Effects of Fertilization Modes on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Paeonia ostii ‘Fengdan’

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0141

Abstract

Abstract:

The paper aims to solve the problem affecting the quality and yield of Paeonia ostii ‘Fengdan’ due to unscientific fertilization in the cultivation process, the five-year-old P. ostii ‘Fengdan’ was used as test material to study the effect of the method of staged controlled fertilization on the photosynthetic characteristics and yield of P. ostii ‘Fengdan’. The results showed that the net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and chlorophyll content of P. ostii ‘Fengdan’ leaves showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the increase of compound fertilizer application and the sprayed boron fertilizer concentration, and reached the maximum value at D3B4 (compound fertilizer 225 kg/hm², boron fertilizer 0.3%) level. The trend of intercellular CO₂concentration in leaves was opposite, showing a trend of first decreasing and then increasing, reaching the lowest value at D3B4 level. At the same time, at the D3B4 level, the number of pods per plant, pod diameter, 1000-grain weight, and grain yield per plant all reached the maximum value. Therefore, in this study, 225 kg/hm² of compound fertilizer base fertilizer at the full flowering stage+ 0.3% boron fertilizer spraying on the leaves at the initial stage of fruiting was the best fertilization mode for the high yield of P. ostii ‘Fengdan’, which could provide a certain reference for scientific fertilization of P. ostii ‘Fengdan’.

Key words: Paeonia ostii ‘Fengdan’, photosynthetic characteristics, yield, compound fertilizer, boron fertilizer

LIU Hang, TIAN Qing, TIAN Zhongping, LI Chengzhong, DING Yinhua, ZHAO Baoyuan, CHEN Yueheng, CHENG Tianli, WANG Tao, ZHONG Zixu. Effects of Fertilization Modes on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Paeonia ostii ‘Fengdan’[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(7): 56-63.

