Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (17): 7-15.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20200100062
Previous Articles Next Articles
Wang Yan, Xu Jun, You Rui, Zhu Min, Zhu Xinkai, Guo Wenshan()
Received:
2020-01-19
Revised:
2020-03-19
Online:
2020-06-15
Published:
2020-06-09
Contact:
Guo Wenshan
E-mail:wheat@yzu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Wang Yan, Xu Jun, You Rui, Zhu Min, Zhu Xinkai, Guo Wenshan. Photosynthetic Material Production, Accumulation and Transport Characteristics of Different Photosynthetic Efficiency Wheat Population in Rice-Wheat Rotation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(17): 7-15.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20200100062
编号 | 密度/(×104株/hm2) | 施氮量/(kg/hm2) | 氮肥运筹 | 处理代号 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 150 | 210 | 5:1:2:2 | D1N1M1 |
2 | 270 | D1N2M1 | ||
3 | 330 | D1N3M1 | ||
4 | 210 | 7:1:2:0 | D1N1M2 | |
5 | 270 | D1N2M2 | ||
6 | 330 | D1N3M2 | ||
7 | 225 | 210 | 5:1:2:2 | D2N1M1 |
8 | 270 | D2N2M1 | ||
9 | 330 | D2N3M1 | ||
10 | 210 | 7:1:2:0 | D2N1M2 | |
11 | 270 | D2N2M2 | ||
12 | 330 | D2N3M2 | ||
13 | 300 | 210 | 5:1:2:2 | D3N1M1 |
14 | 270 | D3N2M1 | ||
15 | 330 | D3N3M1 | ||
16 | 210 | 7:1:2:0 | D3N1M2 | |
17 | 270 | D3N2M2 | ||
18 | 330 | D3N3M2 |
编号 | 密度/(×104株/hm2) | 施氮量/(kg/hm2) | 氮肥运筹 | 处理代号 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 150 | 210 | 5:1:2:2 | D1N1M1 |
2 | 270 | D1N2M1 | ||
3 | 330 | D1N3M1 | ||
4 | 210 | 7:1:2:0 | D1N1M2 | |
5 | 270 | D1N2M2 | ||
6 | 330 | D1N3M2 | ||
7 | 225 | 210 | 5:1:2:2 | D2N1M1 |
8 | 270 | D2N2M1 | ||
9 | 330 | D2N3M1 | ||
10 | 210 | 7:1:2:0 | D2N1M2 | |
11 | 270 | D2N2M2 | ||
12 | 330 | D2N3M2 | ||
13 | 300 | 210 | 5:1:2:2 | D3N1M1 |
14 | 270 | D3N2M1 | ||
15 | 330 | D3N3M1 | ||
16 | 210 | 7:1:2:0 | D3N1M2 | |
17 | 270 | D3N2M2 | ||
18 | 330 | D3N3M2 |
处理 | 经济产量/(kg/hm2) | 收获指数/% | 光合势/(×104 m2·d/hm2) | 花后干物质积累量/(kg/hm2) | 开花期高效叶面积率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1N1M1 | 6031.87 k | 50.84 a | 239.34 p | 5141.90 hi | 79.54 fg |
D1N2M1 | 6325.19 i | 46.44 cd | 257.49 o | 5663.50 fg | 81.72 ef |
D1N3M1 | 7157.13 ef | 46.14 d | 270.99 m | 6289.31 cd | 84.65 cd |
D1N1M2 | 5999.46 k | 47.69 bc | 264.41 n | 4665.07 j | 76.10 hi |
D1N2M2 | 6101.09 jk | 45.64 d | 286.89 k | 4909.35 ij | 75.64 ij |
D1N3M2 | 6250.47 ik | 45.52 d | 299.59 j | 5139.99 hi | 76.29 hi |
D2N1M1 | 7641.59 bc | 48.23 b | 282.86 l | 6550.39 bc | 86.11 bc |
