
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (34): 121-128.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0091
Previous Articles Next Articles
XU Shuaihua1(
), DANG Xia1, CHU Han1, LI Qiujian2, ZHANG Panfeng1, CHEN Xi1, DING Yifei1, WANG Xuan1, ZHANG Xianghui1(
)
Received:2025-02-12
Revised:2025-09-26
Online:2025-12-04
Published:2025-12-04
XU Shuaihua, DANG Xia, CHU Han, LI Qiujian, ZHANG Panfeng, CHEN Xi, DING Yifei, WANG Xuan, ZHANG Xianghui. Research on Re-drying Parameter Control Technology for Strong Flavor Type Tobacco Leaves in Henan Based on Sensory Quality Stability[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(34): 121-128.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0091
| 序号 | 干燥曲线 | 来料水分/% | 物料厚度/mm | 干燥区温度/℃ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 一区 | 二区 | 三区 | 四区 | 五区 | 六区 | 总温度 | ||||
| A | 上斜线 | 16.82 | 110~120 | 60 | 61.1 | 63.3 | 64.2 | 65.4 | 66.5 | 380.5 |
| B | 抛物线 | 16.89 | 110~120 | 60 | 64.7 | 67.4 | 64.8 | 62 | 60 | 378.9 |
| C | 下斜线 | 16.94 | 110~120 | 67 | 65 | 63.4 | 62.2 | 61.6 | 60 | 379.2 |
| D | 梯形 | 16.88 | 110~120 | 60.5 | 62.5 | 65 | 65 | 63 | 61 | 377 |
| 序号 | 干燥曲线 | 来料水分/% | 物料厚度/mm | 干燥区温度/℃ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 一区 | 二区 | 三区 | 四区 | 五区 | 六区 | 总温度 | ||||
| A | 上斜线 | 16.82 | 110~120 | 60 | 61.1 | 63.3 | 64.2 | 65.4 | 66.5 | 380.5 |
| B | 抛物线 | 16.89 | 110~120 | 60 | 64.7 | 67.4 | 64.8 | 62 | 60 | 378.9 |
| C | 下斜线 | 16.94 | 110~120 | 67 | 65 | 63.4 | 62.2 | 61.6 | 60 | 379.2 |
| D | 梯形 | 16.88 | 110~120 | 60.5 | 62.5 | 65 | 65 | 63 | 61 | 377 |
| 序号 | 干燥曲线 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 浓度 | 杂气 | 劲头 | 刺激性 | 余味 | 总分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 上斜线 | 6.43 | 6.31 | 6.37 | 6.43 | 6.33 | 6.34 | 6.33 | 44.54 |
| B | 抛物线 | 6.71 | 6.67 | 6.47 | 6.67 | 6.33 | 6.67 | 6.63 | 46.15 |
| C | 下斜线 | 6.41 | 6.43 | 6.41 | 6.41 | 6.33 | 6.41 | 6.39 | 44.79 |
| D | 梯形线 | 6.40 | 6.43 | 6.45 | 6.38 | 6.33 | 6.40 | 6.38 | 44.77 |
| 序号 | 干燥曲线 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 浓度 | 杂气 | 劲头 | 刺激性 | 余味 | 总分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 上斜线 | 6.43 | 6.31 | 6.37 | 6.43 | 6.33 | 6.34 | 6.33 | 44.54 |
| B | 抛物线 | 6.71 | 6.67 | 6.47 | 6.67 | 6.33 | 6.67 | 6.63 | 46.15 |
| C | 下斜线 | 6.41 | 6.43 | 6.41 | 6.41 | 6.33 | 6.41 | 6.39 | 44.79 |
| D | 梯形线 | 6.40 | 6.43 | 6.45 | 6.38 | 6.33 | 6.40 | 6.38 | 44.77 |
