Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (34): 89-93.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0321
Previous Articles Next Articles
FAN Jiahui1(), LI Huadong2, CHENG Ningning3, LIN Dian3(
)
Received:
2024-05-17
Revised:
2024-10-18
Online:
2024-12-05
Published:
2024-12-03
FAN Jiahui, LI Huadong, CHENG Ningning, LIN Dian. Effects of Fertilizer Application Rates on Yield, Quality and Economic Benefit of ‘Tainong’ Mango[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(34): 89-93.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0321
土层/cm | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 有效钙/(mg/kg) | 有效镁/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~20 | 5.26 | 4.36 | 17.31 | 25.78 | 35.29 | 119.28 | 17.85 |
20~40 | 4.98 | 2.82 | 14.53 | 15.61 | 34.76 | 90.70 | 12.41 |
土层/cm | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 有效钙/(mg/kg) | 有效镁/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~20 | 5.26 | 4.36 | 17.31 | 25.78 | 35.29 | 119.28 | 17.85 |
20~40 | 4.98 | 2.82 | 14.53 | 15.61 | 34.76 | 90.70 | 12.41 |
处理 | 果纵茎/mm | 果横茎/mm | 果厚/mm | 果型指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | 76.27±1.08ab | 50.64±0.72b | 41.76±0.25b | 1.51±0.03a |
B | 73.50±1.39b | 50.50±1.47b | 42.26±1.22b | 1.46±0.03a |
C | 78.41±2.41a | 53.30±0.40a | 43.88±0.61a | 1.47±0.04a |
处理 | 果纵茎/mm | 果横茎/mm | 果厚/mm | 果型指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | 76.27±1.08ab | 50.64±0.72b | 41.76±0.25b | 1.51±0.03a |
B | 73.50±1.39b | 50.50±1.47b | 42.26±1.22b | 1.46±0.03a |
C | 78.41±2.41a | 53.30±0.40a | 43.88±0.61a | 1.47±0.04a |
处理 | 抗坏血酸/(mg/100 g) | 可溶性固形物/% | 总酸/(g/kg) | 还原糖/(mg/g) | 可溶性糖/(g/kg) | 糖酸比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 13.43±1.48a | 19.06±0.56a | 7.83±0.70a | 47.22±2.39a | 135.10±7.34a | 17.40±2.52a |
B | 17.83±3.20a | 17.27±2.83a | 7.39±0.95a | 43.63±0.57b | 124.08±19.92a | 17.12±4.18a |
C | 15.61±2.50a | 17.85±0.91a | 7.96±0.53a | 42.51±1.07b | 115.54±1.24a | 14.57±1.16a |
处理 | 抗坏血酸/(mg/100 g) | 可溶性固形物/% | 总酸/(g/kg) | 还原糖/(mg/g) | 可溶性糖/(g/kg) | 糖酸比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 13.43±1.48a | 19.06±0.56a | 7.83±0.70a | 47.22±2.39a | 135.10±7.34a | 17.40±2.52a |
B | 17.83±3.20a | 17.27±2.83a | 7.39±0.95a | 43.63±0.57b | 124.08±19.92a | 17.12±4.18a |
C | 15.61±2.50a | 17.85±0.91a | 7.96±0.53a | 42.51±1.07b | 115.54±1.24a | 14.57±1.16a |
处理 | 产量/(t/hm2) | 价格/(元/kg) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 肥料成本/(元/t) | 经济效益/(元/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 16.75 | 6 | 100474.67 | 5270.02 | 95204.65 |
B | 16.52 | 6 | 99115.32 | 4053.86 | 95061.46 |
C | 17.69 | 6 | 106117.58 | 2886.96 | 103230.61 |
处理 | 产量/(t/hm2) | 价格/(元/kg) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 肥料成本/(元/t) | 经济效益/(元/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 16.75 | 6 | 100474.67 | 5270.02 | 95204.65 |
B | 16.52 | 6 | 99115.32 | 4053.86 | 95061.46 |
C | 17.69 | 6 | 106117.58 | 2886.96 | 103230.61 |
指标 | 主成分1(Y1) | 主成分2(Y2) | 主成分3(Y3) |
---|---|---|---|
产量(X1) | 0.18 | 0.41 | -0.52 |
果型指数(X2) | -0.01 | -0.59 | 0.37 |
抗坏血酸(X3) | -0.32 | -0.22 | -0.4 |
可溶性固形物(X4) | 0.48 | -0.08 | 0.26 |
总酸(X5) | -0.36 | 0.35 | 0.44 |
还原糖(X6) | 0.14 | 0.52 | 0.34 |
可溶性糖(X7) | 0.49 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
糖酸比(X8) | 0.49 | -0.15 | -0.20 |
特征值 | 3.54 | 1.89 | 1.35 |
贡献率/% | 44.20 | 23.66 | 16.86 |
累计贡献率/% | 44.20 | 67.86 | 84.72 |
指标 | 主成分1(Y1) | 主成分2(Y2) | 主成分3(Y3) |
---|---|---|---|
产量(X1) | 0.18 | 0.41 | -0.52 |
果型指数(X2) | -0.01 | -0.59 | 0.37 |
抗坏血酸(X3) | -0.32 | -0.22 | -0.4 |
可溶性固形物(X4) | 0.48 | -0.08 | 0.26 |
总酸(X5) | -0.36 | 0.35 | 0.44 |
还原糖(X6) | 0.14 | 0.52 | 0.34 |
可溶性糖(X7) | 0.49 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
糖酸比(X8) | 0.49 | -0.15 | -0.20 |
特征值 | 3.54 | 1.89 | 1.35 |
贡献率/% | 44.20 | 23.66 | 16.86 |
累计贡献率/% | 44.20 | 67.86 | 84.72 |
[1] |
张慧膑. 光“芒”四射引客来三亚探索品牌强农路径[N]. 三亚日报,2023-12-19(02).