Figures/Tables 7

References 52

[1]	姜利, 洪娟, 陈法志, 等. 油用牡丹‘凤丹’不同生育期养分吸收和积累规律[J]. 经济林研究, 2022, 40(1):112-122.
[2]	GUO Q, GUO L L, ZHANG L. Construction of a genetic linkage map in tree peony (Paeonia Sect. Moutan) using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers[J]. Scientia horticulturae, 2017, 219:294-301. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.03.017 URL
[3]	田云芳, 常可可, 杨绯绯, 等. 不同栽培模式对‘凤丹’牡丹丹皮品质与产量的影响[J]. 分子植物育种, 2023, 21(13):4502-4509.
[4]	LI S S, WANG S, SHU Q Y, et al. Fatty acid composition of developing tree peony (Paenoia section Moutan DC.) seeds and transcriptome analysis during seed development[J]. BMC Genomics, 2015, 16:208. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1429-0 URL
[5]	ZHAO D, TANG W, HAO Z, et al. Identification of flavonoids and expression of flavonoid biosynthetic genes in two coloured tree peony flowers[J]. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2015, 459(3):450-456. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.126 pmid: 25748574
[6]	张姗姗, 赵凡, 魏小豹, 等. ‘凤丹’和紫斑牡丹6个产地种子脂肪酸组分的比较[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2021, 36(3):84-90.
[7]	朱铭玮, 邹雨婷, 李永荣, 等. 油用牡丹‘凤丹’种子内源抑制物研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2019, 39(6):64-70.
[8]	HU L, CHENG F Y, CHENG L P. Determination of the fatty acid composition in tree peony seeds using near-infrared spectroscopy[J]. Journal of the American oil chemists society, 2016, 93(7):943-952. doi: 10.1007/s11746-016-2839-0 URL
[9]	张梦娇, 史帅营, 刘政安, 等. 间伐对‘凤丹’牡丹生长、籽粒产量及品质的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(1):162-174.
[10]	ZHANG Q Y, NIU L X, YU R, et al. Cloning, characterization, and expression analysis of a gene encoding a putative lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase from seeds of Paeonia rockii[J]. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2016, 12(2):1-21. doi: 10.1007/BF02798574 URL
[11]	王怡晨, 孙海燕, 李永荣, 等. 油用牡丹‘凤丹’单株结实量及产油品质分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(04):155-160.
[12]	李莹莹, 郑成淑. 利用CDDP标记的菏泽牡丹品种资源的遗传多样性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(13):2739-2750. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.13.012
[13]	YU H P, CHENG FY, ZHONG Y, et al. Development of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers from Paeorria ostii to study the genetic relationships among tree peonies (Paeoniaceae)[J]. Scientia horticulturae, 2013, 164:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.06.043 URL
[14]	王燕青. 利用SRAP标记构建菏泽牡丹优良品种指纹图谱[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2008.
[15]	张旻桓, 姚奕平, 黄宇. 基于SSR标记的江南牡丹品种群遗传多样性及亲缘关系[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(1):164-172.
[16]	耿丹丹, 宋姝凡, 李彤彤, 等. 日本牡丹品种群表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2023.
[17]	张琳, 魏祯祯, 宋程威, 等. ‘凤丹’牡丹PoFD基因克隆及表达分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(11):104-111. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2022-0004
[18]	李勇慧, 于相丽, 马会萍, 等. 不同品种牡丹ISSR遗传多样性分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(4):78-83.
[19]	张琳, 王佩佩, 韩雅祯, 等. 油用牡丹主要相关性状与SSR分子标记的关联分析[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(3):31-37.
[20]	张庆雨. 中国野生牡丹脂肪酸代谢的分子机制研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
[21]	张伟龙, 杨静慧, 宋科, 等. 基于主成分分析油用牡丹‘凤丹’主要性状评价及选优[J]. 天津农学院学报, 2021, 28(2):12-17. doi: 10.19640/j.cnki.jtau.2021.02.003
[22]	崔永宁, 张姗姗, 赵凡, 等. 对西藏不同居群野生牡丹籽油的主要脂肪酸成分分析[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2020, 35(12):74-78.
[23]	杨玉磊, 王英锋, 马松新, 等. 牡丹皮不同入药部位及配方颗粒中主要差异性成分的HPLC分析[A].//中国药理学会药检药理专业委员会第十六届(2019年)学术年会论文集[C]. 2019:273-281.
[24]	HE C, PENG Y, XIAO W, et al. Determination of chemical variability of phenolic and monoterpene glycosides in the seeds of Paeonia species using HPLC and profiling analysis[J]. Food chemistry, 2013, 138(4):2108-2114. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.049 URL
[25]	沈清宇, 叶秋萍, 洪翠云, 等. 一种紫斑牡丹花茶的研制及其主要香气成分分析[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2020, 49(5):351-357.
[26]	LI S S, YUAN R Y, CHEN L G, et al. Systematic qualitative and quantitative assessment of fatty acids in the seeds of 60 tree-peony (Paeonia section Moutan DC.) cultivars GC-MS[J]. Food chemistry, 2015, 173:133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.017 URL
[27]	段祥光, 张利霞, 刘伟, 等. 施氮量对油用牡丹‘凤丹’光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(1):48-54.
[28]	魏冬峰, 张利霞, 常青山, 等. 氮磷钾平衡施肥对凤丹光合特性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2016, 30(11):2265-2273. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2016.11.2265
[29]	魏双雨, 李敏, 吉文丽, 等. 适宜氮磷钾用量和配比提高油用牡丹产量和出油量[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(5):880-888.
[30]	黎媛, 张如义, 陈佑才, 等. 施用基肥及追肥对油用牡丹凤丹生长的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(10):96-100.
[31]	刘双, 吴安楠, 王淑娟, 等. 油用牡丹对氮磷钾元素的吸收和积累规律[J]. 经济林研究, 2019, 37(4):172-178.
[32]	姚微, 李陆嘉, 孙可月, 等. 微量元素硼、钼对牡丹籽产量及籽油品质的影响[J]. 南方农业, 2018, 12(24):129-131.
[33]	魏双雨, 吉文丽, 杨丹怡. 叶施硼、锌对油用牡丹‘凤丹’光合特性和矿质元素含量的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(2):140-147.
[34]	李程程, 吉文丽, 张延龙. 叶面喷硼对牡丹籽油理化性质及抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 中国油脂, 2017, 42(3):40-43.
[35]	LICHTENTHALER H K, WELLBURN A R. Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf in different solvents[J]. Biochemical society transactions, 1985, 11(5):591-592. doi: 10.1042/bst0110591 URL
[36]	侯睿, 张小红, 长小军, 等. 生物菌肥在花生上施用效果的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(8):78-83. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16050109
[37]	刘济明, 陈敬忠, 孙运刚, 等. 紫茎泽兰叶水提液对七种乡土植物幼苗生长和叶绿素的化感影响[J]. 广西植物, 2019, 39(1):79-86.
[38]	张云海, 何念鹏, 张光明, 等. 氮沉降强度和频率对羊草叶绿素含量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(21):6786-6794.
[39]	谢亚萍. 油用亚麻氮磷营养规律及其氮代谢特征研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2014.
[40]	张晓伟, 白牡丹, 高鹏, 等. 氮磷钾肥配施对‘玉露香梨’叶绿素含量及光合特性的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(12):79-83. doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas18060007
[41]	杨乔乔, 康建宏, 王佳. 氮磷钾肥配施对春玉米迪卡517光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(6):1057-1062,1070.
[42]	朱丹, 刘芳, 吴三林, 等. 氮磷钾不同施用量对“凤丹”牡丹产量的影响[J]. 乐山师范学院学报, 2016, 31(12):43-48.
[43]	李程程. 微肥对‘凤丹’牡丹产量和品质的影响研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
[44]	魏双雨. 四种微肥喷施对‘凤丹’牡丹光合特性、产量和品质的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019.
[45]	杜维广, 张桂茹, 满为群, 等. 大豆光合作用与产量关系的研究[J]. 大豆科学, 1999(2):61-66.
[46]	徐庆章, 王庆成, 牛玉贞, 等. 玉米株型与群体光合作用的关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 1995(4):492-496.
[47]	时元智, 崔远来, 王力, 等. 氮磷调控及紫云英配施提高早稻冠层特性和产量[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(1):89-97.
[48]	吴海宁, 黄志鹏, 唐秀梅, 等. 甘蔗花生间作下不同氮磷钾配施对花生养分吸收及产量效益的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2023, 45(1):155-163. doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2021318
[49]	王苏影, 刘宗发, 马众文, 等. 配施硼肥·钼肥对花生产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(31):12293-12294,12297.
[50]	隋文成, 纪伟波. 硼肥不同施用量对玉米产量的影响[J]. 现代化农业, 2019(5):18-19.
[51]	吴拓, 杨刘, 降志兵. 钼、锌、硼微量元素对大豆产量和品质的影响[J]. 南方农业, 2015, 9(31):6-8.
[52]	王囡囡, 张春峰, 张洪权, 等. 不同氮磷钾施肥量对大豆产量的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2021(3):166-169.