| 序号 | 干燥区温度/℃ | 左冷房水分/% | 右冷房水分/% | 左、右冷房水分差值/% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 一区 | 二区 | 三区 | 四区 | 五区 | 六区 | 总温度 | ||||
| 1 | 60 | 64.7 | 67.4 | 64.8 | 62 | 60 | 378.9 | 9.33 | 9.48 | -0.15 |
| 2 | 59.9 | 63.8 | 67.7 | 65.7 | 63.8 | 61.7 | 382.6 | 10.29 | 9.77 | 0.52 |
| 3 | 60.8 | 66.1 | 72.1 | 66.7 | 62.7 | 59.5 | 387.9 | 9.68 | 9.12 | 0.56 |
| 4 | 60.4 | 65.1 | 68.9 | 66.1 | 63.1 | 60.2 | 383.8 | 9.89 | 9.67 | 0.22 |
| 5 | 59.8 | 64.2 | 68.3 | 66.1 | 63.9 | 61.7 | 383 | 9.58 | 10.4 | -0.82 |
| 6 | 59.7 | 64 | 68 | 66 | 63.8 | 61.5 | 382 | 9.72 | 10.15 | -0.43 |
| 7 | 59.8 | 66.2 | 70.9 | 65.4 | 63.5 | 60.3 | 386.1 | 9.41 | 9.98 | -0.57 |
| 8 | 60 | 64.4 | 68.4 | 66.2 | 64 | 61.7 | 384.7 | 10.62 | 9.57 | 1.05 |
| 9 | 59.6 | 63.9 | 68 | 66 | 63.8 | 61.5 | 382.8 | 10.23 | 9.76 | 0.47 |
| 10 | 60.4 | 65.1 | 71.5 | 66.9 | 63.2 | 60 | 387.1 | 9.56 | 9.74 | -0.18 |
| 11 | 59.5 | 63.8 | 67.9 | 66.2 | 64.1 | 61.8 | 383.3 | 10.11 | 9.65 | 0.46 |
| 12 | 59 | 63.2 | 67.2 | 65.5 | 63.3 | 61 | 379.2 | 9.99 | 9.43 | 0.56 |
| 13 | 58.8 | 63 | 67 | 65.5 | 63.3 | 61 | 378.6 | 9.38 | 10.27 | -0.89 |
| 14 | 60.5 | 65.4 | 70.8 | 66.1 | 63.3 | 60.1 | 386.2 | 10.05 | 9.89 | 0.16 |
| 15 | 59.2 | 63.5 | 67.5 | 65.3 | 63.1 | 60.8 | 379.4 | 9.22 | 10.31 | -1.09 |
| 16 | 60 | 65.2 | 71.4 | 67 | 63.1 | 60 | 386.7 | 9.84 | 9.57 | 0.27 |
| 17 | 60.3 | 64.6 | 68.6 | 66.4 | 63.1 | 61.9 | 384.9 | 10.23 | 9.76 | 0.47 |
| 18 | 58.5 | 62.8 | 66.8 | 65 | 62.8 | 60.5 | 376.4 | 9.49 | 10.39 | -0.90 |
| 19 | 59.9 | 63.7 | 66.3 | 64.7 | 62 | 60.1 | 376.7 | 9.95 | 9.61 | 0.34 |
| 20 | 60.4 | 66.3 | 70.9 | 65.9 | 62.5 | 60.2 | 386.2 | 10.17 | 9.83 | 0.34 |
| 21 | 59.9 | 65.3 | 69.1 | 65.2 | 62.6 | 60.2 | 381.3 | 9.78 | 10.29 | -0.51 |
| 22 | 60.2 | 64.8 | 68.8 | 66.1 | 63 | 60 | 382.9 | 10.26 | 9.15 | 1.11 |
| 23 | 59.7 | 63.6 | 67.5 | 65.5 | 63.6 | 61.5 | 381.4 | 9.67 | 10.13 | -0.46 |
| 24 | 60.3 | 63.0 | 67.1 | 65.1 | 63.2 | 61.1 | 379.8 | 9.92 | 9.86 | 0.06 |
| 25 | 60.5 | 66 | 71.4 | 66.3 | 62.8 | 60.1 | 387.1 | 10.34 | 9.47 | 0.87 |
| 26 | 60.1 | 64 | 67.9 | 65.9 | 64 | 61.9 | 383.8 | 9.75 | 10.09 | -0.34 |
| 27 | 59.2 | 63.1 | 67 | 65 | 63.1 | 61 | 380.4 | 10.21 | 9.63 | 0.58 |
| 28 | 59.5 | 63.4 | 67.3 | 65.3 | 63.4 | 61.3 | 380.2 | 9.88 | 10.17 | -0.29 |
| 29 | 60.3 | 65.6 | 71.1 | 66.4 | 62.9 | 60.2 | 386.5 | 10.04 | 9.79 | 0.25 |
| 30 | 61.1 | 64.3 | 68.6 | 65.7 | 62.7 | 60.0 | 382.4 | 9.97 | 9.02 | 0.95 |
