Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (23): 69-76.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0597
Previous Articles Next Articles
Li Zhengsheng1(), Ma Lijuan1, Dong Hongwei1, Gao Yuhong2,3, Yan Bin2,3, Cui Zhengjun2,3, Wang Yifan2,3, Wu Bing1,3(
)
Received:
2020-10-27
Revised:
2021-02-20
Online:
2021-08-15
Published:
2021-08-26
Contact:
Wu Bing
E-mail:1446844413@qq.com;wub@gsau.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Li Zhengsheng, Ma Lijuan, Dong Hongwei, Gao Yuhong, Yan Bin, Cui Zhengjun, Wang Yifan, Wu Bing. Effects of Potassium Fertilizer Application Rate on Lodging Resistance and Yield of Oil Flax Varieties in Dry Land[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(23): 69-76.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0597
处理 | 现蕾期 | 盛花期 | 青果期 | 成熟期 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高/cm | 重心高度/cm | 株高/cm | 重心高度/cm | 株高/cm | 重心高度/cm | 株高/cm | 重心高度/cm | ||
V1 | K0 | 52.84c | 22.27c | 71.83c | 24.28bc | 84.37a | 53.30a | 85.38a | 45.95b |
K1 | 56.19b | 23.40abc | 74.37b | 31.59a | 85.22a | 54.74a | 86.86a | 47.22ab | |
K2 | 58.58a | 24.32ab | 76.79a | 31.45a | 86.62a | 55.88a | 88.02a | 48.98a | |
K3 | 59.42a | 25.17a | 77.10a | 32.53a | 85.54a | 54.76a | 87.98a | 48.38a | |
V2 | K0 | 47.41d | 19.57d | 61.06d | 23.80c | 72.34c | 41.19c | 75.57c | 39.03d |
K1 | 49.22d | 22.81bc | 63.36d | 24.92bc | 74.35bc | 44.16bc | 76.40bc | 40.31cd | |
K2 | 51.63c | 23.10b | 65.82c | 26.39c | 75.92b | 46.20b | 78.83b | 41.45c | |
K3 | 52.13c | 23.24bc | 66.17c | 26.47c | 74.47bc | 41.04c | 78.43bc | 37.97d |
处理 | 现蕾期 | 盛花期 | 青果期 | 成熟期 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高/cm | 重心高度/cm | 株高/cm | 重心高度/cm | 株高/cm | 重心高度/cm | 株高/cm | 重心高度/cm | ||
V1 | K0 | 52.84c | 22.27c | 71.83c | 24.28bc | 84.37a | 53.30a | 85.38a | 45.95b |
K1 | 56.19b | 23.40abc | 74.37b | 31.59a | 85.22a | 54.74a | 86.86a | 47.22ab | |
K2 | 58.58a | 24.32ab | 76.79a | 31.45a | 86.62a | 55.88a | 88.02a | 48.98a | |
K3 | 59.42a | 25.17a | 77.10a | 32.53a | 85.54a | 54.76a | 87.98a | 48.38a | |
V2 | K0 | 47.41d | 19.57d | 61.06d | 23.80c | 72.34c | 41.19c | 75.57c | 39.03d |
K1 | 49.22d | 22.81bc | 63.36d | 24.92bc | 74.35bc | 44.16bc | 76.40bc | 40.31cd | |
K2 | 51.63c | 23.10b | 65.82c | 26.39c | 75.92b | 46.20b | 78.83b | 41.45c | |
