Effect of Alginic Acid Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Strawberry

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0465

Abstract

Abstract:

The primary objective of this study was to screen the most effective alginate acid fertilizers for enhancing strawberry production in the suburban areas of Beijing. To conduct this research, the ‘Hongyan’ variety of strawberries and commonly used alginic acid fertilizers were specifically chosen as experimental materials. Field trials were meticulously carried out to evaluate the impact of alginic acid fertilizers on the growth, yield and quality of strawberries. Compared to the CK group (water control treatment), the application of diverse alginate acid fertilizer treatments could promote the growth of strawberry plants. The T₂ treatment (Haizaojing alginic acid fertilizer treatment) consistently exhibited superior effects on both plant height and petiole length within the two sheds. For instance, in shed 128, the plant height experienced a significant increase of 32.0%, and in shed 234, the petiole length had a substantial increase of 25.71% under the influence of the same treatment. Furthermore, the application of alginate acid fertilizers corresponded to a marked rise in the number of fruits per plant, consequently amplifying the overall yield. Notably, in shed 128, the implementation of the T₂ treatment led to a noteworthy 18.47% increase in yield compared to the CK treatment. And in shed 234, the yield significantly increased by 23.36% with the application of the T₃ treatment (Dalantong alginic acid fertilizer treatment). However, no significant differences were observed among the various alginate acid fertilizer treatments. The application of alginate acid fertilizers could improve fruit quality, such as increasing soluble solid content, sugar-acid ratio and vitamin C content, and reducing titrable acid and nitrate content. A comprehensive analysis of the findings emphasizes that alginic acid fertilizers play a pivotal role in promoting strawberry growth, elevating yield, and improving fruit quality. The T₂ treatment has the best effect for multiple parameters.

Key words: strawberry, alginic acid fertilizer, growth, yield, fruit quality

FAN Shanshan, CHEN Juan, WU Changchun, WANG Rui, ZHANG Xingang, CHEN Xiaohui, GAO Fei, WU Wenqiang. Effect of Alginic Acid Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Strawberry[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 60-65.