| 序号 | 干燥区温度/℃ | 左冷房水分/% | 右冷房水分/% | 左、右冷房水分差值/% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 一区 | 二区 | 三区 | 四区 | 五区 | 六区 | 总温度 | ||||
| 1 | 60 | 64.7 | 67.4 | 64.8 | 62 | 60 | 378.9 | 9.33 | 9.48 | -0.15 |
| 2 | 59.9 | 63.8 | 67.7 | 65.7 | 63.8 | 61.7 | 382.6 | 10.29 | 9.77 | 0.52 |
| 3 | 60.8 | 66.1 | 72.1 | 66.7 | 62.7 | 59.5 | 387.9 | 9.68 | 9.12 | 0.56 |
| 4 | 60.4 | 65.1 | 68.9 | 66.1 | 63.1 | 60.2 | 383.8 | 9.89 | 9.67 | 0.22 |
| 5 | 59.8 | 64.2 | 68.3 | 66.1 | 63.9 | 61.7 | 383 | 9.58 | 10.4 | -0.82 |
| 6 | 59.7 | 64 | 68 | 66 | 63.8 | 61.5 | 382 | 9.72 | 10.15 | -0.43 |
| 7 | 59.8 | 66.2 | 70.9 | 65.4 | 63.5 | 60.3 | 386.1 | 9.41 | 9.98 | -0.57 |
| 8 | 60 | 64.4 | 68.4 | 66.2 | 64 | 61.7 | 384.7 | 10.62 | 9.57 | 1.05 |
| 9 | 59.6 | 63.9 | 68 | 66 | 63.8 | 61.5 | 382.8 | 10.23 | 9.76 | 0.47 |
| 10 | 60.4 | 65.1 | 71.5 | 66.9 | 63.2 | 60 | 387.1 | 9.56 | 9.74 | -0.18 |
| 11 | 59.5 | 63.8 | 67.9 | 66.2 | 64.1 | 61.8 | 383.3 | 10.11 | 9.65 | 0.46 |
| 12 | 59 | 63.2 | 67.2 | 65.5 | 63.3 | 61 | 379.2 | 9.99 | 9.43 | 0.56 |
| 13 | 58.8 | 63 | 67 | 65.5 | 63.3 | 61 | 378.6 | 9.38 | 10.27 | -0.89 |
| 14 | 60.5 | 65.4 | 70.8 | 66.1 | 63.3 | 60.1 | 386.2 | 10.05 | 9.89 | 0.16 |
| 15 | 59.2 | 63.5 | 67.5 | 65.3 | 63.1 | 60.8 | 379.4 | 9.22 | 10.31 | -1.09 |
| 16 | 60 | 65.2 | 71.4 | 67 | 63.1 | 60 | 386.7 | 9.84 | 9.57 | 0.27 |
| 17 | 60.3 | 64.6 | 68.6 | 66.4 | 63.1 | 61.9 | 384.9 | 10.23 | 9.76 | 0.47 |
| 18 | 58.5 | 62.8 | 66.8 | 65 | 62.8 | 60.5 | 376.4 | 9.49 | 10.39 | -0.90 |
| 19 | 59.9 | 63.7 | 66.3 | 64.7 | 62 | 60.1 | 376.7 | 9.95 | 9.61 | 0.34 |
| 20 | 60.4 | 66.3 | 70.9 | 65.9 | 62.5 | 60.2 | 386.2 | 10.17 | 9.83 | 0.34 |
| 21 | 59.9 | 65.3 | 69.1 | 65.2 | 62.6 | 60.2 | 381.3 | 9.78 | 10.29 | -0.51 |
| 22 | 60.2 | 64.8 | 68.8 | 66.1 | 63 | 60 | 382.9 | 10.26 | 9.15 | 1.11 |
| 23 | 59.7 | 63.6 | 67.5 | 65.5 | 63.6 | 61.5 | 381.4 | 9.67 | 10.13 | -0.46 |
| 24 | 60.3 | 63.0 | 67.1 | 65.1 | 63.2 | 61.1 | 379.8 | 9.92 | 9.86 | 0.06 |
| 25 | 60.5 | 66 | 71.4 | 66.3 | 62.8 | 60.1 | 387.1 | 10.34 | 9.47 | 0.87 |
| 26 | 60.1 | 64 | 67.9 | 65.9 | 64 | 61.9 | 383.8 | 9.75 | 10.09 | -0.34 |
| 27 | 59.2 | 63.1 | 67 | 65 | 63.1 | 61 | 380.4 | 10.21 | 9.63 | 0.58 |
| 28 | 59.5 | 63.4 | 67.3 | 65.3 | 63.4 | 61.3 | 380.2 | 9.88 | 10.17 | -0.29 |
| 29 | 60.3 | 65.6 | 71.1 | 66.4 | 62.9 | 60.2 | 386.5 | 10.04 | 9.79 | 0.25 |
