Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7): 49-53.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20200300210
Previous Articles Next Articles
Mu Chan1(), Qian Rongqing1, Yang Shaocong1(
), Yao Zhaobing2, Zhang Zhong1, Li Chengchun3, Shen Wenzhi3, Fei Yong3
Received:
2020-03-16
Revised:
2020-12-28
Online:
2021-03-05
Published:
2021-03-17
Contact:
Yang Shaocong
E-mail:mch7962@163.com;13887750760@163.com
CLC Number:
Mu Chan, Qian Rongqing, Yang Shaocong, Yao Zhaobing, Zhang Zhong, Li Chengchun, Shen Wenzhi, Fei Yong. Effects of Key Planting Techniques on Treatment of Chlorosis of Blueberry ‘Britewell’ Leaves[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(7): 49-53.
试验组号 | 项目 | 植株表现 | pH | 交换Ca/(mg/kg) | 有效Mn/(mg/kg) | 有效Fe/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 试验前 | 轻度黄化 | 5.25±0.15 | 3625±127 | 58.9±4.0 | 102.3±7.4 |
常规技术(B) | 中度黄化 | 5.29±0.11 | 3551±131 | 60.8±3.9 | 97.5±1.6 | |
种植关键技术(A) | 正常 | 4.43±0.10 | 3572±118 | 61.5±3.1 | 131.7±8.7 | |
A与B比较的t值 | 16.550 | 0.611 | 1.000 | 8.540 | ||
Ⅱ | 试验前 | 中度黄化 | 5.72±0.15 | 4359±121 | 51.6±3.9 | 85.9±3.1 |
常规技术(B) | 重度黄化 | 5.74±0.14 | 4208±131 | 49.9±2.0 | 80.3±5.4 | |
种植关键技术(A) | 基本正常 | 5.12±0.11 | 4262±150 | 49.3±1.8 | 117.9±7.9 | |
A与B比较的t值 | 7.113 | 1.471 | 2.000 | 8.209 | ||
Ⅲ | 试验前 | 重度黄化 | 6.21±0.15 | 5351±131 | 43.5±3.1 | 52.6±3.5 |
常规技术(B) | 重度黄化 | 6.30±0.13 | 5318±137 | 42.7±1.5 | 49.8±3.8 | |
种植关键技术(A) | 轻-中度黄化 | 5.43±0.08 | 5355±174 | 43.6±1.6 | 88.8±1.9 | |
A与B比较的t值 | 9.149 | 1.177 | 2.076 | 24.397 |
试验组号 | 项目 | 植株表现 | pH | 交换Ca/(mg/kg) | 有效Mn/(mg/kg) | 有效Fe/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 试验前 | 轻度黄化 | 5.25±0.15 | 3625±127 | 58.9±4.0 | 102.3±7.4 |
常规技术(B) | 中度黄化 | 5.29±0.11 | 3551±131 | 60.8±3.9 | 97.5±1.6 | |
种植关键技术(A) | 正常 | 4.43±0.10 | 3572±118 | 61.5±3.1 | 131.7±8.7 | |
A与B比较的t值 | 16.550 | 0.611 | 1.000 | 8.540 | ||
Ⅱ | 试验前 | 中度黄化 | 5.72±0.15 | 4359±121 | 51.6±3.9 | 85.9±3.1 |
常规技术(B) | 重度黄化 | 5.74±0.14 | 4208±131 | 49.9±2.0 | 80.3±5.4 | |
种植关键技术(A) | 基本正常 | 5.12±0.11 | 4262±150 | 49.3±1.8 | 117.9±7.9 | |
A与B比较的t值 | 7.113 | 1.471 | 2.000 | 8.209 | ||
Ⅲ | 试验前 | 重度黄化 | 6.21±0.15 | 5351±131 | 43.5±3.1 | 52.6±3.5 |
常规技术(B) | 重度黄化 | 6.30±0.13 | 5318±137 | 42.7±1.5 | 49.8±3.8 | |
种植关键技术(A) | 轻-中度黄化 | 5.43±0.08 | 5355±174 | 43.6±1.6 | 88.8±1.9 | |
A与B比较的t值 | 9.149 | 1.177 | 2.076 | 24.397 |
处理 | 植株表现 | 叶片养分含量及比值 | SPAD值 | 百粒重/g | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca/(mg/kg) | Mn/(mg/kg) | Fe/(mg/kg) | Ca/Fe | Ca/Mn | ||||
试验前 | 轻度黄化 | 6502±175 | 106.5±5.2 | 48.5±3.4 | 134.1±9.6 | 61.1±4.7 | 47.0±2.5 | |