Figures/Tables 4

References 43

[1]	刘亚柏. 几种水溶肥喷施对草莓产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(16):77-81. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18030025
[2]	唐静, 周圆圆, 袁利荣. 不同基质配方对立体栽培草莓生长、品质和产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(1):185-187.
[3]	曹贵寿, 张倩茹, 尹蓉, 等. 不同草莓品种酚类物质含量及抗氧化能力研究[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(2):35-41. doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas17070013
[4]	罗学兵, 贺良明. 草莓的营养价值与保健功能[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2011, 17(4):74-76.
[5]	赵彦华. 草莓品种栽培类型及主要优良品种[J]. 山西果树, 2019(6):50-53.
[6]	高璐阳, 陈宏坤, 张强, 等. 大量元素水溶性肥料对草莓生长、品质和产量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2018, 50(3):57-60.
[7]	赵海涛, 李良俊, 殷朝珍, 等. 水生蔬菜轮作对大棚草莓连作土壤性质的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2014, 30(2):289-295.
[8]	刘金凤, 张娟. 海藻酸的农业应用及测定方法研究[J]. 中国果菜, 2015, 35(8):20-23.
[9]	RAYORATH P, JITHESH M N, FARID A, et al. Rapid bioassays to evaluate the plant growth promoting activity of Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jol. using a model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh[J]. Journal of applied phycology, 2008, 20(4):423-429. doi: 10.1007/s10811-007-9280-6 URL
[10]	张运红, 吴礼树, 耿明建, 等. 几种寡糖类物质对菜心产量和品质的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2009(2):164-168.
[11]	马栋, 刘海燕, 单俊伟, 等. 海带与浒苔混合提取液对草莓生长及品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(5):129-134.
[12]	NIKA W, VALENTINA S, JERNEJA J, et al. First fruit in season: seaweed extract and silicon advance organic strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa Duch.) fruit formation and yield[J]. Scientia horticulturae, 2018, 242:103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.07.038 URL
[13]	COLAVITA G M, SPERA N, BLACKHALL V, et al. Effect of seaweed extract on pear fruit quality and yield[J]. Acta horticulturae, 2011, 909:601-607.
[14]	EL-MINIAWY, RAGAB M E, YOUSSEF S M, et al. Influence of foliar spraying of seaweed extract on growth, yield and quality of strawberry plants[J]. Journal of applied sciences research, 2014, 10(2):88-94.
[15]	魏珊珊, 严国富, 汤洁, 等. 海藻多糖对草莓形态及土壤理化指标的影响[J]. 中国农技推广, 2018, 3:60-61.
[16]	李国庭. 海藻生物肥的研制[J]. 河北工业科技, 2009, 26(5):370-372.
[17]	耿银银, 尹媛红, 沈宏. 海藻功能物质的提取工艺、理化性质以及在农业领域中的应用[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(10):2951-2960.
[18]	ALI N, FARRELL A, RAMSUBHAG A, et al. The effect of Ascophyllum nodosum extract on the growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato grown under tropical conditions[J]. Journal of applied phycology, 2016, 28(2):1353-1362. doi: 10.1007/s10811-015-0608-3 URL
[19]	匡石滋, 邵雪花, 赖多, 等. 叶面喷施海藻磷钾肥对金斗香番石榴产量和品质的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2019, 46(10):42-47.
[20]	涂海华, 周坚, 毛宇, 等. 天然海藻肥对夏黑葡萄植株生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(4):213-217.
[21]	KAMEL H M. Impact of garlic oil, seaweed extract and imazalil on keeping quality of valencia orange fruits during cold storage[J]. Journal of horticultural science and ornomental plants, 2014, 6(3):116-125.
[22]	董华芳, 李松, 许延波, 等. 海藻有机肥对草莓叶绿素和果实可溶性固形物的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018(12):52-53,55.
[23]	马欣, 宗静, 刘宝文. 不同水肥用量对日光温室草莓产量和果实品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2015(5):39-42.
[24]	孙树兴. 园艺研究法[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社,1996:23-35.
[25]	谢巧娟. 不同有机肥对草莓生长结果的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2017, 46(3):135-138.
[26]	吕涛, 孙晓东, 刘翠翠, 等. 不同螯合肥对草莓生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2021(5):18-22.
[27]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000:447,463,472.
[28]	王学奎. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006:126,188,268.
[29]	张治安, 张美善, 蔚荣海. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2004:65-75.
[30]	唐光木, 黄微, 卢丽, 等. 三种滴灌肥对草莓生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(1):156-160.
[31]	于会丽, 徐国益, 邵微, 等. 酶解法和碱解法海藻提取物对梨树苗生长和养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(3):158-163.
[32]	石伟勇, 王强. 海藻肥对番茄生长的影响及其机理研究[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2003(2):67-70.
[33]	赵建锋, 王纪忠, 孙玉东, 等. 海藻肥对草莓营养生长和果实发育的影响[J]. 淮阴工学院学报, 2017, 26(5):46-51.
[34]	郭蓉, 龚一富, 姜洁, 等. 海藻生物肥对火龙果生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(12):2455-2461. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.12.2455
[35]	于会丽, 司鹏, 邵微, 等. 海藻酸水溶肥对梨树生长与果实产量及品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(5):603-611.
[36]	ALAM M Z, BRAUN G, NORRIE J, et al. Effect of Ascophyllum extract application on plant growth, fruit yield and soil microbial communities of strawberry[J]. Canadian journal of plant science, 2013, 93:23-36. doi: 10.4141/cjps2011-260 URL
[37]	于会丽, 徐变变, 徐国益, 等. 海藻提取物复合制剂适宜用量提高桃果实产量、品质及养分吸收量[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(9):1656-1664.
[38]	ZODAPE S T, MUKHOPADHYAY S, ESWARAN K, et al. Enhanced yield and nutritional quality in green gram (Phaseolus radiata L.) treated with seaweed (Kappaphycus alvarezii) extract[J]. Journal of scientific and industrial research, 2010, 69(6):468-471.
[39]	ROUPHAEL Y, MICCO V D, ARENA C, et al. Effect of Ecklonia maxima seaweed extract on yield, mineral composition, gas exchange, and leaf anatomy of zucchini squash grown under saline conditions[J]. Journal of applied phycology, 2017, 29(1):459-470. doi: 10.1007/s10811-016-0937-x URL
[40]	林梅, 尹皓婵, 杨剑超, 等. 海藻提取液对甜樱桃(Prunus avium)生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(22):7538-7544.
[41]	谢思敏, 董晓玲, 杜根盛. 新红星苹果叶片解剖构造与光合特性的研究[J]. 山东农业大学学报, 1993, 13(1):9-12.
[42]	姜洁, 龚一富, 郭蓉, 等. 海藻生物肥对草莓产量和品质的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2019, 33(5):1032-1037. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2019.05.1032
[43]	庞荣丽, 何为华, 方金豹, 等. 几种果品中硝酸盐和亚硝酸盐的含量[J]. 果树学报, 2006, 23(4):627-630.