| 30 | 61.1 | 64.3 | 68.6 | 65.7 | 62.7 | 60.0 | 382.4 | 9.97 | 9.02 | 0.95 |
| 序号 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 浓度 | 杂气 | 劲头 | 刺激性 | 余味 | 总分 | 稳定性 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.71 | 6.67 | 6.47 | 6.67 | 6.33 | 6.67 | 6.63 | 46.15 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 6.73 | 6.67 | 6.5 | 6.63 | 6.33 | 6.57 | 6.5 | 45.93 | -0.22 |
| 3 | 6.56 | 6.51 | 6.51 | 6.32 | 6.32 | 6.2 | 6.46 | 44.88 | -1.27 |
| 4 | 6.67 | 6.67 | 6.5 | 6.71 | 6.33 | 6.67 | 6.53 | 46.08 | -0.07 |
| 5 | 6.53 | 6.67 | 6.47 | 6.43 | 6.33 | 6.37 | 6.27 | 45.07 | -1.08 |
| 6 | 6.67 | 6.51 | 6.5 | 6.71 | 6.33 | 6.5 | 6.47 | 45.69 | -0.46 |
| 7 | 6.5 | 6.53 | 6.43 | 6.39 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.5 | 45.01 | -1.14 |
| 8 | 6.57 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.21 | 6.47 | 44.91 | -1.24 |
| 9 | 6.73 | 6.71 | 6.43 | 6.73 | 6.33 | 6.63 | 6.67 | 46.23 | 0.08 |
| 10 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.43 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.43 | 45.02 | -1.13 |
| 11 | 6.72 | 6.65 | 6.45 | 6.65 | 6.32 | 6.55 | 6.55 | 45.89 | -0.26 |
| 12 | 6.65 | 6.55 | 6.45 | 6.6 | 6.32 | 6.45 | 6.48 | 45.5 | -0.65 |
| 13 | 6.7 | 6.5 | 6.47 | 6.6 | 6.33 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 45.7 | -0.45 |
| 14 | 6.54 | 6.54 | 6.44 | 6.41 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.5 | 45.09 | -1.06 |
| 15 | 6.41 | 6.33 | 6.5 | 6.29 | 6.33 | 6.41 | 6.37 | 44.64 | -1.51 |
| 16 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.45 | 6.41 | 6.33 | 6.35 | 6.25 | 44.79 | -1.36 |
| 17 | 6.73 | 6.65 | 6.45 | 6.65 | 6.33 | 6.58 | 6.55 | 45.94 | -0.21 |
| 18 | 6.59 | 6.52 | 6.52 | 6.35 | 6.33 | 6.22 | 6.48 | 45.01 | -1.14 |
| 19 | 6.68 | 6.6 | 6.45 | 6.65 | 6.33 | 6.6 | 6.55 | 45.86 | -0.29 |
| 20 | 6.5 | 6.43 | 6.5 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.37 | 44.79 | -1.36 |
| 21 | 6.68 | 6.62 | 6.45 | 6.62 | 6.33 | 6.55 | 6.55 | 45.8 | -0.35 |
| 22 | 6.33 | 6.41 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.5 | 44.9 | -1.25 |
| 23 | 6.73 | 6.67 | 6.45 | 6.67 | 6.33 | 6.57 | 6.63 | 46.05 | -0.10 |
| 24 | 6.71 | 6.62 | 6.43 | 6.62 | 6.33 | 6.5 | 6.55 | 45.76 | -0.39 |
| 25 | 6.43 | 6.37 | 6.47 | 6.5 | 6.33 | 6.29 | 6.5 | 44.89 | -1.26 |
| 26 | 6.68 | 6.65 | 6.45 | 6.65 | 6.33 | 6.55 | 6.53 | 45.84 | -0.31 |
| 27 | 6.71 | 6.63 | 6.43 | 6.63 | 6.33 | 6.58 | 6.6 | 45.91 | -0.24 |
