Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (14): 22-27.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190500141
Special Issue: 玉米
Previous Articles Next Articles
Shi Qingling1,2, Li Kewei1, Dong Yongbin1(), Ran Wuling2, Li Yuling1
Received:
2019-05-14
Revised:
2019-07-30
Online:
2020-05-15
Published:
2020-05-20
Contact:
Dong Yongbin
E-mail:dyb0816@163.com
CLC Number:
Shi Qingling, Li Kewei, Dong Yongbin, Ran Wuling, Li Yuling. Ear Traits of Maize Four-cross Population: Correlation Analysis and Path Analysis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(14): 22-27.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190500141
性状 | 穗长/cm | 穗粗/cm | 穗行数/行 | 行粒数/粒 | 粒长/cm | 粒宽/cm | 粒厚/cm | 秃尖长/cm | 轴粗/cm | 穗粒重/g | 百粒重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
先玉335 | 14.51 | 4.69 | 15.3 | 30.56 | 1.29 | 0.88 | 0.44 | 0.84 | 2.62 | 140.09 | 33.21 |
郑单958 | 13.86 | 4.84 | 15.04 | 32.8 | 1.23 | 0.86 | 0.4 | 0.59 | 2.77 | 124.31 | 28.37 |
PH6WC | 13.04 | 4.1 | 14.54 | 18.79 | 0.95 | 0.78 | 0.51 | 0.35 | 1.66 | 74.97 | 31.36 |
PH4CV | 12.65 | 3.96 | 14.77 | 22.6 | 0.99 | 0.74 | 0.44 | 0.66 | 1.61 | 63.82 | 25.39 |
郑58 | 13.86 | 3.86 | 11.44 | 21.19 | 0.89 | 0.9 | 0.51 | 0.17 | 1.48 | 65.4 | 32.83 |
昌7-2 | 9.56 | 4.05 | 15.22 | 18.26 | 0.94 | 0.73 | 0.44 | 0.26 | 1.66 | 53.61 | 23.34 |
性状 | 穗长/cm | 穗粗/cm | 穗行数/行 | 行粒数/粒 | 粒长/cm | 粒宽/cm | 粒厚/cm | 秃尖长/cm | 轴粗/cm | 穗粒重/g | 百粒重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
先玉335 | 14.51 | 4.69 | 15.3 | 30.56 | 1.29 | 0.88 | 0.44 | 0.84 | 2.62 | 140.09 | 33.21 |
郑单958 | 13.86 | 4.84 | 15.04 | 32.8 | 1.23 | 0.86 | 0.4 | 0.59 | 2.77 | 124.31 | 28.37 |
PH6WC | 13.04 | 4.1 | 14.54 | 18.79 | 0.95 | 0.78 | 0.51 | 0.35 | 1.66 | 74.97 | 31.36 |
PH4CV | 12.65 | 3.96 | 14.77 | 22.6 | 0.99 | 0.74 | 0.44 | 0.66 | 1.61 | 63.82 | 25.39 |
郑58 | 13.86 | 3.86 | 11.44 | 21.19 | 0.89 | 0.9 | 0.51 | 0.17 | 1.48 | 65.4 | 32.83 |
昌7-2 | 9.56 | 4.05 | 15.22 | 18.26 | 0.94 | 0.73 | 0.44 | 0.26 | 1.66 | 53.61 | 23.34 |
性状 | 平均数 | 变幅 | 标准差 | 变异系数/% | 小于四个亲本自交系的株数、比例/(株/%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH6WC | PH4CV | 郑58 | 昌7-2 | |||||
穗长/cm | 14.78 | 9.80~22.90 | 2.40 | 16.22 | 42/29.00 | 30/20.70 | 57/39.30 | 0/0.00 |
穗粗/cm | 4.73 | 3.94~5.87 | 0.36 | 7.68 | 4/2.80 | 1/0.70 | 0.00/0.00 | 3/2.10 |
穗行数/行 | 15.31 | 10.00~24.00 | 2.51 | 16.39 | 64/44.10 | 64/44.10 | 2/1.40 | 64/44.10 |
行粒数/个 | 25.17 | 12.00~43.00 | 5.50 | 21.85 | 19/13.10 | 46/31.70 | 39/26.90 | 19/13.10 |
粒长/cm | 1.13 | 0.21~1.73 | 0.17 | 14.92 | 10/6.90 | 19/13.10 | 10/6.90 | 10/6.90 |
粒宽/cm | 0.88 | 0.11~1.69 | 0.16 | 18.64 | 32/22.10 | 23/15.90 | 75/51.70 | 20/13.80 |
粒厚/cm | 0.59 | 0.13~1.41 | 0.30 | 50.81 | 105/72.40 | 71/49.00 | 105/72.40 | 71/49.00 |