D2N2M1 | 6910.81 g | 43.59 e | 327.45 g | 6021.95 def | 73.42 jk |
D2N3M1 | 6694.68 h | 42.57 efg | 322.81 h | 5960.48 def | 74.29 ijk |
D2N1M2 | 6330.16 i | 43.42 ef | 311.83 i | 5390.39 gh | 80.59 f |
D2N2M2 | 8436.69 a | 48.51 b | 385.19 d | 7289.6 a | 88.19 ab |
D2N3M2 | 8406.11 a | 48.13 b | 385.76 d | 7183.17 a | 86.85 abc |
D3N1M1 | 7850.16 b | 46.36 cd | 398.17 b | 6789.82 b | 83.44 de |
D3N2M1 | 8341.19 a | 47.76 bc | 383.58 e | 7249.21 a | 88.12 ab |
D3N3M1 | 8547.96 a | 48.82 b | 383.71 e | 7448.37 a | 88.51 a |
D3N1M2 | 7472.11 cd | 42.07 fg | 381.22 f | 6251.50 cd | 78.22 gh |
D3N2M2 | 7333.34 de | 41.19 g | 399.66 a | 6138.83 de | 72.06 k |
D3N3M2 | 6974.50 fg | 41.98 g | 387.12 c | 5791.05 ef | 73.16 k |
F值 | 144.80** | 32.42** | 21134.06** | 46.07** | 52.34** |
处理 | 经济产量/(kg/hm2) | 收获指数/% | 光合势/(×104 m2·d/hm2) | 花后干物质积累量/(kg/hm2) | 开花期高效叶面积率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1N1M1 | 6031.87 k | 50.84 a | 239.34 p | 5141.90 hi | 79.54 fg |
D1N2M1 | 6325.19 i | 46.44 cd | 257.49 o | 5663.50 fg | 81.72 ef |
D1N3M1 | 7157.13 ef | 46.14 d | 270.99 m | 6289.31 cd | 84.65 cd |
D1N1M2 | 5999.46 k | 47.69 bc | 264.41 n | 4665.07 j | 76.10 hi |
D1N2M2 | 6101.09 jk | 45.64 d | 286.89 k | 4909.35 ij | 75.64 ij |
D1N3M2 | 6250.47 ik | 45.52 d | 299.59 j | 5139.99 hi | 76.29 hi |
D2N1M1 | 7641.59 bc | 48.23 b | 282.86 l | 6550.39 bc | 86.11 bc |
D2N2M1 | 6910.81 g | 43.59 e | 327.45 g | 6021.95 def | 73.42 jk |
D2N3M1 | 6694.68 h | 42.57 efg | 322.81 h | 5960.48 def | 74.29 ijk |
D2N1M2 | 6330.16 i | 43.42 ef | 311.83 i | 5390.39 gh | 80.59 f |
D2N2M2 | 8436.69 a | 48.51 b | 385.19 d | 7289.6 a | 88.19 ab |
D2N3M2 | 8406.11 a | 48.13 b | 385.76 d | 7183.17 a | 86.85 abc |
D3N1M1 | 7850.16 b | 46.36 cd | 398.17 b | 6789.82 b | 83.44 de |
D3N2M1 | 8341.19 a | 47.76 bc | 383.58 e | 7249.21 a | 88.12 ab |
D3N3M1 | 8547.96 a | 48.82 b | 383.71 e | 7448.37 a | 88.51 a |
D3N1M2 | 7472.11 cd | 42.07 fg | 381.22 f | 6251.50 cd | 78.22 gh |
D3N2M2 | 7333.34 de | 41.19 g | 399.66 a | 6138.83 de | 72.06 k |
D3N3M2 | 6974.50 fg | 41.98 g | 387.12 c | 5791.05 ef | 73.16 k |
F值 | 144.80** | 32.42** | 21134.06** | 46.07** | 52.34** |
群体类型 | 光合势/(×104 m2·d/hm2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
出苗-越冬期 | 越冬-拔节期 | 拔节-孕穗期 | 孕穗-开花期 | 开花-成熟期 | 全生育期 | |
高光效 | 22.85±2.07 a | 108.31±3.85 a | 94.26±2.77 a | 64.72±1.20 b | 97.14±1.82 a | 387.28±2.75 a |
