Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (29): 125-131.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0715
Previous Articles Next Articles
Bu Yaqiang1(), Zhang Wang1, Li Meizhu1, Luo Yucai1, Yu Shuqi1, Peng Xinmei1, Xie Yangui1, Lu Chao1, Wu Fuping3, Xie Jing1,2(
)
Received:
2020-11-26
Revised:
2021-05-06
Online:
2021-10-15
Published:
2021-10-29
Contact:
Xie Jing
E-mail:408709643 @qq.com;air_fish@126.com
CLC Number:
Bu Yaqiang, Zhang Wang, Li Meizhu, Luo Yucai, Yu Shuqi, Peng Xinmei, Xie Yangui, Lu Chao, Wu Fuping, Xie Jing. Formula of Eleusine coracana Cereal: Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(29): 125-131.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0715
项目 | 标准 | 得分/分 |
---|---|---|
色泽(10分) | 灰白色,加热水冲泡后呈深褐色 | 8~10 |
浅褐色,不太均匀 | 6~7 | |
灰白色,均匀一致 | 4~5 | |
浅,不均匀 | 1~4 | |
滋味及气味(20分) | 有穇子香味,香味浓 | 18~20 |
香味较淡 | 15~17 | |
香味不明显,有轻微焦煳味 | 12~14 | |
香味不明显,焦煳味明显 | 1~12 | |
黏性(20分) | 黏性适宜,不稀不稠 | 19~20 |
黏性适宜,黏连性好 | 16~18 | |
黏度一般,黏连性小 | 13~15 | |
黏度过稀或过稠 | 1~13 | |
溶解性(30分) | 冲泡后呈糊状,不分层,溶解良好 | 29~30 |
冲泡后呈糊状,有轻微分层 | 26~28 | |
冲泡后呈糊状,分层不明显 | 20~25 | |
冲调后呈糊状,有明显分层 | 1~20 | |
口感(20分) | 甜度适中,入口即咽,无砂粒感 | 18~20 |
甜度适当,有微量砂粒 | 16~17 | |
甜度适当,有明显砂粒 | 14~15 | |
甜味过淡或过浓,砂粒明显 | 1~14 |
项目 | 标准 | 得分/分 |
---|---|---|
色泽(10分) | 灰白色,加热水冲泡后呈深褐色 | 8~10 |
浅褐色,不太均匀 | 6~7 | |
灰白色,均匀一致 | 4~5 | |
浅,不均匀 | 1~4 | |
滋味及气味(20分) | 有穇子香味,香味浓 | 18~20 |
香味较淡 | 15~17 | |
香味不明显,有轻微焦煳味 | 12~14 | |
香味不明显,焦煳味明显 | 1~12 | |
黏性(20分) | 黏性适宜,不稀不稠 | 19~20 |
黏性适宜,黏连性好 | 16~18 | |
黏度一般,黏连性小 | 13~15 | |
黏度过稀或过稠 | 1~13 | |
溶解性(30分) | 冲泡后呈糊状,不分层,溶解良好 | 29~30 |
冲泡后呈糊状,有轻微分层 | 26~28 | |
冲泡后呈糊状,分层不明显 | 20~25 | |
冲调后呈糊状,有明显分层 | 1~20 | |
口感(20分) | 甜度适中,入口即咽,无砂粒感 | 18~20 |
甜度适当,有微量砂粒 | 16~17 | |
甜度适当,有明显砂粒 | 14~15 | |
甜味过淡或过浓,砂粒明显 | 1~14 |
配方 | 等级 | 色泽 | 滋味香气 | 黏性 | 溶解性 | 口感 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 优 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
良 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |
中 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
差 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
2 | 优 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
良 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 4 | |
中 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
差 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
3 | 优 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
良 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |
中 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
差 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
4 | 优 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
良 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
中 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
差 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
5 | 优 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
良 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |
中 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
差 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
6 | 优 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
良 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | |
中 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
差 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
7 | 优 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
良 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | |
中 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
差 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
8 | 优 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
良 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
中 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | |
差 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |
9 | 优 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
良 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
中 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
差 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
配方 | 等级 | 色泽 | 滋味香气 | 黏性 | 溶解性 | 口感 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 优 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
良 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |
中 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
差 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
2 | 优 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
良 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 4 | |
中 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
差 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
3 | 优 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
良 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |
中 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