秃尖长/cm | 0.93 | 0.00~4.30 | 0.90 | 96.27 | 44/30.30 | 62/42.80 | 43/29.70 | 43/29.70 |
轴粗/cm | 2.64 | 1.82~3.50 | 0.31 | 11.54 | 0/0.00 | 0/0.00 | 0/0.00 | 0/0.00 |
穗粒重/g | 114.29 | 48.19~210.02 | 29.33 | 25.66 | 13/9.00 | 4/2.80 | 6/4.10 | 1/0.70 |
百粒重/g | 36.60 | 21.27~55.71 | 6.33 | 17.29 | 28/19.30 | 5/3.40 | 40/27.60 | 1/0.70 |
性状 | 平均数 | 变幅 | 标准差 | 变异系数/% | 小于四个亲本自交系的株数、比例/(株/%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH6WC | PH4CV | 郑58 | 昌7-2 | |||||
穗长/cm | 14.78 | 9.80~22.90 | 2.40 | 16.22 | 42/29.00 | 30/20.70 | 57/39.30 | 0/0.00 |
穗粗/cm | 4.73 | 3.94~5.87 | 0.36 | 7.68 | 4/2.80 | 1/0.70 | 0.00/0.00 | 3/2.10 |
穗行数/行 | 15.31 | 10.00~24.00 | 2.51 | 16.39 | 64/44.10 | 64/44.10 | 2/1.40 | 64/44.10 |
行粒数/个 | 25.17 | 12.00~43.00 | 5.50 | 21.85 | 19/13.10 | 46/31.70 | 39/26.90 | 19/13.10 |
粒长/cm | 1.13 | 0.21~1.73 | 0.17 | 14.92 | 10/6.90 | 19/13.10 | 10/6.90 | 10/6.90 |
粒宽/cm | 0.88 | 0.11~1.69 | 0.16 | 18.64 | 32/22.10 | 23/15.90 | 75/51.70 | 20/13.80 |
粒厚/cm | 0.59 | 0.13~1.41 | 0.30 | 50.81 | 105/72.40 | 71/49.00 | 105/72.40 | 71/49.00 |
秃尖长/cm | 0.93 | 0.00~4.30 | 0.90 | 96.27 | 44/30.30 | 62/42.80 | 43/29.70 | 43/29.70 |
轴粗/cm | 2.64 | 1.82~3.50 | 0.31 | 11.54 | 0/0.00 | 0/0.00 | 0/0.00 | 0/0.00 |
穗粒重/g | 114.29 | 48.19~210.02 | 29.33 | 25.66 | 13/9.00 | 4/2.80 | 6/4.10 | 1/0.70 |
百粒重/g | 36.60 | 21.27~55.71 | 6.33 | 17.29 | 28/19.30 | 5/3.40 | 40/27.60 | 1/0.70 |
性状 | 穗长 | 穗粗 | 穗行数 | 行粒数 | 粒长 | 粒宽 | 粒厚 | 秃尖长 | 轴粗 | 百粒重 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗粗 | 0.170* | |||||||||
穗行数 | 0.007 | 0.434** | ||||||||
行粒数 | 0.406** | 0.097 | -0.030 | |||||||
粒长 | 0.100 | 0.190* | 0.023 | 0.137 | ||||||
粒宽 | -0.023 | 0.002 | -0.209 | 0.109 | 0.401** | |||||
粒厚 | 0.025 | -0.152 | -.187* | 0.242** | 0.139 | 0.240** | ||||
秃尖长 | 0.284** | 0.175* | 0.134 | 0.101 | 0.030 | 0.047 | -0.032 | |||
轴粗 | 0.072 | 0.507** | 0.417** | -0.038 | 0.201* | 0.079 | -0.137 | 0.209* | ||
百粒重 | 0.099 | 0.189* | -0.306 | -0.142 | 0.304** | 0.429** | 0.138 | 0.078 | 0.220** | |
穗粒重 | 0.492** | 0.398** | 0.258** | 0.623** | 0.272** | 0.021 | 0.206* | 0.090 | 0.275** | 0.198* |
性状 | 穗长 | 穗粗 | 穗行数 | 行粒数 | 粒长 | 粒宽 | 粒厚 | 秃尖长 | 轴粗 | 百粒重 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗粗 | 0.170* | |||||||||
穗行数 | 0.007 | 0.434** | ||||||||
行粒数 | 0.406** | 0.097 | -0.030 | |||||||
粒长 | 0.100 | 0.190* | 0.023 | 0.137 | ||||||
粒宽 | -0.023 | 0.002 | -0.209 | 0.109 | 0.401** | |||||
粒厚 | 0.025 | -0.152 | -.187* | 0.242** | 0.139 | 0.240** | ||||
秃尖长 | 0.284** | 0.175* | 0.134 | 0.101 | 0.030 | 0.047 | -0.032 | |||
轴粗 | 0.072 | 0.507** | 0.417** | -0.038 | 0.201* | 0.079 | -0.137 | 0.209* | ||
百粒重 | 0.099 | 0.189* | -0.306 | -0.142 | 0.304** | 0.429** | 0.138 | 0.078 | 0.220** | |