中等光效 | 22.97±2.26 a | 97.39±8.56 b | 93.44±3.85 b | 65.98±1.07 a | 83.86±1.51 b | 363.65±16.02 b |
低光效 | 14.94±1.55 b | 65.09±3.99 c | 71.60±1.75 c | 54.02±0.98 c | 71.02±2.59 c | 276.68±8.29 c |
群体类型 | 光合势/(×104 m2·d/hm2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
出苗-越冬期 | 越冬-拔节期 | 拔节-孕穗期 | 孕穗-开花期 | 开花-成熟期 | 全生育期 | |
高光效 | 22.85±2.07 a | 108.31±3.85 a | 94.26±2.77 a | 64.72±1.20 b | 97.14±1.82 a | 387.28±2.75 a |
中等光效 | 22.97±2.26 a | 97.39±8.56 b | 93.44±3.85 b | 65.98±1.07 a | 83.86±1.51 b | 363.65±16.02 b |
低光效 | 14.94±1.55 b | 65.09±3.99 c | 71.60±1.75 c | 54.02±0.98 c | 71.02±2.59 c | 276.68±8.29 c |
群体类型 | 干物质积累量/(kg/hm2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
出苗-越冬期 | 越冬-拔节期 | 拔节-孕穗期 | 孕穗-开花期 | 开花-成熟期 | 全生育期 | |
高光效 | 549.74±57.87 b | 3032.32±189.63 a | 5521.59±291.15 a | 1056.93±257.00 c | 7192.04±109.63 a | 17352.63±106.46 a |
中等光效 | 585.84±57.53 a | 2988.13±252.26 a | 4737.33±435.19 b | 2040.88±445.47 a | 6032.76±78.38 b | 16750.94±447.17 b |
低光效 | 432.28±41.79 c | 2027.30±169.37 b | 4191.22±419.31 c | 1767.82±348.09 b | 5468.74±233.80 c | 13887.35±484.01 c |
群体类型 | 干物质积累量/(kg/hm2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
出苗-越冬期 | 越冬-拔节期 | 拔节-孕穗期 | 孕穗-开花期 | 开花-成熟期 | 全生育期 | |
高光效 | 549.74±57.87 b | 3032.32±189.63 a | 5521.59±291.15 a | 1056.93±257.00 c | 7192.04±109.63 a | 17352.63±106.46 a |
中等光效 | 585.84±57.53 a | 2988.13±252.26 a | 4737.33±435.19 b | 2040.88±445.47 a | 6032.76±78.38 b | 16750.94±447.17 b |
低光效 | 432.28±41.79 c | 2027.30±169.37 b | 4191.22±419.31 c | 1767.82±348.09 b | 5468.74±233.80 c | 13887.35±484.01 c |
群体类型 | 穗数/(×104/hm2) | 每穂粒数 | 千粒重/g | 籽粒产量/(kg/hm2) | 收获指数/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
高光效 | 442.07±6.00 a | 42.32±1.23 b | 46.14±0.59 a | 8316.43±121.27 a | 47.92±0.43 a |
中等光效 | 413.13±9.33 b | 39.85±0.65 c | 44.65±0.23 b | 7077.09±142.50 b | 42.28±0.40 c |
低光效 | 338.96±13.52 c | 44.08±1.24 a | 44.61±0.23 b | 6479.62±210.53 c | 46.74±0.78 b |
群体类型 | 穗数/(×104/hm2) | 每穂粒数 | 千粒重/g | 籽粒产量/(kg/hm2) | 收获指数/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
高光效 | 442.07±6.00 a | 42.32±1.23 b | 46.14±0.59 a | 8316.43±121.27 a | 47.92±0.43 a |
中等光效 | 413.13±9.33 b | 39.85±0.65 c | 44.65±0.23 b | 7077.09±142.50 b | 42.28±0.40 c |
低光效 | 338.96±13.52 c | 44.08±1.24 a | 44.61±0.23 b | 6479.62±210.53 c | 46.74±0.78 b |
群体类型 | 单位叶面积含氮量/(g/m2) | 净光合速率/[μmol CO2/(m2·s)] | 最大光化学效率/(Fv/Fm) |
---|---|---|---|
高光效 | 2.33±0.10 a | 23.19±0.45 a | 0.879±0.004 a |
