Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 159-164.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0737
WANG Yuanyuan1(), LIANG Jing1, WANG Lingling1, LAI Xiaoshan2(
)
Received:
2024-11-25
Revised:
2025-02-20
Online:
2025-04-15
Published:
2025-04-11
WANG Yuanyuan, LIANG Jing, WANG Lingling, LAI Xiaoshan. Determination of Six Types of Phenoxy Acid Herbicides in Water by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry with Liquid-Liquid Extraction and Derivatization[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(11): 159-164.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0737
试验号 | 衍生剂用量/µL | 催化剂用量/µL | 反应温度/℃ | 反应时间/h | 6种苯氧羧酸类除草剂回收率之和 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 100 | 10 | 室温 | 2 | 2.151 |
2 | 100 | 20 | 40 | 3 | 4.495 |
3 | 100 | 30 | 60 | 4 | 4.134 |
4 | 200 | 10 | 40 | 4 | 4.476 |
5 | 200 | 20 | 60 | 2 | 3.610 |
6 | 200 | 30 | 室温 | 3 | 2.877 |
7 | 300 | 10 | 60 | 3 | 4.879 |
8 | 300 | 20 | 室温 | 4 | 3.390 |
9 | 300 | 30 | 40 | 2 | 5.426 |
均值1 | 3.593 | 3.835 | 2.806 | 3.729 | |
均值2 | 3.654 | 3.832 | 4.799 | 4.084 | |
均值3 | 4.565 | 4.146 | 4.208 | 4.000 | |
极差 | 0.972 | 0.314 | 1.993 | 0.355 |
试验号 | 衍生剂用量/µL | 催化剂用量/µL | 反应温度/℃ | 反应时间/h | 6种苯氧羧酸类除草剂回收率之和 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 100 | 10 | 室温 | 2 | 2.151 |
2 | 100 | 20 | 40 | 3 | 4.495 |
3 | 100 | 30 | 60 | 4 | 4.134 |
4 | 200 | 10 | 40 | 4 | 4.476 |
5 | 200 | 20 | 60 | 2 | 3.610 |
6 | 200 | 30 | 室温 | 3 | 2.877 |
7 | 300 | 10 | 60 | 3 | 4.879 |
8 | 300 | 20 | 室温 | 4 | 3.390 |
9 | 300 | 30 | 40 | 2 | 5.426 |
均值1 | 3.593 | 3.835 | 2.806 | 3.729 | |
均值2 | 3.654 | 3.832 | 4.799 | 4.084 | |
均值3 | 4.565 | 4.146 | 4.208 | 4.000 | |
极差 | 0.972 | 0.314 | 1.993 | 0.355 |
序号 | 化合物名称 | 曲线方程 | 相关系数 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | MCPA | y=1.84x+0.010 | 0.9998 |
2 | 2,4-DP | y=2.54x+0.041 | 0.9997 |
3 | 2,4-D | y=3.00x+0.0084 | 0.9998 |
4 | 2,4,5-TP | y=2.72x+0.036 | 0.9998 |
5 | 2,4,5-T | y=3.40x+0.0065 | 0.9998 |
6 | 2,4-DB | y=8.30x+0.039 | 0.9998 |
序号 | 化合物名称 | 曲线方程 | 相关系数 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | MCPA | y=1.84x+0.010 | 0.9998 |
2 | 2,4-DP | y=2.54x+0.041 | 0.9997 |
3 | 2,4-D | y=3.00x+0.0084 | 0.9998 |
4 | 2,4,5-TP | y=2.72x+0.036 | 0.9998 |
5 | 2,4,5-T | y=3.40x+0.0065 | 0.9998 |
6 | 2,4-DB | y=8.30x+0.039 | 0.9998 |
序号 | 化合物名称 | 加标浓度 | 平均值 | 标准偏差 | 检出限 | 测定下限 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MCPA | 1.0 | 0.75 | 0.046 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
2 | 2,4-DP | 1.0 | 0.80 | 0.047 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
3 | 2,4-D | 1.0 | 0.81 | 0.038 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
4 | 2,4,5-TP | 1.0 | 0.83 | 0.047 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
5 | 2,4,5-T | 1.0 | 0.85 | 0.043 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
6 | 2,4-DB | 1.0 | 0.85 | 0.042 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
序号 | 化合物名称 | 加标浓度 | 平均值 | 标准偏差 | 检出限 | 测定下限 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MCPA | 1.0 | 0.75 | 0.046 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
2 | 2,4-DP | 1.0 | 0.80 | 0.047 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
3 | 2,4-D | 1.0 | 0.81 | 0.038 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
4 | 2,4,5-TP | 1.0 | 0.83 | 0.047 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