| 28 | 6.67 | 6.55 | 6.45 | 6.6 | 6.33 | 6.45 | 6.5 | 45.55 | -0.60 |
| 29 | 6.33 | 6.43 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.33 | 6.41 | 6.33 | 44.83 | -1.32 |
| 30 | 6.52 | 6.64 | 6.44 | 6.41 | 6.33 | 6.35 | 6.25 | 44.94 | -1.21 |
| 序号 | 香气质 | 香气量 | 浓度 | 杂气 | 劲头 | 刺激性 | 余味 | 总分 | 稳定性 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.71 | 6.67 | 6.47 | 6.67 | 6.33 | 6.67 | 6.63 | 46.15 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 6.73 | 6.67 | 6.5 | 6.63 | 6.33 | 6.57 | 6.5 | 45.93 | -0.22 |
| 3 | 6.56 | 6.51 | 6.51 | 6.32 | 6.32 | 6.2 | 6.46 | 44.88 | -1.27 |
| 4 | 6.67 | 6.67 | 6.5 | 6.71 | 6.33 | 6.67 | 6.53 | 46.08 | -0.07 |
| 5 | 6.53 | 6.67 | 6.47 | 6.43 | 6.33 | 6.37 | 6.27 | 45.07 | -1.08 |
| 6 | 6.67 | 6.51 | 6.5 | 6.71 | 6.33 | 6.5 | 6.47 | 45.69 | -0.46 |
| 7 | 6.5 | 6.53 | 6.43 | 6.39 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.5 | 45.01 | -1.14 |
| 8 | 6.57 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.21 | 6.47 | 44.91 | -1.24 |
| 9 | 6.73 | 6.71 | 6.43 | 6.73 | 6.33 | 6.63 | 6.67 | 46.23 | 0.08 |
| 10 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.43 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.43 | 45.02 | -1.13 |
| 11 | 6.72 | 6.65 | 6.45 | 6.65 | 6.32 | 6.55 | 6.55 | 45.89 | -0.26 |
| 12 | 6.65 | 6.55 | 6.45 | 6.6 | 6.32 | 6.45 | 6.48 | 45.5 | -0.65 |
| 13 | 6.7 | 6.5 | 6.47 | 6.6 | 6.33 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 45.7 | -0.45 |
| 14 | 6.54 | 6.54 | 6.44 | 6.41 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.5 | 45.09 | -1.06 |
| 15 | 6.41 | 6.33 | 6.5 | 6.29 | 6.33 | 6.41 | 6.37 | 44.64 | -1.51 |
| 16 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.45 | 6.41 | 6.33 | 6.35 | 6.25 | 44.79 | -1.36 |
| 17 | 6.73 | 6.65 | 6.45 | 6.65 | 6.33 | 6.58 | 6.55 | 45.94 | -0.21 |
| 18 | 6.59 | 6.52 | 6.52 | 6.35 | 6.33 | 6.22 | 6.48 | 45.01 | -1.14 |
| 19 | 6.68 | 6.6 | 6.45 | 6.65 | 6.33 | 6.6 | 6.55 | 45.86 | -0.29 |
| 20 | 6.5 | 6.43 | 6.5 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.37 | 44.79 | -1.36 |
| 21 | 6.68 | 6.62 | 6.45 | 6.62 | 6.33 | 6.55 | 6.55 | 45.8 | -0.35 |
| 22 | 6.33 | 6.41 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.5 | 44.9 | -1.25 |
| 23 | 6.73 | 6.67 | 6.45 | 6.67 | 6.33 | 6.57 | 6.63 | 46.05 | -0.10 |
| 24 | 6.71 | 6.62 | 6.43 | 6.62 | 6.33 | 6.5 | 6.55 | 45.76 | -0.39 |