穗粒重 | 0.492** | 0.398** | 0.258** | 0.623** | 0.272** | 0.021 | 0.206* | 0.090 | 0.275** | 0.198* |
性状 | 通径系数 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗长 | 穗粗 | 穗行数 | 行粒数 | 粒长 | 粒宽 | 粒厚 | 秃尖长 | 轴粗 | 百粒重 | |
穗长 | 0.212 | 0.040 | -0.003 | 0.402 | 0.048 | -0.158 | -0.074 | 0.273 | -0.028 | 0.152 |
穗粗 | 0.049 | 0.086 | 0.354 | 0.195 | 0.076 | -0.093 | -0.166 | 0.023 | 0.272 | 0.271 |
穗行数 | -0.003 | 0.380 | 0.326 | -0.157 | 0.097 | -0.067 | 0.016 | 0.091 | 0.352 | -0.449 |
行粒数 | 0.435 | 0.172 | -0.129 | 0.587 | 0.098 | 0.163 | 0.291 | 0.005 | -0.012 | -0.311 |
粒长 | 0.046 | 0.059 | 0.070 | 0.087 | 0.084 | 0.284 | 0.057 | -0.072 | 0.064 | 0.118 |
粒宽 | -0.171 | -0.082 | -0.055 | 0.163 | 0.323 | -0.195 | 0.121 | 0.078 | 0.034 | 0.279 |
粒厚 | -0.065 | -0.117 | 0.010 | 0.234 | 0.052 | 0.097 | 0.119 | -0.014 | -0.074 | 0.113 |
秃尖长 | 0.227 | 0.016 | 0.057 | 0.004 | -0.063 | 0.060 | -0.013 | -0.119 | 0.098 | 0.022 |
轴粗 | -0.033 | 0.261 | 0.315 | -0.013 | 0.080 | 0.037 | -0.100 | 0.138 | 0.058 | 0.213 |
百粒重 | 0.208 | 0.301 | -0.464 | -0.392 | 0.170 | 0.352 | 0.177 | 0.035 | 0.246 | 0.382 |
性状 | 通径系数 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗长 | 穗粗 | 穗行数 | 行粒数 | 粒长 | 粒宽 | 粒厚 | 秃尖长 | 轴粗 | 百粒重 | |
穗长 | 0.212 | 0.040 | -0.003 | 0.402 | 0.048 | -0.158 | -0.074 | 0.273 | -0.028 | 0.152 |
穗粗 | 0.049 | 0.086 | 0.354 | 0.195 | 0.076 | -0.093 | -0.166 | 0.023 | 0.272 | 0.271 |
穗行数 | -0.003 | 0.380 | 0.326 | -0.157 | 0.097 | -0.067 | 0.016 | 0.091 | 0.352 | -0.449 |
行粒数 | 0.435 | 0.172 | -0.129 | 0.587 | 0.098 | 0.163 | 0.291 | 0.005 | -0.012 | -0.311 |
粒长 | 0.046 | 0.059 | 0.070 | 0.087 | 0.084 | 0.284 | 0.057 | -0.072 | 0.064 | 0.118 |
粒宽 | -0.171 | -0.082 | -0.055 | 0.163 | 0.323 | -0.195 | 0.121 | 0.078 | 0.034 | 0.279 |
粒厚 | -0.065 | -0.117 | 0.010 | 0.234 | 0.052 | 0.097 | 0.119 | -0.014 | -0.074 | 0.113 |
秃尖长 | 0.227 | 0.016 | 0.057 | 0.004 | -0.063 | 0.060 | -0.013 | -0.119 | 0.098 | 0.022 |
轴粗 | -0.033 | 0.261 | 0.315 | -0.013 | 0.080 | 0.037 | -0.100 | 0.138 | 0.058 | 0.213 |
百粒重 | 0.208 | 0.301 | -0.464 | -0.392 | 0.170 | 0.352 | 0.177 | 0.035 | 0.246 | 0.382 |
[1] | 邓飞, 薛晓静, 董永彬 , 等. 外引杂交种对HL5311自交系植株形状的改良潜势分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2015,44(2):7-14. |
[2] | 赵久然, 王荣焕 . 中国玉米生产发展历程存在问题及对策[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2013,15(3):1-6. |
[3] | Mason L, Zuber M S . Corn leaf orientation effects on light interception, intraspecific competition, and grain yields[J]. Jounral of Production Ag riculture, 1999,12(3):396-399. |
[4] | 陈玉君, 邓小华, 肖守斌 , 等. 稻田春播杂交玉米产量与主要农艺性状的相关及通径分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009,37(19):8950-8952. |
[5] |