|
[2] |
农学明. 浅析右江河谷台农一号芒无胚果实成因及对策[J]. 中国热带农业, 2018(2):14-16.
|
[3] |
司若彤, 刘维, 林电. 有机肥部分替代化肥对台农芒果产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(4):107-114.
|
[4] |
钟维. 右江河谷流域“台农1号”无胚芒果栽培技术简介[J]. 南方农业, 2022, 16(11):55-58.
|
[5] |
南立军, 吴佳珍, 赵玲, 等. 不同发酵条件对小台农芒果酒中的Vc含量及风味的影响[J]. 楚雄师范学院学报, 2022, 37(3):24-32.
|
[6] |
臧小平, 葛宇, 康由发, 等. 花序短截强度对芒果台农1号产量与品质的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2018, 46(1):30-32.
|
[7] |
华敏, 邓会栋, 郭利军, 等. 机械疏花与化学疏果对‘台农1号’芒无胚果单果质量及品质的影响[J]. 中国热带农业, 2021(4):41-46.
|
[8] |
刘维, 司若彤, 范家慧, 等. 不同施肥模式对芒果产量、品质的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(3):761-768.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2021.03.022 |
[9] |
凌小环, 李秋慧, 卢欣微, 等. 右江河谷地区台农一号芒果生产现状及发展对策[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2021, 27(7):58-60.
|
[10] |
胡隆孝, 曹琳彩, 王凯, 等. 采后催熟对‘台农一号’芒果理化品质及营养特性的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2023, 44(2):369-375.
|
[11] |
农业农村部关于印发《到2025年化肥减量化行动方案》和《到2025年化学农药减量化行动方案》的通知[Z]. 中华人民共和国农业农村部公报, 2022.
|
[12] |
郭宏伟, 陈晓璐, 刘子山, 等. 施肥量对不同小麦品种产量及养分吸收的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(24):38-43.
|
[13] |
陈娟, 赵永志, 曲明山, 等. 化肥减施对日光温室辣椒产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国农技推广, 2018, 34(7):48-50.
|
[14] |
姚春霞, 郭开秀, 赵志辉, 等. 减量施肥对三种蔬菜硝酸盐含量、营养品质和生理特性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(4):153-156.
|
[15] |
王冰清, 尹能文, 郑棉海, 等. 化肥减量配施有机肥对蔬菜产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(1):242-247.
|
[16] |
樊小林, 廖宗文. 控释肥料与平衡施肥和提高肥料利用率[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998, 4(3):219-223.
|
[17] |
张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):915-924.
|
[18] |
黄顺坚, 龙笛笛, 何彦. 我国芒果施肥研究进展及展望[J]. 农业与技术, 2018, 38(16):7-8.