K3 | 52.13c | 23.24bc | 66.17c | 26.47c | 74.47bc | 41.04c | 78.43bc | 37.97d |
处理 | 茎秆抗折力/N | 抗倒伏指数 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
现蕾期 | 盛花期 | 青果期 | 成熟期 | 现蕾期 | 盛花期 | 青果期 | 成熟期 | |||
V1 | K0 | 5.73c | 6.61d | 6.81c | 12.56b | 3.75c | 3.29c | 1.86c | 3.98d | |
K1 | 6.37bc | 7.46c | 7.46bc | 17.51a | 3.97bc | 3.44c | 2.00c | 4.73cd | ||
K2 | 6.80ab | 8.11c | 8.11ab | 17.69a | 4.08bc | 3.75bc | 2.21bc | 5.25bc | ||
K3 | 6.59abc | 8.32b | 8.32ab | 19.25a | 3.82bc | 3.74bc | 2.18bc | 5.15c | ||
V2 | K0 | 6.87abc | 7.18b | 7.18bc | 11.97b | 4.47abc | 4.40ab | 2.34abc | 4.47cd | |
K1 | 7.02ab | 7.84b | 7.84abc | 14.86ab | 4.49ab | 4.58a | 2.56ab | 5.38abc | ||
K2 | 7.71a | 8.54b | 8.54a | 17.62a | 4.86a | 4.72a | 2.70a | 6.21ab | ||
K3 | 7.17ab | 8.60a | 8.60a | 18.24a | 4.50ab | 4.73a | 2.58ab | 6.35a |
处理 | 茎秆抗折力/N | 抗倒伏指数 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
现蕾期 | 盛花期 | 青果期 | 成熟期 | 现蕾期 | 盛花期 | 青果期 | 成熟期 | |||
V1 | K0 | 5.73c | 6.61d | 6.81c | 12.56b | 3.75c | 3.29c | 1.86c | 3.98d | |
K1 | 6.37bc | 7.46c | 7.46bc | 17.51a | 3.97bc | 3.44c | 2.00c | 4.73cd | ||
K2 | 6.80ab | 8.11c | 8.11ab | 17.69a | 4.08bc | 3.75bc | 2.21bc | 5.25bc | ||
K3 | 6.59abc | 8.32b | 8.32ab | 19.25a | 3.82bc | 3.74bc | 2.18bc | 5.15c | ||
V2 | K0 | 6.87abc | 7.18b | 7.18bc | 11.97b | 4.47abc | 4.40ab | 2.34abc | 4.47cd | |
K1 | 7.02ab | 7.84b | 7.84abc | 14.86ab | 4.49ab | 4.58a | 2.56ab | 5.38abc | ||
K2 | 7.71a | 8.54b | 8.54a | 17.62a | 4.86a | 4.72a | 2.70a | 6.21ab | ||
K3 | 7.17ab | 8.60a | 8.60a | 18.24a | 4.50ab | 4.73a | 2.58ab | 6.35a |
处理 | 分茎数/个 | 分枝数/个 | 单株蒴果数/个 | 无效蒴果数/个 | 籽粒数/粒 | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V1 | K0 | 1.80a | 7.97cd | 45.57ab | 10.90a | 8.09a | 6.50c | 1180c | - |
K1 | 2.10a | 8.52c | 51.57a | 9.88a | 8.49a | 7.20abc | 1473.3b | 19.91 | |
K2 | 1.63a | 9.41bc | 42.22ab | 5.24b | 8.01a | 7.15abc | 1536.7a | 23.21 | |
K3 | 1.90a | 12.00a | 53.70a | 7.88ab | 8.07a | 6.75bc | 1430b | 17.48 | |
V2 | K0 | 1.60a | 6.70d | 40.65ab | 6.27b | 8.65a | 7.43ab | 1335c | - |
K1 | 1.57a | 9.50bc | 36.17b | 5.90b | 8.70a | 7.65a | 1700a | 21.47 | |
K2 | 1.83a | 10.67ab | 46.77ab | 5.56b | 8.32a | 6.88bc | 1820a | 26.65 | |
K3 | 2.49a | 9.07bc | 41.16ab | 3.98b | 8.81a | 6.55c | 1605a | 16.82 |
