Effect of Sulphur and Nitrogen Combined Application on Quantity and Yield and Yield Components of Strong Gluten Wheat

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0537

Abstract

Abstract:

To study the effect of combined application of nitrogen and sulfur on yield and quality characters of strong gluten wheat, strong gluten wheat ‘Zhouyuan 9369’ was used as experimental material. Three nitrogen fertilizer levels, 150, 300 and 45 kg/hm², and four sulfur fertilizer levels, 20, 40, 60 and 80 kg/hm², were set up in the experiment. In this paper, the effects of combined application of nitrogen and sulfur on dry matter accumulation, yield and yield components, and some quality characters of ‘Zhouyuan 9369’ were studied. The results showed that when the nitrogen application rate was at the range of 150-300 kg/hm², the dry matter accumulation and grain yield of ‘Zhouyuan 9369’ were increased with the increase of applying sulfur; while the nitrogen application rate was 450 kg/hm², the dry matter accumulation and grain yield were decreased with the increase of sulfur application rate. When the nitrogen application rate was at the range of 150-300 kg/hm², the grain protein content of ‘Zhouyuan 9369’ was increased with the increase of applying sulfur; while the nitrogen application rate was 450 kg/hm² and the sulfur application rate was less than 40 kg/hm², the grain protein content was increased with the increase of sulfur application rate, but when the sulfur application rate exceeded 40 kg/hm², the grain protein content was decreased. The content of Glutenin Macropolymer (GMP) was increased by increasing sulfur fertilizer and nitrogen fertilizer. Under the same nitrogen application rate, the content of hydrogen sulfur bond and disulfide bond in grain protein were increased, while under the same sulfur application rate, the content of hydrogen sulfur bond and disulfide bond were increased at first and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Therefore, for the wheat field with a perennial yield of around 8200 kg/hm², it was suggested that in the production of strong gluten wheat, nitrogen fertilizer should be controlled at the range of 150-300 kg/hm² and sulfur fertilizer should be controlled at the range of 60-80 kg/hm², to obtain ideal yield and quality.

Key words: nitrogen and sulfur combined application, strong gluten wheat, quality traits, yield composition

SUN Yunchao, JI Chuanyun, ZHANG Xin, LI Haibin, WANG Luying, FENG Shengye, CHENG Qianqian, ZHAO Yang, XIONG Yongxing. Effect of Sulphur and Nitrogen Combined Application on Quantity and Yield and Yield Components of Strong Gluten Wheat[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(16): 7-12.