处理	羊粪/(kg/hm²)	NPK复合肥/(kg/hm²)	硼肥/%
D1B1(CK)	750	0	0
D1B2			0.1
D1B3			0.2
D1B4			0.3
D1B5			0.4
D2B1	750	150	0
D2B2			0.1
D2B3			0.2
D2B4			0.3
D2B5			0.4
D3B1	750	225	0
D3B2			0.1
D3B3			0.2
D3B4			0.3
D3B5			0.4
D4B1	750	300	0
D4B2			0.1
D4B3			0.2
D4B4			0.3
D4B5			0.4

处理	羊粪/(kg/hm²)	NPK复合肥/(kg/hm²)	硼肥/%
D1B1(CK)	750	0	0
D1B2			0.1
D1B3			0.2
D1B4			0.3
D1B5			0.4
D2B1	750	150	0
D2B2			0.1
D2B3			0.2
D2B4			0.3
D2B5			0.4
D3B1	750	225	0
D3B2			0.1
D3B3			0.2
D3B4			0.3
D3B5			0.4
D4B1	750	300	0
D4B2			0.1
D4B3			0.2
D4B4			0.3
D4B5			0.4

处理	单株果荚数/个	果荚直径/cm	千粒重/g	单株籽粒产量/g
D1B1	6a	6.987a	276.30a	13.556a
D1B2	6ab	7.383bc	296.94bcd	14.636ab
D1B3	6abc	7.566cde	310.88bcdefg	17.889d
D1B4	7bcd	7.889fgh	318.77cdefg	25.295f
D1B5	7abcd	7.597cde	312.05bcdefg	18.784d
D2B1	6a	7.217b	291.32b	15.433bc
D2B2	6ab	7.494cd	308.39bcdefg	22.806e
D2B3	7abcd	7.596cde	319.58defg	26.557g
D2B4	8cd	7.928gh	325.10fgh	33.438jk
D2B5	8de	7.599cde	319.87defg	28.693h
D3B1	8de	7.342bc	298.63bcde	26.991g
D3B2	8de	7.546cde	314.30cdefg	32.772j
D3B3	10f	7.762efg	328.59gh	36.660l
D3B4	10f	8.089h	340.88h	41.700m
D3B5	9ef	7.691def	325.30fgh	34.489k
D4B1	8de	7.224b	296.22bc	16.433c
D4B2	8de	7.377bc	303.35bcdef	22.560e
D4B3	7abcd	7.410bc	315.21cdefg	30.992i
D4B4	7bcd	7.891fgh	321.43efg	32.754j
D4B5	7abcd	7.470cd	313.57cdefg	24.327f

处理	单株果荚数/个	果荚直径/cm	千粒重/g	单株籽粒产量/g
D1B1	6a	6.987a	276.30a	13.556a
D1B2	6ab	7.383bc	296.94bcd	14.636ab
D1B3	6abc	7.566cde	310.88bcdefg	17.889d
D1B4	7bcd	7.889fgh	318.77cdefg	25.295f
D1B5	7abcd	7.597cde	312.05bcdefg	18.784d
D2B1	6a	7.217b	291.32b	15.433bc
D2B2	6ab	7.494cd	308.39bcdefg	22.806e
D2B3	7abcd	7.596cde	319.58defg	26.557g
D2B4	8cd	7.928gh	325.10fgh	33.438jk
D2B5	8de	7.599cde	319.87defg	28.693h
D3B1	8de	7.342bc	298.63bcde	26.991g
D3B2	8de	7.546cde	314.30cdefg	32.772j
D3B3	10f	7.762efg	328.59gh	36.660l
D3B4	10f	8.089h	340.88h	41.700m
D3B5	9ef	7.691def	325.30fgh	34.489k
D4B1	8de	7.224b	296.22bc	16.433c
D4B2	8de	7.377bc	303.35bcdef	22.560e
D4B3	7abcd	7.410bc	315.21cdefg	30.992i
D4B4	7bcd	7.891fgh	321.43efg	32.754j
D4B5	7abcd	7.470cd	313.57cdefg	24.327f