处理 | 分茎数/个 | 分枝数/个 | 单株蒴果数/个 | 无效蒴果数/个 | 籽粒数/粒 | 千粒重/g | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V1 | K0 | 1.80a | 7.97cd | 45.57ab | 10.90a | 8.09a | 6.50c | 1180c | - |
K1 | 2.10a | 8.52c | 51.57a | 9.88a | 8.49a | 7.20abc | 1473.3b | 19.91 | |
K2 | 1.63a | 9.41bc | 42.22ab | 5.24b | 8.01a | 7.15abc | 1536.7a | 23.21 | |
K3 | 1.90a | 12.00a | 53.70a | 7.88ab | 8.07a | 6.75bc | 1430b | 17.48 | |
V2 | K0 | 1.60a | 6.70d | 40.65ab | 6.27b | 8.65a | 7.43ab | 1335c | - |
K1 | 1.57a | 9.50bc | 36.17b | 5.90b | 8.70a | 7.65a | 1700a | 21.47 | |
K2 | 1.83a | 10.67ab | 46.77ab | 5.56b | 8.32a | 6.88bc | 1820a | 26.65 | |
K3 | 2.49a | 9.07bc | 41.16ab | 3.98b | 8.81a | 6.55c | 1605a | 16.82 |
生育时期 | 茎秆抗折力 | 抗倒伏指数 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
现蕾期 | 盛花期 | 青果期 | 成熟期 | 现蕾期 | 盛花期 | 青果期 | 成熟期 | |
株高 | -0.226 | 0.108 | -0.184 | 0.307 | -0.494* | -0.626** | -0.616** | -0.330 |
重心高度 | 0.101 | 0.339 | -0.166 | 0.285 | -0.365* | -0.415* | -0.588** | -0.380 |
茎粗 | 0.109 | 0.188 | 0.065 | 0.317 | 0.322 | 0.322 | 0.256 | 0.237 |
产量 | 0.630** | 0.545** | 0.5948** | 0.410* | 0.572** | 0.615** | 0.665** | 0.699** |
生育时期 | 茎秆抗折力 | 抗倒伏指数 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
现蕾期 | 盛花期 | 青果期 | 成熟期 | 现蕾期 | 盛花期 | 青果期 | 成熟期 | |
株高 | -0.226 | 0.108 | -0.184 | 0.307 | -0.494* | -0.626** | -0.616** | -0.330 |
重心高度 | 0.101 | 0.339 | -0.166 | 0.285 | -0.365* | -0.415* | -0.588** | -0.380 |
茎粗 | 0.109 | 0.188 | 0.065 | 0.317 | 0.322 | 0.322 | 0.256 | 0.237 |
产量 | 0.630** | 0.545** | 0.5948** | 0.410* | 0.572** | 0.615** | 0.665** | 0.699** |
[1] | 崔政军, 高玉红, 剡斌, 等. 水氮耦合对土壤水分时空分布与胡麻耗水特性及产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2019, 33(2):398-411. |
[2] | 崔红艳, 方子森, 牛俊义. 胡麻栽培技术的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(18):8-13. |
[3] | Sangiovanni J P, Chew E Y. The role of omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in health and disease of the retina[J]. Progress in Retinal & Eye Research, 2005, 24(1):87-138. |
[4] | 高颐雄, 张坚. α-亚麻酸体内转化为二十碳五烯酸和二十二碳六烯酸的研究进展[J]. 中国油脂, 2015, 40(9):77-81. |
[5] |
Delion S, Chalon S, J Hérault, et al. Chronic dietary alpha-linolenic acid deficiency alters dopaminergic and serotoninergic neurotransmission in rats.[J]. Journal of Nutrition, 1994, 124(12):2466-2476.