Figures/Tables 4

References 28

[1]	胡文静, 程顺和, 高致富, 等. 晚播条件下小麦籽粒产量、硬度与蛋白质含量对品种、施氮量和密度的响应[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2018, 34(2):245-25.
[2]	王金凤, 王壮壮, 谷丰序, 等. 氮密调控对两个冬小麦品种碳氮代谢及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(19):4070-4083. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.19.004
[3]	JOHANSSON E, MALIK A H, HUSSAIN A, et al. wheat gluten polymer structures: the impact of genotype, environment, and processing on their functionality in various applications why are gluten proteins important for functionality?[J]. Cereal chemistry, 2013, 90:367-376.
[4]	NAKANO H, MORITA S. Effects of seeding rate and nitrogen application rate on grain yield and protein content of the bread wheat cultivar ‘Minaminokaori’ in Southwestern Japan (Agronomy)[J]. Plant production science, 2009, 12(1):109-115.
[5]	OTTESON B N, MERGOUM M, RANSOM J K. Seeding rate and nitrogen management on milling and baking quality of hard red spring wheat genotypes[J]. Crop science, 2008, 48:749-755.
[6]	崔岩山, 王庆仁. 土壤与大气环境中硫行为及其对植物的影响[J]. 中国农业生态学报, 2002, 10(3):80-82.
[7]	SAIO K. Sulfur assimilatory metabolism the long smelling road[J]. Plant physiology, 2004, 136:2443-2450.
[8]	ZHAO F J, HAWKESFORDT M J. Sulfur assimilation and effects on yield and quality of wheat[J]. Journal of cereal science, 1999, 30:1-17.
[9]	张亦涛, 王洪媛, 刘申, 等. 氮肥农学效应与环境效应国际研究发展态势[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(15):1-15.
[10]	KETTLEWELL P S, GRIFITHS M W, HOCKING T J, et al. Dependence of wheat dough extensibility on flour sulphur and nitrogen concentrations and the influence of foliar-applied sulphur and nitrogen fertilizers[J]. Journal of cereal science, 1998, 28:15-23.
[11]	KHAN N A, MOBIN M, SAMIULLAH. The influence of gibberellic acid and sulfur fertilization rate on growth and S use efficiency of mustard (Brassica juncea)[J]. Plant soil, 2005, 270:269-274.
[12]	GUARDA G, PADOVAN S, DELOGU G. Grain yield, nitrogen-use efficiency and baking quality of old and modern Italian bread-wheat cultivars grown at different nitrogen levels[J]. European journal of agronomy, 2004, 21:181-192.
[13]	赵玉霞, 李娜, 周芳, 等. 氮硫配施对冬小麦籽粒灌浆特性及产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(5):1366-1372.
[14]	李国强. 施硫对强筋小麦豫麦34产量和主要品质性状调控效应研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2006:1-2.
[15]	HOLGER H, VICTORIA N, BERTRAND G, et al. Molecular analysis and control of cysteine biosynthesis: Integration of nitrogen andsulphur metabolism[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2004, 55(401):1283-1292.
[16]	蔡铁, 王振林, 尹燕枰, 等. 氮硫肥配施对小麦籽粒谷蛋白大聚合体含量及粒度分布的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(6):1060-1068.
[17]	罗明江, 罗春霞. Ellman’s试剂比色法测定食品中蛋白质琉基和二硫键[J]. 郑州粮食学院报, 1986(1):92-95.
[18]	CHAN K Y, WASSERMAN B P. Direct colorimetric assay of free thiol groups and disulfide bonds in suspensions of solubilized and particulate cereal proteins[J]. Cereal chemistry, 1993, 70(1):22-26.
[19]	朱云集, 谢迎新, 郭天财, 等. 硫肥对两个不同穗型冬小麦品种光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(3):436-441.
[20]	马春英, 李雁鸣, 韩金玲. 不同种类硫肥对冬小麦光合特性和籽粒产量性状的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2004, 19(1):67-70. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2004.01.019
[21]	石玉, 张永丽, 于振文. 小麦籽粒蛋白质组分含量及其加工品质的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(7):1306-1312.
[22]	马春英. 硫对小麦光合特性及产量和品质的影响规律[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2003.
[23]	刘志华, 胡尚连. 小麦蛋白质组分与加工品质关系[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2003(10):7-9.
[24]	张平平, 陈东升, 张勇, 等. 春播小麦醇溶蛋白组成及其对品质性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(12):1796-1801.
[25]	沈学善, 朱云集, 郭天财, 等. 施硫对两种品质类型小麦光合物质积累与转运的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(1):17-21.
[26]	李建楠, 罗勤贵, 张蕾, 等. 氮硫肥对小麦主要品质性状的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2011, 31(1):126-132.
[27]	OURY F X, GODIN C. Yield and grain protein concentration in bread wheat: how to use the negative relationship between the two characters to identify favourable genotypes?[J]. Euphytica, 2007, 157:45-57.
[28]	SIMMONDS N W. The relation between yield and protein in cereal grain[J]. Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 1995, 67:309-315.

施氮量	施硫量	粗蛋白含量/%	吸水率/%	面团形成时间/min	面团稳定时/min
N1	S1	12.81±0.11f	63.4±0.25d	4.6±0.20fg	9.3±0.25e
	S2	13.46±0.13d	64.1±0.26c	5.1±0.10efg	9.8±0.10cd
	S3	14.27±0.11c	65.4±0.26b	5.3±0.30de	10.1±0.10bc
	S4	15.47±0.17b	63.2±0.61de	4.7±0.15g	9.2±0.20e
N2	S1	13.20±0.10e	64.6±0.44c	5.2±0.30def	10.3±0.30b
	S2	14.15±0.15c	66.1±0.44a	5.6±0.20cd	11.2±0.30a
	S3	15.43±0.13b	66.2±0.21a	6.2±0.30ab	11.4±0.20a
	S4	15.41±0.10b	64.4±0.32c	4.8±0.10fg	10.1±0.10bc
N3	S1	14.28±0.19c	65.4±0.15b	5.9±0.10bc	10.5±0.40b
	S2	15.61±0.14a	66.4±0.32a	6.3±0.10a	11.2±0.20a
	S3	13.27±0.12e	63.2±0.15de	5.2±0.10def	9.5±0.40de
	S4	13.19±0.11e	62.7±0.06e	4.3±0.40h	9.1±0.10e