常规技术(B) | 中度黄化 | 7341±114 | 83.0±2.8 | 34.5±2.0 | 212.8±12.3 | 88.4±3.6 | 35.0±3.2 | 120.0±7.0 |
种植关键技术(A) | 正常株 | 5422±156 | 184.5±10.8 | 64.0±2.8 | 84.7±3.8 | 29.4±2.3 | 56.0±4.1 | 139.0±3.6 |
A比B增量 | -1919.0 | 101.5 | 29.5 | -128.1 | -59.1 | 21.0 | 19.0 | |
A比B增加比例/% | -26.1 | 122.3 | 85.5 | -60.2 | -66.8 | 60.0 | 15.8 | |
A与B比较的t值 | 23.555 | 21.234 | 35.042 | 27.307 | 30.792 | 13.194 | 10.318 |
处理 | 植株表现 | 叶片养分含量及比值 | SPAD值 | 百粒重/g | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca/(mg/kg) | Mn/(mg/kg) | Fe/(mg/kg) | Ca/Fe | Ca/Mn | ||||
试验前 | 轻度黄化 | 6502±175 | 106.5±5.2 | 48.5±3.4 | 134.1±9.6 | 61.1±4.7 | 47.0±2.5 | |
常规技术(B) | 中度黄化 | 7341±114 | 83.0±2.8 | 34.5±2.0 | 212.8±12.3 | 88.4±3.6 | 35.0±3.2 | 120.0±7.0 |
种植关键技术(A) | 正常株 | 5422±156 | 184.5±10.8 | 64.0±2.8 | 84.7±3.8 | 29.4±2.3 | 56.0±4.1 | 139.0±3.6 |
A比B增量 | -1919.0 | 101.5 | 29.5 | -128.1 | -59.1 | 21.0 | 19.0 | |
A比B增加比例/% | -26.1 | 122.3 | 85.5 | -60.2 | -66.8 | 60.0 | 15.8 | |
A与B比较的t值 | 23.555 | 21.234 | 35.042 | 27.307 | 30.792 | 13.194 | 10.318 |
处理 | 植株表现 | 叶片养分含量及比值 | SPAD值 | 百粒重/g | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca/(mg/kg) | Mn/(mg/kg) | Fe/(mg/kg) | Ca/Fe | Ca/Mn | ||||
试验前 | 中度黄化 | 7054±281 | 80.0±4.3 | 35.5±2.5 | 205.5±15.8 | 176.5±10.5 | 31.0±2.1 | |
常规技术(B) | 重度黄化 | 7992±303 | 68.0±1.7 | 29.5±1.5 | 275.0±22.4 | 227.5±9.5 | 15.0±2.1 | 90.0±2.2 |
种植关键技术(A) | 基本正常 | 5858±120 | 123.5±12.7 | 47.5±3.1 | 127.0±9.1 | 90.0±7.2 | 56.0±3.3 | 142.0±3.1 |
A比B增量 | -2134.0 | 55.5 | 18.0 | -148.0 | -137.5 | 41.0 | 52.0 | |
A比B增加比例/% | -26.7 | 81.6 | 61.0 | -53.8 | -60.4 | 273.3 | 57.8 | |
A与B比较的t值 | 16.324 | 10.210 | 9.530 | 13.495 | 22.586 | 37.428 | 54.588 |
处理 | 植株表现 | 叶片养分含量及比值 | SPAD值 | 百粒重/g | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca/(mg/kg) | Mn/(mg/kg) | Fe/(mg/kg) | Ca/Fe | Ca/Mn | ||||
试验前 | 中度黄化 | 7054±281 | 80.0±4.3 | 35.5±2.5 | 205.5±15.8 | 176.5±10.5 | 31.0±2.1 | |
常规技术(B) | 重度黄化 | 7992±303 | 68.0±1.7 | 29.5±1.5 | 275.0±22.4 | 227.5±9.5 | 15.0±2.1 | 90.0±2.2 |
种植关键技术(A) | 基本正常 | 5858±120 | 123.5±12.7 | 47.5±3.1 | 127.0±9.1 | 90.0±7.2 | 56.0±3.3 | 142.0±3.1 |
A比B增量 | -2134.0 | 55.5 | 18.0 | -148.0 | -137.5 | 41.0 | 52.0 | |
A比B增加比例/% | -26.7 | 81.6 | 61.0 | -53.8 | -60.4 | 273.3 | 57.8 | |
A与B比较的t值 | 16.324 | 10.210 | 9.530 | 13.495 | 22.586 | 37.428 | 54.588 |
处理 | 植株表现 | 叶片养分含量及比值 | SPAD值 | 百粒重/g | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca/(mg/kg) | Mn/(mg/kg) | Fe/(mg/kg) | Ca/Fe | Ca/Mn | ||||
试验前 | 重度黄化 | 8949±150 | 61.5±5.2 | 28.5±2.7 | 322.0±62.5 | 120.5±7.9 | 17.0±1.6 | |
常规技术(B) | 重度黄化 | 9239±196 | 44.0±4.4 | 22.5±3.6 | 415.0±67.7 | 141.5±8.7 | 10.0±1.4 | 75.0±4.1 |