| 25 | 6.43 | 6.37 | 6.47 | 6.5 | 6.33 | 6.29 | 6.5 | 44.89 | -1.26 |
| 26 | 6.68 | 6.65 | 6.45 | 6.65 | 6.33 | 6.55 | 6.53 | 45.84 | -0.31 |
| 27 | 6.71 | 6.63 | 6.43 | 6.63 | 6.33 | 6.58 | 6.6 | 45.91 | -0.24 |
| 28 | 6.67 | 6.55 | 6.45 | 6.6 | 6.33 | 6.45 | 6.5 | 45.55 | -0.60 |
| 29 | 6.33 | 6.43 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.33 | 6.41 | 6.33 | 44.83 | -1.32 |
| 30 | 6.52 | 6.64 | 6.44 | 6.41 | 6.33 | 6.35 | 6.25 | 44.94 | -1.21 |
| 序号 | 来料水分/% | 环境温度/℃ | 环境湿度/% | 干燥区温度/℃ | 总温度/℃ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 一区 | 二区 | 三区 | 四区 | 五区 | 六区 | |||||
| 1 | 15.12 | 22 | 46 | 60.5 | 64.3 | 67.8 | 64.8 | 62 | 60.1 | 379.5 |
| 2 | 17.13 | 25 | 49 | 60.1 | 64.5 | 69.1 | 66.2 | 63.2 | 60.2 | 383.3 |
| 3 | 15.71 | 25 | 49 | 60.8 | 64.6 | 68.9 | 66.1 | 63.3 | 60.3 | 384 |
| 4 | 17.38 | 29 | 40 | 61.1 | 64.5 | 68.6 | 65.6 | 62.9 | 60.3 | 383 |
| 5 | 16.00 | 30 | 45 | 60.6 | 64.1 | 68.6 | 65.9 | 62.9 | 60.1 | 382.2 |
| 序号 | 来料水分/% | 环境温度/℃ | 环境湿度/% | 干燥区温度/℃ | 总温度/℃ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 一区 | 二区 | 三区 | 四区 | 五区 | 六区 | |||||
| 1 | 15.12 | 22 | 46 | 60.5 | 64.3 | 67.8 | 64.8 | 62 | 60.1 | 379.5 |
| 2 | 17.13 | 25 | 49 | 60.1 | 64.5 | 69.1 | 66.2 | 63.2 | 60.2 | 383.3 |
| 3 | 15.71 | 25 | 49 | 60.8 | 64.6 | 68.9 | 66.1 | 63.3 | 60.3 | 384 |
| 4 | 17.38 | 29 | 40 | 61.1 | 64.5 | 68.6 | 65.6 | 62.9 | 60.3 | 383 |
| 5 | 16.00 | 30 | 45 | 60.6 | 64.1 | 68.6 | 65.9 | 62.9 | 60.1 | 382.2 |
| 序号 | 冷房水分/% | 感官质量 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 实际检测值 | 预测值 | 偏差 | 人工评吸结果 | 预测值 | 偏差 | ||
| 1 | 9.01 | 8.99 | 0.02 | 46.07 | 46.09 | 0.02 | |
| 2 | 8.76 | 8.77 | -0.01 | 46.10 | 46.11 | 0.01 | |
| 3 | 8.64 | 8.63 | -0.01 | 46.25 | 46.26 | 0.01 | |
| 4 | 8.81 | 8.81 | 0 | 46.09 | 46.09 | 0 | |
| 5 | 8.36 | 8.36 | 0 | 46.11 | 46.10 | -0.01 | |
| 序号 | 冷房水分/% | 感官质量 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 实际检测值 | 预测值 | 偏差 | 人工评吸结果 | 预测值 | 偏差 | ||
| 1 | 9.01 | 8.99 | 0.02 | 46.07 | 46.09 | 0.02 | |
| 2 | 8.76 | 8.77 | -0.01 | 46.10 | 46.11 | 0.01 | |
| 3 | 8.64 | 8.63 | -0.01 | 46.25 | 46.26 | 0.01 | |
| 4 | 8.81 | 8.81 | 0 | 46.09 | 46.09 | 0 | |
| 5 | 8.36 | 8.36 | 0 | 46.11 | 46.10 | -0.01 | |
| [1] |
黄长庚, 王清旺, 胡宗玉. 灰色关联度分析法在打叶复烤数据分析中的应用[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2019, 25(14):34-37.
|
| [2] |
孔祥, 杨波. 不同形状打叶框栏对叶片结构的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(23):175-176.