pmid: 16856329 |
[6] | 安建平, 牛一川. 亚麻籽粒中主要脂肪酸和蛋白质积累过程研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2004, 24(7):1308-1311. |
[7] | 王耀, 孙小娟, 方子森. 多效唑叶喷施对胡麻抗倒伏能力和籽粒产量的影响[J]. 土壤与作物, 2018, 7(3):338-348. |
[8] | 辛柳, 赵宏伟, 雷万钧, 等. 施钾量对寒地粳稻抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(4):93-100. |
[9] | 姚玉璧, 邓振镛, 王润元, 等. 气候变化对甘肃胡麻生产的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2006, 28(1):49-54. |
[10] | 何巧林, 张绍文, 李应洪, 等. 硅钾配施对水稻茎秆性状和抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2017, 32(1):66-73. |
[11] | 赵国英, 王红光, 李东晓, 等. 灌水次数和施钾量对冬小麦茎秆形态特征和抗倒性的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(6):759-768. |
[12] | 向达兵, 郭凯, 雷婷, 等. 磷钾营养对套作大豆茎秆形态和抗倒性的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2010, 32(3):395-402. |
[13] | 李波, 张吉旺, 崔海岩, 等. 施钾量对高产夏玉米抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(11):2093-2099. |
[14] |
Ghosh B N, Khola O, Bhattacharyya R, et al. Effect of potassium on soil conservation and productivity of maize/cowpea based crop rotations in the north-west Indian Himalayas[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2016, 13(4):754-762.
doi: 10.1007/s11629-013-2885-0 URL |
[15] | 朱新开, 王祥菊, 郭凯泉, 等. 小麦倒伏的茎秆特征及对产量与品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2006, 26(1):87-92. |
[16] | 李金才, 尹钧, 魏凤珍. 播种密度对冬小麦茎秆形态特征和抗倒指数的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2005(5):662-666. |
[17] | 刘举. 高产夏玉米施钾抗倒增产效应及其机理研究[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2015. |
[18] | 郭娟娟, 董宏伟, 崔政军, 等. 氮肥运筹方式对胡麻干物质积累、产量及氮素吸收转运的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2020, 55(4):60-68. |
[19] |
Clement-Bailey J, Gwathmey C O. Potassium effects on partitioning yield, and earliness of contrasting cotton cultivars[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2007, 99(4):1130-1136.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2006.0288 URL |
[20] | 陈双恩, 杜汉强. 亚麻种子中磷、钾、铁积累规律的研究[J]. 中国麻业科学, 2010, 32(4):206-209. |
[21] | 史瑞杰, 戴飞, 赵武云, 等. 胡麻茎秆生物力学特性试验[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2018, 39(11):45-50. |
[22] | 王勇, 李晴祺. 小麦品种抗倒性评价方法的研究[J]. 华北农学报, 1995(3):84-88. |
[23] | 田保明, 杨光圣, 曹刚强, 等. 农作物倒伏及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(4):163-167. |
[24] | 陈新军, 戚存扣, 浦惠明, 等. 甘蓝型油菜抗倒性评价及抗倒性与株型结构的关系[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2007, 29(1):54-57. |
[25] |
Jiao Y, Grant C A, Bailey L D. Growth and nutrient response of flax and durum wheat to phosphorus and zinc fertilizers[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 2007, 87(3):461-470.
doi: 10.4141/P05-212 URL |
[26] | 郭芳, 牛俊义, 高珍妮. 品种密度互作对胡麻抗倒伏特性的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2016, 51(3):72-76. |
[27] | 赵国英, 王红光, 李东晓, 等. 灌水次数和施钾量对冬小麦茎秆形态特征和抗倒性的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(6):759-768. |
[28] | 张忠旭, 陈温福, 杨振玉, 等. 水稻抗倒伏能力与茎秆物理性状的关系及其对产量的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 1999(2):3-5. |
[29] | 于晓波, 梁建秋, 何泽民, 等. 撒播量对大豆茎秆特性和产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9):117-124. |
[30] | 王成雨, 代兴龙, 石玉华, 等. 氮肥水平和种植密度对冬小麦茎秆抗倒性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(1):121-128. |
[31] | 郭艳青, 朱玉玲, 刘凯, 等. 水钾互作对高产夏玉米茎秆结构和功能的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1):143-149. |
[32] | 高珍妮, 赵利, 郭丽琢, 等. 灌溉量和施氮量对油用亚麻茎秆抗倒性能及产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(5):544-553. |
[33] | 吴海兵, 刘道红, 钟鸣, 等. 水分管理和钾肥施用对水稻产量和抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2019(1):127-133. |
[34] | 孙加威, 李娜, 王春雨, 等. 栽插方式和施钾量对杂交籼稻抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(12):2408-2417. |