种植关键技术(A) | 轻—中度黄化 | 7325±136 | 101.5±13.4 | 41.0±2.9 | 183.5±14.2 | 61.5±6.7 | 34.5±1.1 | 132.0±3.0 |
A比B增量 | -1914 | 57.5 | 18.5 | -231.5 | -80.0 | 24.5 | 57.0 | |
A比B增加比例/% | -20.7 | 130.7 | 82.2 | -55.8 | -56.5 | 245.0 | 76.0 | |
A与B比较的t值 | 18.825 | 9.530 | 10.210 | 7.732 | 15.785 | 31.675 | 32.549 |
处理 | 植株表现 | 叶片养分含量及比值 | SPAD值 | 百粒重/g | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca/(mg/kg) | Mn/(mg/kg) | Fe/(mg/kg) | Ca/Fe | Ca/Mn | ||||
试验前 | 重度黄化 | 8949±150 | 61.5±5.2 | 28.5±2.7 | 322.0±62.5 | 120.5±7.9 | 17.0±1.6 | |
常规技术(B) | 重度黄化 | 9239±196 | 44.0±4.4 | 22.5±3.6 | 415.0±67.7 | 141.5±8.7 | 10.0±1.4 | 75.0±4.1 |
种植关键技术(A) | 轻—中度黄化 | 7325±136 | 101.5±13.4 | 41.0±2.9 | 183.5±14.2 | 61.5±6.7 | 34.5±1.1 | 132.0±3.0 |
A比B增量 | -1914 | 57.5 | 18.5 | -231.5 | -80.0 | 24.5 | 57.0 | |
A比B增加比例/% | -20.7 | 130.7 | 82.2 | -55.8 | -56.5 | 245.0 | 76.0 | |
A与B比较的t值 | 18.825 | 9.530 | 10.210 | 7.732 | 15.785 | 31.675 | 32.549 |
[1] | 商晓芳. 蓝莓的生物学特性及栽培技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2010(2):138-137. |
[2] | 于强波, 苏丹, 孟凡丽, 等. 蓝莓缺铁失绿症产生原因与防治技术. 北方园艺, 2011(7):67-68. |
[3] | 孙攀, 杨静慧, 冀馨宁, 等. 不同铁肥对蓝莓黄化叶片光合特性的影响[J]. 天津农林科技, 2019(2):16-18. |
[4] | 沐婵, 钱荣青, 吕艳玲, 等. 蓝莓“灿烂”叶片黄化症的相关营养元素分析[J]. 中国南方果树, 2019,48(3):121-123. |
[5] | 唐佩显, 崔桂兴, 殷登科, 等. 黄岛区蓝莓叶片黄化原因分析与矫治[J]. 中国农技推广, 2017(10):51-52. |
[6] | 王兴东, 刘成, 魏鑫. 蓝莓叶片“黄化”现象简析[J]. 北方果树, 2017(5):30-31. |
[7] | 陈义平, 胡勇, 陈程, 等. 长江流域蓝莓栽培管理种植关键技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2010(20):143-144. |
[8] | 李亚东, 吴林. 土壤pH对越橘的生理作用及其调控[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2007,19(1):112-118. |
[9] | 赵敏, 罗开源, 李性苑. 硫磺粉对土壤pH及蓝莓幼苗生长的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2017,45(3):58-61. |
[10] | 赵爱雪, 佟海恩, 孙喜臣. 蓝莓对土壤酸碱度的要求和调节[J]. 北方果树, 2008(5):22-23. |
[11] | 张悦, 张会慧, 周琳, 等. 基于正交设计的施用硫磺、控水灌溉和施肥对蓝莓生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017,33(1):57-63. |
[12] | 宁道儒, 邓先才, 向敏, 任学群. 不同硫磺施肥量对土壤pH值的影响研究[J]. 四川农业与农机, 2015(6):41-42. |
[13] | 李性苑, 罗开源, 杨芩, 等. 施硫磺粉对土壤养分及蓝莓产量品质的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2015,44(5):101-105. |
[14] | 杨芩, 曹锡波, 张婷渟, 等. 木醋对蓝莓土壤pH值和主要营养成分的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2018,47(4):88-91. |
[15] | 纪前羽, 刘星剑, 刘爱兵, 等. 糠醛渣替代硫磺调节土壤pH值及其对蓝莓生长发育的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2013,42(2):15-17,21. |
[16] | 全国农业技术推广服务中心. 土壤分析技术规范[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006:73-89,145-147. |
[17] | 中国土壤学会农业化学专业委员会. 土壤农业化学常规分析方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1983:279-296. |
[18] | 李志友. 生物有机肥对蓝莓根区土壤养分及微生物学特性的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017,24(2):36-42. |