施氮量	施硫量	粗蛋白含量/%	吸水率/%	面团形成时间/min	面团稳定时/min
N1	S1	12.81±0.11f	63.4±0.25d	4.6±0.20fg	9.3±0.25e
	S2	13.46±0.13d	64.1±0.26c	5.1±0.10efg	9.8±0.10cd
	S3	14.27±0.11c	65.4±0.26b	5.3±0.30de	10.1±0.10bc
	S4	15.47±0.17b	63.2±0.61de	4.7±0.15g	9.2±0.20e
N2	S1	13.20±0.10e	64.6±0.44c	5.2±0.30def	10.3±0.30b
	S2	14.15±0.15c	66.1±0.44a	5.6±0.20cd	11.2±0.30a
	S3	15.43±0.13b	66.2±0.21a	6.2±0.30ab	11.4±0.20a
	S4	15.41±0.10b	64.4±0.32c	4.8±0.10fg	10.1±0.10bc
N3	S1	14.28±0.19c	65.4±0.15b	5.9±0.10bc	10.5±0.40b
	S2	15.61±0.14a	66.4±0.32a	6.3±0.10a	11.2±0.20a
	S3	13.27±0.12e	63.2±0.15de	5.2±0.10def	9.5±0.40de
	S4	13.19±0.11e	62.7±0.06e	4.3±0.40h	9.1±0.10e

施氮量	施硫量	谷蛋白大聚合体(GMP)	硫氢键(-SH)	二硫键(-S-S-)
N1	S1	781.10±0.84h	7.51±0.15h	1.32±0.11j
	S2	790.12±2.02f	8.00±0.13f	2.32±0.10i
	S3	795.14±1.02e	8.30±0.10e	2.93±0.13g
	S4	805.21±1.06b	9.32±0.11c	3.82±0.11d
N2	S1	785.21±1.06g	8.51±0.10d	3.41±0.11f
	S2	795.27±1.11e	8.51±0.14d	4.02±0.15c
	S3	800.10±1.01d	9.41±0.10c	4.63±0.11b
	S4	806.28±1.11b	13.93±0.11a	5.00±0.17a
N3	S1	791.10±1.01f	7.73±0.11g	2.52±0.10h
	S2	799.04±1.00d	7.90±0.10fg	3.00±0.12g
	S3	802.22±1.07c	8.21±0.12e	3.60±0.10e
	S4	810.08±1.01a	10.21±0.12b	3.92±0.11cd

施氮量	施硫量	谷蛋白大聚合体(GMP)	硫氢键(-SH)	二硫键(-S-S-)
N1	S1	781.10±0.84h	7.51±0.15h	1.32±0.11j
	S2	790.12±2.02f	8.00±0.13f	2.32±0.10i
	S3	795.14±1.02e	8.30±0.10e	2.93±0.13g
	S4	805.21±1.06b	9.32±0.11c	3.82±0.11d
N2	S1	785.21±1.06g	8.51±0.10d	3.41±0.11f
	S2	795.27±1.11e	8.51±0.14d	4.02±0.15c
	S3	800.10±1.01d	9.41±0.10c	4.63±0.11b
	S4	806.28±1.11b	13.93±0.11a	5.00±0.17a
N3	S1	791.10±1.01f	7.73±0.11g	2.52±0.10h
	S2	799.04±1.00d	7.90±0.10fg	3.00±0.12g
	S3	802.22±1.07c	8.21±0.12e	3.60±0.10e
	S4	810.08±1.01a	10.21±0.12b	3.92±0.11cd

施氮量	施硫量	穗数/(×10⁴/hm²)	穗粒数/(×10⁴/hm²)	千粒重/g	籽粒产量/(kg/hm²)
N1	S1	499.2±4.01h	633.0±4.00d	36.4±1.00d	6209.9±101.47h
	S2	512.7±0.58g	636.0±3.61cd	37.2±0.85d	6848.3±50.07g
	S3	514.2±4.01g	634.2±0.29d	37.2±0.35d	6951.8±50.10g
	S4	526.2±4.01f	634.2±1.04d	38.0±1.00cd	7204.2±100.3f
N2	S1	519.0±6.00g	634.0±2.00d	37.2±1.06d	6900.1±50.00g
	S2	543.0±4.00e	642.0±3.00ab	39.3±1.10bc	7870.8.3±26.05c
	S3	577.2±3.01b	642.0±3.00ab	40.1±1.01ab	8455.6±50.93b
	S4	604.2±3.01a	646.2±1.04a	41.1±1.03a	9122.8±107.54a
N3	S1	543.0±4.00e	639.0±1.00bc	37.2±1.06d	7797.6±4.10cd
	S2	555.8±4.54d	633.0±1.00d	38.2±1.04cd	7711.8±33.92d
	S3	574.2±4.01bc	633.2±1.04d	37.1±1.03d	7601.9±13.01e
	S4	570.5±2.02c	644.2±3.01a	38.0±1.00cd	7547.6±50.18e