|
| [3] |
王发勇. 全程实现打叶复烤均质化加工的研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(12):11-13.
|
| [4] |
浦同慧, 付涛. 打叶复烤均质化技术要点[J]. 农业工程技术, 2016, 36(29):65-66.
|
| [5] |
田忠, 王宏伟, 王孝峰. 卷烟纸性能对常规卷烟和细支卷烟综合特性的影响[J]. 中国造纸, 2018, 37(12):30-35.
|
| [6] |
朱毓航, 黄文勇, 尚关兰, 等. 打叶复烤烟碱均匀性控制工艺过程质量评价方法研究与应用[J]. 科技创新导报, 2018, 15(23):82-84.
|
| [7] |
杨家琪, 何晓健, 潘志玲, 等. 打叶复烤均质化加工核心指标控制的研究进展[J]. 农产品加工, 2022(6):88-91.
|
| [8] |
宋智勇, 帅鸣, 刘华友, 等. 打叶复烤平库均质化加工方法研究与应用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(3):196-198.
|
| [9] |
孔祥, 杨波, 王苏红, 等. 不同润叶和复烤强度对上部烟叶质量的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2024, 30(7):104-109.
|
| [10] |
王发勇, 可文庚, 张春磊, 等. 不同加工强度对复烤烟叶质量影响的研究进展[J]. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(11):98-101.
|
| [11] |
王发勇, 牛绍辉, 蔡尤东, 等. 均质与保香加工技术的烟叶复烤机控制模式筛选[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(4):125-130.
|
| [12] |
朱毓航, 毛林伟, 杨博, 等. 打叶复烤参数管理模式研究及实践[J]. 价值工程, 2024, 43(12):49-53.
|
| [13] |
周季蓉, 李润婷. 浅谈打叶复烤过程中复烤工序对片烟综合品质的影响[J]. 科技与创新, 2022(10):82-84.
|
| [14] |
朱锋, 孙炯, 孙纪周, 等. 复烤干燥方式对叶片复烤的影响[J]. 河北农机, 2019(10):43-44.
|
| [15] |
李善莲, 陈良元, 李华杰, 等. 复烤方式对烟片加工质量的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2012(10):5-8.
|
| [16] |
卢幼祥, 丁乃红, 张胜军, 等. 不同叶片复烤方式对烤烟烟叶品质的影响[J]. 湖南文理学院学报(自然科学版), 2012(1):87-92.
|
| [17] |
李超, 关罗浩, 袁文彬. 低温慢烤对烟叶品质的影响研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021(7):180-183.
|
| [18] |
朱波, 岳先领, 张金林, 等. 复烤温度对烤烟烟叶风格特征指标及感官质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(19):168-173.
|
| [19] |
包秀萍, 王超, 刘煜宇, 等. 打叶复烤不同工艺强度对烟叶自然醇化品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(3):647-654.
|
| [20] |
王子冲, 汤云海, 何靖, 等. 不同复烤方式对复烤片烟质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(23):180-183.
|
| [21] |
王浩, 陈婷, 陈兴侯, 等. 基于改进SSA-BP神经网络的复烤水分和温度预测[J]. 农业与技术, 2022, 42(6):18-25.
|
| [22] |
王浩, 陈婷, 常杰, 等. 基于回归正交设计的烤片机温度参数优化[J]. 农业装备与车辆工程, 2022, 60(12):87-91.
|
| [23] |
皋元崚, 王征, 李毅, 等. 基于神经网络的烟叶复烤回潮过程预测控制模型构建[J]. 现代农业与科技, 2024(8):170-174.
|
| [24] |
周永长, 黄亚宇. 基于BP神经网络建立二次润叶工艺参数的预测模型[J]. 电子科技, 2022, 35(9):79-86.
|
| [25] |
王艳胜, 贾星蓓, 肖尚力. 神经网络在烟草打叶机组频率预报中的应用[J]. 自动化技术与应用, 2021, 40(9):142-145.
|
| [26] |
关欣, 娄元菲, 温亚东. 八大香型烤烟典型产地中部烟叶适宜复烤干燥温度研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2023(1):11-22.