中等光效 | 1.69±0.12 b | 20.38±0.63 b | 0.863±0.008 b |
低光效 | 1.62±0.12 c | 20.38±0.62 b | 0.847±0.005 c |
群体类型 | 单位叶面积含氮量/(g/m2) | 净光合速率/[μmol CO2/(m2·s)] | 最大光化学效率/(Fv/Fm) |
---|---|---|---|
高光效 | 2.33±0.10 a | 23.19±0.45 a | 0.879±0.004 a |
中等光效 | 1.69±0.12 b | 20.38±0.63 b | 0.863±0.008 b |
低光效 | 1.62±0.12 c | 20.38±0.62 b | 0.847±0.005 c |
处理 | 密度/(×104株/hm2) | 施氮量/(kg/hm2) | 氮肥运筹 | 穗数/(×104/hm2) | 每穗粒数 | 千粒重/g | 实际产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D2N2M2 | 225 | 270 | 7:1:2:0 | 455.00 | 43.04 | 44.85 | 8436.69 |
D2N3M2 | 225 | 330 | 7:1:2:0 | 456.00 | 41.34 | 46.24 | 8406.11 |
D3N1M1 | 300 | 210 | 5:1:2:2 | 439.67 | 38.10 | 48.33 | 7850.16 |
D3N2M1 | 300 | 270 | 5:1:2:2 | 435.00 | 43.90 | 45.55 | 8341.19 |
D3N3M1 | 300 | 330 | 5:1:2:2 | 424.67 | 45.22 | 45.73 | 8547.96 |
处理 | 密度/(×104株/hm2) | 施氮量/(kg/hm2) | 氮肥运筹 | 穗数/(×104/hm2) | 每穗粒数 | 千粒重/g | 实际产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D2N2M2 | 225 | 270 | 7:1:2:0 | 455.00 | 43.04 | 44.85 | 8436.69 |
D2N3M2 | 225 | 330 | 7:1:2:0 | 456.00 | 41.34 | 46.24 | 8406.11 |
D3N1M1 | 300 | 210 | 5:1:2:2 | 439.67 | 38.10 | 48.33 | 7850.16 |
D3N2M1 | 300 | 270 | 5:1:2:2 | 435.00 | 43.90 | 45.55 | 8341.19 |
D3N3M1 | 300 | 330 | 5:1:2:2 | 424.67 | 45.22 | 45.73 | 8547.96 |
[1] | Makino A. Photosynjournal,Grain Yield,and Nitrogen Utilization in Rice and Wheat[J]. Plant Physiology, 2011,155(1):125-128. |
[2] | Das K, Baruah K K . A comparison of growth and photosynthetic characteristics of two improved rice cultivars on methane emission from rainfed agroecosystem of northeast India[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2008,124:105-113. |
[3] | Liu T, Wang Z , Cai, T. Canopy apparent photosynthetic characteristics and yield of two spike-type wheat cultivars in response to row spacing under high plant density[J]. Plos One, 2016,11(2):1-14. |
[4] | Lu D, Yue S, Lu F , et al. Integrated crop-N system management to establish high wheat yield population[J]. Field crops Research, 2016,191:66-74. |
[5] | 毕常锐, 白志英, 杨訸 , 等. 种植密度对小麦群体光能资源利用的调控效应[J]. 华北农学报, 2010,25(5):171-176. |
[6] | Hofmeier M, Roelcke M, Han Y , et al. Nitrogen management in a rice-wheat system in the Taihu Region: Recommendations based on field experiments and surveys[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment, 2015,209:60-73. |
[7] | 丁锦峰, 成亚梅, 黄正金 , 等. 稻茬小麦不同氮效率群体花后物质生产与衰老特性差异分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015,48(6):1063-1073. |