处理	基肥前		追肥1					追肥2					养分折纯量
	复合肥和有机肥		水溶肥			海藻酸肥		水溶肥			海藻酸肥		水溶肥养分含量	海藻酸肥含量
	品种及用量	次数	品种	用量	次数	用量	次数	品种	用量	次数	用量	次数	水溶肥养分含量	海藻酸肥含量
CK	复合肥375、商品有机肥1500	1次	24-8-18+TE	180	3次	—	3次	18-6-31+TE	420	7次	—	10次	490	—
T₁						180					600		490	78
T₂						180					600		490	117
T₃						45					150		490	17.6
T₄						45					150		490	23.4

处理	基肥前		追肥1					追肥2					养分折纯量
	复合肥和有机肥		水溶肥			海藻酸肥		水溶肥			海藻酸肥		水溶肥养分含量	海藻酸肥含量
	品种及用量	次数	品种	用量	次数	用量	次数	品种	用量	次数	用量	次数	水溶肥养分含量	海藻酸肥含量
CK	复合肥375、商品有机肥1500	1次	24-8-18+TE	180	3次	—	3次	18-6-31+TE	420	7次	—	10次	490	—
T₁						180					600		490	78
T₂						180					600		490	117
T₃						45					150		490	17.6
T₄						45					150		490	23.4

试验园区	处理	单株结果数/个	单果重/g	单株产量/g	产量/(kg/hm²)
128号棚	CK	8.87±0.85a	15.03±1.13a	132.67±3.06b	12903.76±297.15b
	T₁	9.67±0.91a	15.01±0.81a	144.67±8.61ab	14070.93±837.17ab
	T₂	10.20±2.19a	15.64±1.59a	157.17±17.06a	15286.74±1659.45a
	T₃	9.97±1.20a	15.25±0.96a	151.33±11.02ab	14719.36±1071.38ab
	T₄	9.70±1.25a	15.91±0.96a	153.83±16.60ab	14962.52±1614.66ab
234号棚	CK	9.67±0.75a	15.37±0.25b	148.56±11.75b	14449.61±1143.31b
	T₁	10.13±2.51a	16.22±0.59ab	164.95±44.56ab	16044.10±4334.16ab
	T₂	10.23±1.36a	17.18±0.34a	175.77±22.62ab	17095.86±2199.91ab
	T₃	11.10±1.970a	16.51±0.56ab	183.27±33.39a	17825.34±3247.87a
	T₄	10.53±1.80a	15.93±0.98b	168.97±38.47ab	16434.46±3742.05ab

试验园区	处理	单株结果数/个	单果重/g	单株产量/g	产量/(kg/hm²)
128号棚	CK	8.87±0.85a	15.03±1.13a	132.67±3.06b	12903.76±297.15b
	T₁	9.67±0.91a	15.01±0.81a	144.67±8.61ab	14070.93±837.17ab
	T₂	10.20±2.19a	15.64±1.59a	157.17±17.06a	15286.74±1659.45a
	T₃	9.97±1.20a	15.25±0.96a	151.33±11.02ab	14719.36±1071.38ab
	T₄	9.70±1.25a	15.91±0.96a	153.83±16.60ab	14962.52±1614.66ab
234号棚	CK	9.67±0.75a	15.37±0.25b	148.56±11.75b	14449.61±1143.31b
	T₁	10.13±2.51a	16.22±0.59ab	164.95±44.56ab	16044.10±4334.16ab
	T₂	10.23±1.36a	17.18±0.34a	175.77±22.62ab	17095.86±2199.91ab
	T₃	11.10±1.970a	16.51±0.56ab	183.27±33.39a	17825.34±3247.87a
	T₄	10.53±1.80a	15.93±0.98b	168.97±38.47ab	16434.46±3742.05ab

试验园区	处理	可滴定酸/%	可溶性固形物/%	糖酸比	维生素C/(mg/100 g)	硝酸盐含量/(mg/g)
128号棚	CK	0.44±0.01a	10.42±1.23ab	23.64±2.19b	40.12±13.95a	4.09±2.12a
	T₁	0.43±0.02a	9.62±0.13ab	22.21±1.41b	52.81±1.42a	3.16±1.08ab
	T₂	0.35±0.10a	11.20±1.33ab	34.28±11.31a	49.87±1.71a	3.14±0.54ab
	T₃	0.43±0.02a	12.10±2.00a	28.44±5.7ab	52.36±1.8a	4.03±0.36a
	T₄	0.43±0.05a	9.10±1.07b	21.16±1.03b	42.55±7.67a	2.61±0.29b
234号棚	CK	0.49±0.06ab	11.18±0.75a	22.96±2.29ab	29.47±2.75a	3.98±0.33ab
	T₁	0.47±0.07ab	11.98±0.87a	25.71±2.77ab	31.51±3.07a	3.71±1.25b
	T₂	0.45±0.04b	11.90±1.63a	26.27±3.5a	31.96±2.45a	4.17±0.64a
	T₃	0.57±0.06a	12.04±1.39a	21.26±0.5b	29.79±1.38a	3.31±0.28c
	T₄	0.51±0.05ab	10.80±1.42a	21.31±2.45b	29.92±1.18a	2.98±0.12c