5 | 2,4,5-T | 1.0 | 0.85 | 0.043 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
6 | 2,4-DB | 1.0 | 0.85 | 0.042 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
序号 | 化合物名称 | 加标浓度/(μg/L) | 平均值/(μg/L) | 标准偏差/(μg/L) | 相对标准偏差/% | 相对误差/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MCPA | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.055 | 6.9 | -20 |
10.0 | 8.9 | 0.560 | 6.3 | -11 | ||
36.0 | 32.7 | 1.586 | 4.9 | -9.2 | ||
2 | 2,4-DP | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.041 | 5.1 | -20 |
10.0 | 9.2 | 0.514 | 5.6 | -8.0 | ||
36.0 | 33.5 | 1.515 | 4.5 | -6.9 | ||
3 | 2,4-D | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.041 | 5.1 | -20 |
10.0 | 8.9 | 0.475 | 5.3 | -11 | ||
36.0 | 32.8 | 1.335 | 4.1 | -8.9 | ||
4 | 2,4,5-TP | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.052 | 6.5 | -20 |
10.0 | 9.4 | 0.443 | 4.7 | -6.0 | ||
36.0 | 33.7 | 1.162 | 3.4 | -6.4 | ||
5 | 2,4,5-T | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.055 | 6.1 | -10 |
10.0 | 8.9 | 0.565 | 6.3 | -11 | ||
36.0 | 33.4 | 1.298 | 3.9 | -7.2 | ||
6 | 2,4-DB | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.055 | 6.1 | -10 |
10.0 | 9.7 | 0.216 | 2.2 | -3.0 | ||
36.0 | 34.3 | 1.168 | 3.4 | -4.7 |
序号 | 化合物名称 | 加标浓度/(μg/L) | 平均值/(μg/L) | 标准偏差/(μg/L) | 相对标准偏差/% | 相对误差/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MCPA | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.055 | 6.9 | -20 |
10.0 | 8.9 | 0.560 | 6.3 | -11 | ||
36.0 | 32.7 | 1.586 | 4.9 | -9.2 | ||
2 | 2,4-DP | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.041 | 5.1 | -20 |
10.0 | 9.2 | 0.514 | 5.6 | -8.0 | ||
36.0 | 33.5 | 1.515 | 4.5 | -6.9 | ||
3 | 2,4-D | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.041 | 5.1 | -20 |
10.0 | 8.9 | 0.475 | 5.3 | -11 | ||
36.0 | 32.8 | 1.335 | 4.1 | -8.9 | ||
4 | 2,4,5-TP | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.052 | 6.5 | -20 |
10.0 | 9.4 | 0.443 | 4.7 | -6.0 | ||
36.0 | 33.7 | 1.162 | 3.4 | -6.4 | ||
5 | 2,4,5-T | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.055 | 6.1 | -10 |
10.0 | 8.9 | 0.565 | 6.3 | -11 | ||
36.0 | 33.4 | 1.298 | 3.9 | -7.2 | ||
6 | 2,4-DB | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.055 | 6.1 | -10 |
10.0 | 9.7 | 0.216 | 2.2 | -3.0 | ||
36.0 | 34.3 | 1.168 | 3.4 | -4.7 |
序号 | 化合物名称 | 加标前/(μg/L) | 加标后/(μg/L) | 加标浓度/(μg/L) | 回收率/% | 样品种类 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MCPA | 未检出 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 92.5 | 地下水 |
未检出 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 95.0 | 海水 | ||
未检出 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 95.0 | 地表水 | ||
未检出 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 94.0 | 生活污水 | ||
11.4 | 19.7 | 10.0 | 83.0 | 工业废水 | ||
2 | 2,4-DP | 未检出 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 97.5 | 地下水 |
未检出 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 92.5 | 海水 | ||
未检出 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 100 | 地表水 | ||
未检出 | 9.5 | 10.0 | 95.0 | 生活污水 | ||
未检出 | 8.4 | 10.0 | 84.0 | 工业废水 | ||
3 | 2,4-D | 未检出 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 90.0 | 地下水 |
未检出 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 100 | 海水 | ||
未检出 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 90.0 | 地表水 | ||
未检出 | 10.1 | 10.0 | 101 | 生活污水 | ||
3.0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 94.0 | 工业废水 | ||