[8] | 张文静, 江东国, 黄正来 , 等. 氮肥施用对稻茬小麦冠层结构及产量品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2018,38(2):164-174. |
[9] | 赵全志, 黄丕生, 凌启鸿 . 水稻群体光合速率和茎鞘贮藏物质与产量关系的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2001(3):304-310. |
[10] | 延飞龙, 赵俊晔, 石玉 , 等. 灌溉畦长对小麦冠层光能利用特性的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019(10):1-5. |
[11] | 梁鹏, 石玉, 赵俊晔 , 等. 不同产量潜力小麦品种冠层光截获特性及产量的差异[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2018,38(10):1189-1194. |
[12] | 丁位华, 冯素伟, 姜小苓 , 等. 播期密度和行距对BNS型杂交小麦光合及产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2017,37(3):366-375. |
[13] | 薛丽华, 赵连佳, 陈兴武 , 等. 施氮量对滴灌冬小麦光合特性产量及氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018,34(10):11-16. |
[14] | 凌励 . 小麦高产群体叶面积的质量特征[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2000(2):73-78. |
[15] | 许轲, 张洪程, 戴其根 , 等. 冬小麦不同生长类型群体超高产的中期栽培调控[J]. 作物学报, 2002(6):760-766. |
[16] | Wang L, Sun J, Wang C , et al. Leaf photosynthetic function duration during yield formation of large-spike wheat in rainfed cropping systems[J]. PeerJ, 2018,6:1-2. |
[17] | 凌启鸿 . 作物群体质量[M]. 上海: 科学技术出版社, 2000. |
[18] | 吴祯, 张保军, 海江波 , 等. 不同种植方式对冬小麦花后干物质积累与分配特征及产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2017,37(10):1377-1382. |
[19] |
周玲, 王朝辉, 李富翠 , 等. 不同产量水平旱地冬小麦品种干物质累积和转移的差异分析[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(13):4123-4131.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201106120775 URL |
[20] | 常磊, 韩凡香, 柴雨葳 , 等. 秸秆带状覆盖下冬小麦干物质积累及氮磷钾素的吸收利用[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019,39(4):487-494. |
[21] | 邵庆勤, 周琴, 王笑 , 等. 不同小麦品种物质积累转运与抗倒性差异及其对多效唑的响应[J]. 核农学报, 2018,32(12):2438-2447. |
[22] | 魏海燕, 凌启鸿, 张洪程 , 等. 作物群体质量及其关键调控技术[J]. 扬州大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 2018,39(2):1-9. |
[23] |
田中伟, 王方瑞, 戴廷波 , 等. 小麦品种改良过程中物质积累转运特性与产量的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012,45(4):801-808.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.04.022 URL |
[24] | 任建强, 陈仲新, 周清波 , 等. 基于时序归一化植被指数的冬小麦收获指数空间信息提取[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010,26(8):160-167. |
[25] | 谢成俊, 王平, 李卫民 , 等. 小麦收获指数与主要农艺性状的相关性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(3):88-93. |
[26] | 亓振, 赵广才, 常旭虹 , 等. 小麦产量与农艺性状的相关分析和通径分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2016(3):45-50. |
[27] | 彭永欣 . 小麦高光效群体结构与控制程序[J]. 江苏农学院学报, 1983(04):56-60. |
[28] |
Long S P, Zhu X G, Naidu S L , et al. Can improvement in photosynthetsis increase crop yields[J]. Plant,Cell and Environment, 2006,29(3):315-320.