[35] | 徐秀银, 陈锦坤, 周晓林. 大豆植株缺钾症状及施钾对产量构成的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报1997, 3(2):192-193. |
[36] | 张翼飞, 于崧, 杨克军, 等. 不同氮钾配比对玉米茎秆形态力学特性及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(6):1741-1750. |
[37] | 刘战东, 肖俊夫, 南纪琴, 等. 倒伏对夏玉米叶面积、产量及其构成因素的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(18):107-110. |
[38] | 董宏伟, 郭娟娟, 高玉红, 等. 施钾对黄土高原旱区胡麻钾素分配利用及产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2020, 51(6):1437-1444. |
[39] | 郭芳, 牛俊义, 高珍妮, 等. 品种密度互作对胡麻抗倒伏特性的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2016, 51(3):72-76. |
[40] | 张培培. 氮磷钾肥互作协调油菜产量与抗倒性机理研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2017. |
[1] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[2] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[3] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. |
[4] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
[5] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. |
[6] | WANG Qiangqiang, YANG Zihui, GUO Shujiang, ZHANG Jianhui, WANG Duoze. Effect of Irrigation Amount on Growth and Yield of Jujube in Arid Desert Area of Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 71-74. |
[7] | ZHOU Xiaohong. The Crop Yield Estimation Model Based on Multiple Regression Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 152-156. |
[8] | QIN Naiqun, MA Qiaoyun, GAO Jingwei, YANG Pu, CAI Jinlan, HAO Yingchun, LI Yanmei, JI Hongce, LIAO Xiangzheng. Effects of Biogas Residue Application on Nutrient and Heavy Metal Content in Soil and Yield of Crops Under Peanut-wheat Rotation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 58-63. |
[9] | WU Zhibin, HUANG Chao, LEI Yuan, JING Feng, LIU Zhandong. Water and Fertilizer Utilization Characteristics of Winter Wheat Under Different Yield Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 64-71. |
[10] | SHEN Jicheng, ZHAO Caixia, YE Fahui, LI Yaxin, LIU Demei, LIU Ruijuan, SHEN Yuhu, ZHANG Huaigang, CHEN Wenjie. Analysis of Germplasm Differentiation of Ledu Long Pepper Based on Agronomic Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 29-34. |
[11] | LI Dongxue, WANG Yiliu, HUAN Weiwei, BU Lingduo, WANG Ruizhi, LIU Hao, LU Dianjun, WANG Huoyan, CHEN Xiaoqin. Nutrient Content of Tobacco Leaves and Root Zone Soil Affected by Citrate Soluble Potassium Fertilizer in Yuxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 67-73. |
[12] | ZHENG Benchuan, ZHANG Jinfang, JIANG Jun, CUI Cheng, CHAI Liang, HUANG Youtao, ZHOU Zhengjian, LI Haojie, JIANG Liangcai. Correlation Analysis of Main Traits and Yield of Brassica napus ‘Chuanyou’ Varieties with Different Maturity Stages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 7-17. |
[13] | LIU Xiaohang, MA Shuqing, ZHAO Jing, QUAN Hujie, DENG Kuicai, CHAI Qingrong. Yield Response of Japonica Rice of Northeast China to Low Temperature in Different Time Periods of Booting Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 91-98. |
[14] | FU Yanyan, LI Yunfeng, HAN Dong, MA Shuqing. Water Surplus and Deficit of Maize Growing Season and Its Effect on Yield in Major Grain Producing Areas of Jilin Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 99-105. |
[15] | NIU Liya, WANG Weiwei, ZHANG Yujie, ZOU Jingwei, WANG Zhi, LU Li, WANG Fengzhi, WANG Wei, YU Liang. Wheat Quality and Yield Traits: Effects on Scores of Steamed Bread and Noodles [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 129-133. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||