
[26] |
于春晓, 张丽莉, 杨立杰, 等. 减氮配施抑制剂及鸡粪提高尿素氮在稻田土壤中的转化及利用[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(9):1581-1591.
|
[27] |
胡田田, 崔晓路, 李梦月, 等. 不同氮肥增效剂和水氮用量对冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(4):302-310.
|
[28] |
王耀锋, 刘玉学, 吕豪豪, 等. 水洗生物炭配施化肥对水稻产量及养分吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(4):1049-1055.
|
[29] |
doi: 10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00044-9 URL |
[30] |
张斌, 刘晓雨, 潘根兴, 等. 施用生物质炭后稻田土壤性质、水稻产量和痕量温室气体排放的变化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(23):4844-4853.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.23.011 |
[31] |
翟勇, 苏倩, 许文霞, 等. 不同施磷水平下生物质炭用量对土壤磷素状况及棉花养分吸收的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2014, 45(6):1464-1470.
|
[32] |
徐明岗, 李冬初, 李菊梅, 等. 化肥有机肥配施对水稻养分吸收和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(10):3133-3139.
|
[33] |
周卫军, 王凯荣, 张光远. 有机无机结合施肥对红壤稻田土壤氮素供应和水稻生产的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(5):914-921.
|
[34] |
曲晶晶, 郑金伟, 郑聚锋, 等. 小麦秸秆生物质炭对水稻产量及晚稻氮素利用率的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2012, 28(3):288-293.
|
[35] |
张小莉, 孟琳, 王秋君. 不同有机无机复泡肥对水稻产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(3):624-630.
|
[36] |
朱菜红, 董彩霞, 沈其荣, 等. 配施有机肥提高化肥氮利用效率的微生物作用机制研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010(2):282-288.
|
[37] |
周旋, 吴良欢, 戴锋. 生化抑制剂组合与施肥模式对黄泥田水稻养分累积及利用率的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(10):1495-1507.
|
[1] | CHEN Guiyun, WANG Huifang, WANG Duo, SHI Dingguo, ZHANG Zhijun, XU Dongya, LI Yunchuan, KONG Decui, WANG Na, WANG Ge, DING Yi, BAI Yuxiang. Effects of Tobacco Stem Biochar Based Fertilizer Application on Production and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(1): 12-19. |
[2] | ZHENG Jianchao, DONG Fei. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction on Growth Characteristics and Fertilizer Use Efficiency of Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 52-57. |
[3] | YU Guilong, LIU Xiangchen, ZHANG Qiang, FENG Daqing, ZHAO Haiying, GU Mengxuan, SUN Quandong, WANG Bin, XIONG Qu. Effects of Different Slow-release Fertilizer Groups on Growth and Yield of Regenerative Rice in Southern Henan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(36): 22-27. |
[4] | MEI Tingting, WANG Xiaoli, DUAN Jianjun, YANG Hongwei, XU Bin, MENG Ruoxi, ZHANG Liwu. Effects of Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Rice Yield, Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization and Root Morphology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(15): 92-98. |
[5] | XU Xingyang, ZHANG Xiaowei, LIU Zhonghua, YU Xiaofen, QIU Xueli, JIAO Zhongyun, ZHANG Lianqiao, YANG Shuming. Effects of Organic and Inorganic Compound Fertilizer Combined with Potassium Feldspar Soil Conditioner on Yield, Quality and Nutrient Utilization Rate of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(15): 104-110. |
[6] | CHEN Jianfeng, ZHAO Wenjun, FU Libo, YIN Mei, WANG Zhiyuan, WANG Wei, WANG Yingxue, YANG Yanxian, CHEN Hua. Influence of Fertilization System of Nutrient Critical Value for Optimum Yield of Tobacco on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Yuxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 1-6. |
[7] | JIAO Jiabin, CHEN Xiaodong, ZHENG Chaoyuan, CHEN Xiao, CHANG Jingjing, SONG Zhao, XIE Dasen, HE Yuzhi, ZHANG Baige. Dynamics of Dry Matter and Nutrient Absorption and Distribution of Black Wax Gourd [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(18): 62-69. |
[8] | JIANG Longgang, REN Yanli, SHI Jianshuo, GUO Li, WANG Liying, LI Ruonan, WANG Ping. The Difference of Yield and Nutrient Absorption of Soybean Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(10): 9-14. |
[9] | Chen Min, Zheng Shufeng, Xu Daoqing, Liu Xiaoling, Wang Wei, Li Shuying, Kan Huachun. Effects of One-off Reduced Fertilization of Slow-release Fertilizer on Nitrogen Accumulation and Yield of Machine-picked Cotton [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(4): 19-24. |
[10] | Nie Liangpeng, Guo Liwei, Zheng Chunfeng, Lv Yuhu, Zhang Meng, Li Benyin, Pan Ziliang, Li Jie. Planting and Incorporation of Chinese Milk Vetch Coupled with Chemical Fertilizer Application: Effects on the Physical and Chemical Characters of Paddy Soil and Rice Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(27): 65-69. |
[11] | Hua Wenyuan, Li Ninghui, Luo Liangguo. Fertilizer Use Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors of Facility Vegetable Growers [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(23): 144-150. |
[12] | Jiang Lingjie, Dong Linlin, Fan Peng, Cao Yifan, Zhou Zhengping, Shen Xinping, Lu Changying, Shen Mingxing. Effect of Pipe Drainage on Scale Farmland Rice Nutrient Absorption and Yield Composition [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(17): 105-111. |
[13] | Ji Li, Shao Wenqi, Chen Fuping, Dong Qingjun, Zhang Ankang. Effects of Successive Years of Rice-duck Co-cultivation on Soil Properties, Rice Yield and Quality in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(13): 1-7. |
[14] | Zheng Jie, Guo Shiqian, Cui Zengtuan, Gao Fei, Dong Xingchen. Effects on Fertilizer Use Efficiency of Maize: Different Fertilization Modes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(11): 103-107. |
[15] | Wang Xiangling, Song Baiquan. Nitrogen Fertilizer Use Efficiency: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(5): 93-97. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||