差 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
4 | 优 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
良 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
中 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
差 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
5 | 优 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
良 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |
中 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
差 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
6 | 优 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
良 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | |
中 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
差 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
7 | 优 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
良 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | |
中 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
差 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
8 | 优 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
良 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
中 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | |
差 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |
9 | 优 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
良 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
中 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
差 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
试验号 | A | B | C | 得分/分 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 80.6 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 81.9 |
3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 83.6 |
4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 81.8 |
5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 79.0 |
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 78.9 |
7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 75.9 |
8 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 73.3 |
9 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 72.0 |
K1 | 79.4 | 77.5 | 77.2 | |
K2 | 78.1 | 78.6 | 78.9 | |
K3 | 78.2 | 79.5 | 79.6 | |
极差R | 1.3 | 2 | 2.4 |
试验号 | A | B | C | 得分/分 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 80.6 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 81.9 |
3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 83.6 |
4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 81.8 |
5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 79.0 |
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 78.9 |
7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 75.9 |
8 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 73.3 |
9 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 72.0 |
K1 | 79.4 | 77.5 | 77.2 | |
K2 | 78.1 | 78.6 | 78.9 | |
K3 | 78.2 | 79.5 | 79.6 | |
极差R | 1.3 | 2 | 2.4 |
[1] | 姚理武, 吴应齐, 王声淼, 等. 油茶林下套种穇子栽培技术及效益[J]. 南方林业科学, 2017(4):41-43. |
[2] | Srimathi K. Finger millet in nutrition transition: an infant weaning food ingredient with chronic disease preventive potential[J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 2010, 104(12):2. |
[3] | 子娟一家_767. 穇子的营养功效[EB/OL]. sina新浪博客. http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_a09818bf010129g3.html, 2012-04-26. |
[4] | 何定杰. 本草纲目简编[M]. 武汉: 湖北科技出版社, 1978: 357. |
[5] | Kumar A, Metwal M, Sanveen K, et al. Nutraceutical Value of Finger Millet [Eleusinecoracana (L.) Gaertn.], and TheirImprovement Using Omics Approaches[J]. Frontiers in PlantScience, 2016(7):2-14. |
[6] | 李基光, 王艳兰, 汤睿. 湖南穇子创新利用与发展前景[J]. 安徽农学, 2018, 46(30):66-67. |
[7] | 王双辉, 陈致印, 谢晶, 等. 穇子营养成分及功能利用研究进展[J]. 食品工业科技, 2017, 38(13):329-334. |
[8] | 卢福芝, 李启虔, 黄芳, 等. 广西产鸭脚粟米营养成分的测定及分析[J]. 粮食与饲料工业, 2016(3):40-42. |
[9] | Wankhede D B, hehnaj A, Raghavendra Rao M R. Carbohydrate composition of finger millet (Eleusinecoracana) andfoxtail millet( Setariaitalica)[J]. Qualitas Plantarum Plant Foodsfor Human Nutrition, 1979, 8(4):293-303. |
[10] | 吴应齐, 王声淼, 应国华, 等. 3个不同种子来源穇子农艺性状及营养成分比较与评价[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2017, 7(5):30-34. |
[11] | 席国成, 肖荷霞, 等. 穇子耐盐性研究[J]. 河北农业科学, 1994(1):25-27. |
[12] | Viswanathan D, Sivaraman R, Perumal S. Effect of domestic sewage wastewater irrigation on nutritional and nutraceutical perspectives of Eleusine coracana and Zea mays (raw and processed) from selected semi-urban and rural areas of Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International, 2020, 26(8):2203-2224. |
[13] | 池福敏, 幸塔, 辜雪冬, 等. 西藏察隅龙爪稷营养成分、含量与农药残留分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2015, 41(5):187-191. |
[14] | 吴应齐, 应国华, 薛振文, 等. 穇子秸秆栽培大球盖菇培养料配方筛选初报[J]. 南方林业科学, 2018, 46(1):54-56. |
[15] | 蔡梦. 五谷杂粮养生堂[J]. 家用电器, 2014(9):86-89. |