Liu Y, Wang L W, Sun C L , et al. Genetic analysis and major QTL detection for maize kernel size and weight in multi-environments[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2014,127(5):1019-1037.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2276-0 URL |
[6] | 刘帆, 石海春, 余学杰 . 玉米果穗主要性状与产量间的相关与通径分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2005,13(3):17-20. |
[7] | 何代元, 吴广成, 刘强 , 等. 玉米主要农艺性状的通径分析[J]. 种子, 2004,23(2):59-60. |
[8] | 杨坤, 段正凤, 李福星 , 等. 玉米穗部性状及产量间的通径分析[J]. 农技服务, 2016,3(1):69-71 |
[9] | 王铁固, 赵新亮, 张怀胜 , 等. 玉米杂交种不同产量水平穗部性状的相关和通径分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2012,41(7):12-16. |
[10] | 李桂芝, 魏常敏, 周文伟 , 等. 玉米穗部性状与单株产量的相关及通径分析[J]. 栽培育种, 2015: 31-32. |
[11] | 吕莹莹, 张萌, 沈丹丹 , 等. 玉米区域实验品种产量与穗部性状的相关与通径分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2017,23(增刊):160-165. |
[12] | 栗建枝, 成锴, 赵太存 . 玉米杂交种穗部性状对单株产量影响的研究[J]. 种子科技, 2018, 1005-2690. |
[13] | 王楠, 王树星, 张乐 , 等. 玉米产量性状与产量的相关性及通径分析[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2019,2019(1):23-26. |
[14] | 谭华, 郑德波, 陈国品 , 等. 玉米若干数量性状遗传相关和通径分析[J]. 中国种业, 2008(增刊):57-59. |
[15] | 王有芳, 李少勇, 王凌汉 , 等. 玉米果穗性状的相关和通径分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2003,3(10):30-31. |
[16] | 余学杰, 石海春, 柯永培 , 等. 一个玉米F2:3群体主要性状的变异及相关分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2008,16(3):22-25. |
[17] | 希日格勒, 李春辉, 郭世华 . 春玉米穗部性状与单株产量间的相关和通径分析[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报, 2010,31(3):106-110. |
[18] | 闫海霞, 刘家友, 吴伟华 . 夏玉米主要穗部性状与单株产量之间的相关和通径分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2008,1(9):7-9,50. |
[19] | 陈灿, 林秀芳, 陈勤平 , 等. 广西不同产量水平普通玉米穗部性状与其产量的相关与通径分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2015,46(5):760-765. |
[20] | 李召锋, 梁晓玲, 阿布来提 , 等. 不同年代主要玉米品种穗部性状演变研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2010,18(4):27-31. |
[1] | LU Qianqian, FENG Linjiao, WANG Shuang, GULIZHATI·Baoerhan , CHU Ren, ZHOU Long. Effects of Compound Saline-alkali Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Table Grapes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 62-70. |
[2] | JI Kun, WANG Bin, ZHAO Bowen, XUE Hao, WU Jianmin, ZHU Xiaojian, WANG Yixin, ZHAO Haijun, HAN Zanping. Different Maize Germplasm Materials: Grey Correlation Analysis of Plant and Ear-kernel Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 27-32. |
[3] | ZHOU Xiaohong. The Crop Yield Estimation Model Based on Multiple Regression Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 152-156. |
[4] | ZHENG Benchuan, ZHANG Jinfang, JIANG Jun, CUI Cheng, CHAI Liang, HUANG Youtao, ZHOU Zhengjian, LI Haojie, JIANG Liangcai. Correlation Analysis of Main Traits and Yield of Brassica napus ‘Chuanyou’ Varieties with Different Maturity Stages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 7-17. |