doi: 10.1111/pce.2006.29.issue-3 URL |
[29] | 衡亚蓉, 李晓, 贺利 , 等. 基于上部叶片叶绿素荧光参数的小麦产量预测与评价[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2018,38(6):701-709. |
[1] | LIU Haiying, WANG Zeng, XU Yaowen, GE Xiaogai, ZHOU Benzhi, JIANG Zhonglong. Characteristics of Carbon Storage in Phyllostulis pubescens Ecosystem with Different Stand Densities [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 17-21. |
[2] | HE Mengxia, CUI Shunli, ZHENG Baozhi, BI Zhile, LU Suizeng, QI Liya, LI Xinna, LIU Hong, HAN Peng, WANG Jin, LIU Lifeng. Suitable Density of Single-seed Precision Sowing for Peanut Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 23-27. |
[3] | LANG Man, YUAN Xiaohang, LI Ping. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Net Nitrogen Transformation Rate and Greenhouse Gas Emission in Cropland Black Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 93-100. |
[4] | MAO Sishuai, LI Renkun, ZHOU Jihua, WANG Junying. Effect of Planting Density on Stem Tip, Yield and Planting Benefit of Facility Leaf-vegetable Sweet Potato in North China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 13-18. |
[5] | DING Mingliang, LIU Jia, LI Shaoxiang, YANG Zhonghui, BAI Yingwen, ZHANG Yanjun, LI Hongsheng, XIONG Shian, YANG Mujun, LIU Kun. Responses of Yield and Quality Traits of New Wheat Variety ‘Yunmai 110’ to Different Planting Densities [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(24): 1-7. |
[6] | CHENG Hongyan, ZHANG Lanying, WANG Feng, DU Zhenyu. Soil Physicochemical Characteristics and Comprehensive Fertility of Pinus densiflora Artificial Forests in Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 70-76. |
[7] | LI Keke, DONG Yongbin, WANG Lishuang, WANG Han, LI Yayong, ZHANG Long, LI Yuling. Suitable Planting Density of New Maize Variety ‘Yudan 132’ for Mechanical Harvesting [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 1-5. |
[8] | GUO Lizhuo, YANG Bo, GAO Yuhong, NIU Junyi. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Phosphorus Nutrition of Oil Flax [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 24-31. |
[9] | NIE Dahang, CHEN Leilei, LIU Shuyan. Effect of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer and Organic Fertilizer Application Rates on the Yield and Nutrient Distribution of Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 32-35. |
[10] | JIN Yangang, DING Jinfeng, YUAN Quan, XIA Zhonghua, YIN Jing, YANG Yongle, LIU Hailang, REN Yangtao, CHEN Wei, LI Zhenfu, ZHAO Qibing, WEI Wanjuan, ZHENG Yayue. Sowing Date and Planting Density of Strong-gluten Wheat in Huaibei Area of Jiangsu: Effects on Grain Yield and Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(18): 1-7. |
[11] | CHENG Jianmei, ZHAO Shuzheng, YANG Meili, SU Yujie, WANG Bangtai, LU Hongwei, QIN Guiwen. Planting Density of Maize: Effects on Plant and Kernel Related Characters of Different Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(18): 20-27. |
[12] | LI Yunxia, LI Lei, LI Sijun, ZHENG Weiwei, ZENG Bei. A New Flue-cured Tobacco Strain ‘HN2146’: Effects of Cultivation Measures on Agronomic Characters and Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(16): 13-17. |
[13] | LI Ning. Carbon Storage and Carbon Density of Arboreal Forest in Liaoning Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(16): 27-31. |
[14] | WANG Rongjiang, CHEN Yingli, LV Caibo, BI Jianjie, LIU Jiandong. Yield-increasing Mechanism of Double Row Interlacing Sparse Planting of Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(12): 13-19. |
[15] | LI Huaide, CUI Tongxia, FAN Chongxiu, YAO Youxu, HUI Heping. Planting Density and Growth Years of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi: Effects on Growth, Yield and Planting Benefit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(12): 41-46. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||