[16] | 张瑞姝. 正确应用维生素类药物[J]. 丹东医药, 2008(4):25-26. |
[17] | 凌鸿敏, 任春兰. 应激对实验动物体内锌、铜、铁、镁离子代谢的影响[J]. 苏州大学学报:医学版, 2001, 21(2):137-138. |
[18] | 鲁云霞, 郑茂强, 张燕萍. 大米麦芽糊精的性质及应用[J]. 食品科技, 2002(5):40-42. |
[19] | 梁秀章. 分子蒸馏单甘酯在方便面上的应用[J]. 中国食品添加剂, 1994(2):20-22. |
[20] | 王振斌, 王世清, 马晓珂. 模糊综合评判在食品感官评定中的应用[J]. 莱阳农学院学报, 2002, 19(1):41-43. |
[21] | Cardello A V. Food quality: relativity, context and consumer expectations[J]. Food Quality & Preference, 1995, 6(3):163-170. |
[22] | Garvin D A. Competing on the eight dimensions of quality[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1987, 651(6):101-109. |
[23] | 张丽霞, 黄纪念, 宋国辉, 等. 营养黑芝麻糊生产工艺的研究[J]. 农产品加工(学刊), 2012(1):30-34. |
[24] | 中华人民共和国, 国家卫生和计划生育委员会. GB/T 5009.3,食品安全国家标准 食品中水分的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016:1-6. |
[25] | 中华人民共和国卫生部, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 4789.21,食品卫生微生物学检验 冷冻饮品、饮料检验[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2003:157-160. |
[26] | 李蒙娜. 小麦抗性淀粉的制备及结构性质研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2019. |
[27] | 孙延修, 孙佳凡. 一种无糖小米南瓜营养即食糊工艺的优化[J]. 食品工业, 2020, 280(1):11-13. |
[28] | 魏征. 小杂粮的优势与发展对策[J]. 农产品加工, 2005(3):49-51. |
[29] | 谢新华, 李晓方. 不同介质对糯米淀粉糊化特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2009(5):226-228. |
[1] | GESANG Dunzhun. Soil Nutrient Status Analysis and Soil Fertility Comprehensive Evaluation in Luolong County of Changdu City in Tibet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 30-34. |
[2] | LU Jian, WANG Dong, WANG Qun, FU Dejun, WU Dongfen, LIU Yu, ZHU Jianjie, LUO Yaoping. Comparison Analysis of Aromatic Constituents of Jasmine Scented Tea During Orthodox and Isolated Scenting Process [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 158-164. |
[3] | Guo Xiangyang. Volatile Compositions Analysis and Beverage Application of Chamomile Essential Oil from Matricaria recutita [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(4): 138-145. |
[4] | Zhang Wen, Han Shou’an, Wang Min, , AIermaike· Caikasim, Zhong Haixia, Wang Huan, Pan Mingqi, Xie Hui. Drying Standard and Rapid Detection Technology of Green Raisin Based on Texture and Sensory Evaluation Method [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(28): 128-135. |
[5] | Xia Chun, Zhao Jinchao, Zhang Mingjin, Xia Jianhua, Zhang Yonghui, Wang Fei, Hu Yongtao, Wang Jian’an, Song Zhaopeng. Effects of Harvesting Method and Maturity on Physiological and Sensory Quality of Upper Tobacco Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(25): 14-18. |
[6] | Jiang Dezhi, Cheng Junyong, Du Yangwen, Yin Xingdong. Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation on Economic Characters of Camellia oleifera Individuals in Dabie Mountain of Eastern Hubei [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(16): 42-48. |
[7] | . Spatial-temporal Difference of Eco-environmental Carrying Capacity Based on PSR Model and GIS: A Case Study of Hainan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(11): 40-47. |
[8] | . Quality Components Variation and Fermenting Degree Discrimination During Fermentation Process of Congou Black Tea Based on Dynamic Cluster Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(7): 196-204. |
[9] | . Correlation Analysis of Main Maillard Reaction Components and Sensory Evaluation Indices of Flue-Cured Tobacco of Different Flavor Types [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(7): 179-184. |
[10] | Wang Weiwei,Jiang Heyuan,Jiang Yongwen and Zhang Jianyong. Effect of Withering Time on CTC Black Tea Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(4): 129-135. |
[11] | Guo Dongliang,Zhang Anming,Liu Zefang and Guo Huanhuan. Evaluation of Land Use Performance of Mountainous Cities:A Case Study of Nanchuan, Chongqing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(2): 106-111. |
[12] | Wang Xiaoqiao,Liao Guiping,Wang Fang,Li Jinwei and Liu Yao. Study of Rapeseed Information Website Trusted Measurement Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(8): 252-259. |
[13] | . Optimizing the Formula of the Maca Buccal tablets by Orthogonal Test [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(18): 315-320. |
[14] | . Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation on Nature Reserve Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study on Bawanling National Nature Reserve [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(29): 118-125. |
[15] | . Research on Benefit Evaluation of the Utilization of the Biomass in Beijing for Energy [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(26): 190-195. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||