[5] | FU Yanyan, LI Yunfeng, HAN Dong, MA Shuqing. Water Surplus and Deficit of Maize Growing Season and Its Effect on Yield in Major Grain Producing Areas of Jilin Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 99-105. |
[6] | YAO Jinbao, YANG Xueming, ZHOU Miaoping, ZHANG Peng. Analysis of Yield and Its Components of Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Jiangsu Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 15-19. |
[7] | ZHANG Hongfen, YANG Lijie, ZHAO Yujuan, ZHANG Feng. Strong Cool Summer in East Gansu in 2020: Climate Characteristics and the Impact on Agriculture [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 117-123. |
[8] | LI Rui, SHANG Xiao, SHANG Chunshu, CHANG Lifang, YAN Lei, BAI Jianrong. 224 Maize Inbred Lines from Shanxi: Genetic Structure and Genetic Relationships Based on SSR Markers by Fluorescence Detection [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 9-16. |
[9] | ZHOU Zhongwen, ZHANG Moucao, LIU Ying, LIU Donghui, ZHANG Hongni, ZHANG Junlin, HAN Bo. The Influence of Meteorological Factors on Grain Filling Speed of Spring Maize in the Plateau Area of Eastern Gansu [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 94-98. |
[10] | WANG Hui, LU Xinhai, DU Meifang, ZHANG Qi. Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Extreme Heat During Summer Maize Growing Season in Haihe Plain from 1960 to 2019 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 62-68. |
[11] | HUA Limin, LIU Huiying, XUE Yinghao, LAN Xiping, WANG Yitao, CAI Guangxing. Quantitative Assessment on Comprehensive Effects of Mulching Films by Integrated Evaluation Index Method [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 76-80. |
[12] | ZHANG Nianguo, ZHOU Yuhua, PAN Guiping, ZHOU Wenyu, HOU Wenjie, LIU Benwei, YU Fei. Path Analysis of Morphological Trait Effects on Body Weight of Low-salinity Population of Exopalaemon carinicauda [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 141-147. |
[13] | SUN Yanming, HUANG Shaohui, LIU Ketong, YANG Yunma, YANG Junfang, XING Suli, JIA Liangliang. Effects of Soil Fertility Difference on Summer Maize Yield in Piedmont Plain and Low Plain in Central and Southern Hebei [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 35-42. |
[14] | HU Xuechun, XIE Wenyan, MA Xiaonan, ZHOU Huaiping, YANG Zhenxing, LIU Zhiping. Effects of Long-term Straw Returning on Organic Carbon and Carbon Pool Management Index in Dryland Maize Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 8-13. |
[15] | JIANG Jufang, YANG Hua, HU Wenqing, WEI Yuguo. Effects of Continuous High Temperature and Drought Stress on the Growth of Spring Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 63-68. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||