[19] | 徐照丽, 李天福. SPAD-502叶绿素仪在烤烟生产中的应用研究[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2006,34(4):23-24. |
[20] | 曾建敏, 姚恒, 李天福, 等. 烤烟叶片叶绿素含量的测定及其与SPAD值的关系[J]. 分子植物育种, 2009,7(1):56-62. |
[21] | 冯国华, 冀馨宁, 杨静慧, 等. 不同品种蓝莓植株失绿的叶片和土壤诊断及分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2019(9):34-41. |
[22] | 刘红弟, 宋杨, 张红军. 越桔园土壤有效养分和叶片营养状况分析[J]. 中国南方果树, 2016,45(6):32-38. |
[23] | 鲁如坤. 土壤-植物营养学原理和施肥[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 1998:258-261. |
[24] | 唐佩显, 崔桂兴, 殷登科, 等. 黄岛区蓝莓叶片黄化原因分析与矫治[J]. 中国农技推广, 2017(10):51-52. |
[25] | 王兴东, 刘成, 魏鑫. 蓝莓叶片“黄化”现象简析[J]. 北方果树, 2017(5):30-31. |
[26] | 陈义平, 胡勇, 陈程, 等. 长江流域蓝莓栽培管理种植关键技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2010(20):143-144. |
[27] | 李亚东, 吴林. 土壤pH对越橘的生理作用及其调控[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2007,19(1):112-118. |
[28] | 赵敏, 罗开源, 李性苑. 硫磺粉对土壤pH及蓝莓幼苗生长的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2017,45(3):58-61. |
[29] | 宁道儒, 邓先才, 向敏, 任学群. 不同硫磺施肥量对土壤pH值的影响研究[J]. 四川农业与农机, 2015(6):41-42. |
[1] | LI Xiang, WANG Yongping, WANG Yaofeng, CHU Chunnian, SUN Xijun, KE Xiheng, ZENG Qiao. Study on the Best Composting Parameters and Fertilization Effect of Branch Organic Fertilizer [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 63-68. |
[2] | HOU Jianlin, LI Sijun, HE Mingyu, XIAO Hanqian, XIANG Tiejun, HUANG Jie, LI Wujin, XIAO Yansong, JIANG Zhimin, XU Junhua, DENG Xiaohua. Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on the Growth, Dry Matter Accumulation, Yield and Quality of Paddy-tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 39-43. |
[3] | WANG Yuemin, KE Yuqin, XIE Rongrong, LI Chunying, LI Wenqing. Effects of Spraying Microelement-fertilizer on Physiological Metabolism of Tobacco Plant at Mature Stage Under Localized Fertilization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 24-30. |
[4] | FANG Keming, XIAO Xin, QIN Leiying, JIANG Lin, WANG Lu, ZHANG Lu, WANG Meiling, ZHANG Ming, LUO Wenhan, JIANG Hong, HUANG Huaxiang, ZHONG Guomin. Study on Fertilizer Reduction and Efficiency Increase for Japonica Rice in South China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 6-11. |
[5] | ZHOU Lanlan, LIU Meijin, LI Mingjun, XU Dongli, WANG Guoping, GUO Jianwei, HU Zaiqing, ZHANG Zhongguang, LI Fengqing, SANG Anping, ZHANG Tao, XIAO Yunshan, YAN Chunmei. Effects on Ammonium Nitrogen and Nitrate Nitrogen in Rhizosphere Soil of Highland Barley Under Different Fertilization Treatments [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 85-90. |