4 | 2,4,5-TP | 未检出 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 95.0 | 地下水 |
未检出 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 105 | 海水 | ||
未检出 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 100 | 地表水 | ||
未检出 | 9.9 | 10.0 | 99.0 | 生活污水 | ||
未检出 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 92.0 | 工业废水 | ||
5 | 2,4,5-T | 未检出 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 97.5 | 地下水 |
未检出 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 108 | 海水 | ||
未检出 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 85.0 | 地表水 | ||
未检出 | 10.7 | 10.0 | 107 | 生活污水 | ||
未检出 | 10.3 | 10.0 | 103 | 工业废水 | ||
6 | 2,4-DB | 未检出 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 103 | 地下水 |
未检出 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 110 | 海水 | ||
未检出 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 105 | 地表水 | ||
未检出 | 11.3 | 10.0 | 113 | 生活污水 | ||
未检出 | 10.5 | 10.0 | 105 | 工业废水 |
序号 | 化合物名称 | 加标前/(μg/L) | 加标后/(μg/L) | 加标浓度/(μg/L) | 回收率/% | 样品种类 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MCPA | 未检出 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 92.5 | 地下水 |
未检出 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 95.0 | 海水 | ||
未检出 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 95.0 | 地表水 | ||
未检出 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 94.0 | 生活污水 | ||
11.4 | 19.7 | 10.0 | 83.0 | 工业废水 | ||
2 | 2,4-DP | 未检出 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 97.5 | 地下水 |
未检出 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 92.5 | 海水 | ||
未检出 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 100 | 地表水 | ||
未检出 | 9.5 | 10.0 | 95.0 | 生活污水 | ||
未检出 | 8.4 | 10.0 | 84.0 | 工业废水 | ||
3 | 2,4-D | 未检出 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 90.0 | 地下水 |
未检出 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 100 | 海水 | ||
未检出 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 90.0 | 地表水 | ||
未检出 | 10.1 | 10.0 | 101 | 生活污水 | ||
3.0 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 94.0 | 工业废水 | ||
4 | 2,4,5-TP | 未检出 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 95.0 | 地下水 |
未检出 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 105 | 海水 | ||
未检出 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 100 | 地表水 | ||
未检出 | 9.9 | 10.0 | 99.0 | 生活污水 | ||
未检出 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 92.0 | 工业废水 | ||
5 | 2,4,5-T | 未检出 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 97.5 | 地下水 |
未检出 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 108 | 海水 | ||
未检出 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 85.0 | 地表水 | ||
未检出 | 10.7 | 10.0 | 107 | 生活污水 | ||
未检出 | 10.3 | 10.0 | 103 | 工业废水 | ||
6 | 2,4-DB | 未检出 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 103 | 地下水 |
未检出 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 110 | 海水 | ||
未检出 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 105 | 地表水 | ||
未检出 | 11.3 | 10.0 | 113 | 生活污水 | ||
未检出 | 10.5 | 10.0 | 105 | 工业废水 |
[1] |
杨峰山, 孙丛, 鲍霞霞, 等. 5类化学除草剂在作物中残留分析的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(10):136-141.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0126 |
[2] |
魏茂琼, 林昕, 杨娟, 等. 苯氧羧酸类除草剂残留检测技术的研究进展[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2019, 10(10):2896-2902.
|
[3] |
张远芳, 江涛, 万建春. 液相色谱-质谱/质谱法测定植物源性食品中2,4-D残留量[J]. 江西化工, 2023, 39(6):28-31,36.