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
张鹏, 范家慧, 程宁宁, 等. 水肥一体化减量施肥对芒果产量、品质及肥耗的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(2):114-118.
|
[21] |
侯广军, 陈海宁, 杜加银, 等. 化肥减肥30%对红富士苹果产量与品质的影响[J]. 烟台果树, 2018(3):9-11.
|
[22] |
韩宏伟, 刘会芳, 王强, 等. 化肥减施对设施番茄生长生理、产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(5):863-870.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2018.05.010 |
[23] |
唐芳玉, 曾卫军, 邓秀汕, 等. 生态配方肥施用量及挂果量对芒果产量和经济效益的影响[J]. 广西农学报, 2016, 31(5):25-32.
|
[24] |
位高生, 胡承孝, 谭启玲, 等. 氮磷减量施肥对琯溪蜜柚果实产量和品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(2):471-478.
|
[25] |
朱德进, 张辉, 黄卉, 等. 不同施肥处理对不同地力水平油菜产量和经济效益的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(10):73-76.
|
[26] |
尚玮瑶, 杨龙涛, 万子龙, 等. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对紫甘蓝产量、品质及干物质和养分分配的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2024, 59(2):74-82.
|
[1] | HE Guohe, CHEN Haibin, DU Jianjun, ZHANG Weili, GUO Lihua, HU Yibo, YAN Zhaohua, ZHANG Jing. Effects of Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Nutrient Utilization in Western Guangdong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 1-8. |
[2] | CHENG Yujing, WANG Xiaoqiu, GE Lijiao, QIU Liang, ZHAI Caijiao, SONG Xudong, ZHANG Zhenliang, WANG Ximeng. Establishment of Evaluation Model for Eating Quality of Waxy Corn [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 157-164. |
[3] | YAO Jinbao, YANG Xueming, ZHANG Peng, FAN Xiangyun, YU Guihong, HE Yi, WANG Huadun. Analysis of Yield and Quality Traits of New Weak-Gluten Wheat Cultivar ‘Ningmai 36’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 20-24. |
[4] | LI Qian, ZHANG Yangli, YAN Miaomiao, HAO Shuangkui, NIE Song, SUN Jie, CAO Sanchao, WANG Na. Effect of Sowing Date, Planting Density and Nitrogen Application on Population Structure and Grain Quality of ‘Weimai 9’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 25-29. |
[5] | HOU Mengyuan. Cotton Yield Forecast in Shandong Province Based on Meteorological Key Factors [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 37-41. |
[6] | LIU Yu, YAN Shi, ZHAO Kaili, YU Yueyue, HAN Bao, ZHANG Jing, GUO Ning. Recommendation of Appropriate Phosphorus Application Rate for Lettuce in Vegetable Fields with Different Phosphorus Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 55-59. |
[7] | FAN Shanshan, CHEN Juan, WU Changchun, WANG Rui, ZHANG Xingang, CHEN Xiaohui, GAO Fei, WU Wenqiang. Effect of Alginic Acid Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Strawberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 60-65. |
[8] | DING Hao, GAO Haitao, BI Xiangjun, LI Shengdong. Effects of Different Sowing Methods on Yield Components and Flag Leaf Photosynthetic Characteristics of Winter Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 9-19. |
[9] | PANG Yinghua, GU Wanfan, JIN Xin, ZHANG Zhouna, JIN Yahui, ZHENG Hongfu. Soil Nutrient Status and Fertility Quality Evaluation of Jingshan Tea Garden in Yuhang District of Hangzhou City [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 97-105. |
[10] | YANG Zhiwei, QIAN Aiping, ZHANG Wei, CAO Xiuxia. Effect of Planting Density on Lodging Resistance and Yield of Flax [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 1-5. |
[11] | LUO Li, LI Xiaodan, LIU Xuelu, LIU Xingyu, LI Quanxi, MAO Zixuan, MA Biao. Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Habitat Quality in the West Qinling Mountains Based on Land Use Change from 1990 to 2020 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 101-111. |
[12] | ZHANG Shijie, YANG Bo, WANG Bingang, LIU Yun, ZHANG Xifeng, WANG Wenli, WANG Zeli, LI Shan. Effect of Organic Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Weibei Loess Tableland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 38-46. |
[13] | ZHANG Zhengzhen, MU Ruirui, WANG Jia, XU Can, CHEN Yongwei, ZHANG Zhansheng, WU Hongliang, KANG Jianhong. Effect of Potassium Application Rate on Absorption, Transport and Yield of Maize Potassium [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 47-56. |
[14] | YANG Han, HUANG Zhimou, QU Heping, CHAI Shasha, LI Yuwei, ZHAO Qingchun, QIN Xiaoyin. Effects of Optimal Fertilization on Yield, Nutrient Utilization and Soil Fertility of Edible Sweet Potato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 63-67. |
[15] | ZHAN Wenjie, ZHOU Ben, ZHU Linxing, WANG Min, ZHU Changtai, SHEN Qirong, GUO Shiwei. Effects of Trichoderma Bio-organic Fertilizer on Salinized Soil Fertility and Yield and Quality of Hang Cabbage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(7): 108-117. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||