[6] | CHEN Jianfeng, ZHAO Wenjun, FU Libo, YIN Mei, WANG Zhiyuan, WANG Wei, WANG Yingxue, YANG Yanxian, CHEN Hua. Influence of Fertilization System of Nutrient Critical Value for Optimum Yield of Tobacco on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Yuxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 1-6. |
[7] | SHI Lihong, SUN Mei, TANG Haiming, WEN Li, LI Chao, CHENG Kaikai, LI Weiyan, XIAO Xiaoping. Soil Nitrogen Fractions and Microbial Diversity in Paddy Field Under Different Fertilization Modes: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 106-110. |
[8] | YANG Min, CHEN Xiuhu, PI Xiaojuan, GUO Feng, CHEN Xinmiao, HU Jiewen. Migration and Distribution Characteristics of Available Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Rice Terrace Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 50-55. |
[9] | DENG Limei, CHEN Xiaofen, WANG Xuan, CUI Rongyang, ZHOU Tao, LIU Gangcai. Water-Fertilizer Coupling: Effect on the Efficiency of Reduced Fertilization for Wheat in Purple Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(24): 51-56. |
[10] | WANG Jun, TIAN Junling, LIU Lan, ZONG Zhaohui, FAN Miaomiao, LUO Fuming. Effects of Different Fertilization Levels on Dry Matter and Nutrient Accumulation and Distribution in Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(22): 8-14. |
[11] | MEI Ying, LIU Yuqi, ZHOU Hang, TIAN Yanfeng, ZANG Chen, LI Xianhua. Transport of Nitrogen Nutrient Salts in Large-scale Dairy Farming Waste Returning to Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(2): 52-62. |
[12] | SU Zechun, HE Jiawei, YANG Zhengsong, HE Zhijiao, YANG Yahan, HE Wenjia. Study on the Mechanism of Blueberry Off-season Flowering [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(19): 37-42. |
[13] | LIU Yongqiang, HU Xinyuan. Fertilizer Reduction and Green Substitution Mode of Potato Cultivation in Arid Areas [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(15): 85-90. |
[14] | HUAI Yan, CHEN Zhaoming, YANG Shaona, FANG Wenying, TANG Xuejun, MENG Zhonglei, WANG Qiang. New-type Fertilizers in Simplified Fertilization of Rice: Evaluation of Yield Stabilization Effect [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(15): 1-6. |
[15] | ZHANG Lin, ZHOU Xingbing, LIU Mao, JIANG Peng, GUO Xiaoyi, GAO Shangqing, XU Wei, LI Yanrong, MEI Xiufeng, ZHU Yongchuan, XIONG Hong, XU Fuxian. Effects of Simplified Fertilization on Yield of Hybrid Rice Varieties in Mid-rice/Ratoon Rice System in No Tillage Winter Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(14): 1-10. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 70
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 537
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||