|
| [1] | REN Qingguo, WU Guangjun, LIN Ping, ZHANG Jiyu, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Yongshan, HAI Tao. Study of Yield and Quality Traits of New Wheat Cultivar ‘Hemai 26’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 32-37. |
| [2] | ZHAO Guozhen, LIU Weihua, LIU Siyu, DONG Linbo, LI Lindong, CHEN Yumin. Stability Analysis of A New Japonica rice ‘Yunjing 37’ with Good Eating Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(5): 1-6. |
| [3] | LIU Fengfeng, BI Qingwen, ZHANG Guochao, HE Jiewang, SUN Fushan, DAI Yingpeng. Analysis of Key Influencing Factors of Upper Tobacco Leaves Quality in Stalk-Cutting and Curing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 126-133. |
| [4] | YE Tianhui, YANG Xue, JIANG Chaoqiang, YANG Jianchun, YAN Fangfang, YANG Xingyou, ZU Chaolong, YAN Yifeng. Comparative Analysis of Quality of Tobacco Leaves in Different Altitude Tobacco Growing Areas of Panzhihua [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 144-148. |
| [5] | CHEN Qingming, SHEN Guanwang, QI Yuliang, LU Yun, YU Linchuang, YU Xinchun, FU Ding, SHEN Guanghui, HUO Erwei, XU Shiku, CHANG Xingyuan, ZHANG Kaixuan. Study on Characteristics and Adaptability of High yield and Stable yield in Hybrid Rice New Variety ‘Liangyou 2189’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(29): 1-6. |
| [6] | GUO Yiwei, ZHANG Yongying, GAO Zihang, FAN Chunmei. Study on Stability and Fractal Characteristics of Soil Aggregates in Mine Spoil Areas [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(29): 38-45. |
| [7] | SUN Yi, WANG Teng, FU Yunjie, BAO Kui, WANG Jingui. Effects of Soil Amendments on Soil Organic Carbon Fractions and Aggregate Stability in Saline-Alkali Soil of Qaidam Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(21): 131-138. |
| [8] | ZHAO Mingming, DU Furong, HU Xinyan, LI Ke, CHEN Xiaoguang. Early Maturing Cotton Varieties in Regional Trial of Jiangsu Province: Comprehensive Analysis of Lint Yield Traits and Testing Sites Discrimination [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(20): 10-17. |
| [9] | GENG Shaowu, DING Yishu, FU Yanyan, BU Yunhong, CHAI Yunxia, WANG Yuejin, WANG Wenlun, WANG Huaguo, HU Yang, ZHANG Shengyu, LU Yao. Studies on Stability and Regionalization of Potassium, Chlorine Content and Potassium-chlorine Ratio in ‘K326’ Tobacco Leaves of Chuxiong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(19): 20-29. |
| [10] | LI Yanlan, LI Chengchun, JIANG Xintong, ZHANG Na, HU Xinzhou, GAO Yuxi, LIU Jianjian, LUO Bin, LI Xiang, FANG Xiaodong, YANG Jincheng. Analysis on Yield and Stability of New Fresh Broad Bean Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(18): 40-46. |
| [11] | YU Liping, WANG Lijun, LIANG Mengju, WANG Lu, SUN Jinyang, ZHANG Junpeng, HOU Xianghao. Effects of Base Application of Organic Fertilizer on Yield of Winter Wheat and Soil Physical-chemical Properties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(18): 8-16. |
| [12] | GE Lijiao, QIU Liang, WANG Xiaoqiu, ZHAI Caijiao, CHENG Yujing, LIU Shuidong, SONG Yimin. Genetic Diversity of Important Agronomic Traits in Tomato Germplasms [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(12): 34-45. |
| [13] | ZHANG Zhouna, ZHOU Huaping, ZHANG Mingkui. Effects of Different Conditioning Agents on the Stabilization of Soil Phosphorus in Phosphorus-rich Vegetable Fields [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(12): 61-66. |
| [14] | GUO Wenlong, WANG Huiqing, DING Songshuang, XING Zhuoran, LIU Feng, DENG Cheng, TANG Jie, SHI Xiangdong, DING Jianbing. Research Progress on Effect of Light Intensity on Production of Cigar Wrapper Leaves Under Shade Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(10): 38-44. |
| [15] | ZHOU Xiao, XU Zhengrong, LU Xin, YANG Gang, DONG Junzhong, WANG Yue, WANG Bingbing, LI Tian, LIU Yan. Optimization of Fermentation Process for Yunnan Produced Cigar Tobacco Leaves Using Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(1): 141-147. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||