|
[4] |
黄幼芳, 刘珺, 黄晓佳. “一锅法”制备氨基碳纳米管功能化磁性纳米粒子及其在谷物和蔬菜中苯氧羧酸类除草剂测定中的应用[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(10):900-909.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2021.12008 |
[5] |
艾小红, 刘文峰, 秦冬冬, 等. LC-MS/MS法测定2,4-D在土壤中的残留研究[J]. 广州化工, 2023, 51(23):57-61.
|
[6] |
doi: 10.15302/J-FASE-2021420 |
[7] |
段星春, 刘永志, 巫培山, 等. 离子色谱法测定饮用水及水源水中2,4-D、灭草松的探讨[J]. 四川环境, 2020, 39(5):15-18.
|
[8] |
张鑫, 吴阁格, 崔文连, 等. 基于金属有机骨架材料复合气凝胶的分散固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定水中7种苯氧羧酸类除草剂[J]. 色谱, 2024, 42(11):1042-1051.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2024.01005 |
[9] |
张蓓蓓, 章勇, 赵永刚, 等. 水中苯氧羧酸类除草剂的液相色谱-串联质谱测定方法研究[J]. 分析测试学报, 2013, 32(1):89-93.
|
[10] |
王枭鹏, 许诗尧. 分散固相萃取-三重四极杆气相色谱质谱联用法测定糙米、小麦和玉米中2,4-滴丁酯残留[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2024,(14):96-100,105.
|
[11] |
杨峰山, 高梦颖, 孙丛, 等. 4类除草剂对土壤酶活性的影响研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(8):97-102.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0201 |
[12] |
亢卫华, 杨迪, 王昕, 等. 固相萃取-高效液相色谱法同时检测饮用水中MC-LR、灭草松和2,4-D[J]. 山西大同大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 38(6):18-22.
|
[13] |
李健平, 王晓婧, 王缘, 等. HPLC-MS-MS法和IC法测定水中2,4-D、草甘膦、灭草松含量的对比研究[J]. 中国公共卫生管理, 2021, 37(5):641-643.
|
[14] |
王沛, 易卫红, 晏喜云. 全自动固相萃取-高效液相色谱法同时测定水中灭草松、2,4-滴和阿特拉津[J]. 供水技术, 2023, 17(4):51-54.
|
[15] |
张文锦, 李志华, 陈晓琴, 等. 气相色谱联合三重四级杆串联质谱法检测地表水中苯达松、乙草胺、异丙隆等7种常用除草剂残留[J]. 中国测试, 2022, 48(10):36-40.
|
[16] |
石盼盼. 衍生化-气相色谱质谱法测定水中2,4-D和灭草松[J]. 山东化工, 2024, 53(3):164-168.
|
[17] |
梁娜, 王静, 李强, 等. 高效液相色谱法测定水中7种苯氧羧酸类除草剂[J]. 应用化工, 2022, 51(S2):304-307.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
王丹君, 易建希, 颜茜煜. UHPLC-MS/MS法测定耕地周围地表水中5种除草剂含量[J]. 化学研究与应用, 2024, 36(1):191-196.
|
[20] |
段立红, 王秀芝, 齐翠翠. 超高效液相色谱质谱联用法测定水中2,4-滴、莠去津、呋喃丹和甲萘威[J]. 质量安全与检验检测, 2022, 32(1):39-44.
|
[21] |
关小桃, 吴艳龙. 高效液相色谱串联质谱测定生活饮用水和地表水中2,4-滴、灭草松和莠去津[J]. 广州化工, 2021, 49(8):121-123.
|
[22] |
郑磊, 李宏亮, 闵巍, 等. 在线固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱测定饮用水中2,4-滴和灭草松[J]. 实用预防医学, 2022, 29(3):303-306.
|
[23] |
张莉, 张永涛, 桂建业, 等. 水中氯代酸性除草剂衍生气相色谱法主要要素探讨[J]. 中国环境监测, 2011, 27(4):45-49.
|
[24] |
陈晨, 王艳丽, 崔连喜, 等. 两种测定水中2,4-滴分析方法的比较[J]. 山东化工, 2021, 50(11):83-85.
|
[25] |
pmid: 11093646 |
[26] |
张念华, 王军淋, 冯靓, 等. 全自动固相萃取-气相色谱-质谱法测定水中6种苯氧羧酸类除草剂[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2021, 31(1):24-27.
|
[1] | XU Zhihao, JIA Kai, XIE Rongrong, ZHU Chenyu, WANG Yuemin, ZENG Wenlong, LIN jianqi, XU Chensheng, TANG Lina, ZHENG Chaoyuan, LI Wenqing. Spatial and Temporal Variability of Trace-elements in Tobacco-planting Soil in Fujian Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(6): 100-108. |
[2] | GUO Ying, WANG Renjie, XU Beibei, ZHANG Zhongyi, CAI Hongming, ZHANG Hongyan, GAO Juexiao, XIA Haibo, CHEN Jiajing. Analysis of Main Flavor Substances in Three Different Types of Tomato Cultivars [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 149-155. |
[3] | HU Qirui, JI Chunrong, GAO Jian. Analysis of Growth Meteorological Conditions and Main Meteorological Disasters of Korla Fragrant Pear [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(3): 91-97. |
[4] | LIU Qingchao, GUO Yuefeng, QI Wei, SU Wanfa. Effects of Different Stumping Treatments on Ecological Physiology and Soil Moisture Content of Underground Part of Salix psammophila [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(3): 69-75. |
[5] | FAN Peng, YANG Qingwei, GAO Chao, LI Di, WANG Lei, YANG Xihui. Correlation Analysis Between Soil Organic Matter Content and Grain Yield: A Case Study of Lankao County in Henan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(32): 77-84. |
[6] | LI Chen, JIANG Xinfeng, CAO Huihua, ZHANG Jiangen, YU Zhi, NI Dejiang, DONG Chunwang, JIANG Heyuan. Study on Flavor Characteristics of Hehong Tea in Different Grades [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(21): 151-157. |
[7] | HUA Limin, LIU Huiying, XUE Yinghao, LAN Xiping, WANG Yitao, CAI Guangxing. Quantitative Assessment on Comprehensive Effects of Mulching Films by Integrated Evaluation Index Method [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 76-80. |
[8] | ZHU Mingxia, BAI Ting, JIN Yulong, WANG Shanshan, LIU Xiaojiao, ZHANG Yuhong. Analysis of Flavor Substances of Different Highland Barley Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(12): 146-152. |
[9] | JIANG Kunming, LI Zhenjie, XIANG Nengjun, LIU Ze, WEI Keyi, ZHAO Yingliang, BI Yubo, LI Xiangzhen, WANG Tao, ZOU Congming, LIU Zhihua. Comparative Analysis of Aroma Components of Huize and Shizong Air-cured Tobacco Leaves by HS-SPME-GC/MS Based on Sensory Differences [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(10): 126-133. |
[10] | Zi Haoran, Xu Haishun, Wu Shengnan, Zhang Danning, Xu Juan, Bai Yan, Wang Hongzhen, Wu Xueqian. Under-forest Tetrastigma hemsleyanum: Polysaccharide Fingerprint in Different Producing Areas [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(27): 139-145. |
[11] | Jiang Shuo, Wan Lu, Xu Zhexiang, Yan Jiajia, Zheng Chunying. Research Progress on Flavonoids of Cannabis sativa L [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(17): 120-128. |
[12] | Liang Yanqiong, Li Rui, Wu Weihuai, Tan Shibei, Xi Jingen, Zheng Jinlong, Lu Ying, He Chunping, Yi Kexian. Volatile Organic Compounds from Bacillus subtilis Czk1: Optimization of Extraction Conditions Based on HS-SPME-GC-MS [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(11): 24-31. |
[13] | Ma Weihua, Li Lixin, Shen Jinshan, Wu Wenqing, Song Huailei, Zhang Xufeng, Li Jie. Effects of Different Extraction Fibers on Volatile Compounds of Pyrus bretschneideri Flowers [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(4): 147-150. |
[14] | Ding Yi, Li Rongyu, Liu Shijiang, Zhao Qijun. Determination of 5 Kinds of Pesticide Residues in Tea by HPLC [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(29): 132-138. |
[15] | Wu Yingxiang, Ye Zhengmei, Wang Wenting, Zong Weixun, Guo Bingchun, Li Yongyu. Volatiles in Leaves of Melaleuca bracteata: Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(2): 53-63. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||